IRC log of adapt on 2024-05-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:02:47 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #adapt
- 14:02:51 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-irc
- 14:02:52 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 14:02:53 [Zakim]
- please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), janina
- 14:03:05 [janina]
- Meeting: Adapt Teleconference
- 14:03:11 [janina]
- Date: 14 May 2024
- 14:04:02 [janina]
- present+
- 14:04:03 [matatk]
- present+
- 14:04:04 [Abhinav]
- present+
- 14:04:08 [matatk]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:04:09 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html matatk
- 14:04:16 [janina]
- topic: WKD
- 14:04:32 [janina]
- scribe+
- 14:04:44 [janina]
- matatk: Little to report just now ...
- 14:05:05 [janina]
- matatk: Suggests a quick read of last meeting (with COGA) to consider followups
- 14:05:27 [janina]
- matatk: Have not yet had opportunity to followup with the AC meeting person who expressed WKD concern
- 14:08:49 [Russell]
- Russell has joined #adapt
- 14:08:52 [Russell]
- present+
- 14:10:37 [matatk]
- scribe+
- 14:11:16 [matatk]
- Abhinav: Happy with presentation; no specific questions for COGA.
- 14:12:19 [matatk]
- janina: I think they were saying that it was not critical for WKDs to be discoverable from the current page only, rather than site-wide, particularly if the toolbar icon is badged. Though some top-level WKDs are important, like help. What does everyone think?
- 14:13:15 [janina]
- Abhinav: Want to understand who's our target user?
- 14:13:46 [janina]
- Abhinav: By definition tWK are site wide
- 14:14:37 [janina]
- matatk: Believe it's machine to machine; so user agent can present appropriate to user -- in a form the user prefers
- 14:14:56 [janina]
- matatk: Yes, the ietf wk are site wide, but we're looking at how to help people navigate
- 14:15:26 [janina]
- matatk: we believe the ietf is useful, but we might take another approach, e.g. rhel with added values
- 14:15:52 [janina]
- matatk: that would be discovered from current page
- 14:16:47 [janina]
- matatk: We wanted COGA to understand how important site wide is to them
- 14:16:58 [janina]
- matatk: Don't believe we have a clear answer from them
- 14:19:27 [janina]
- Abhinav: expresses concern about maintaining rhel
- 14:19:32 [janina]
- matatk: yes
- 14:19:53 [janina]
- matatk: Don't believe we're saying we want to switch to rhel now
- 14:20:22 [janina]
- matatk: But, yes. Browser would need to parse; and site would need to maintain
- 14:20:53 [janina]
- matatk: Most people I've discussed with have had concerns about IETF; but seem sanguine about maintaining page content
- 14:21:27 [janina]
- matatk: Concerned that using both approaches might confuse users
- 14:22:19 [janina]
- matatk: A bit difficult to understand now, but we need to explore a bit more; would people understand this isn't a complete list for the site?
- 14:23:07 [matatk]
- janina: I've been using 'IETF' for well-known URLs (side-wide) and 'rel' for in-page.
- 14:23:24 [matatk]
- janina: I'm not sure the user should know/care whether the approach underneath is IETF or rel
- 14:23:32 [matatk]
- q+
- 14:24:07 [janina]
- Abhinav: So machine to machine, but some kind of option to provide visibility to the user? Any problem with that?
- 14:25:10 [janina]
- matatk: Problem with user not caring which approach agree from the underlying tech
- 14:25:33 [janina]
- matatk: Problem, if we use both and user has no way of knowing and the list will be different on different pages
- 14:28:25 [janina]
- matatk: matatk: Will ask whether IETF folks might be amenable to a small feature upgrade, i.e. a directory
- 14:29:34 [matatk]
- s/but some kind of option to provide/I proposed a syntax to provide/
- 14:29:38 [matatk]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:29:39 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html matatk
- 14:30:26 [matatk]
- Abhinav: My understanding is that the content served at the well-known URLs is up to us, so we have flexibility on that.
- 14:30:41 [matatk]
- matatk: ACK; let's check the spec.
- 14:31:09 [janina]
- matatk: ack to Abhinav
- 14:33:31 [janina]
- Abhinav: concerned we may get a more complex set; better look if we massage appropriately
- 14:34:42 [matatk]
- topic: Synbols (issue 240)
- 14:35:04 [matatk]
- subtopic: News from COGA
- 14:35:13 [matatk]
- janina: E A Draffan was on the call yesterday and we got into symbols.
- 14:35:20 [matatk]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:35:21 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html matatk
- 14:35:50 [matatk]
- janina: I tested the theory as to whether the Unicode approach would be adequate. We had to separate out the concepts of user agent and authoring content.
- 14:36:18 [matatk]
- janina: The UAs want the simplest way to display what they're going to display without having to read another registry of data values. That was resolved quickly.
- 14:36:28 [matatk]
- janina: The concern that was expressed was on the authoring side.
- 14:38:19 [matatk]
- janina: E A wasn't convinced that any non-expert could author the content. I said that's probably right - you can't rely on a computer tool to do perfect translations. If you're doing this on a word-by-word basis I agree. But asked what about chapter titles in videos? Is there reasonable expectation that it would deliver benefits to people there
- 14:38:19 [matatk]
- then it's worth doing. Note our remit came from COGA.
- 14:38:39 [matatk]
- janina: Also we are focusing on specific use cases like chapter titles, procedural content, etc.
- 14:39:04 [matatk]
- janina: That was pretty-much signed off on - I thought I should send some links, like to issue 240 - any others?
- 14:41:47 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- Lionel_Wolberger has joined #Adapt
- 14:41:52 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- present+
- 14:42:21 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:42:23 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html Lionel_Wolberger
- 14:42:34 [matatk]
- matatk: Is 240 the best issue - could lead down technical rabbit hole - especially if use case already validated?
- 14:42:45 [matatk]
- janina: Maybe we should invite E A to this call?
- 14:43:08 [janina]
- matatk: Notes we're currently unable to hear Russell
- 14:43:22 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- scribe+
- 14:43:25 [janina]
- matatk: Good idea is set up a conversation -- invite to a call?
- 14:43:41 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- matatk: (Noting that Russel's audio is not working, cannot hear him.)
- 14:44:00 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- matatk: We need very specific questions for EA
- 14:44:03 [janina]
- janina: lionel: Russell has no mic at the moment
- 14:45:14 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- s/UAs/User Agents
- 14:45:21 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:45:22 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html Lionel_Wolberger
- 14:46:07 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- janina: What was significant to the discussion yesterday is that we are not trying to write a symbol above every word, that is not what we are building
- 14:46:17 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- ... they mentioned an issue paper that they could not locate.
- 14:47:37 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- matatk: We should put on the agenda, this follow-up with EA
- 14:49:16 [Abhinav]
- 1) RFC 8615 on Well-Known URIs can be found at https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/pdfrfc/rfc8615.txt.pdf
- 14:49:17 [Abhinav]
- 2) Section 3 gives good details
- 14:49:17 [Abhinav]
- 3) There is paragraph:
- 14:49:17 [Abhinav]
- "Note that this specification defines neither how to determine the
- 14:49:18 [Abhinav]
- hostname to use to find the well-known URI for a particular
- 14:49:18 [Abhinav]
- application, **nor the scope of the metadata discovered by
- 14:49:18 [Abhinav]
- dereferencing the well-known URI**; both should be defined by the
- 14:49:19 [Abhinav]
- application itself."
- 14:49:19 [Abhinav]
- 4) Apologies for commenting between different discussion....
- 14:51:53 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:51:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html Lionel_Wolberger
- 14:53:35 [matatk]
- Thanks Abhinav, re the WK info
- 14:53:41 [matatk]
- Here is my mock-up for 240: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-adapt/2024May/0006.html
- 15:09:48 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:09:50 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html Lionel_Wolberger
- 15:10:01 [Lionel_Wolberger]
- zakim, end meeting
- 15:10:01 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been janina, matatk, Abhinav, Russell, Lionel_Wolberger
- 15:10:03 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 15:10:04 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/14-adapt-minutes.html Zakim
- 15:10:09 [Zakim]
- I am happy to have been of service, Lionel_Wolberger; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye
- 15:10:10 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #adapt