Meeting minutes
<gb> /issues/107 -> #107
<gb> /issues/154 -> #154
<gb> /issues/156 -> #156
New Business
jkline presented work in one of presentation in Austin, IAAP is also working on maturity model.. Need to check that work
Fazio IAAP working on smart city maturity model and not on web accessiblity - 4 years back update
Maturity Model Scoring Subgroup Update
no update from scoring group
<gb> /issues/107 -> #107
Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then
<Fazio> Github Issue #107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 107 Definition of "Full maturity" needs to be adjusted, as there is no need to optimize anymore by then (by jake-abma)
Mark_Miller Optimization is the continuous process so it should be optimizing/ optimal. It is not completed, still there can be something to improve
CharlesL We need to work on changing stage names
janina we should reject issue and close it
<Mark_Miller> You are not complete when you are fully mature. In the fully mature stage, you should have processes in place to continue optimization. Optimal implies optimization does not continue. CMMI defines the final level of maturity as:
<Mark_Miller> Maturity Level 5: Optimizing
<Mark_Miller> Stable and flexible. Organization is focused on continuous improvement and is built to pivot and respond to opportunity and change. The organization’s stability provides a platform for agility and innovation.
<Fazio> Close issue 107 with comment: A maturity Model is a continuum, there is no end point. The Task Force has decided to keep the term optimize, as it suggests an ongoing effort without an end point.
RESOLUTION: Close issue 107 with comment: A maturity Model is a continuum, there is no end point. The Task Force has decided to keep the term optimize, as it suggests an ongoing effort without an end point.
Github Issue #154 Section 3.3.1: can a measure of support effectiveness be included?
<gb> /issues/154 -> #154
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 154 Section 3.3.1: can a measure of support effectiveness be included? (by jasonjgw)
Dr_Keith there is already a way to add proof points
janina It is a good thing to add measure of support effectiveness
Jeff: It is not saying to add standard but to include it
Jeff: It is mentioned in one of the proof point
Jeff: we should find a way to include this measure to include
A long discussion of proof points and outcomes and their mapping
RRAgent, make minutes
<Fazio> please make minutes
<Fazio> oh thx
RRAgent, make the minutes