14:55:05 RRSAgent has joined #web-on-the-moon 14:55:09 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/09/25-web-on-the-moon-irc 14:55:09 RRSAgent, do not leave 14:55:10 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:55:11 Meeting: Web on the Moon 14:55:11 Chair: Jay Kishigami 14:55:11 Agenda: https://github.com/w3c/tpac2024-breakouts/issues/52 14:55:11 Zakim has joined #web-on-the-moon 14:55:12 Zakim, clear agenda 14:55:12 agenda cleared 14:55:12 Zakim, agenda+ Pick a scribe 14:55:14 agendum 1 added 14:55:14 Zakim, agenda+ Reminders: code of conduct, health policies, recorded session policy 14:55:14 agendum 2 added 14:55:14 Zakim, agenda+ Goal of this session 14:55:15 agendum 3 added 14:55:15 Zakim, agenda+ Discussion 14:55:15 agendum 4 added 14:55:15 Zakim, agenda+ Next steps / where discussion continues 14:55:16 agendum 5 added 14:55:17 tpac-breakout-bot has left #web-on-the-moon 21:24:02 msw has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:27:29 kota has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:42:04 gkellogg has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:42:57 okin has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:45:35 present+ Gregg_Kellogg 21:45:37 moonira has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:46:08 anssik has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:46:18 fserb has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:46:23 present+ 21:46:25 Present+ Anssi_Kostiainen 21:46:33 niklas has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:46:40 Jayadevi has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:46:42 eemeli has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:46:43 preset 21:46:47 present+ 21:46:53 present+ 21:47:09 present+ 21:47:33 ktoumura has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:47:44 kaz has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:47:44 slides anywhere? 21:48:19 scribenick: kaz 21:48:49 jay: (gives some chat about Mr. Kaneko, who gave the original story at AC 2024 in Hiroshima) 21:48:56 ... (then goes through the slides) 21:49:06 ... [slide 1] 21:49:22 ... commercialization in space 2020- 21:50:07 .. astronauts can enjoy contents at ISS 21:50:20 ... but some plan going to the moon 21:50:21 ... [slide 2] 21:50:41 ... the human sphere continues to the moon 21:50:45 ... [slide 3] 21:50:52 mk has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:50:56 ... artemis: landing humans on the moon 21:51:05 ... [slide 4] 21:51:20 ... (video by NASA on Artemis) 21:51:29 ... training for the Artemis project 21:51:51 ... human beings will go to the moon (again) soon 21:52:19 ... very special vehicles are under development 21:52:31 .. [slide 5] 21:52:51 .. Artemis watching the south pole of the moon 21:53:07 ... searching for water 21:53:09 ... [slide 6] 21:53:20 ... japanese SLIM - the "moon sniper" 21:53:26 ... landed Jan. 2024 21:53:31 ... [slide 7] 21:53:38 ... US and India to the lunar surface 21:53:46 ... [slide 8] 21:53:53 ... Future assets envisioned 21:54:12 ... developed by each company 21:54:18 ... [slide 9] 21:54:27 ... Lunar communications play a vital role 21:54:39 ... the distance between the earth and the moon 21:54:57 ... takes 2.6 sec even with the light 21:55:11 ... [slide 10] 21:55:28 ... Development of the lunar comm infrastructure, late 2020s- 21:55:38 ... NASA's LunaNet 21:56:00 ... need delay-tolerant network 21:56:13 ... what would happen with the Web 21:56:27 ... [slide 11] 21:56:33 ... Global interest in LunaNet 21:56:45 ... (various companies listed) 21:56:49 ... [slide 12] 21:56:58 ... Industry's plans 21:57:07 ... JP companies including KDDI, etc. 21:57:12 ... [slide 13] 21:57:21 ... JAXA' efforts 21:57:30 takumi has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:57:47 ... assessmen on Lnar communication and navigation architecture and research on optical @@@ 21:57:52 ... [slide 13] 21:57:55 s/13/14/ 21:58:05 ... The solar system internet (SSI) 21:58:15 ... toward a "common structure" 21:58:25 ... [slide 15] 21:58:33 shiestyle has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:58:40 present+ 21:58:42 ... Analogy with the Internet development 21:58:49 present+ Kaz_Ashimura 21:58:53 ioana has joined #web-on-the-moon 21:58:59 ... (picture of Vint Cerf) 21:59:02 ... [slide 16] 21:59:09 ... Deep space challenges 21:59:20 ... have to work other SDOs 21:59:34 ... astronomical distance and planetary motion 21:59:42 ... thinking about Mars as well 21:59:49 ... but it's too far from the earth 21:59:58 ... 40-min round trip 22:00:09 ... [slide 17] 22:00:18 ... another "internet"? 22:00:34 ... Earth Internet vs Moon "internet"? 22:00:45 ... [slide 18] 22:01:06 ... how to handle the 2.6 sec delay? 22:01:20 naomi has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:01:25 ... connected with the Earth Internet? 22:01:29 ... [slide 19] 22:01:35 ntim has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:01:44 ... New standrds and governance challenges 22:02:04 ...universal standards for lunar time and solar system coordinates 22:02:10 ... [slide 20] 22:02:21 ... Our common future to work toward 22:02:41 ... "space"as the next frontier 22:02:50 ... [slide 21] 22:02:54 ... Another video 22:03:09 ... near-earth satellites 22:03:14 ... NASA's DSM 22:03:20 ... moon network 22:03:32 ... 2030, may be assets with Mars 22:03:39 .... will take 40 mins 22:03:48 ....inter-planet networ 22:03:51 s/wor/work/ 22:04:00 ... multi-hop connection 22:04:08 ... then even earth to neptune 22:04:21 ... for the universe also 22:04:38 ... (IPNSG logo) 22:04:43 ... [slide 22] 22:04:50 ... Web on the Moon 22:04:59 ... already used 20 mins 22:05:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 22:05:04 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/09/25-web-on-the-moon-minutes.html naomi 22:05:13 anatoly-scherbakov has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:05:18 garykac has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:05:24 present+ 22:05:24 ... (describes the goal and description of this session) 22:05:33 -> https://github.com/w3c/tpac2024-breakouts/issues/52 session proposal 22:05:45 rwarren2 has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:06:02 Taka has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:06:05 jay: referring to DTN, RRC4838 22:06:28 i/describe/... [slide 23]/ 22:06:33 DTN = Delay Tolerant Network 22:06:38 ... [slide 24] 22:06:54 ... RFC 4838 - Delay-Tolerant Networking Architecture 22:06:55 present+ 22:07:10 ... why needed? 22:07:34 ... end-to-end path between the source and the destination 22:08:04 ... retransmissions based on timely/stable feedback 22:08:21 ... end-to-end loss relatively small 22:08:32 ... etc. 22:08:55 q+ 22:08:55 ... from now on, would like to have discussion with you all 22:08:59 q+ 22:09:01 q? 22:09:03 present+ Kiyoto_Ozawa, Daisuke_Kodajima, Lu_Huang, Michiko_Kuriyama, Mike_Wasserman, Satoru_Takagi, Takahiro_Aritaki, Kota_Yatagai, Ana_Sollano_Kim, Akira_Nagaoki, Anatoly_Scherbakov, Atsushi_Tagami, Daihei_Shiohama, Frankie_Wolf, Jayadevi_Natarajan, Osamu_Nakamura, Ryoya_Kawai, Ivan 22:09:19 EricS has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:09:27 garykac: upgrade all our technology for this purpose? 22:09:29 jay: yes 22:09:33 ... the problem is timing 22:09:49 ... we can't upgrade everything at once 22:09:53 ... so gradually 22:09:55 ack g 22:10:07 present+ Gary_Kacmarcik, Eemeli_Aro 22:10:38 eemeli: IPv4 solved problems for the Earth 22:10:49 ... much more problems for the Moon 22:10:58 satakagi has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:11:03 ... we should be starting with addressing 22:11:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 22:11:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/09/25-web-on-the-moon-minutes.html naomi 22:11:14 ... including lunar colony, and other colonies 22:11:38 ... if we wait before starting, would get even more problems 22:11:48 present+ 22:12:01 jay: region codes too 22:12:08 q? 22:12:10 ack e 22:12:21 @@@: laser-based communication? 22:12:23 jay: yes 22:13:12 garyk: latency due to remote access 22:13:15 cbiesinger has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:13:20 What are roaming fees going to be on the moon? 22:13:29 ... geolocation on the Moon 22:13:36 .... video codecs 22:13:58 jay: can't avoid the 2.6 sec delay itself 22:14:10 ... each protocol should handle the delay 22:14:24 ... possibly timeout would happen 22:14:28 xfq has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:14:32 ... have to check all the existing protocols 22:14:38 ... that would be the first step 22:14:49 s/@@@/garyk/ 22:15:19 garyk: simpler thing would be based on the existing technologies 22:15:37 jay: at least as the first 2-3 years, we have to upgrade the software 22:15:50 ... and its protocols 22:16:11 ... some system using reasonable upgrade is expected 22:16:11 As technology areas specific to the WWW, CDN and browser edge computing seem interesting. 22:16:24 q? 22:16:52 @@1: something mirrored locally 22:17:11 ... need whole new system to avoid collisions 22:17:15 s/@@1/Bas/ 22:17:24 jay: that's true 22:17:39 ... maybe we have to think of some reasonable timing 22:17:54 ntim has changed the topic to: Breakout: Web on the Moon - Palos Verdes - 14:45-15:45, Minutes: https://www.w3.org/2024/09/25-web-on-the-moon-minutes.html 22:18:02 ... to handle that kind of collisions 22:18:19 My earlier question was why not use existing remote access protocols to address this communication problem. 22:18:22 @@2: intermediate cash? 22:18:22 That would require a single channel of communication between Moon and Earth, with a video feed from Earth. 22:18:23 Video codes are already designed to handle dropped frames in the face of long latency. 22:18:45 @@@ will move that to the original place later 22:19:11 jay: just an idea in mind at the moment 22:19:29 ... if we have 2.6 sec delay, communication with each other would be difficult 22:19:48 ... to handle that situation, we're now planning some scalable network 22:20:07 ... using such a network, we can emulate the situation with the Moon 22:20:30 ... at an exhibition in Japan, named Interop 22:20:41 q+ 22:20:51 osamu: would provide some testbed for that purpose 22:21:15 ... also thinking an email system as well 22:21:41 ... recently IETF discusses bundled network 22:21:54 ... may be used for the communication with the Moon 22:22:10 ... IP network may be still used 22:22:40 ... but the network protocol might not be symmetry 22:23:04 ... some of the CDN protocol might be able to be reused 22:23:33 jay: next year, based on the discussion, we'd like to try a test network with big delay 22:23:50 david: regarding UUCP comment 22:24:07 ... really long delay with long-distance call 22:24:23 ... long-distance connection to be handled 22:24:39 ... certainly, local cash would work 22:24:56 ... NTP also would be useful 22:25:21 ... how to synchronize the time between the Earth and he Moon 22:25:45 @@2: there is a precedents 22:25:51 s/a // 22:25:56 s/is/are/ 22:26:08 q+ 22:26:14 jay: any questions from remote participants? 22:26:20 q? 22:26:31 kota: we're working on QUIC 22:26:37 shiestyle has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:26:38 ack kota 22:26:45 ... conjection control 22:26:55 ... kind of simulating space situation 22:27:07 ... might be able to use QUIC for the connection 22:27:25 ... the IP layer would be usable based on that 22:27:30 jay: ok 22:27:42 ... QUICK and DTN are good recent progress 22:27:59 anatoly: interesting presentation 22:28:14 ... synchronizing with the Moon and the Mars 22:28:26 ... probably will be independent 22:28:28 ack ana 22:28:48 ... some work on inter-planetary file systems 22:28:54 ... might be of interest 22:29:15 ... every piece has unique cache 22:29:23 s/cash/cache/g 22:29:34 ... synchronize the data set between the Earth and the Moon 22:30:15 ... maybe interesting to keep the same contents on the both sides 22:30:26 ... the idea like remote desktop 22:31:14 ... the most effective way may be sending magnetic tapes 22:31:55 ... might happen more realistic way is text-based browser 22:32:07 jay: very much interesting 22:32:20 ... IPFS is an interesting topic 22:32:20 ack anatoly-scherbakov 22:32:37 ... good for inter-space network 22:32:48 ... any other questions? 22:33:05 @@2: for file system use case 22:33:20 ... there is a team started fetch api 22:33:35 ... can send data in a modular manner 22:33:37 q+ 22:33:39 I thought it would be interesting to dig deeper into what challenges CDNs have as caching mechanisms for the WWW that are realistically operating now. 22:33:56 q? 22:34:33 speak irc post 22:35:18 ack sat 22:35:28 jay: no answer at the moment 22:35:45 q+ 22:35:49 q+ 22:36:06 ... some kind of coordination and costomerziation needed 22:36:13 s/cost/cust/ 22:36:37 ... this is not just tech approach but related to human acceptance 22:36:54 q? 22:36:56 Thanks 22:37:21 ntim: user experience with latency 22:37:28 ack ntim 22:37:38 ... latency for seconds 22:37:47 ... animations will be broken 22:38:05 ... any plan about the design? 22:38:34 jay: we have to think of what kind of applications to be customized 22:38:50 ... email or ftp 22:39:06 ... one possible solution is caching 22:39:20 ... but need to ask the Earth and it takes time 22:39:44 q? 22:39:45 ntim: 2.6-sec would make the content different 22:40:03 eemeli: is that reasonable to expect resouces? 22:40:26 ack ee 22:40:44 ... with inter-planetary distance, the situation becomes more and more complicated 22:40:59 ... somebody else would get cached data 22:41:20 ... possible problem with privacy 22:42:06 blad: may need text-based browser 22:42:18 ... do we know about the bandwidgh? 22:42:28 s/widgh/width/ 22:42:33 shiestyle has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:42:40 jay: don't know... 22:43:02 q+ 22:43:06 blad: how many lasers could be used? 22:43:25 @@1: multiple lasers would provide wider connection 22:43:53 jay: btw, has everybody signed up on the attendees list? 22:44:43 (those who have not signed up are encouraged to sign up) 22:44:52 jay: please give email to me 22:45:11 ... jay@w3.org 22:45:56 [adjourned] 22:45:59 xfq has left #web-on-the-moon 22:46:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 22:46:01 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/09/25-web-on-the-moon-minutes.html kaz 22:53:35 ktoumura has left #web-on-the-moon 22:58:36 gkellogg has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:59:42 gkellogg has joined #web-on-the-moon 22:59:54 gkellogg has left #web-on-the-moon 23:00:56 kaz has joined #web-on-the-moon