15:02:12 RRSAgent has joined #pbgsc 15:02:16 logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/03/08-pbgsc-irc 15:02:16 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:02:17 Meeting: Publishing Steering Committee 15:02:27 date: 2024-03-08 15:02:54 liisamk has joined #pbgsc 15:03:05 present+ 15:03:23 present+ 15:03:34 George has joined #pbgsc 15:05:17 George has joined #pbgsc 15:05:17 present+ 15:05:31 chair: tzviya 15:05:35 scribe+ 15:05:55 George: We have the IDPF board, which as 14 people on it 15:06:18 ... when the merger was envisioned, we were thinking that all the publishing activities would move to W3C and IDPF would dissolve 15:06:42 present+ 15:06:44 ... leadership of the publishing industry would be in the hands of W3C 15:06:55 ... because of the lawsuits, that hasn't gone to plan 15:07:35 ... we've won the lawsuits, they didn't need to rule on the copyright one, as W3C has a valid license 15:08:05 ... in the fall the IDPF negotiated an agreement where W3C would cover the D&O insurance and accounting for IDPF 15:08:20 ... as long as those funds are continued, the license continues 15:08:29 ... there are now some questions about how long would this be in effect 15:08:48 ... when we started this, we thought it would be quite a while 15:09:01 q+ 15:09:04 ... now, some folks think it should shorter 15:09:12 ... we're in disagreement, but it's being discussed 15:09:22 ... we have 14 board members who are currently not doing much 15:09:27 ... we need to stay in existence 15:09:41 ... but the discussion has been that there should be more integration with the W3C steering committee 15:10:24 ... some of the members of the IDPF board voiced the desire to join the publishing steering committee 15:10:24 ack Bill_Kasdorf 15:10:24 Bill_Kasdorf: That was a brilliant summary 15:10:46 ... the only thing I would add is an important issue we identified 15:11:02 ... it's important that it's demonstrable that W3C is actively supporting EPUB as a standard 15:11:24 present+ Graham 15:12:12 present+ wolfgang 15:12:24 present+ 15:12:45 q? 15:12:56 present+ 15:13:45 zakim, who is here? 15:13:45 Present: liisamk, wendyreid, George, AvneeshSingh, Graham, wolfgang, tzviya, Bill_Kasdorf 15:13:48 On IRC I see George, liisamk, RRSAgent, Zakim, wendyreid, Bill_Kasdorf, AvneeshSingh, wolfgang, tzviya, Ralph, ivan 15:15:25 q+ 15:15:30 ack wendyreid 15:15:32 ack wendyreid 15:16:11 wendyreid: What does it look like to be demonstrably supporting EPUB? 15:16:16 present+ 15:16:21 George: We need to work on it, promote it more 15:16:28 q+ 15:16:34 ... for EPUB to continue, we need to have maintenance of EPUBCheck 15:16:40 ... we've done fundraising in the past 15:16:52 ... maintenance is looking like $10k a yea 15:16:54 q+ 15:16:58 ... W3C needs to maintain EPUBCheck 15:17:14 ... maintenance of the costs of IDPF insurance and such 15:17:30 ... about $30k a year in total costs 15:17:39 ... supporting new features, new work 15:17:49 ... that's why we want the board joining the steerco 15:18:16 ack AvneeshSingh 15:18:28 AvneeshSingh: Looking at it broadly, EPUBCheck is a detail 15:18:41 ... broader goal is to support the EPUB and publishing ecosystems 15:18:47 ... IDPF had a complete ecosystem 15:18:59 ... when we came to W3C the standard became a priority 15:19:08 ... IDPF supported the ecosystem at large 15:19:21 ... we should encourage the IDPF board to join the steering committee 15:19:30 ... leadership for the ecosystem 15:19:31 q+ to talk about concrete proposals 15:19:37 ... marketing, promoting the standard 15:19:45 ... improvements to the tools, reading systems 15:20:00 ack Bill_Kasdorf 15:20:00 ... we need to go beyond technical leadership 15:20:10 Bill_Kasdorf: Avneesh covered what I wanted to say 15:20:19 ... it's not just a matter of maintaining EPUB and moving the technology forward 15:20:21 q+ 15:20:36 ... it's a good group and it's a group that is underrepresented in W3C 15:20:52 ... advocate for new work in W3C that is not just related to EPUB 15:21:00 ... adds more meat to the role of the steering committee 15:21:05 ... something we need to do more 15:21:12 ack me 15:21:12 tzviya, you wanted to talk about concrete proposals 15:21:30 tzviya: We've been talking about this issue for years, we should not think about this in terms of membership 15:21:38 ... membership is a separate conversation 15:21:47 ... what are the actions for the steering committee 15:21:51 ... what do we hope to happen? 15:22:10 ... IDPF does not really function, the steering committee needs to think of things to do 15:22:14 ack wendyreid 15:22:23 ... breathe life in to the steerco, run a conference, etc 15:22:49 s/the steerco/CG 15:23:25 q+ 15:25:51 ack av 15:26:00 regrets+ cristina 15:26:11 AvneeshSingh: This is the main problem that I see, we are looking at the publishing ecosystem from the lens of standards world 15:26:18 ... WG/CG is the structure we need to fit in 15:26:27 ... our vision should not be confined with the structure 15:26:33 ... the vision should be broader 15:26:43 ... if we find that there are standards we want to develop 15:26:52 ... we can form new WGs 15:27:01 ... we need to incubate tools, reading systems 15:27:10 ... the best practices from those might become standards 15:27:22 ... we don't need to worry about what the WG is doing right now 15:27:38 ... if steerco has a different culture, that's ok 15:27:46 ... publishing can be different 15:27:48 q+ 15:28:04 ... WG and CG should be seen as the wheels, but we need to move beyond it 15:28:15 ... starting point to bring everyone together F2F 15:28:28 ... let's go to where the publishing industry already is? 15:28:38 ... get people face to face, the key priorities of the industry 15:28:43 ack wendyreid 15:29:53 wendyreid: I agree on some parts, but I think we need to be incredibly realistic about where we are today. I would love to incubate tools and RS. There have been many layoffs, and the whole industry is retreating from no direct ROI kind of work. 15:30:13 +1 to wendyreid 15:30:32 ...I am fully in favor of an F2F, but there is a lot working against us 15:30:38 q+ 15:31:15 ack George 15:31:21 q+ 15:31:45 George: I agree that there is challenges with resources, trying to bring things into the CG to find people to take on the work 15:32:11 ... I think by opening up the steering committee to IDPF members and in general trying to get more participation from the community 15:32:28 ... having the requirement of being a W3C member, it's still that W3C mindset 15:32:39 ... we need to broaden our appeal to people in order to get more participation 15:32:50 ... one way to do it is bring fresh ideas into the steerco 15:32:56 ... and more energy 15:33:26 Leslie: Coming at it from a publisher POV, ebook sales are down, audio is growing 15:33:39 ... trade publishers thinking about ebooks, maybe thinking about accessibility and the deadlines 15:33:48 ... you need to rework files, frontlist, backlist, etc 15:33:57 ... that's publishers and their thoughts 15:34:01 ... maybe thinking about AI 15:34:10 ... the content may or may not be scraped by AI 15:34:23 ... beyond that, they're not thinking about them 15:34:29 ... it's a declining business 15:34:39 ... if you're trying to energize, it's in those areas 15:34:53 ack liisamk 15:35:12 liisamk: I agree with Leslie, where a lot of publishers are is an aging backlist of files, needs work 15:35:25 ... the big project in front of anybody is getting it done, all or some 15:35:31 ... is there a process for remediating 15:35:36 ... quickly if complaints arise 15:35:46 ... what this means for AI, in the counterfeit world 15:35:52 ... how are you going to slow that down 15:35:57 q+ 15:36:02 ... those topics are what we hear from for the business 15:36:09 ... we can't just keep talking about them 15:36:09 q+ to ask how that translates to standards or a conf 15:36:35 ... Daihei raised to me that in Japan, they don't just need TTS, they might need to do semantics and structure 15:36:50 ... they're considering shutting Europe out of their sites to avoid fines 15:36:56 ... we can take a leadership role 15:37:07 ... you should do this for your own populations and the good of the world 15:38:04 Bill_Kasdorf: The point I wanted to make, I agree with most of the discussion, when I was talking about board members joininig 15:38:10 ... it wasn't just about EPUB and our standards 15:38:21 ... this conversation is book-centric, lots of publishing is not books 15:39:03 ... another frustration for me is that there are W3C standards and discussions beyond publishing that are useful 15:39:10 ... publishers aren't aware or ignore 15:39:23 q? 15:39:30 ... Web Annotations, Provenance, Verifiable Credentials 15:39:44 ... VCs are essential to the solution 15:39:56 ... we don't have responsibility, but we could be pushing them 15:40:06 ack AvneeshSingh 15:40:29 AvneeshSingh: Thanks Liisa and Leslie for good examples, W3C is a standards organization, but our work is not just standards 15:40:39 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pbgsc 15:40:46 present+ 15:41:03 ... DAISY has achieved so much promotion and adoption of EPUB in the world 15:41:09 ... W3C hasn't paid much attention 15:41:17 +1 to AvneeshSingh 15:41:33 ... brand image of W3C is standards, and when the standards folk talk to the outside world, they speak from a standards perspective 15:41:39 ... it's a communication and branding issue 15:41:51 ... we need to address this to evolve the steerco 15:41:55 ack me 15:41:55 tzviya, you wanted to ask how that translates to standards or a conf 15:42:10 tzviya: It's really important, DAISY has done so much work 15:42:18 ... there's so many W3C standards that apply to us 15:42:25 q+ 15:42:36 ... Web Annotations, browsers don't support, but there's implementations 15:42:43 ... Prov, VC, it's a bit controversial 15:42:51 ... I can't just go out and build a tool 15:43:01 ... we need to build tools if we want to tell people to use them 15:43:14 The new CP/LD spec from NISO uses publication manifest, annotations, prov, and verifiable credentials. 15:43:16 ... what I've heard over the years, EPUB is a brand, IDPF/EPUB were inseparable 15:43:29 ... people are working with EPUB and there's forking happening 15:43:39 ... we need to reclaim EPUB 15:43:48 ... ensure the work happening in the rest of the world is good work 15:44:14 ... in terms of marketability, and that we can speak to people, it's not about interop of EPUB, it's reading systems 15:44:33 ... the accessibility, the solution is not to shut off Europe, it's to discuss how we solve the problems 15:44:46 q? 15:44:47 ... maybe we include this in the DPUB Summit, or other events 15:44:51 ack ivan 15:45:04 ivan: Coming back to what Bill listed, and what Wendy referred to 15:45:09 ... the problem from where I stand 15:45:30 ... publishers don't pick up the a11y standards, the technical people are not at the publishers, at least how I see it 15:45:41 ... they expect the technical world to come up with the solutions they'll use 15:46:18 ... for the EPUB working group, our biggest problem is that we do technical work, we did not have publishers represented 15:46:32 ... it's not bad will, but there's a gap with the technical people 15:46:44 q+ 15:46:50 ... we need to talk about how we document and implement standards in a publishing context 15:46:59 ... I don't know where it is or how to reach them 15:47:06 ack Bill_Kasdorf 15:47:35 Bill_Kasdorf: To reinforce Ivan's point, you're right, with the exception of publishers like Elsevier or Springer with technical expertise 15:47:51 ... the technical work in trade is happening in pre-print and conversion houses 15:48:05 ... on the journals side, it's the journal hosts 15:48:12 ... they do the conversiosn 15:48:35 ... publishers rely on hosts, book production services 15:49:18 George: Joint meeting between the IDPF board and steerco? 15:49:25 tzviya: Everyone is invited to this meeting 15:49:30 q+ 15:50:23 ack AvneeshSingh 15:50:39 AvneeshSingh: Not proposing a chair, next important step is engaging the IDPF board 15:50:53 ... we need them to help us determine the future for the ecosystem 15:51:07 tzviya: It might be me sending agendas late, I can't continue this 15:51:19 AvneeshSingh: We can't rely on the efforts of one person, it's too risky 15:51:34 Bill_Kasdorf: Every IDPF board member, of those present, we do have quite a few 15:51:49 tzviya: It's good to have those that aren't active in W3C 15:52:06 George: When is the next meeting? 15:52:10 tzviya: April 12 15:52:45 George: We want to get April 12 into people's calendars, maybe have Ralph join as well 15:52:56 ... IDPF folks, look at identifying co-chairs 15:53:01 ... develop areas of work 15:53:22 ... BG, CG, WG is an ok structure, I don't know if something else is needed 15:53:29 ... need to get everyone together 15:53:34 q+ 15:54:22 Leslie has joined #pbgsc 15:54:24 tzviya: That meeting is happening the same week of the AC meeting 15:54:29 George: April 5? 15:54:53 tzviya: We can do that, but there is PMWG meeting 15:54:57 ivan: And people might be travelling 15:55:03 ... might be safer to aim for the 19th 15:55:30 q+ 15:55:37 AvneeshSingh: Next steerco, its more than a month away 15:55:58 ... putting so much stress on the meeting, we need to socialize the ideas to the members before the call 15:56:07 ack av 15:56:19 ... George can you take the initiative? 15:56:20 ack liisamk 15:56:41 liisamk: I'm not sure we're ready to meet with Seth and Ralph, we need to know what we want 15:56:59 ... we need to figure out what we're doing and what we want 15:57:05 ... I will co-chair if someone else will help 15:57:10 ... happy to send out agendas 15:57:13 ... can't always do it 15:57:39 tzviya: Maybe we can ask Rick as well? 15:57:49 Bill_Kasdorf: Paul Belfanti? 15:57:59 tzviya: April 19th for now 15:58:07 ... whoever owns it in the W3C calendar 15:58:20 ivan: I will look 15:58:32 George: I can send out an invite to the board 15:58:56 zakim, end meeting 15:58:56 As of this point the attendees have been liisamk, wendyreid, George, AvneeshSingh, Graham, wolfgang, tzviya, Bill_Kasdorf, ivan 15:58:58 RRSAgent, please draft minutes v2 15:58:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/08-pbgsc-minutes.html Zakim 15:59:07 I am happy to have been of service, wendyreid; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 15:59:07 Zakim has left #pbgsc 15:59:55 rrsagent, bye 15:59:55 I see no action items