14:53:14 RRSAgent has joined #pcg-a11y 14:53:18 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-pcg-a11y-irc 14:53:19 Zakim has joined #pcg-a11y 14:53:26 zakim, this will be pcg-a11y 14:53:27 ok, AvneeshSingh 14:53:43 present+ 14:53:49 chair: AvneeshSingh 14:54:19 agenda+ Review of in-progress techniques documents. 14:54:42 agenda+ Issue #251: Principles document examples for nonvisual reading 14:54:58 agenda+ Issue #260: Need to harmonize Principles and Techniques on Non-Visual Reading 14:55:12 agenda+ Issue #256: Align Hazards examples 14:55:30 agenda+ Any other business. 15:00:36 gautierchomel has joined #pcg-a11y 15:01:06 gpellegrino has joined #pcg-a11y 15:01:44 JonasLillqvist has joined #pcg-a11y 15:01:44 Madeleine has joined #pcg-a11y 15:01:56 CharlesL has joined #pcg-a11y 15:01:59 pgilius has joined #pcg-a11y 15:02:31 zakim, next agendum 15:02:31 agendum 1 -- Review of in-progress techniques documents. -- taken up [from AvneeshSingh] 15:02:40 present + 15:02:42 present+ 15:02:43 Chris has joined #pcg-a11y 15:02:48 present+ 15:02:50 scribe+ 15:02:57 present+ 15:03:00 AvneeshSingh: let's start with the update on ONIx 15:03:19 https://w3c.github.io/publ-a11y/UX-Guide-Metadata/draft/techniques/onix-metadata/index.html 15:03:37 Zoom link https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81130400256?pwd=czI2WTErKzRTMnplZlhhNDhFTUJEQT09 15:04:04 MiiaK has joined #pcg-a11y 15:04:48 gautierchomel: on the ONIX techniques we've added charts, diagrams, accessibility. summary and Pre-recorded audio 15:06:04 ... for accessibility summary: in ONIX there are two codes for that (one for the "old" way to intend accessbility summary, one for the "new" way: the idea that should not say the same thing that are already expressed by machine-readable metadata) 15:06:33 ... so our proposal is that if in a record there is both the accessibility addendum and accessibility summary, only the first should be displayed 15:06:47 q? 15:06:56 ... second thing is to identify the language in which the accessibility summary (or addendum) is written 15:07:06 ... to pass it to the assistive technologies 15:07:12 AvneeshSingh: any comment? 15:07:43 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pcg-a11y 15:07:59 ... other items are "Charts, diagrams, and formulas" and "Pre-recorded audio" 15:08:11 present+ 15:08:14 present+ 15:08:20 gautierchomel: sure, all the text is there, and it can be reviewed 15:08:55 AvneeshSingh: yes, we can get feedback via the mailing list or via the issue tracker 15:09:20 AvneeshSingh: Charles do you have any update on the EPUB metadata techniques? 15:09:45 https://w3c.github.io/publ-a11y/UX-Guide-Metadata/draft/techniques/epub-metadata/index.html 15:10:28 CharlesL: we are using the work done for ONIX and mirroring that in the EPUB metadata world 15:11:01 zakim, next agendum 15:11:01 agendum 2 -- Issue #251: Principles document examples for nonvisual reading -- taken up [from AvneeshSingh] 15:11:08 .. the conformance may be tricky, but let's see 15:11:08 https://github.com/w3c/publ-a11y/issues/251 15:12:06 Madeleine: the original issue was that examples in the Principles document for nonvisual reading were not aligned 15:12:26 ... now it's ok, so I think now we can close it 15:12:56 ... but there is still a question about aligning examples in the principles document with examples in the non visual reading 15:13:01 q+ 15:13:12 ... ok I'm closing this issue 15:13:53 q? 15:13:54 AvneeshSingh: question: may be there cases where the order may differ from ONIX to EPUB metadata? 15:14:07 ack next 15:14:29 Madeleine has joined #pcg-a11y 15:15:43 q? 15:16:15 gpellegrino: I think that trying to align the order in the techniques and in the principles it doesn't make a lot of sense 15:16:22 q+ 15:16:24 ... the goal of the documents are different 15:16:37 ack madel 15:16:39 ... the order may even differ from ONIX to EPUB 15:16:45 CharlesL: I agree 15:16:58 Madeleine: I agree too 15:16:59 q+ 15:17:25 zakim, next agendum 15:17:25 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, AvneeshSingh 15:17:47 ... another thing is about the "unkown" value 15:17:48 ack next 15:17:54 zakim, next agendum 15:17:54 agendum 3 -- Issue #260: Need to harmonize Principles and Techniques on Non-Visual Reading -- taken up [from AvneeshSingh] 15:17:58 ... is it meaningful? Do we need it? 15:18:12 https://github.com/w3c/publ-a11y/issues/260 15:20:15 gpellegrino: Principles states that some values can be hidden if null (unknown), but techniques must provide what to say in such case for implementers who want's to display something. 15:20:24 q+ 15:20:40 q+ 15:20:56 ack char 15:21:34 CharlesL: we can addd a note in the principles to explain why order can change in techniques 15:21:51 AvneeshSingh: yes, I think that we can remove the "unknown" in the principles document, and leave it in the techniques 15:21:52 ack next 15:22:13 CharlesL: er may add a note about the order of the examples in the principles document 15:23:08 gpellegrino: i agree with Avneesh, but there may be cases where we have to say it in the principle (for the three jeys informations). 15:23:10 q? 15:23:35 AvneeshSingh: yes for the three key information that should always be display, we'll leave the unkown 15:23:56 q? 15:24:04 zakim, next agendum 15:24:04 agendum 4 -- Issue #256: Align Hazards examples -- taken up [from AvneeshSingh] 15:24:20 https://github.com/w3c/publ-a11y/issues/256 15:24:21 AvneeshSingh: so: for the key information that can be hidden, we remove the "unkown" for the principles and leave them in the techniques, with a note telling that the key information can be hidden 15:26:54 gautierchomel: the problem here is that we don't have examples for the extended version of all the hazards 15:27:17 ... I made a proposal in the ticket 15:27:32 q+ 15:27:44 Madeleine: how many variants of hazards do we have? 15:27:46 q+ 15:27:47 q+ 15:28:12 Maybe we can elevate the flashing hazard 15:28:30 and then add another statement about the less common ones 15:28:33 ack charl 15:28:48 CharlesL: this is tricky 15:29:29 ... I think that if there is at least one hazard we should display all 15:29:51 ack next 15:32:00 CharlesL: yes, I think we can have information about multimedia in ebooks 15:32:31 q? 15:32:39 ... I like the idea of displaying something only if there is an hazard 15:33:18 q+ 15:33:30 ack next 15:33:40 AvneeshSingh: I agree we should not get in too much complex specification here 15:34:20 gautierchomel: Yes, I think in most cases we'll not have hazards 15:34:56 ... I would add a note telling that hazards can be displayed both concatenated and un-concatenated (as a list) 15:35:39 ... maybe we can also update the section about filtering 15:36:27 ack bill 15:36:29 ... to suggest that in some cases filtering for different types of hazards 15:37:57 Bill_Kasdorf: I'm about uncomfortable with under specifying, and to hide information 15:38:53 ... I think a lot of publishers may use the "unkown" value 15:39:10 q+ 15:39:21 ... and it should be displayed 15:39:57 q+ 15:40:39 AvneeshSingh: we have a problem since not all hazards are specified, for example what does it mean an audio-hazard? 15:40:44 q+ 15:40:51 ack gaut 15:41:38 gautierchomel: the proposal is not to hide hazards, is only to being able to manage this section both concatenated and as list 15:41:48 ack next 15:42:42 ack next 15:42:52 gpellegrino: i suggest to check techniques that are clarifying our intention. Only EPUB with no Hazard metadata will have no information displayed. 15:42:58 CharlesL: can we tell if there is multimedia in the ebook? 15:43:11 q+ 15:43:15 1+ 15:43:20 q+ 15:43:36 +1, as long as we can trust that metadata, which I guess we have to do 15:45:04 ack gautier 15:45:15 gautierchomel: I like this approach 15:45:23 ... I would like to digg into it 15:46:11 ... to check if there is multimedia before displaying it 15:46:21 ack next 15:47:19 q+ 15:47:56 AvneeshSingh: in ONIX there is a way to tell if there is audio or video in the EPUB 15:48:03 ack next 15:48:40 gpellegrino: we may dig into a rabbit hole 15:48:51 q? 15:49:25 zakim, next agendum 15:49:25 agendum 5 -- Any other business. -- taken up [from AvneeshSingh] 15:51:45 gautierchomel: I'm trying to setup transifex, I've asked them but they say that we cannot use it for free, since being part of W3C is not for free 15:52:21 AvneeshSingh: ok, let's continue with the JSON files 15:52:43 CharlesL has left #pcg-a11y 15:53:15 rrsagent, make minutes 15:53:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/25-pcg-a11y-minutes.html AvneeshSingh 15:53:28 rrsagent, make logs public 15:55:15 zakim, leave 15:55:15 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been AvneeshSingh, gautierchomel, gpellegrino, Madeleine, CharlesL, Bill_Kasdorf 15:55:15 Zakim has left #pcg-a11y