13:54:58 RRSAgent has joined #pbgsc 13:55:02 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/04/19-pbgsc-irc 13:55:02 RRSAgent, make logs Public 13:55:03 Meeting: Publishing Steering Committee 13:55:14 date: 2024-04-19 13:57:14 George has joined #pbgsc 13:59:03 shiestyl_ has joined #pbgsc 13:59:51 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pbgsc 14:00:08 present+ 14:00:19 present+ 14:00:27 present+ 14:00:35 present+ 14:00:45 liisamk has joined #pbgsc 14:00:59 present+ 14:01:08 present+ 14:01:10 rickj has joined #pbgsc 14:01:17 present+ 14:01:24 AvneeshSingh has joined #pbgsc 14:01:33 chair: George 14:01:37 present+ 14:02:18 shiestyl_ has joined #pbgsc 14:03:16 shiestyle_ has left #pbgsc 14:03:18 shiestyle_ has joined #pbgsc 14:04:33 scribe+ 14:04:41 present+ 14:04:58 everyone: [introductions] 14:06:38 Topic: Overview of the current activites 14:06:55 liisamk: Publishing BG is co-chaired by myself, Daihei Shiohama, and Cristina Mussinelli 14:06:59 ... we meet monthly 14:07:20 ... tryo to bring together business people from publishing worldwide, to discuss publishing issues that may need standardization 14:07:45 ... we try to organize so we can meet in two different timezones, so we can bring together NA and EU in one, NA and Asia in the other 14:08:00 wolfgang: The main work of the CG is done in taskforces 14:08:26 ... an A11y taskforce that has gone on for years, Anti-counterfeiting TF, and a FXL A11y TF 14:08:40 ... we meeting every 2-3 months for a plenary session to get everyone together 14:08:50 ... if there is enough energy around a topic, we can form further taskforces 14:08:56 ... looking for further people to get engaged 14:09:07 George: The CG does not require W3C membership 14:09:21 ... the biggest difference between that and other groups 14:11:04 wendyreid: The WG meets monthly, we focus on maintaining EPUB 3.3, Audiobooks, and Publication Manifest 14:11:47 George: All of the chairs, Ivan, Ralph Swick from W3C, myself, are part of the Steering Committee 14:12:01 ... we meet to collaborate and guide the publishing work 14:12:06 ... is that a good summary? 14:12:09 q? 14:12:46 George: When we did this last round of negotiations between the IDPF board and W3C, we ended up with an agreement that W3C would continue paying the bills for IDPF in return for the license 14:13:20 ... we have been thinking on the IDPF board, in the spirit of the original intention of the merger 14:13:33 ... the IDPF board and the steering committee to explore combining the groups 14:13:40 ... in order to drive digital publishing world wide 14:13:53 ... one of the things we've seen, there's a lot around standards and specifications 14:14:00 ... not much around marketing, uptake, or promotion 14:14:06 ... that's always been a concern 14:14:11 ... what do you all think? 14:14:51 rickj: I'll state the obvious, we want this to continue on into the future, the current setup is untenable 14:15:08 ... the more coordination we can achieve between the bodies, the better and I'm in favour of it 14:15:16 George: Are we in agreement on this? 14:15:38 Bill_Kasdorf: I'll state another obvious thing, I'm not seeing as many IDPF board members as I was hoping on this call 14:15:48 George: I was surprised as well, I spoke with Paul 14:16:09 ... he sent his regrets, he is retiring and hasn't been tracking what has been going on 14:16:20 ... I was hoping for others to come 14:16:34 ... Cristina is also on the Steering Committee, I think today is just a conflict 14:16:53 ... one of the things we want to do is establish who might be the chairs of this activity 14:16:57 Topic: Structure 14:17:17 George: I think co-chairs is essential, having more than one person to share the load 14:17:38 Leslie: You wanted to explore combining the IDPF board and SteerCo 14:17:59 q+ 14:18:00 George: I am trying to bring more IDPF people into the Steering committee to bring life and excitement to it 14:18:06 ... there's need for more energy 14:18:16 Leslie: The SteerCo? 14:18:28 George: I think it should be a combination, the name doesn't matter 14:18:46 ... they don't need to be a member of W3C to participate in this, we have room in W3C process to bring people in 14:19:30 Bill_Kasdorf: Another concern was that it's quite important for W3C to be clearly showing ongoing support for EPUB 14:19:40 ... getting the IDPF board involved is part of that demonstration 14:19:53 ack AvneeshSingh 14:20:03 q+ 14:20:07 AvneeshSingh: IDPF had a broad responsibility of maintaining the EPUB ecosystem 14:20:19 ... specs, promotion, community, EPUBCheck 14:20:19 q- 14:20:29 ... this was the practice of IDPF 14:20:36 ... in W3C things focused on standards 14:20:47 ... the steerco consists of the technical experts that drive the standards work 14:20:59 ... the IDPF board has more experience driving the ecosystem 14:21:06 ... combining the two will help both efforts 14:21:13 +1 to Avneesh 14:21:19 ack rickj 14:21:38 rickj: It sounds to me from a logistical point of view we're proposing a few things 14:21:43 ... IDPF needs to maintain it's board 14:22:02 ... the current members of the IDPF board who are not W3C members will become invited experts to sit on the SteerCo 14:22:21 s/it's/its/ 14:22:28 ... for the longevity of this, and we may do the inverse, the SteerCo members who aren't members of the IDPF board become members of the board 14:22:34 ... from a logistical POV 14:22:41 q+ 14:22:42 George: I think that sounds right to me 14:23:12 ... we probably will have a vacancy on the board 14:23:16 Leslie: Not just any seat 14:23:26 George: He is chairman of the board 14:23:36 rickj: Whoever is chair of the SteerCo is chair of the Board 14:23:41 Leslie: who is that? 14:23:48 rickj: We'd need to figure it out 14:24:03 ... are we saying we're making this functionally one body, but two things 14:24:03 q+ 14:24:23 Bill_Kasdorf: Does anyone on this call remember enough of the bylaws of the IDPF, how does one become a board member 14:24:26 ack Bill_Kasdorf 14:24:41 rickj: We dicussed with counsel, and we can do what we want 14:24:50 George: We can vote to add/replace board members 14:24:54 ... it's a vote of the IDPF 14:24:56 q+ 14:25:10 Bill_Kasdorf: One clarification, is there a fixed number of board members in the bylaws? 14:25:20 George: I think there are 14 seats 14:25:23 rickj: 14 or 21 14:25:40 ack liisamk 14:25:53 q+ 14:25:56 liisamk: My question, for the folks on the call not on the IDPF board, would you want that? 14:26:09 ... it's a weird legal responsibility that no one is asking for 14:26:34 rickj: If we can set this up logistically, it might make the transition to W3C merger smoother 14:26:37 q+ 14:26:58 ack wendyreid 14:27:25 q- 14:27:42 q+ 14:27:43 q+ 14:28:13 wendyreid: As someone who would be in this position, what is involved? And who is the membership? 14:28:13 rickj: The membership is the board 14:28:27 George: We have to file paperwork and get D&O insurance 14:28:40 AvneeshSingh: My suggestion would not be to make it mandatory 14:28:51 ... anyone who becomes a chair would be added to the board 14:29:11 ... my suggestion would be keeping them together as a steering committee who moves the mission forward 14:29:12 q+ 14:29:27 ... keep steering committee less formal 14:29:29 ack AvneeshSingh 14:29:33 ack Bill_Kasdorf 14:30:23 Bill_Kasdorf: Just answering Wendy's concern, I'm hoping that what we're talking about is IDPF board members joining as individuals not representatives of their employers. 14:30:30 ack wolfgang 14:30:49 wolfgang: I think the same as Wendy and Bill, I'm open to joining the board, but I would want to know the implications 14:30:54 ... an informed decision 14:31:20 ... speaking for myself, it's a personal engagement and private commitment 14:31:42 George: I totally agree, it's individuals who are on the IDPF board, it's impossible for people to speak for their companies 14:31:55 ... think of the best interests of publishing in general 14:31:56 +1 to George 14:32:07 ... what's good for publishers, developers, distributors, etc 14:32:22 ... the focus on the complete ecosystem is super important 14:32:24 ack rickj 14:32:38 rickj: The example of Paul retiring, and us being in a situation of not having a chair of the board 14:33:05 Leslie has joined #pbgsc 14:33:11 ... we need a mechanism to keep people on the IDPF board to uphold the license with W3C, we need to have people who are active and interested 14:33:26 ... the board will cease to exist, and then the license is in trouble 14:33:30 q+ 14:33:34 ... we need to keep the industry alive 14:33:44 Bill_Kasdorf: We need to keep this alive long term 14:33:57 rickj: It's long-term untenable, but we also need a short-term solution 14:34:00 ack liisamk 14:34:08 liisamk: I think that's a great point Rick 14:34:25 ... to bring all of us together to figure out how to keep the energy going and the work going 14:34:46 rickj: My desire is, help W3C understand how critical the situation 14:35:03 q+ 14:36:43 q+ 14:36:59 wendyreid: What does Publishing need from W3C? 14:37:09 ack ivan 14:37:35 ivan: As it happens, Wendy has said what I wanted to say, if I tried to imagine the discussion happening in the AB or Board 14:37:47 ... the question is what is the publishing industry expecting W3C to do? 14:37:52 ... we are a technology organization 14:38:02 ... we've worked through EPUB and be proud of this work 14:38:11 ... the activity around the core of publishing is minimal 14:38:18 ... what does publishing need from W3C? 14:38:54 ... if the answer is nothing, maybe one day when there are fewer publishing people on the AB, publishing could be looked at as an activity not active enough to support 14:39:05 ... there's other examples of this happening, health, automotive 14:39:09 ... it goes two ways 14:39:22 ack liisamk 14:39:24 q+ 14:39:25 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pbgsc 14:39:35 present+ 14:39:39 liisamk: Ivan, I take that to heart, that's what many of us are worried about 14:39:49 ... we're at a place where EPUB is stable, but we're not quite done 14:40:03 ... constantly this possibility of someone forking what we do to do things different 14:40:16 ... we've had retailers come forward with features for reading systems 14:40:22 q+ 14:40:24 ... to enable them would require a change to EPUB to support 14:40:36 ... and gracefully degraded for RSs that didn't support 14:40:47 ... the PBG has danced a little bit with the membership thing 14:41:05 ... on one hand people don't get invites without being members, but we have brought in guests 14:41:12 ... the core membership for publishing has dropped off 14:41:18 ... it's expensive and hard to maintain 14:41:29 ... I wonder if it's possible to keep that dance going with the PBG 14:41:41 ... the business discussions to help feed the WG discussions 14:41:44 ack AvneeshSingh 14:42:00 AvneeshSingh: You are right that the core WG membership has been declining due to fees 14:42:10 ... the BG and CG have more of the industry members 14:42:32 ... reinforcing what Ivan said, when we joined in 2017, I had a different impression of what W3C would do for us 14:43:24 ... my understanding is that we have to figure out how to sustain the publishing industry through W3C 14:43:35 ... how W3C can be leveraged for our purpose 14:43:43 ... all the planning, execution will depend on us 14:44:26 ... it's up to us to determine how to sustain publishing, within W3C 14:44:28 ack ivan 14:44:44 ivan: Going back to what Liisa said, if there are things that needs to be done in EPUB 14:44:47 ... we can do that 14:45:10 ... for now, my understanding was, and the feedback we got at the end of the EPUB charter, the industry valued stability more than change for EPUB 14:45:25 ... that's why the WG voted to not allow new features in EPUB 14:45:29 ... just do basic maintenance 14:45:39 ... we can change this at any time with a rechartering 14:45:45 ... the problem is the membership 14:45:55 ... I cannot judge from the outside what the problems are 14:46:15 ... whether it's money, or the industry does not want to engage with the technical work 14:46:20 ... and leave it to others 14:46:39 q+ 14:46:49 ... it's a question of participating in the technical development 14:46:57 ... it's a complicated issue 14:47:00 q+ 14:47:00 ack Leslie 14:47:48 Leslie: Just to respond to Ivan, it's mathematics, we used to have 100 members paying a small amount to IDPF, and fewer people paying much more to W3C 14:47:59 ... if it was more affordable, we'd have more people 14:48:12 ... it's not that people don't want to engage in the technical conversations 14:48:19 q+ 14:48:31 ... clearly there's a gap that Liisa is highlighting 14:48:59 q? 14:48:59 ... there's potential for broader engagement at a lower price 14:49:05 ... maybe TFs or other means 14:49:55 ... something more approachable than W3C 14:50:28 George: We have 10 minutes left, I would like to see changes at Publishing@W3C 14:50:36 ... I would like to see more participation 14:50:42 ... more industries, K-12 14:50:57 ... more people on to the steering committee, that can drive that. 14:51:14 ... we can get more participation from education 14:51:33 ... we could get that if there was a more inviting way to participate 14:51:52 ... we still see so many people clueless about what to ask for in content 14:52:17 ... it's not about throwing standards out there and see what sticks 14:52:22 ... it needs to be promoted 14:52:28 ack Bill_Kasdorf 14:52:39 Bill_Kasdorf: Enthusiastically agree with George and Leslie 14:52:49 ... in my personal experience, I'm a member of lots of organizations 14:52:50 q+ 14:52:54 ... I'm often talking with technical people 14:53:12 ... the technical people are enthusiastic and invovled 14:53:24 ... and the accessibility people 14:53:34 s/invovled/involved/ 14:53:37 ... people may think EPUB is a done deal, but there's lots to do 14:53:47 ... all kinds of issues that people need to see addressed 14:54:01 ... its management that needs to be engaged with 14:54:20 ... the cost to join IDPF vs joining W3C 14:54:37 ... maybe in some cases it's a problem-focused pitch 14:54:41 W3C membership in the US is 1950-68K EUR depending on the size of your org 14:54:43 q? 14:55:01 ... FXL problem is a big problem for accessibiltiy 14:55:04 ack wendyreid 14:55:53 wendyreid: What are we doing coming out of this meeting? 14:56:01 liisamk: We should meet in 2 weeks 14:56:03 wendyreid: Yes 14:56:11 +1 Liisa 14:56:15 rickj: What Wendy said, we need to talk about "now what" 14:56:20 meeting in two weeks is fine with me 14:57:14 [discussion of when to meet next] 14:57:45 +1 14:58:06 Proposed: Merge the Steering Committee and IDPF Board 14:58:20 +1 14:58:23 Proposed: Merge the Steering Committee and IDPF Board, logistics to follow 14:58:38 +1 14:58:41 +1 14:59:59 +1 15:00:10 +1 15:00:10 +1 15:00:16 +1 15:00:18 +1 15:00:40 ACTION: wendyreid to send poll for future meeting dates to whole list 15:01:09 +1 15:01:40 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:01:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/19-pbgsc-minutes.html ivan 15:01:49 zakim, end meeting 15:01:49 As of this point the attendees have been Bill_Kasdorf, wendyreid, wolfgang, shiestyl_, ivan, liisamk, rickj, AvneeshSingh, shiestyle_ 15:01:49 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 15:01:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/04/19-pbgsc-minutes.html Zakim 15:01:55 I am happy to have been of service, wendyreid; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 15:01:55 Zakim has left #pbgsc 15:09:57 rrsagent, bye 15:09:57 I see 1 open action item saved in https://www.w3.org/2024/04/19-pbgsc-actions.rdf : 15:09:57 ACTION: wendyreid to send poll for future meeting dates to whole list [1] 15:09:57 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2024/04/19-pbgsc-irc#T15-00-40