IRC log of rdf-star on 2024-03-08

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:02:17 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star
15:02:22 [RRSAgent]
logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/03/08-rdf-star-irc
15:02:22 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #rdf-star
15:02:35 [AndyS]
AndyS has joined #rdf-star
15:02:50 [ora]
ora has joined #rdf-star
15:02:53 [TallTed]
meeting: RDF-star Semantics TF
15:02:55 [TallTed]
previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html
15:02:57 [TallTed]
next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/03/14-rdf-star-minutes.html
15:03:01 [TallTed]
present+
15:03:13 [gkellogg]
present+
15:03:14 [ora]
present+
15:03:21 [AndyS]
present+
15:03:34 [enrico]
enrico has joined #rdf-star
15:03:56 [TallTed]
present+ tl, pchampin, enrico
15:04:03 [TallTed]
Zakim, who's here?
15:04:03 [Zakim]
Present: TallTed, gkellogg, ora, AndyS, tl, pchampin, enrico
15:04:06 [Zakim]
On IRC I see enrico, ora, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, pfps, TallTed, gkellogg, tl, niklasl, driib, Tpt, ktk, pchampin, csarven, gb, gtw, AnthonySpencer, VladimirAlexiev,
15:04:06 [Zakim]
... SintayewGashaw, Timothe, smoothsalt, joraboi445, rhiaro, agendabot
15:04:17 [TallTed]
present+ pfps
15:04:38 [enrico]
present+
15:05:17 [ora]
q?
15:05:19 [TallTed]
present+ souri
15:05:28 [Souri]
Souri has joined #rdf-star
15:05:30 [Souri]
present+
15:05:50 [tl]
present+
15:06:09 [pchampin]
present+
15:06:24 [pchampin]
can only stay until the end of the hour, though
15:06:46 [pchampin]
q+
15:10:35 [gkellogg]
q+
15:11:05 [ora]
ack pchampin
15:11:30 [ora]
q+
15:13:37 [ora]
ack gkellogg
15:14:22 [Souri]
q+
15:15:16 [TallTed]
"subject term", "predicate term", "object term", "triple term"?
15:16:01 [pchampin]
q+
15:16:24 [ora]
ack ora
15:16:54 [tl]
q+
15:19:08 [pchampin]
q-
15:21:08 [ora]
ack Souri
15:24:33 [pchampin]
q+
15:24:57 [AndyS]
q+
15:26:42 [gkellogg]
q+
15:27:04 [ora]
ack tl
15:27:55 [pchampin]
<#pa> a schema:Person .
15:27:55 [pchampin]
Depending on the context, I can call #pa an identifier/IRI, a node of the RDF graph, a person.
15:29:45 [enrico]
q+
15:29:57 [ora]
ack pchampin
15:30:09 [ora]
ack AndyS
15:31:01 [pchampin]
q+
15:31:12 [ora]
ack gkellogg
15:32:31 [Souri]
For example, for PG audience, I could choose to say: An atomic reification associates a name with a (set of) directed, labeled edge(s).
15:32:35 [ora]
ack enrico
15:35:12 [ora]
ack pchampin
15:37:23 [ora]
GOFR = "Good Old-Fashioned Reification" (pronounce like "gopher"?)
15:37:35 [enrico]
q+
15:38:10 [AndyS]
"gopher it"
15:38:12 [pchampin]
[] rdf:subjct [].
15:38:38 [gkellogg]
s/subjct/subject/
15:38:55 [AndyS]
q+
15:39:07 [ora]
ack enrico
15:39:13 [TallTed]
perhaps instead of talking about "triple term", we could talk about rdf:triple alongside rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, rdf:object. "triple occurrence" remains hard for me to get a grip on.
15:39:33 [Souri]
For example, for PG audience, I could choose to say: [refined a bit] Using atomic reification(s), a name may be associated with a (set of) directed, labeled edge(s).
15:40:57 [ora]
ack AndyS
15:46:48 [gkellogg]
q+
15:47:13 [pchampin]
q+
15:48:48 [AndyS]
https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF%E2%80%90star-semantics:-option-3
15:48:49 [enrico]
https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF%E2%80%90star-semantics%3A-option-3
15:49:50 [AndyS]
:e rdf:reifies <<(:s :p :o)>> .
15:50:58 [ora]
ack gkellogg
15:52:40 [AndyS]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2024Feb/0066.html
15:52:49 [ora]
ack pchampin
15:53:51 [Souri]
[Simplified message to PG audience] A single atomic (well-formed?) reification (using a single rdf:reifies triple) associates a (single) name to a (single) directed, labeled edge. One can always use multiple rdf:reifies triples to implement many-to-many associations.
15:54:06 [enrico]
q+
15:55:17 [Souri]
q+
15:56:06 [ora]
ack enrico
15:56:54 [ora]
ack Souri
15:57:04 [AndyS]
q+
15:58:02 [pchampin]
:richard :marriedTo :liz {| :e | |}.
15:58:07 [pchampin]
:)
15:59:13 [niklasl]
:e rdf:reifies <<( richard :marriedTo :liz )>>. # isn't this just a named edge (not even asserted)?
15:59:44 [pchampin]
niklasl, indeed
16:00:00 [niklasl]
(also +1 for the macro syntax for named and asserted)
16:00:21 [enrico]
q+
16:00:23 [niklasl]
(... with the caveat of the "sparql property path or" issue)
16:03:08 [tl]
q+
16:03:48 [ora]
ack AndyS
16:06:48 [enrico]
q-
16:08:03 [AndyS]
"upfront restricted syntax" is for defining semantics, and not a restriction on N-Triple, Turtle grammar.
16:10:12 [tl]
<< :e | :s :p :o >> a rdf:Resource .
16:11:32 [gkellogg]
() a rdf:Resource .
16:11:55 [niklasl]
s/rdf:Resource/rdfs:Resource/
16:12:15 [gkellogg]
s/rdf:Resource/rdfs:Resource/g
16:13:21 [AndyS]
q?
16:13:48 [tl]
tl-
16:13:50 [AndyS]
ack tl
16:14:36 [TallTed]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:14:37 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/08-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
16:15:26 [TallTed]
Zakim, bye
16:15:26 [Zakim]
leaving. As of this point the attendees have been TallTed, gkellogg, ora, AndyS, tl, pchampin, enrico, pfps, souri
16:15:26 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #rdf-star
16:15:34 [TallTed]
RRSAgent, make logs public
16:15:46 [TallTed]
RRSAgent, bye
16:15:46 [RRSAgent]
I see no action items