IRC log of rdf-star on 2024-03-07
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:54:20 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star
- 16:54:24 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-irc
- 16:54:26 [ktk]
- meeting: RDF-Star WG biweekly meeting
- 16:54:46 [ktk]
- Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240307T120000/
- 16:54:47 [agendabot]
- clear agenda
- 16:54:47 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: [1]
- 16:54:47 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Proposal for next week's discussion [2]
- 16:54:47 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Charter Extension / Rechartering
- 16:54:47 [agendabot]
- agenda+ W3C Breakout Day [3]
- 16:54:50 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Review of open actions, available at [4]
- 16:54:52 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Review of pull requests, available at [5]
- 16:54:55 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Issue Triage, available at [6]
- 16:54:57 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting
- 16:55:03 [ktk]
- Agenda?
- 16:55:07 [pfps]
- present+
- 16:55:32 [pfps]
- scribe+
- 16:57:07 [ktk]
- present+
- 16:57:14 [ktk]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 16:57:16 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html ktk
- 16:57:20 [ktk]
- RRSAgent, make log public
- 16:57:55 [eBremer]
- eBremer has joined #rdf-star
- 16:58:03 [ktk]
- Regrets: doerthe, olaf
- 16:58:06 [tl]
- tl has joined #rdf-star
- 16:58:47 [fsasaki]
- fsasaki has joined #rdf-star
- 16:59:02 [TallTed]
- TallTed has joined #rdf-star
- 16:59:36 [Dominik_T]
- Dominik_T has joined #rdf-star
- 16:59:40 [ktk]
- FYI bot is already there, you can present
- 16:59:50 [ora]
- ora has joined #rdf-star
- 17:00:19 [gtw]
- present+
- 17:00:24 [enrico]
- enrico has joined #rdf-star
- 17:00:41 [pchampin]
- present
- 17:00:42 [enrico]
- present+
- 17:00:44 [Dominik_T]
- present+
- 17:01:03 [eBremer]
- present+
- 17:01:08 [pfps]
- zakim, who is here
- 17:01:08 [Zakim]
- pfps, you need to end that query with '?'
- 17:01:11 [pfps]
- zakim, who is here?
- 17:01:11 [Zakim]
- Present: pfps, ktk, gtw, enrico, Dominik_T, eBremer
- 17:01:13 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see enrico, ora, Dominik_T, TallTed, fsasaki, tl, eBremer, RRSAgent, Zakim, pfps, gkellogg, AndyS, Tpt, ktk, pchampin, driib, csarven, gb, gtw, AnthonySpencer,
- 17:01:13 [Zakim]
- ... VladimirAlexiev, SintayewGashaw, Timothe, smoothsalt, joraboi445, rhiaro, agendabot
- 17:01:18 [pchampin]
- pchampin has changed the topic to: RDF-star WG — Short Biweekly meeting — https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240307T120000/
- 17:01:23 [pchampin]
- pchampin has changed the topic to: RDF-star WG — Short biweekly meeting — https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240307T120000/
- 17:01:24 [ora]
- present+
- 17:01:30 [ora]
- chair: ora
- 17:01:35 [pchampin]
- present+
- 17:01:37 [Tpt]
- present+
- 17:02:01 [niklasl]
- niklasl has joined #rdf-star
- 17:02:03 [gkellogg]
- present+
- 17:02:07 [niklasl]
- present+
- 17:02:20 [TallTed]
- TallTed has changed the topic to: RDF-star WG — 2024-03-07 agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0a6aa6e3-635c-42c2-baba-938c76b6ef01/20240307T120000/
- 17:02:22 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 17:02:23 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
- 17:02:29 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 17:02:30 [TallTed]
- present+
- 17:02:30 [TallTed]
- Zakim, agenda?
- 17:02:30 [Zakim]
- I see 8 items remaining on the agenda:
- 17:02:30 [Zakim]
- 1. Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: [from 1 via agendabot]
- 17:02:30 [Zakim]
- 2. Proposal for next week's discussion [from 2 via agendabot]
- 17:02:30 [Zakim]
- 3. Charter Extension / Rechartering [from agendabot]
- 17:02:30 [Zakim]
- 4. W3C Breakout Day [from 3 via agendabot]
- 17:02:31 [Zakim]
- 5. Review of open actions, available at [from 4 via agendabot]
- 17:02:31 [Zakim]
- 6. Review of pull requests, available at [from 5 via agendabot]
- 17:02:31 [Zakim]
- 7. Issue Triage, available at [from 6 via agendabot]
- 17:02:32 [Zakim]
- 8. Any Other Business (AOB), time permitting [from agendabot]
- 17:02:52 [tl]
- present+
- 17:03:10 [AndyS]
- present+
- 17:03:12 [pfps]
- zakim, next agendum
- 17:03:12 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Approval of minutes from the last two meetings: -- taken up [from 1]
- 17:03:20 [pfps]
- https://www.w3.org/2024/02/22-rdf-star-minutes.html
- 17:03:27 [Souri]
- Souri has joined #rdf-star
- 17:03:39 [pfps]
- https://www.w3.org/2024/02/29-rdf-star-minutes.html
- 17:03:46 [pfps]
- ora: any comments or concerns about the minutes?
- 17:04:01 [draggett]
- draggett has joined #rdf-star
- 17:04:07 [gtw]
- "(MEETING TITLE)"?
- 17:04:08 [ktk]
- PROPOSAL: Approve minutes 2024-02-22
- 17:04:15 [Souri]
- present+
- 17:04:15 [gkellogg]
- +1
- 17:04:15 [niklasl]
- +1
- 17:04:17 [eBremer]
- +1
- 17:04:20 [TallTed]
- previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/03/01-rdf-star-minutes.html
- 17:04:22 [tl]
- +1
- 17:04:22 [TallTed]
- next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2024/03/08-rdf-star-minutes.html
- 17:04:24 [Souri]
- +1
- 17:04:30 [enrico]
- +1
- 17:04:33 [Dominik_T]
- +0 (absent)
- 17:04:35 [ktk]
- +1
- 17:04:36 [gtw]
- +1
- 17:04:36 [ora]
- +1
- 17:04:38 [TallTed]
- +1
- 17:04:42 [pfps]
- zakim, who is here?
- 17:04:42 [Zakim]
- Present: pfps, ktk, gtw, enrico, Dominik_T, eBremer, ora, pchampin, Tpt, gkellogg, niklasl, TallTed, tl, AndyS, Souri
- 17:04:44 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see draggett, Souri, niklasl, enrico, ora, Dominik_T, TallTed, fsasaki, tl, eBremer, RRSAgent, Zakim, pfps, gkellogg, AndyS, Tpt, ktk, pchampin, driib, csarven, gb, gtw,
- 17:04:44 [Zakim]
- ... AnthonySpencer, VladimirAlexiev, SintayewGashaw, Timothe, smoothsalt, joraboi445, rhiaro, agendabot
- 17:04:54 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 17:04:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
- 17:05:10 [ktk]
- RESOLUTION: Approve minutes 2024-02-22
- 17:05:29 [ktk]
- PROPOSAL: Approve minutes 2024-02-29
- 17:05:33 [gkellogg]
- +1
- 17:05:34 [ora]
- +1
- 17:05:36 [Dominik_T]
- +1
- 17:05:36 [Tpt]
- +1
- 17:05:37 [gtw]
- +1
- 17:05:37 [ktk]
- +1
- 17:05:38 [pchampin]
- +1
- 17:05:40 [enrico]
- +1
- 17:05:40 [tl]
- +1
- 17:05:42 [niklasl]
- +1
- 17:05:46 [pfps]
- ktk: Pierre-Antoinne please fix title on minutes of 22nd
- 17:05:59 [ktk]
- RESOLUTION: Approve minutes 2024-02-29
- 17:05:59 [TallTed]
- s/FYI bot is already there, you can present//
- 17:06:19 [pfps]
- zakim, next agendum
- 17:06:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Proposal for next week's discussion -- taken up [from 2]
- 17:06:31 [pfps]
- ora: any ideas for next week?
- 17:07:03 [enrico]
- q+
- 17:07:09 [ora]
- ack enrico
- 17:07:25 [pfps]
- enrico: have names been agreed on, for now
- 17:07:30 [pfps]
- ora: yes
- 17:07:48 [niklasl]
- Specifically `rdf:reifies`
- 17:07:49 [pchampin]
- q+
- 17:07:54 [TallTed]
- i/chair: ora/scribe: pfps
- 17:07:58 [TallTed]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 17:07:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html TallTed
- 17:08:06 [pfps]
- gregg: there were some concerns about terminology related to reification
- 17:08:28 [pfps]
- andys: we need to have the documents updated to see how things flow
- 17:08:44 [ora]
- ack pchampin
- 17:08:45 [pfps]
- gregg: the Turtle document needs updating
- 17:09:36 [pfps]
- pchampin: my understanding is that we will go ahead with some reification-related vocabulary
- 17:09:52 [AndyS]
- q+
- 17:09:54 [pfps]
- pchampin: it might be possible to not have much in concepts
- 17:10:05 [pfps]
- ora: let's proceed with current terminology
- 17:10:06 [ora]
- ack AndyS
- 17:10:37 [pfps]
- andys: concepts doesn't have much on vocabulary so it is understandable that lists are not ther
- 17:10:54 [enrico]
- q+
- 17:11:04 [pfps]
- andys: the stuff related to embedded triples is different
- 17:11:10 [ora]
- ack enrico
- 17:11:24 [pchampin]
- regrets+ draggett
- 17:11:42 [pfps]
- enrico: how about well-formedness?
- 17:11:50 [pfps]
- ora: sound reasonable
- 17:12:11 [pfps]
- ora: for next week - fallout from breakout day and well-formedness
- 17:13:08 [pchampin]
- q+
- 17:13:09 [gkellogg]
- q+
- 17:13:15 [pchampin]
- q-
- 17:13:15 [pfps]
- Zakim, next agendum
- 17:13:16 [ora]
- ack pchampin
- 17:13:16 [Zakim]
- I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, pfps
- 17:13:18 [gkellogg]
- q=
- 17:13:20 [gkellogg]
- q-
- 17:13:25 [AZ]
- AZ has joined #rdf-star
- 17:13:29 [AZ]
- present+
- 17:13:35 [pfps]
- Zakim, next agendum
- 17:13:35 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- Charter Extension / Rechartering -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 17:13:42 [pfps]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2024Mar/0002.html
- 17:14:01 [pfps]
- s/https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2024Mar/0002.html//
- 17:14:20 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/pulls
- 17:14:30 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/pull/57
- 17:14:30 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/pull/57 -> Pull Request 57 Charter extension 2024-03 (by pchampin)
- 17:15:01 [pfps]
- pchampin: I have made a PR to modify the charter, so far just to push the dates
- 17:16:04 [pfps]
- pchampin: charter extensions are only for six months so a one year extension is a rechartering that needs a vote
- 17:16:38 [pfps]
- pchampin: the recharter could include a one-year extension plus one year for maintenance
- 17:17:26 [pfps]
- ora: asking for a six-month extension seems to be a simpler thing
- 17:17:41 [pfps]
- pchampin: that would be optimistic but the WG could so decide
- 17:17:46 [pfps]
- ora: any thoughts
- 17:18:01 [tl]
- so we can have multiple six-months extensions?
- 17:18:30 [pfps]
- andys: I don't know how much effort is required for rechartering. Is there a risk that the charter might be significantly modified?
- 17:19:23 [pfps]
- pchampin: We would decide what to put in the new charter. There is a risk that members could request changes.
- 17:19:52 [pfps]
- ora: is there is a risk that the rechartering would be denied?
- 17:20:22 [pfps]
- andys: my worry is more about concerns that require changes, not about denial
- 17:20:47 [pfps]
- gregg: can we ask for an extension and mention that we might need another?
- 17:21:02 [pfps]
- andys: what is the history here?
- 17:21:13 [TallTed]
- q+
- 17:21:28 [ora]
- ack TallTed
- 17:21:57 [pfps]
- tallted: extensions are less acceptable than they used to be
- 17:22:23 [pfps]
- tallted: we should take the advice we have been given, i.e., recharter
- 17:22:55 [pchampin]
- q+
- 17:23:02 [ora]
- ack pchampin
- 17:24:13 [pfps]
- pchampin: members have been more stringent, and the team has responded to this
- 17:24:44 [pfps]
- tallted: the AC can always override team decisions so it might be better to go directly to them
- 17:26:02 [pfps]
- gregg: there is no guarantee here but we are now making progress
- 17:26:27 [pfps]
- gregg: my recollection was that the plan was to go into maintenance mode
- 17:26:40 [pchampin]
- q+
- 17:26:48 [pfps]
- tallted: living standard might be better than maintenance mode
- 17:26:49 [ora]
- ack pchampin
- 17:27:11 [pfps]
- tallted: living standard allows new features
- 17:27:32 [ktk]
- +q
- 17:27:50 [ora]
- ack ktk
- 17:27:55 [pfps]
- pchampin: my view is that maintenance mode involves updates to a living standard
- 17:29:01 [pfps]
- ktk: a rechartering allows us to adjust scope of the working group to better correspond to what is needed
- 17:29:22 [ktk]
- https://www.w3.org/2022/08/rdf-star-wg-charter/
- 17:29:37 [pfps]
- tallted: some aspects of the work that has already been done could also be documented
- 17:29:52 [pfps]
- pchampin: the charter does mention all the documents
- 17:30:01 [gkellogg]
- q+
- 17:30:06 [pfps]
- pchampin: I would be careful about changing scope
- 17:30:20 [ora]
- ack gkellogg
- 17:30:54 [pfps]
- gregg: there was a WG discussion of the name early on
- 17:30:57 [pfps]
- q+
- 17:31:06 [ora]
- ack pfps
- 17:31:34 [ora]
- STRAWPOLL: re-chartering rather than charter extension?
- 17:31:35 [pfps]
- pfps: the old WG names did not correspond well with the names of the output documents
- 17:31:45 [pchampin]
- +1
- 17:31:48 [pfps]
- ora: let's do a straw poll
- 17:31:54 [gkellogg]
- +1
- 17:31:56 [pfps]
- 0
- 17:32:00 [Tpt]
- 0
- 17:32:01 [AndyS]
- +0 : either - defer to experts
- 17:32:02 [ora]
- 0
- 17:32:02 [AZ]
- +0
- 17:32:03 [enrico]
- 0
- 17:32:04 [niklasl]
- +0
- 17:32:06 [TallTed]
- +1 recharter, +0.5 extension
- 17:32:06 [Souri]
- 0
- 17:32:07 [ktk]
- +0
- 17:32:08 [tl]
- +0
- 17:32:17 [eBremer]
- +1
- 17:32:21 [Dominik_T]
- +0
- 17:32:21 [gtw]
- +0
- 17:33:10 [pfps]
- ora: the chairs will discuss this issue
- 17:33:21 [pfps]
- ktk: ... and come up with a proposal
- 17:33:23 [fsasaki]
- present+
- 17:33:32 [pfps]
- Zakim, next agendum
- 17:33:32 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- W3C Breakout Day -- taken up [from 3]
- 17:34:07 [pfps]
- https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2024Mar/0002.html
- 17:34:13 [niklasl]
- q+
- 17:34:18 [AndyS]
- RDF-star , RDF1.2 -- https://github.com/w3c/breakouts-day-2024/issues/21
- 17:34:18 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/breakouts-day-2024/issues/21 -> Issue 21 RDF-Star and RDF 1.2 (by rdfguy) [session]
- 17:34:22 [ora]
- ack niklasl
- 17:34:32 [pfps]
- ora: who wants to make a presentation?
- 17:34:46 [pfps]
- niklasl: I can put together some slide
- 17:35:11 [pfps]
- ora: I'll put together some slides and niklasl and I can collaborate
- 17:35:49 [pchampin]
- https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/rdf-star/calendar/ gives the correct time in your own timezone
- 17:36:07 [ktk]
- q+
- 17:36:08 [pfps]
- ora: the US is switching to summer time this weeken and this changes meeting times for those who aren't switching (yet)
- 17:36:13 [ora]
- ack ktk
- 17:37:05 [Souri]
- +1 I'll be there (9am-10am ET, right?)
- 17:37:07 [pchampin]
- I'll do my best, but I'll be in a train
- 17:37:12 [pfps]
- ora: who will be there?
- 17:37:39 [pchampin]
- Breakout session: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/0fc23324-8bf1-47b8-b0cf-1f0f31befb09/
- 17:39:54 [pfps]
- zakim, next agendum
- 17:39:54 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 -- Review of open actions, available at -- taken up [from 4]
- 17:40:44 [TallTed]
- Looks like a glitch in the W3 calendar. Some sub-events show both CUT and "reader's local time". Our sub-event only shows CUT. https://www.w3.org/calendar/breakouts-day-2024/breakout-sessions/
- 17:41:13 [gkellogg]
- q+
- 17:41:17 [pchampin]
- q+
- 17:41:30 [pfps]
- https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/3
- 17:41:30 [pfps]
- ora: we can talk about action items to fix up the vocabulary
- 17:41:44 [ora]
- ack gkellogg
- 17:41:51 [pchampin]
- q-
- 17:42:06 [pfps]
- gregg: I've been proceeding and have some PRs lined up for this. There are others as well.
- 17:42:48 [pfps]
- gregg: Perhaps we need something for vocabulary extensions.
- 17:43:11 [pfps]
- gregg: Olaf has a PR for concepts.
- 17:43:21 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/78
- 17:43:21 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/78 -> Pull Request 78 Proposal to adapt the abstract syntax to option 3 (by hartig) [spec:substantive]
- 17:44:01 [pfps]
- ora: looks good for now
- 17:44:12 [pfps]
- gregg: SPARQL documents need to be updated
- 17:45:04 [pfps]
- pfps: it looks like Semantics and Schema are the ones that need to be addressed
- 17:45:23 [pfps]
- ora: there should be something in the What's New note.
- 17:45:44 [Souri]
- q+
- 17:45:50 [ora]
- ack Souri
- 17:45:52 [pfps]
- gregg: something in RDF/XML seems indicated
- 17:46:24 [pfps]
- souri: we may need distinction between old-style and new-style
- 17:46:43 [Souri]
- atomic, new-style, well-formed, ...
- 17:46:53 [pfps]
- ora: anything else
- 17:46:56 [niklasl]
- +1 to e.g. atomic reification.
- 17:47:01 [pfps]
- Zakim, next agendum
- 17:47:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 -- Review of pull requests, available at -- taken up [from 5]
- 17:47:07 [pchampin]
- q+
- 17:47:22 [ora]
- ack pchampin
- 17:47:23 [ora]
- https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/20/views/4
- 17:47:57 [pfps]
- pchampin: I looked at the PRs and I suggest how we represent triple terms in concrete syntax
- 17:48:16 [AndyS]
- q+
- 17:48:19 [pchampin]
- <( :s :p :o )>
- 17:48:45 [pfps]
- pchampin: the current notation is <<>> - I suggest using <(...)>
- 17:48:54 [niklasl]
- <(:s:p:o)> a :ValidURI . # ?
- 17:49:00 [ora]
- ack AndyS
- 17:49:03 [AndyS]
- <()> is a valid URI :-)
- 17:49:06 [pfps]
- pchampin: this should be easy to parse and be less confusing
- 17:49:31 [pchampin]
- I stand corrected, then
- 17:49:32 [niklasl]
- (... rather common in wikipedia...)
- 17:49:42 [pfps]
- andys: parentheses are legal in IRIs so there may be problems
- 17:49:44 [niklasl]
- q+
- 17:49:56 [ora]
- ack niklasl
- 17:49:58 [pfps]
- pchampin: so my proposal won't work
- 17:50:23 [pfps]
- niklasl: should we have a discussion
- 17:50:49 [pfps]
- andys: if we go with <<(...)>> for now we can proceed and change afterwards
- 17:51:39 [pfps]
- ora: sparql makes use of every possible ASCII bracket
- 17:51:56 [Souri]
- <| ... |> allowed in URIs?
- 17:52:09 [ora]
- q?
- 17:52:21 [niklasl]
- <|:s:p:o|> a :InvalidURI . # hm.
- 17:53:15 [AndyS]
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#appendix-A
- 17:53:20 [pfps]
- q+
- 17:53:32 [pfps]
- ora: mobile phone display
- 17:53:36 [pfps]
- q-
- 17:54:13 [pfps]
- ora: RDF is a model is too new to dispose of right now
- 17:54:26 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/pull/143
- 17:54:27 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/sparql-query/pull/143 -> Pull Request 143 RDF is a model, not a format (by TallTed) [spec:editorial]
- 17:54:43 [pfps]
- tallted: I think we can go ahead
- 17:54:47 [pfps]
- ora: agreed
- 17:55:49 [pfps]
- gregg: the concepts one is a gate on other PRs
- 17:56:00 [gkellogg]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/78
- 17:56:00 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/78 -> Pull Request 78 Proposal to adapt the abstract syntax to option 3 (by hartig) [spec:substantive]
- 17:56:30 [Souri]
- Do we have a meeting tomorrow?
- 17:56:44 [pfps]
- gregg: this adds the new way of thinking about embedded triples
- 17:56:55 [pfps]
- andys: there are required changes on this PR
- 17:57:13 [pchampin]
- q+
- 17:57:53 [pchampin]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/80
- 17:57:54 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/80 -> Issue 80 where are triple terms allowed (by pfps) [needs discussion] [spec:substantive]
- 17:58:08 [pfps]
- tallted: the stuff that remains on #78 is covered by #80
- 17:58:09 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/80 -> CLOSED Action 80 configure the gb IRC bot to route actions to w3c/rdf-star-wg (on pchampin)
- 17:58:09 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/78 -> CLOSED Action 78 investigate hiccups in github actions (on pchampin) due 27 Jul 2023
- 17:58:36 [pfps]
- andys: we need to have this point cleared up but can we proceed with #78 as is
- 17:58:38 [pchampin]
- q-
- 17:58:53 [pfps]
- andys: are pfps and tallted OK with this
- 17:58:58 [pfps]
- tallted: fine by me
- 17:59:23 [pfps]
- ... but I want a reason
- 17:59:27 [pfps]
- pfps: fine by me
- 17:59:59 [pfps]
- ora: merge #78 so that other work can proceed
- 18:00:02 [pchampin]
- +1
- 18:00:15 [TallTed]
- to be clear -- fine to merge https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/78 and follow up in https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/issues/80
- 18:00:16 [gb]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-concepts/pull/78 -> Pull Request 78 Proposal to adapt the abstract syntax to option 3 (by hartig) [spec:substantive]
- 18:01:17 [pchampin]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 18:01:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2024/03/07-rdf-star-minutes.html pchampin
- 18:04:48 [pchampin]
- gkellogg, the echidna issue is about "quoted_ triple" and "asserted_triple" being not defined anymore, but still referenced by some parts of the doc
- 18:11:17 [pchampin]
- gkellogg, just pushed a quick fix
- 18:11:22 [pchampin]
- Zakim, bye
- 18:11:22 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees have been pfps, ktk, gtw, enrico, Dominik_T, eBremer, ora, pchampin, Tpt, gkellogg, niklasl, TallTed, tl, AndyS, Souri, AZ, fsasaki
- 18:11:22 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #rdf-star
- 18:11:25 [pchampin]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 18:11:25 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items