IRC log of matf on 2024-05-01

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:01:37 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #matf
13:01:41 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-matf-irc
13:01:41 [Zakim]
RRSAgent, make logs Public
13:01:42 [Zakim]
please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), JJ
13:01:51 [JJ]
Zakim, this is MATF 1 May 2024
13:01:51 [Zakim]
got it, JJ
13:02:01 [JJ]
present+
13:02:05 [RacheleD4]
present+
13:02:35 [AA]
AA has joined #matf
13:02:38 [JJ]
agenda+ How WCAG 2.2 Relates to Mobile
13:02:50 [JJ]
agenda+ 2.5.8 Target Size
13:02:52 [Carol]
present +
13:02:58 [Carol]
present+
13:03:23 [JJ]
zakim, agenda?
13:03:23 [Zakim]
I see 2 items remaining on the agenda:
13:03:24 [Zakim]
1. How WCAG 2.2 Relates to Mobile [from JJ]
13:03:24 [Zakim]
2. 2.5.8 Target Size [from JJ]
13:03:47 [JJ]
agenda+ Scribe
13:03:54 [JJ]
zakim, agenda?
13:03:54 [Zakim]
I see 3 items remaining on the agenda:
13:03:55 [Zakim]
1. How WCAG 2.2 Relates to Mobile [from JJ]
13:03:55 [Zakim]
2. 2.5.8 Target Size [from JJ]
13:03:55 [Zakim]
3. Scribe [from JJ]
13:03:57 [JJ]
zakim, open agenda 3
13:03:57 [Zakim]
agendum 3 -- Scribe -- taken up [from JJ]
13:04:12 [Devanshu]
Devanshu has joined #matf
13:04:35 [JJ]
IRC cheetsheat: https://github.com/w3c/matf/wiki/IRC-Cheatsheet
13:05:56 [julianmka]
julianmka has joined #MATF
13:06:02 [AA]
present+
13:06:04 [julianmka]
present+
13:06:05 [Joe_Humbert]
present+
13:06:07 [Mick]
Mick has joined #MATF
13:06:18 [Mick]
present+
13:06:21 [Devanshu]
present+
13:07:38 [quintinb]
quintinb has joined #MATF
13:08:03 [JJ]
nominate a scribe
13:08:07 [JJ]
Zakim, nominate a scribe
13:08:07 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Mick
13:08:15 [quintinb]
present+
13:08:22 [JJ]
nominate a scribe
13:08:27 [JJ]
Zakim, nominate a scribe
13:08:27 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose julianmka
13:09:49 [JJ]
scribe: quintinb
13:09:58 [JJ]
Zakim, scribe: quintinb
13:09:58 [Zakim]
I don't understand 'scribe: quintinb', JJ
13:10:19 [JJ]
move to next agendum
13:10:19 [Zakim]
agendum 1 -- How WCAG 2.2 Relates to Mobile -- taken up [from JJ]
13:11:38 [quintinb]
TOPIC: Touch Target size (2.5.8)
13:12:54 [quintinb]
JJ considering moving comments for sheet in a data repo (git)
13:13:39 [quintinb]
q+ JJ Any ideas how to track comments in the document
13:14:06 [Joe_Humbert]
I like github, because people can add comments and they are visible
13:14:53 [quintinb]
I like Github too, we could use issues for each criteria
13:14:56 [Devanshu]
+1
13:15:20 [Mick]
+1 for Github, and creating documents for each criteria, will be easier to manage and track.
13:15:24 [julianmka]
could we move out of the spreadsheet and into Github fully? I would rather not track 2 places.
13:15:34 [quintinb]
agree julianmka
13:15:39 [Joe_Humbert]
+1 for not 2 places
13:15:46 [quintinb]
I am nothing if not redundant
13:16:13 [Joe_Humbert]
q?
13:16:45 [Joe_Humbert]
I was seeing if anyone was in the queue
13:16:51 [JJ]
q+ Joe_Humbert
13:16:53 [JJ]
q?
13:16:59 [JJ]
q- Joe_Humbert
13:17:40 [quintinb]
JJ confirms to use GitHub
13:17:52 [quintinb]
How do we use GitHub? JJ to propose
13:18:12 [JJ]
move to next agendum
13:18:12 [Zakim]
agendum 2 -- 2.5.8 Target Size -- taken up [from JJ]
13:19:36 [quintinb]
Joe: Pixel conversion: CSS pixel is the native density for the platform.
13:19:55 [quintinb]
q+ Could we provide a mechanism to convert? Like a calculator?
13:21:04 [quintinb]
JJ: We should align with WCAG2ICT
13:21:33 [Mick]
I asked this question recently in the MATF slack channel. The consensus was the same - to see 24 pixels being equivalent to whatever the appropriate unit used for other platforms - for iOS this is 24 points and for Android this is 24 density-independent pixels. This is an approach Deque follows as well I believe.
13:22:17 [julianmka]
q+
13:22:47 [quintinb]
AA: should we just use mm on the screen, as specified by NN?
13:22:59 [Devanshu]
WCAG2ICT notes: https://github.com/w3c/wcag2ict/issues/293#issuecomment-1903545744
13:23:46 [quintinb]
JJ: Android can modify density, so perhaps mm can be difficult
13:25:01 [quintinb]
Joe: Can't verify, but it's consistent across devices and settings
13:25:28 [Mick]
Would points or density-independent pixels be more helpful to developement teams then using mm?
13:27:01 [quintinb]
quintinb: Users can define what they want the physical size to be, the separation is intentional
13:27:59 [Joe_Humbert]
Q+
13:28:12 [quintinb]
julian: Should we just follow the platform guidelines? Fingertips are variable in size and not precise. Shouldn't we be advocating for large touch targets?
13:28:56 [quintinb]
Rachele: Shouldn't we just reference the AAA requirement?
13:29:04 [quintinb]
Joe confirms
13:30:01 [julianmka]
q-
13:30:48 [quintinb]
JJ: (AA) Spacing can be 24 from another target and then size can be anything
13:31:09 [quintinb]
Sorry that was a reference to WCAG_AA not AA the user
13:32:17 [Mick]
As an observation - we tried previously pushing Apple and Android sizes to our teams and got so much pushback from designers about it being too big.
13:32:18 [AA]
I will make sure to add my name as AAK, to avoid confusion quintinb
13:32:41 [Joe]
Joe has joined #matf
13:32:58 [Joe_Humbert8]
Joe_Humbert8 has joined #matf
13:33:44 [quintinb]
ty AAK
13:33:48 [Joe_Humbert]
Joe_Humbert has joined #matf
13:35:16 [quintinb]
quintinb: we also need to be considerate that Google does allow for 32x32dp in seemingly certain cases
13:37:34 [quintinb]
JJ: Relying on public documentation can be problematic as the internal algo doesn't necessarily follow the 48x48 rule
13:37:34 [quintinb]
https://github.com/google/Accessibility-Test-Framework-for-Android/blob/c65cab02b2a845c29c3da100d6adefd345a144e3/src/main/java/com/google/android/apps/common/testing/accessibility/framework/checks/TouchTargetSizeCheck.java#L164
13:39:45 [quintinb]
JJ: We may have to figure out what Google's math is - maybe someone can look later
13:40:27 [quintinb]
JJ A lot of people asking how to check size
13:40:40 [quintinb]
q+
13:40:50 [JJ]
q+ Joe_Humbert
13:40:55 [JJ]
ack quintinb
13:42:04 [quintinb]
quintinb: ADB can be used to extract the ally tree and the density, which can calculate the dp size
13:42:22 [JJ]
ack Joe_Humbert
13:42:23 [Mick]
A physical ruler or sending screenshots and using likes of photoshop. Neither massively accurate but have struggled to find other methods when not having access to code in audits.
13:42:24 [quintinb]
JJ: but we need to be understanding of what tools auditors need
13:42:28 [quintinb]
q-
13:43:15 [quintinb]
Joe: Uses the scanner with larger requirements because it reports the details of what is wrong
13:43:19 [Mick]
That's clever Joe_Humbert
13:43:40 [quintinb]
agree - thanks Joe - I think I failed to understand previously
13:44:14 [quintinb]
Mick has done an audit against 2.2
13:44:59 [quintinb]
They have been sending screenshots and measuring with a ruler
13:45:36 [JJ]
agenda+ 1.3.5 Input Purpose
13:45:49 [JJ]
move to next agendum
13:45:49 [Zakim]
agendum 4 -- 1.3.5 Input Purpose -- taken up [from JJ]
13:45:55 [Joe_Humbert]
there is no way to set a custom size in Apple's Accessibility inspector. Also I think the inspector rules are closed source
13:51:54 [quintinb]
JOE: In HTML if a first name is registered, but no autocomplete doesn't work then it's a fail
13:52:56 [quintinb]
JJ: Should we just add guidance on attributes and how to validate if they are available
13:54:10 [quintinb]
Joe: keyboard types might be easier
13:56:04 [quintinb]
Joe: Will try research how he can find out how to find autofill attributes
13:58:53 [quintinb]
Joe: Where can testers put this dummy data
14:00:23 [quintinb]
JJ: will look into MarkDown as a format for the success criteria
14:00:57 [quintinb]
Joe: Do we know anyone who has experience writing tests
14:03:29 [julianmka]
iOS can set autofill for Safari from any contact. Wondering if that setting propagates throughout apps.
14:06:07 [JJ]
Quintin: has experience writing automated accessibility tests
14:06:49 [JJ]
JJ: also has experience writing these; with source code access you can certainly extract input type related properties. Without source code access it's harder, believes it's possible on Android but probably not on iOS.
14:07:06 [JJ]
Zakim, list participants
14:07:06 [Zakim]
As of this point the attendees have been JJ, RacheleD, Carol, AA, julianmka, Joe_Humbert, Mick, Devanshu, quintinb
14:07:13 [JJ]
rrsagent, make minutes
14:07:15 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-matf-minutes.html JJ
14:07:47 [JJ]
Zakim, meeting: MATF 1 May 2024
14:07:47 [Zakim]
I don't understand 'meeting: MATF 1 May 2024', JJ
14:07:51 [JJ]
meeting: MATF 1 May 2024
14:08:11 [JJ]
rrsagent, make minutes
14:08:12 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/05/01-matf-minutes.html JJ