13:57:27 RRSAgent has joined #matf 13:57:31 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-irc 13:57:31 RRSAgent, make logs Public 13:57:32 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), JJ 13:57:40 Zakim, this is MATF 6 November 2024 13:57:40 got it, JJ 13:57:43 Meeting: MATF 6 November 2024 13:57:45 present+ 13:57:56 regrets+ JeroenHulscher 13:57:58 regrets+ KarlaRubiano 13:58:03 regrets+ MickKeane 13:58:33 agenda+ Guidance naming 13:58:37 agenda+ 4.1.3 Status Messages 13:58:43 agenda+ 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) 13:58:47 agenda+ 1.2.4 Captions (Live) 13:58:52 agenda+ 1.3.3 - Sensory Characteristics 13:58:57 agenda+ Definitions 14:00:34 quintinb has joined #MATF 14:00:54 present+ 14:01:34 Carolina has joined #MATF 14:01:48 present+ 14:03:52 present+ 14:04:29 julianmka has joined #MATF 14:04:42 AlainVagner has joined #matf 14:04:50 present+ 14:04:57 present+ 14:05:40 Jon Gibbins introducing himself, he was previously involved in WCAG guidance, actively working in consultancy and training for Android and iOS 14:06:09 GleidsonRamos has joined #matf 14:06:41 Jamie has joined #matf 14:06:54 Scribe: quintinb 14:06:58 present+ 14:07:36 JJ walking us through the agenda: 14:07:36 Guidance naming 14:07:36 4.1.3 Status Messages 14:07:36 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) 14:07:37 1.2.4 Captions (Live) 14:07:37 1.3.3 - Sensory Characteristics 14:07:37 Definitions 14:08:23 dotjay has joined #matf 14:08:39 JJ we'll now be going back to some small variations - the idea is that we finish these done in terms of guidance so we can get to the other larger ones. 14:09:46 No other agenda topics to be discussed before starting on planned agenda 14:10:08 present+ [Jon Gibbins] 14:10:38 agenda? 14:10:41 Move to next agenda item 14:10:41 agendum 1 -- Guidance naming -- taken up [from JJ] 14:10:57 thanks :) 14:11:37 julianmka has joined #MATF 14:11:43 present+ 14:12:30 JJ Name is not very consitant, suggesting Guidance on Applying WCAG 2.2 to Mobile (WCAG2Mobile) and Shortname: wcag2mobile-22 14:12:36 q+ 14:12:50 Link to guidance naming: https://github.com/w3c/matf/issues/76 14:12:54 ack Jamie 14:13:16 Jamie So this isn't a continuation of the prior draft note? 14:13:24 JJ no 14:13:56 Q+ 14:14:20 JJ will remove references to 2.0 14:14:30 ack Joe_Humbert 14:14:32 JJwe should point to latest doc 14:14:49 Joe_Humbert Is there a way to let people know what's outdated? 14:15:14 JJ there is a repo (Mobile-A11y-TF-Note) 14:15:35 ACTION: Update W3C Mobile Accessibility Page 14:15:54 ACTION: Check if we can update published (outdated) guidance with link to new guidance 14:16:48 Move to next agenda item 14:16:48 agendum 2 -- 4.1.3 Status Messages -- taken up [from JJ] 14:18:19 JJ mentioning that use of the term "markup" is problematic for mobile 14:19:01 q+ 14:19:07 JJ reading through comments 14:19:59 ack Joe_Humbert 14:20:39 q+ 14:20:51 Joe_Humbert for the note about toast/snackbar - this seems very specific and terms might change, subject to Google or other platforms 14:21:15 +1 - probably should call them "UI-based notifications" 14:21:29 ack julianmka 14:21:31 good suggestion quintinb 14:21:54 Joe has a good point. It’s probably better to use WAI Aria APG design pattern terminology – although totally acknowledge that these don’t all map neatly to native mobile 14:22:18 julianmka I think that we need to talk about iOS - we should describe the general behaviour, the problem is that they're always at the bottom, self-dismissing, etc 14:22:26 +1 julianmka - magnifier magnifier magnifier 14:23:11 Yeah we should mention or link to "time to take action" - although that is Android only 14:23:20 q? 14:23:37 I use “snackbars” and “in-app notifications” interchangably 14:23:51 AlainVagner has joined #matf 14:23:54 JJ I noticed that when going through WCAG3 I found it interesting that when things are too generic, it's difficult to follow 14:24:43 +1 to generic term , but give current examples somewhere 14:24:43 normative vs informative? 14:26:00 JJ we are trying to focus on normative for now 14:26:43 JJ we don't want to end up with too many notes distracting and balance is key 14:26:52 q+ dotjay 14:26:55 ack dotjay 14:27:47 dotjayit's a good idea to be generic in terms of UI patterns. Glossaries can be helpful in this context. Probably smart idea to specify a group of standard phrases to describe things in a cross platform manner. 14:28:39 q+ 14:29:11 ack Jamie 14:29:16 q+ 14:29:17 JJ can we delete the first sentence of NOTE 1, since mobile is not markup 14:29:35 Jamie can we use "since it's not implemented using m/u..." 14:30:33 the shorter, the better 14:31:23 +1 Joe_Humbert - probably should remove references to markup - regardless of presentation + structure, it should work as such... 14:31:49 or we could just publish a new book on 4.1.3 Note 1... 14:32:00 ack Joe_Humbert 14:32:49 Joe_Humbert should we consider other elements such as PDF's in this context? 14:33:13 JJ we should focus on native right now 14:33:42 JJ PDF would use WCAG2PDF and web WCAG2Web etc 14:35:00 q+\ 14:35:10 ack \ 14:35:14 q+ quintinb 14:35:15 ack quintinb 14:35:23 Could we not just remove the reference to markup languages for mobile? 14:35:26 quintinb: +1 14:35:48 I do feel it’s important to be clear around use of web terminology. Indeed, I know accessibillity consultants that use references to web technology like markup languages to be the reason that an SC should not be applied. 14:36:44 While this guidance likely needs to reflect WCAG, there are SCs that need to be specifically interpreted for mobile. 14:36:45 JJ the mobile guidance would be more compact, so maybe we can remove the reference, but we need to be careful as to why WCAG2ICT didn't remove the guidance 14:37:01 +1 dotjay 14:37:21 We should be able to deviate from guidance that’s been designed to apply to “software” in general 14:38:02 q+ 14:38:36 A glossary term or something somewhere about "markup languages" could be helpful for non-technical readers 14:38:45 ack Joe_Humbert 14:39:30 Joe_Humbert maybe there needs to be a higher level statement about removing markup languages with a set of reasons why - there may be a greater pattern here 14:39:41 q+ 14:39:48 ack quintinb 14:41:03 quintinb has valid points about consumers of this Group Note 14:41:14 Comment: It would be nice to reach devs, but they are not the primary audience for this type of documentation 14:41:53 q? 14:42:20 ACTION: Proposetext for 4.1.3 and shortened note on Github 14:42:51 Move to next agenda item 14:42:51 agendum 3 -- 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) -- taken up [from JJ] 14:43:28 Quintin's hot take: I love this 14:43:56 1.2.3 is already voted on 14:44:19 Move to next agenda item 14:44:19 agendum 4 -- 1.2.4 Captions (Live) -- taken up [from JJ] 14:44:31 1.2.4 is already voted on 14:44:33 Move to next agenda item 14:44:33 agendum 4 was just opened, JJ 14:44:40 Move to next agenda item 14:44:40 agendum 4 was just opened, JJ 14:45:03 Move to next agenda item 14:45:03 agendum 4 was just opened, JJ 14:45:26 Zakim is fault tolerant regarding accidentally moving forward at least 14:45:43 julianmka has joined #MATF 14:45:55 I think this is one of the best and clear SC's ever 14:46:04 p+ 14:46:12 present+ 14:47:15 Move to next agenda item 14:47:15 agendum 5 -- 1.3.3 - Sensory Characteristics -- taken up [from JJ] 14:47:31 JJ we seem to just add haptics, unless nyone has anything to add 14:47:43 q+ 14:47:49 ack julianmka 14:48:39 q+ 14:48:53 ack Joe_Humbert 14:49:11 Joe_Humbert - wondering if we do a note for haptics 14:49:19 +1 14:49:45 Was thinking to add it to the list 14:49:54 Joe_Humbert we should probably add a note 14:50:08 e.g. You ca't just have a "shake to report" mechanism - there needs to be other mechanisms 14:50:39 ACTION: Can we make additions to SC text, e.g. for 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics: add "haptics" to the list 14:50:44 Joe_Humbert can we add it - it would be nice to know if we can change that list 14:50:49 Thanks Joe_Humbert 14:51:05 Just noting that the wording of “such as” implies that this is not a definitive list. A note may suffice. 14:51:15 Vote: add "haptics" in Note of 1.3.3 14:51:23 +1 14:51:31 +1 14:51:31 +1 14:51:31 +1 14:51:31 +1 14:51:40 +1 14:51:58 also +1 to know if we can't modify... or what that needs to look like formally for W3C since we have several larger variation SC 14:52:10 ACTION: Add "haptics" in Note of 1.3.3 (and potentially convert to text change at future stage) 14:52:42 Move to next agenda item 14:52:42 agendum 6 -- Definitions -- taken up [from JJ] 14:53:35 did we skip Captions and AD on purpose? 14:53:57 Jamie we already voted and closed them previously 14:54:10 ah right thx 14:55:21 JJ if you want to chair or participate in the views subgroup, let JJ know 14:55:59 can we go ahead and officially close "closed" issues in Github JJ? 14:59:36 ACTION: Close SC's that have been voted on and included in draft guidance 15:00:13 Slack link: https://matf.to/slack 15:00:31 julianmka 3.2.2 is ready to be voted on 15:00:34 SC 3.3.2 is ready for voting: https://github.com/w3c/matf/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Avoting 15:00:41 https://github.com/w3c/matf/issues/45 15:00:56 Thanks JJ 15:01:26 Bye! 15:17:29 rrsagent, make minutes 15:17:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-minutes.html JJ 15:18:19 rrsagent, bye 15:18:19 I see 6 open action items saved in https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-actions.rdf : 15:18:19 ACTION: Update W3C Mobile Accessibility Page [1] 15:18:19 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-irc#T14-15-35 15:18:19 ACTION: Check if we can update published (outdated) guidance with link to new guidance [2] 15:18:19 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-irc#T14-15-54 15:18:19 ACTION: Proposetext for 4.1.3 and shortened note on Github [3] 15:18:19 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-irc#T14-42-20 15:18:19 ACTION: Can we make additions to SC text, e.g. for 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics: add "haptics" to the list [4] 15:18:19 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-irc#T14-50-39 15:18:19 ACTION: Add "haptics" in Note of 1.3.3 (and potentially convert to text change at future stage) [5] 15:18:19 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-irc#T14-52-10 15:18:19 ACTION: Close SC's that have been voted on and included in draft guidance [6] 15:18:19 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2024/11/06-matf-irc#T14-59-36