16:53:00 RRSAgent has joined #aria 16:53:05 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/09/12-aria-irc 16:53:05 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:53:06 Meeting: ARIA WG 16:53:06 agendabot, find agenda 16:53:06 jamesn, OK. This may take a minute... 16:53:06 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/2b57854a-65cb-421e-b9e0-f9a8da31f160/20240912T130000/ 16:53:06 clear agenda 16:53:06 agenda+ -> New Issue Triage https://bit.ly/3ZfD4lL 16:53:07 agenda+ -> New PR Triage https://bit.ly/3XnyQGd 16:53:09 agenda+ -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y 16:53:12 agenda+ -> TPAC planning https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/TPAC-2024-ARIA-Meetings#topics-to-schedule 16:53:15 agenda+ -> Table without table headers https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/issues/562 16:53:17 agenda+ -> Make aria-relevant and ariaRelevant reflect https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2326 16:56:58 filippo-zorzi has joined #aria 17:00:49 spectranaut_ has joined #aria 17:00:52 Francis_Storr has joined #aria 17:00:57 present+ 17:01:02 sarah has joined #aria 17:01:10 present+ 17:01:20 present+ 17:02:34 scott has joined #aria 17:02:47 StefanS has joined #aria 17:03:42 pkra has joined #aria 17:03:46 present+ 17:04:07 present+ 17:06:06 giacomo-petri has joined #aria 17:06:09 present+ 17:07:13 present+ 17:07:48 Brett-Lewis has joined #aria 17:07:54 scribe: sarah 17:08:06 zakim, take up first item 17:08:06 I don't understand 'take up first item', sarah 17:08:08 zakim, take up next item 17:08:09 agendum 1 -- -> New Issue Triage https://bit.ly/3ZfD4lL -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:08:17 present+ 17:08:21 katez has joined #aria 17:08:25 present+ 17:08:34 jamesn: one new issue, focusability of elements with aria-disabled 17:08:47 pkra: I think this can be closed, it was a question and was answered 17:09:09 zakim, close this item 17:09:10 agendum 1 closed 17:09:10 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:09:10 2. -> New PR Triage https://bit.ly/3XnyQGd [from agendabot] 17:09:23 zakim, take up next item 17:09:23 agendum 2 -- -> New PR Triage https://bit.ly/3XnyQGd -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:09:30 aardrian has joined #ARIA 17:09:46 +present 17:10:14 jcraig: implementors have taken up a pretty strong stance that ARIA should stay an accessibility layer and not change mainstream functionality 17:10:23 jocelyntran has joined #aria 17:10:35 jamesn: even with that, there are instances when it is useful to allow disabled things to become focusable 17:10:47 jamesn: no new PRs 17:10:59 CurtBellew has joined #aria 17:10:59 zakim, next item 17:10:59 agendum 3 -- -> WPT Open PRs https://bit.ly/wpt_a11y -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:11:05 present+ 17:11:09 jcraig: nothing new 17:11:23 jcraig: if anything has been updated, let me know, otherwise we can move on 17:12:25 jcraig: also worth mentioning, the WPT a11y interop group did resolve to bring Valerie's work into the scoring criteria for this year's interop investigation. She's been working on taking the old core AAM tests that were difficult to maintain, and making it more automated so we can get some more results long-term out of this. Really impressive 17:12:25 work, called acacia, excited to see what comes of it 17:12:57 spectranaut_: next topic is TPAC, I think we'll have a meeting with the browser tools and testing to talk about acacia and getting that landed. There are unresolved kinks and questions, would be great to have the WG in the meeting. 17:13:10 jamesn: would it be nice to demo to the group what acacia can do in the empty slot? 17:13:14 spectranaut_: we can do that 17:13:19 zakim, next item 17:13:19 agendum 4 -- -> TPAC planning https://github.com/w3c/aria/wiki/TPAC-2024-ARIA-Meetings#topics-to-schedule -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:13:38 aaronlev has joined #aria 17:13:42 jcraig: I've had good results demo'ing things to overlapping groups 17:13:52 jcraig: there are different types of questions that come from different groups as well 17:14:18 jamesn: we have a wiki page with our proposed agenda for TPAC. We've put the topics into the various days and time slots, we have only one open slot that we can put acacia into, or we can have some other things 17:14:32 jamesn: if you have any issues, let us know so we can make changes to this 17:14:48 jamesn: we have two joint meetings, AGWG on thursday and APA on friday 17:14:51 q+ 17:15:00 jamesn: apparently the AGWG is to discuss WCAG 3 ARIA techniques, which is news to us 17:15:41 matt: apparently the APA group expect me to drive that one, it's related to having other content that's not currently part of APG better supported or integrated into APG. Things like the media accessibility, MAU 17:16:37 matt: and Using ARIA, which we've already agreed to take on. I don't know how meaty this can be, and I think the bigger challenge is that there are a lot of good ideas, or potentially good ideas. We don't have people to do the work. So I don't know how fruitful this can be, unless there are any people who are willing to work on these things. I'm 17:16:37 not confident that we need it. 17:16:46 jamesn: it's also on friday afternoon, so everyone will be wiped out 17:16:57 matt: I'm leaning towards not having it if it's totally up to me 17:17:07 present+ 17:17:25 jamesn: I'll ask Janina if there's anything else to ask during that meeting. I'd be quite happy to not have that meeting on friday too 17:17:30 ack Rahim 17:17:47 ray-schwartz has joined #ARIA 17:17:51 Rahim: I had a question about the agenda setter and their role. Is their role to lead an effective session, outcomes, should we make a deck -- what should agenda setters be doing? 17:18:53 jamesn: I'm not going to tell you how to do it, having a deck would be helpful, but it doesn't have to be a presentation. Having something written down that's not just a topic, and having specific things to talk about and questions that need answering would be helpful. You can do that however you like. I assume there will be the ability to present 17:18:53 something on a screen in the room, and there will be remote participants as well.\\ 17:19:08 jamesn: there's no formal way to do this, but having something is useful to prevent going in circles 17:19:11 present+ 17:19:23 jamesn: we scribe the same way, there will be a rotating scribe, we'll ask most people to try to scribe at least one session 17:19:31 jamesn: these are like normal meetings but more in depth and in the same room 17:19:45 jamesn: think of it like a deep dive sessions, where the successful ones have a plan and an outcome 17:19:59 jamesn: vs the ones where we talk around a topic without progressing it towards a conclusion 17:21:15 jamesn: some information about where all the cool people talk to eachother 17:21:17 zakim, next item 17:21:17 agendum 5 -- -> Table without table headers https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/issues/562 -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:21:56 jamesn: this was filed, and I just want to know what our plan is for this. We have in the issue the code links to webkit's and blink's isDataTable implementation, and the gecko TableAccessible implementation 17:22:02 jamesn: scott had a related issue 17:22:08 CurtBellew has joined #aria 17:22:52 q+ 17:22:56 jamesn: I don't know if folks think this would be a good idea or not, but it would be nice to detail in words or in an algorithm what each of the implemetations are and we can look to see where they are common and where they differ. I think it would be nice if all browsers treated them the same. If every table in every browser was either a layout 17:22:56 table or a data table the same way, that would be a positive 17:23:07 jamesn: aaronlev is on the queue and is going to tell me I'm wrong 17:23:09 aaronlev: you're right 17:23:15 aaronlev: don't get used to it 17:23:39 aaronlev: I talked to Brett-Lewis at Vispero, and they used to do it in there code, but now they use a variable in our code that tells them what our guess is 17:24:08 aaronlev: the algorithms are so similar, it shouldn't be hard to harmonize them. We need someone to go through the source code and harmonize them. You don't really need to know C++, and create a table 17:24:14 jamesn: could ChatGPT do this? 17:24:14 q+ 17:24:14 nina has joined #aria 17:24:18 aaronlev: It could do it incorrectly 17:24:34 aaronlev: we just need a volunteer to do this, I don't think we need to evaluate this in a big group 17:24:38 keithamus: I volunteer as tribute 17:24:55 aaronlev: if you have any questions about the code, you can ping me 17:25:04 jamesn: you probably wrote most of it, right? 17:25:28 aaronlev: I wrote the code in FF, then found the code in Chrome had been copied from Safari, which had been copied from FF. The same comment code was there 17:25:37 jamesn: if we can get this in browsers and tests for this, that'd be awesome 17:25:44 jcraig: and then the layout list reconciliation 17:25:52 jamesn: that's going to be more c-- 17:25:55 jcraig: inside joke 17:26:15 aaronlev: keithamus do you mind doing it as a google doc at first, and then turn it into a wiki? It'll just be easier to collaborate 17:26:26 keithamus: OK, google doc with a table, enumerating similarities and differences? 17:26:47 aaronlev: rows would be general rule, columns would be each browser, if they do it, and if they do it differently, then a column about why the rule is good or bad 17:27:00 jamesn: can everyone who wants to collab on this use google docs? 17:27:14 jamesn: sounds like we have progress, let's move on 17:27:15 q? 17:27:16 ack keithamus 17:27:19 ack aaronlev 17:27:22 zakim, next item 17:27:22 agendum 6 -- -> Make aria-relevant and ariaRelevant reflect https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/2326 -- taken up [from agendabot] 17:27:48 jamesn: last one, I think this has been concluded, but I want to confirm because it's not the conclusion I expected 17:27:59 jcraig: what I missed was that this is what implementations do anyway, so I approved it 17:28:03 jamesn: so, no action needed? 17:28:07 jcraig: just needs to be merged 17:28:20 jamesn: need reviewers, I guess 17:28:22 spectranaut_: you can add me 17:28:33 jongund has joined #aria 17:28:43 Rahim: (also volunteered) 17:29:07 jamesn: no implementations needed, right 17:29:24 jcraig: I think there might be a line needed in a WPT test, but I think so. That'd be easy to add anyway 17:29:28 agenda? 17:29:36 jamesn: believe that's it for this week 17:30:46 jongund has joined #aria 17:31:39 jongund has joined #aria 17:31:53 rrsagent, make minutes 17:31:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/09/12-aria-minutes.html sarah 17:32:58 zakim, end meeting 17:32:58 As of this point the attendees have been Francis_Storr, Rahim, sarah, pkra, StefanS, giacomo-petri, smockle, keithamus, katez, present, CurtBellew, jcraig, scott 17:33:01 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 17:33:02 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/09/12-aria-minutes.html Zakim 17:33:08 I am happy to have been of service, sarah; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 17:33:08 Zakim has left #aria 18:05:56 jongund has joined #aria 19:05:40 ChrisCuellar has joined #aria 20:31:07 ChrisCuellar has joined #aria 20:51:57 jongund has joined #aria 21:09:32 jongund has joined #aria 21:19:05 ChrisCuellar has joined #aria 21:31:14 jongund has joined #aria 22:40:18 jongund has joined #aria 23:21:07 jongund has joined #aria