13:53:20 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 13:53:25 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/11/01-rdf-star-irc 13:53:25 Zakim has joined #rdf-star 13:53:56 meeting: RDF Star WG Semantics TF 13:53:58 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/6d0cd306-0be8-4267-865a-6272cc8d9da4/20241101T100000/ 13:53:59 clear agenda 13:53:59 agenda+ The Semantics Task Force discussed the basic semantics of triple terms at the meeting on 25 October 2024 and decided that it was a good idea to have a working group decision on which way to go in the very near future so that the significant changes can be made to RDF Semantics and RDF 13:54:00 present+ 13:54:00 … Concepts to fully support triple terms and how they are to be used in RDF 1.2. 13:54:02 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:54:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/11/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 13:54:06 rrsagent, make logs public 13:54:54 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/10/31-rdf-star-minutes.html 13:54:56 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/11/07-rdf-star-minutes.html 14:00:40 tl has joined #rdf-star 14:01:45 niklasl has joined #rdf-star 14:02:45 chair: enrico 14:02:49 william_vw has joined #rdf-star 14:02:54 present+ 14:03:17 enrico has joined #rdf-star 14:03:22 present+ 14:03:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 14:03:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/11/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 14:04:55 present+ 14:05:43 doerthe has joined #rdf-star 14:05:53 present+ 14:06:07 AndyS has joined #rdf-star 14:07:49 last week's -- https://www.w3.org/2024/10/25-rdf-star-minutes.html 14:08:14 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 14:08:34 q+ 14:08:43 present+ 14:08:57 Souri has joined #rdf-star 14:09:02 present+ 14:10:13 q+ 14:11:26 pfps has joined #rdf-star 14:11:37 present+ 14:12:09 present+ 14:14:30 I too feel that "association of a resource and a triple-term" is easier to explain than explaining "reification" -- it will also be better to avoid "occurrence" if we can. 14:15:22 ack tl 14:15:27 ack niklasl 14:15:31 tl 14:15:42 q+ 14:16:16 ack tl 14:17:56 q+ 14:18:05 ack niklasl 14:19:30 q+ 14:20:03 ack niklasl 14:21:19 q+ 14:21:47 :( 14:22:08 I still dislike the object position restriction 14:22:14 doerthe there's still generalized RDF ;-) 14:22:23 There is. 14:23:57 "Triple terms can only be referred to once you've reified them." I do agree, but are we clear about that? 14:24:41 (I would not say it exactly like that though. What we refer to are reifiers of triples (triple terms)?) 14:25:29 q+ 14:25:35 ack tl 14:28:44 q+ 14:29:29 ack william_vw 14:30:04 not sure I like the reifier class, but yes, examples will help :9 14:30:30 q+ 14:31:00 :John rdf12:reifies <<( :s :p :o )>> ; 14:31:00 a ex:Believe. 14:31:00 rdf12:reifies rdfs:domain rdf12:Reifier . 14:32:50 See page 3 of https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.3399 and think of having two creators and sources. 14:33:22 The problem is that triple terms are unique, as opposed to the standard RDF reification. 14:33:39 That this problem occurs in the initial paper on RDF* is telling. 14:36:05 q? 14:36:09 q+ 14:36:40 ack enrico 14:39:18 ack niklasl 14:42:40 q+ 14:43:51 q+ 14:44:04 ack enrico\ 14:44:07 :John rdf12:reifies <<( :s :p :o )>> ; 14:44:07 a ex:Believe. 14:44:07 rdf12:reifies a rdf12:TripleTermProperty . # because it has a triple term in object position 14:44:07 rdf12:TripleTermProperty rdfs:domain rdf12:Reifier . # axiomatic triple 14:44:08 # This makes :John both a believe and a rdf12:Reifier. 14:44:08 # At least making :John a reifier should raise an alarm users. 14:44:08 ack enrico 14:45:17 q+ 14:45:18 ack tl 14:45:32 ack pfps 14:45:54 q+ 14:46:00 :John ex:believs <<( :s :p :o )>> . 14:46:25 but that was the point, right? That we do not want John as a reifier and the class will show it 14:46:38 :John :believes <<( :s :p :o )>> ; a ex:Belief. 14:46:41 (not sure I like that, but I get the point :) ) 14:46:43 Yes, that's how I took it. 14:46:54 e.g. ex:Person owl:disjointWith rdf12:Reifier . ? 14:47:29 :believes a :reificationproperty 14:47:38 :jonh a rdf:reifier. 14:48:15 q+ 14:48:23 ack enrico 14:48:28 ack niklasl 14:50:11 q+ 14:50:42 ack tl 14:51:08 q+ 14:51:45 ack niklasl 14:54:24 q+ 14:54:29 ack andys 14:55:12 I dislike well-formedness, so yes. 14:56:27 ah, OK, I just disliked well-formedness as mandatory 14:58:49 q+ 15:00:06 ack doerthe 15:02:14 q+ 15:02:27 ack niklasl 15:03:14 q+ 15:03:35 ack andys 15:04:47 q? 15:06:59 let us know if you need review/help writing :) 15:07:29 pfps has left #rdf-star 15:07:38 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:07:39 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/11/01-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed 15:29:47 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 15:51:53 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 16:37:03 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 16:46:20 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:42:43 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:02:06 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 18:47:13 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:04:53 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:06:32 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:06:56 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:18:04 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:20:10 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 19:21:34 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 20:57:58 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:14:51 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:24:27 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:40:44 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 21:56:22 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 23:13:21 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star