11:01:07 RRSAgent has joined #wot-uc 11:01:11 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-irc 11:01:15 meeting: WoT Use Cases 11:01:39 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Michael_McCool 11:01:56 McCool has joined #wot-uc 11:02:12 present+ Ege_Korkan 11:03:49 q+ 11:06:13 q- 11:06:34 q- 11:06:38 q+ 11:07:00 q- 11:07:51 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-uc 11:08:50 topic: Agenda 11:09:27 tm: (goes over the agenda). Minutes review, tpac wrap up, use case internal trial, requirements 11:09:44 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 11:10:31 present+ Jan_Romann 11:10:32 topic: logistics 11:10:38 tm: I will not be available on oct23 11:10:40 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:10:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html JKRhb 11:10:46 mm: but let's keep the meeting and I can chair it 11:10:52 rrsagent, make log public 11:11:02 topic: Minutes Revie 11:11:14 tm: (goes over the minutes) 11:11:35 ... we discussed TPAC planning, schedule. Then talked about the internal trial. 11:12:16 ... any opinions on the minutes? 11:12:23 tm: Minutes are approved 11:12:34 topic: Wrap up TPAC24 11:12:45 i|goes|-> https://www.w3.org/2024/09/18-wot-uc-minutes.html Sep-18 minutes| 11:12:56 s/Revie/Review/ 11:13:52 -> https://www.w3.org/2024/09/26-wot-minutes.html#t02 TPAC WoT Meeting - Day 1 - Use Cases and Requirements 11:13:53 mm: There is a small mistake in the requirements section 11:14:08 ... "use case story" should be "user story" 11:16:01 mm: I think we should look at how the Spatial Data in the Web WG does it 11:17:09 tm: we can approve minutes from TPAC24 on the use case session 11:17:32 i/goes over/scribenick: EgeKorkan/ 11:17:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:17:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:17:50 topic: Use Case Trial 11:18:40 q+ 11:18:50 chair: Mizushim, McCool 11:18:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:18:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:18:59 tm: Is there any issues on the trial? 11:18:59 q+ 11:19:45 i|over the agenda|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/main/TODO/20241009.md Agenda for today| 11:19:47 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:19:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:20:43 mm: we should put a deadline for the changes to the template. If there is any feedback, please open an issue 11:21:37 q+ 11:21:51 mm: people can comment on the issue to improve the template 11:21:59 ack McCool 11:22:08 ack Ege 11:22:18 s/logistics/Meeting schedule/ 11:22:19 mm: ROb said that there are use cases and use case scenarios 11:22:33 mm: they are not end user cases 11:22:44 ... for Rob, they are user stories 11:22:47 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:22:48 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html JKRhb 11:22:54 s/ROb/Rob/ 11:23:06 mm: ege's examples were more feature requests 11:24:09 q? 11:24:25 mm: the TD examples are feature requests that are placed in use case scenario 11:24:34 q+ 11:24:46 ack k 11:24:51 kaz: I have asked the group to include the scenarios in the use case descriptions 11:25:22 mm: it would be also weird to include two types of "submissions" in the use case document 11:25:56 qq+ 11:26:16 mm: we want people outside to submit features since they are not able to do something 11:26:50 kaz: use case or scenario is a sequence of device or user behavior or results. At least for me 11:27:17 ... so we should look into their definitions in their document 11:27:52 q- 11:28:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:28:05 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:29:24 s/use case or scenario is/from my viewpoint, "use case scenario"/ 11:29:46 ek: who is the user is not clear for me. the developer or end user of an application? 11:29:56 ... also I want to see examples for each of these terms 11:29:57 s/ At least for me// 11:30:15 q+ 11:30:35 mm: feature comes from developer and use case comes from a business point of view 11:30:46 s/so we should/but maybe the SDW guys use "use case scenario" for a bit different meaning, so I'd suggest we should/ 11:31:11 s/who is the user/"who is the user"/ 11:31:17 luca_barbato has joined #wot-uc 11:31:51 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:31:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:32:52 ek: If use cases are end user view, then the current use case document has just that and is merely a marketing document 11:36:02 ack Ege 11:38:08 mm: if there is no end user scenario but it is a developer pain point, that can be a category but even a developer is working under a context 11:38:26 ek: not always if they are building a library, e.g. node-wot which is used in multiple domcains 11:38:36 mm: they can be all written down as application areas 11:38:39 jthomas has joined #wot-uc 11:38:51 ek: can you give an example of an end user use case driving a technical feature 11:39:13 present+ Josh_Thomas, Luca_Barbato 11:39:15 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:39:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:39:31 mm: in a farm with contrained battery powered devices, they need to support CBOR-LD so that they be more efficient 11:39:45 ek: ok I understand 11:40:57 q+ 11:40:59 ek: in this case, even this submission would have a feature request in it 11:41:45 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:41:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 11:42:11 mm: yes in a way 11:43:10 ek: I would be fine if there is always a "demand" from the submission to the standards 11:43:12 q? 11:43:45 q+ 11:44:16 mm: not really. A use case can be explaining how WoT is used 11:44:20 ek: why do we care? 11:44:29 mm: because the W3C is asking for it when we go to REC 11:44:54 lb: somebody can ask for a feature but there has to be a why. 11:45:09 ... we also have the other side. I want a pony but there is no detail on what is going on 11:46:38 ack luca 11:47:01 lb: we should welcome use cases when a company says "we want to use WoT because we cant and here is the reason why" 11:47:53 q+ 11:48:15 lb: I also agree that categories is a good idea 11:48:30 mm: we have several problems 11:48:33 ack McCool 11:48:44 mm: in a use case, people may not provide enough detail 11:48:59 mm: then developers who have a limitation that is blocking them 11:49:32 mm: and in the end going to REC, we have explain why we are working on the standards 11:49:54 mm: last problem is that we also have a lot of use cases. 11:53:02 q+ 11:53:05 my proposal: separate use cases and feature requests. Feature requests can be in the form of user stories, and link a feature to a purpose. The purpose can be a single use case or a category of use cases (e.g. use cases needing efficiency). If accepted, a feature request becomes a requirement. 11:55:40 q+ 11:55:44 ek: we can use the current template since if they don't provide a technical expectation it can be a user story 11:56:23 -> https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/new?assignees=plehegar&labels=Awaiting+Team+Verification%2C+Entering+CR&projects=&template=6.3.07-candidate-recommendation.md&title=CR+Request+for+%3Ctitle%3E+-+%3Cspecification+shortname%3E Transition Issue for CR 11:56:39 -> https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#transition-cr Process Doc 11:56:50 mm: it can work but it would be cleaner to separate 11:56:57 jr: I agree with separation 11:57:43 ack k 11:58:44 kaz: I would like to remind you about the transition process which requires a list of requiremeents. For that we need a document of use cases 11:59:12 s/about/of/ 11:59:15 ... and feature requests can be formed from requirements 11:59:32 s/transition process/W3C Process/ 11:59:39 tm: feature request driven by use case is good. We need evidence of feature request requirements 11:59:54 ... I agree with mccool 12:00:46 ek: could you provide definition and example of each terminology we want to use? 12:00:50 s/a list of requiremeents/us to show the fact the specification (as a CR) meets all the WG's requirements/ 12:00:51 mm: I will try that in an issue 12:01:29 kaz: and McCool, please talk with Mizushima-san again about how to organize the UC calls./ 12:01:33 mm: will do 12:01:36 [adjourned] 12:01:38 rrsagent, 12:01:38 I'm logging. I don't understand '', kaz. Try /msg RRSAgent help 12:01:43 s/rrsagent,// 12:01:50 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:01:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 12:02:34 i/and Mc/scribenick: kaz/ 12:02:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:02:37 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 12:03:51 s/remind you/remind you all/ 12:03:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:03:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 12:04:12 s/For that/For that purpose,/ 12:04:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:04:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/10/09-wot-uc-minutes.html kaz 12:10:34 dape has joined #wot-uc 12:12:22 mahda has joined #wot-uc 14:01:47 Zakim has left #wot-uc 14:04:53 mahda has joined #wot-uc 14:28:29 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 16:15:54 EgeKorka_ has joined #wot-uc 16:54:22 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 17:03:25 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 17:50:57 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 17:52:28 JKRhb_ has joined #wot-uc 18:00:30 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 18:09:53 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 18:35:39 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 18:41:12 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 19:47:27 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 19:55:14 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 19:56:01 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 20:14:43 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-uc 20:18:37 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 20:18:56 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-uc 20:53:22 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 21:10:44 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 21:20:35 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-uc 21:28:18 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 21:47:40 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-uc 22:20:41 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 22:26:41 EgeKorkan has joined #wot-uc 22:38:37 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 23:13:50 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 23:34:34 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 23:52:15 JKRhb has joined #wot-uc 23:54:36 kaz has joined #wot-uc