11:06:48 RRSAgent has joined #wot-script 11:06:52 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/03/18-wot-script-irc 11:07:15 meeting: WoT Scripting API 11:07:36 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Jan_Romann, Tomoaki_Mizushima 11:08:19 scribenick: kaz 11:08:33 zkis has joined #wot-script 11:08:38 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#March_18%2C_2024 11:08:41 topic: Minutes 11:08:50 -> https://www.w3.org/2024/03/04-wot-script-minutes.html Mar-4 11:09:47 present+ Zoltan_Kis 11:10:44 JKRhb has joined #wot-script 11:11:20 jr: I had a problem with Firefox for HTML diff last week 11:11:22 kaz: fixed 11:11:28 rrsagent, make log public 11:11:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:11:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/18-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 11:11:46 minutes approved 11:11:59 topic: Logistics 11:12:33 ca: reminder that (1) Scripting API call is now bi-weekly and (2) US Daylight Saving has started 11:13:28 ... we can cancel the call on Apr-1 11:13:56 ... then April 8 also due to the AC meeting 11:15:05 kaz: btw, we should be clear about the "bi-weekly policy" as the basis :) 11:15:55 ... no call on Apr-1 or 8. right? 11:16:02 ca: right 11:16:53 resolution: Scripting API TF will not have the TF call Apr 1 or 8 11:17:05 topic: PRs 11:17:18 subtopic: PR 545 11:17:21 https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/545 11:17:36 q+ 11:17:42 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/545|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/545 PR 545 - feat: expand exploreDirectory algorithm 11:17:48 jr: no real update so far 11:18:02 ... just want to push one commit 11:18:10 ... started to define some kind of dictionary 11:18:32 ... minor change so far 11:18:39 ... should have some more discussion 11:19:12 ca: tx 11:19:28 ... think the direction is good, and would see the final resolution 11:19:41 ... let's have more discussion 11:19:52 ... any opinions from Zoltan? 11:19:57 zk: not really 11:20:10 ... still a bit vague 11:20:29 ... general thought is already described but need to think about how to implement it 11:20:42 ... should be aligned with the Discovery work 11:20:52 .. would ask the Discovery TF for review also 11:21:15 q+ 11:21:17 ack jk 11:21:31 ... after Jan makes clarification 11:21:56 ack k 11:22:10 kaz: this is related to the "inter-TF collaboration" discussion 11:22:32 ... you can mention your need about the review during the main call also 11:22:58 ca: any conclusion about the "inter-TF collaboration" discussion? 11:23:02 kaz: still ongoing 11:23:12 ... so you can mention your need during the main call 11:24:18 ... maybe we might want to think about the mechanism for the Wide Review for sepcs on GitHub 11:24:21 zk: right 11:24:35 kaz: but let's have discussion during the main call first 11:24:40 topic: Issues 11:24:55 ca: no new issues this week 11:25:16 ... but have many remaining issues 11:25:21 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues remaining issues 11:25:39 ca: need to think about how to have discussion with related TFs 11:25:56 q+ 11:26:14 ack k 11:26:28 kaz: this is also related to the "inter-TF collaboration" discussion 11:26:43 ... but some of the issues are already identified as "bug"s 11:26:53 ... so we can work on those issues first 11:26:57 ca: that's true 11:27:31 ... also maybe it might be a good timing to think about how to deal with use cases too 11:27:50 q+ 11:28:05 present- Zoltan_Kis 11:29:04 kaz: we should join the UC discussion for that purpose 11:29:18 ... they're working on the updated procedure and the improved template 11:29:40 ... but at some point, Mizushima-san can make some debriefing at the main call also 11:29:45 ack k 11:29:48 ca: good point 11:30:26 ... we might want to start with error handling 11:30:37 q+ 11:30:41 qq+ 11:31:00 kaz: there are several issues about error handling. right? 11:31:03 ca: yes 11:31:05 ack k 11:31:05 kaz, you wanted to react to kaz 11:31:29 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/200 Issue 200 - Error Handling 11:32:00 mizu: it's important to clarify what Scripting spec describes 11:32:20 ... use cases are useful to understand that too 11:32:36 ... so would suggest we (=Scripting TF guys) join the UC discussion also 11:33:20 ... note that not many people are really aware of the Scripting API discussion as a whole 11:34:03 ... clarifying concrete use cases would be helpful for people to understand what is expected for Scripting APIs 11:34:07 ca: agree 11:34:28 ... Jan, can you join the UC call? 11:34:41 jr: have some conflict at the moment 11:34:49 ca: would try to join the calls more 11:34:52 q+ 11:34:55 ack mi 11:36:08 ack k 11:36:35 kaz: yeah, Scripting API itself is clear enough but how to improve/update it is a bit vague 11:37:00 ... so providing concrete use cases about our expectation would be helpful for people (including myself) to understand the points 11:37:03 ca: right 11:37:20 ack k 11:37:24 q+ 11:37:48 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:37:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/18-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 11:38:06 ... regarding "error handling" 11:38:18 ... let's describe possible errors first 11:40:33 kaz: that can be a good starting point 11:41:07 ... but at some point, we need to think about the interface between the "WoT World" and the "External IoT World" as well 11:43:03 ... what would be the impact to TD and Scripting API caused by the errors from the outside of WoT 11:43:36 ... and also what would cause potential errors of the external world based on the errors of TD and Scripting API 11:43:40 ca: right 11:43:51 topic: Versioning 11:44:06 ca: we're still waiting for the conclusion from the main group 11:44:20 ... based on the work on TD and Discovery 11:44:42 chair: Cristiano 11:45:24 kaz: the discussion by TD TF and Discovery TF is still ongoing 11:45:47 ... but the TD TF should be able to bring their initial proposal back to the main group next week 11:46:01 present+Zoltan_Kis 11:47:42 jr: there was an issue around Discovery 11:47:55 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/535 Issue 535 - Dedicated methods for DNS-SD, CoRE Link-Format discovery, and other approaches? 11:48:40 ca: what about adding a label of "high-priority" to the issue? 11:48:52 jr: maybe "middle-priority"? 11:49:12 ca: let's discuss this issue next time anyway 11:50:21 q+ 11:50:32 i/there was/topic: AOB/ 11:52:18 ack k 11:52:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:52:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/18-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 11:52:44 [adjourned] 11:52:46 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:52:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/18-wot-script-minutes.html kaz 14:27:53 Zakim has left #wot-script