16:04:59 RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors 16:05:03 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/10/28-aria-editors-irc 16:05:03 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:05:04 Meeting: ARIA Editors 16:06:25 present+ 16:07:58 scribe+ 16:08:03 zakim, next item 16:08:04 agendum 1 -- [new] aria#2357 create repository for PDF-AAM work -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:08:25 spectranaut_ has joined #aria-editors 16:09:06 pkra: only added this to check that the editors get added to this list. 16:09:17 daniel: yes, I'll do that. 16:09:28 present+ spectranaut_ 16:09:32 persent+ jnurthen 16:09:44 present+ rahimAbdi 16:10:05 pkra: great. 16:11:01 zakim, next item 16:11:01 agendum 2 -- [needs reviews] aria #2133: respec dark mode -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:12:22 pkra: it has a PR. I had reviewed it. It's now working at least. Can we merge? 16:12:42 jnurthen: yes. 16:12:44 spectranaut_: yes. 16:12:54 jnurthen: bugs can then come up 16:12:55 pkra: great. 16:14:14 zakim, next item 16:14:14 agendum 3 -- [needs reviews] aria #2312 / #2318 / PR #2321: PR naming/labelling convention -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:15:20 pkra: last week's regular meeting we discuss this can only be checked if merged. And it has reviews 16:15:34 jamesn: yes. it was broken. I think this will fix it. 16:15:55 ... it worked the first time around, then it failed, then I couldn't fix it. Not sure. 16:16:17 pkra: I reviewed, Mel as well. I think let's merge. 16:16:24 daniel: sounds good to me. 16:16:35 jamesn: the paths seemed to be the problem in the original approach. 16:17:24 daniel: I could test on my fork if we want to be sure 16:17:40 jamesn: that's a good idea. Then again, it's currently broken so it won't break more. 16:18:25 pkra: sounds good. 16:18:32 ... assigned to daniel. 16:18:37 zakim, next item 16:18:37 agendum 4 -- aria #2238 / PR #2288: Fix commit log for specs with monorepo -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:20:15 jamesn: I've made progress. It's mostly working in my branch but not main spec yet. 16:20:43 ... but I had that working at some point. hopefully I'll remember. 16:21:15 zakim, next item 16:21:15 agendum 5 -- [merge?] aria #2294 / PR #2307: Prettier throws errors on PRs opened from forks -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:21:42 pkra: this seems merged. 16:21:48 ... is it fixed? 16:21:52 jamesn: I think so 16:22:00 pkra: and we have the prettier config file now. 16:22:09 ... I need to get to the aria spec. 16:22:38 zakim, next item 16:22:38 agendum 6 -- aria #2287: Add ReSpec aliasing clarity in README.me's "Editorial Documentation" section -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:23:17 rahim: haven't got around to it yet. 16:23:43 zakim, next item 16:23:43 agendum 7 -- aria #2286: Prettier removed a line break from a pre-formatted code example -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:24:02 pkra: can we close this now? 16:24:34 ... this should've been resolved via the addition of the prettier config file 16:24:37 jamesn: +1 16:26:25 zakim, next item 16:26:25 agendum 8 -- aria #2231: [peter] turn on automatic prettier formatting for ARIA spec -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:26:41 pkra: I haven't had the time. 16:27:01 zakim, next item 16:27:01 agendum 8 was just opened, pkra 16:27:04 zakim, close this item 16:27:04 agendum 8 closed 16:27:05 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:27:05 9. [status?] aria #2242: Netlify to replace pr-review [from dmontalvo] 16:27:07 zakim, next item 16:27:07 agendum 9 -- [status?] aria #2242: Netlify to replace pr-review -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:27:30 pkra: was this completed? 16:27:34 daniel: almost. 16:27:48 ... status and URL changes remains open. 16:27:53 ... there's a link to my fork. 16:28:04 ... https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/2242#issuecomment-2271738905 16:28:18 pkra: what should we do to test? 16:28:30 daniel: open all links generated by the cross reference script. 16:29:11 ... i.e., links to other specs should point to relative positions in netlify staging area. 16:29:45 ... there's a PR. 16:30:02 pkra: this one ? https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2325 16:31:07 ... oh, I had reviewed it. 16:31:18 ... should we ask jcraig for review? 16:31:22 jamesn: +1 16:34:41 zakim, next item 16:34:41 agendum 10 -- [1 to go] aria #2228: re-direct "moved" PRs after merge (html-aam left with 1 PRs) -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:36:42 rahim: I had tried but had to leave it for scotto 16:37:15 ... I'll talk to him later this week. 16:37:23 pkra: great! 16:38:31 zakim, next item 16:38:31 agendum 11 -- aria PR #2136 [james] Remove abbr elements -- taken up [from dmontalvo] 16:38:54 jamesn: will need to find time. 16:41:12 pkra: spectranaut_had suggested moving away from Monday. 16:41:32 jamesn: maybe Tuesday? It's WCAG but nobody is on there as well? 16:41:38 daniel: that sounds good. 16:41:43 spectranaut_: +1 16:42:02 rahim: that should mostly work. 16:42:38 ... oh, accessibility interop every other week. 16:42:52 spectranaut_: could we do second&fourth week? 16:43:16 daniel: would need 2 different meetings but will work 16:43:24 jamesn: sounds god. 16:44:17 pkra: I'll write to the group on the new time. 16:44:24 daniel: I'll set up the invites. 16:44:56 zakim, end meeting 16:44:56 As of this point the attendees have been pkra, spectranaut_, rahimAbdi 16:44:57 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 16:44:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/28-aria-editors-minutes.html Zakim 16:45:06 I am happy to have been of service, pkra; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:45:06 Zakim has left #aria-editors