IRC log of coga on 2023-07-03
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:11:08 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #coga
- 14:11:12 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/07/03-coga-irc
- 14:11:43 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 14:11:44 [Zakim]
- Meeting: Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
- 14:11:52 [Lisa]
- RRSAgent, publish minutes
- 14:11:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/03-coga-minutes.html Lisa
- 14:12:00 [Lisa]
- agenda+
- 14:12:05 [Lisa]
- agenda+ sign up to scribe https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/wiki/Scribe_list
- 14:12:10 [Lisa]
- agenda?
- 14:13:15 [Lisa]
- agenda order is 8, 1, 2,7
- 14:13:23 [Lisa]
- agenda?
- 14:14:34 [Lisa]
- q?
- 14:52:01 [lisa]
- lisa has joined #coga
- 15:00:37 [Jennie]
- Jennie has joined #coga
- 15:00:50 [lisa]
- no quarm
- 15:01:18 [lisa]
- next item
- 15:01:28 [lisa]
- close item 8
- 15:01:46 [lisa]
- agenda?
- 15:01:49 [abbey]
- abbey has joined #coga
- 15:02:26 [lisa]
- topic: look at CTAUR document colaberation
- 15:04:19 [lisa]
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CJhBYRI-zk2rl_mohHZ63xAGZxzpDMxhHhXT66bjFBI/edit#heading=h.9s2myah44bjb
- 15:06:03 [DavidSwallow]
- DavidSwallow has joined #coga
- 15:06:27 [DavidSwallow]
- present+
- 15:08:43 [Jennie]
- present+
- 15:09:00 [lisa]
- srcibe: Jקממט
- 15:09:20 [Jennie]
- scribe: Jennie
- 15:09:51 [Jennie]
- (talking about the review of the CTAUR document)
- 15:10:06 [Jennie]
- Lisa: I thought we would be adding user needs and requirements
- 15:10:20 [Jennie]
- ...I think we can use "COGA suggested user need 1"
- 15:10:27 [Jennie]
- ...And some of the comments are actually user needs
- 15:10:31 [Jennie]
- ...I started with general comments
- 15:10:38 [Jennie]
- ...Those aren't user requirements
- 15:10:48 [Jennie]
- ...They say you need to follow WCAG, but also do more
- 15:11:02 [Jennie]
- ...I suggested adding a recommendation for Making Content Usable
- 15:11:09 [Jennie]
- ...I took a few more examples from Jennie's comments
- 15:11:27 [Jennie]
- ...And I put them in as COGA suggested User Needs
- 15:11:34 [Jennie]
- ...This looks more like concrete suggestions
- 15:11:56 [Jennie]
- ...The Requirement is their format. So when I added a user need I added the requirements needed to meet them
- 15:12:27 [Jennie]
- ...Is it easier to have them in the comments, or in the "COGA suggested user need"?
- 15:13:21 [Jennie]
- David: Will this need translating from inline comments into Github?
- 15:13:30 [Jennie]
- Lisa: That is a conversation I had with Janina
- 15:13:44 [Jennie]
- ...They have someone who has volunteered to enter each one as a separate issue into Github
- 15:13:54 [Jennie]
- ...They have asked us to make our suggestions extremely concrete.
- 15:14:04 [Jennie]
- ...Because of this they want things like "add this user need here"
- 15:14:18 [Jennie]
- ...We have to make it clear for the person adding into Github
- 15:14:39 [Jennie]
- David: I think the comments are easy to drop in. The suggestions might be a bit more difficult.
- 15:15:15 [Jennie]
- Lisa: We thought that originally. When I started commenting, I could see we had threads
- 15:15:25 [Jennie]
- ...It will be hard to see what the final draft is, I think
- 15:15:53 [Jennie]
- ...We have had to take a step back - right now we are not concerned with what form we give it to APA in
- 15:16:08 [Jennie]
- ...Because we are still trying to make sure we have collected everybody's thoughts
- 15:16:20 [Jennie]
- ...So we need to see what is easier to do. Maybe we will move them back into comments
- 15:16:54 [Jennie]
- ...I think the first issue is collecting the input
- 15:17:01 [Jennie]
- ...We have comments in different documents, unfortunately
- 15:17:08 [Jennie]
- ...We will have to check that things have been added
- 15:17:11 [abbey]
- present+
- 15:17:14 [Jennie]
- ...So we will have to look through all the comments
- 15:20:03 [Jennie]
- Jennie: my suggestion is breaking tasks down into small chunks per person, and being sure we follow up in a compressed timeline
- 15:21:04 [Jennie]
- ...I don't have a preference about inline vs comments, as long as we select one method and keep using it
- 15:21:11 [Jennie]
- Abbey: I cannot see the document right now.
- 15:22:03 [Jennie]
- Jennie: I can access Github at work
- 15:22:53 [Jennie]
- ...and my availability will be spotty over July in terms of participation in concentrated amounts
- 15:23:57 [lisa]
- inline (1) or comment (2)
- 15:24:25 [Jennie]
- Jennie: 0 - as long as it is consistent
- 15:24:40 [lisa]
- 1
- 15:24:47 [abbey]
- 1
- 15:24:50 [DavidSwallow]
- 2
- 15:25:15 [Jennie]
- David: I think the comments help focus the issue. You can browse through them
- 15:25:30 [Jennie]
- ...You can go from comment to comment, and work to them
- 15:25:35 [Jennie]
- ...You can resolve them when they are done
- 15:25:41 [Jennie]
- ...Comments are a kind of unit
- 15:25:55 [Jennie]
- ...They are portable - they force you to condense your idea into a block of text
- 15:26:02 [Jennie]
- ...It might be hard to tease apart the inline comments
- 15:26:32 [Jennie]
- Lisa: the problem is we got stuck getting to the phase of moving them into Github
- 15:26:45 [Jennie]
- ...some members couldn't use them
- 15:27:12 [Jennie]
- ...since we have 2 to 1, it goes towards the inline
- 15:27:23 [Jennie]
- ...We will have to try to make it easy to change into Github comments
- 15:28:09 [Jennie]
- ...Let's go through the things that they have, and see if we think we have the suggestions we need
- 15:28:32 [Jennie]
- ...Real-time co-editing - their user needs were mainly focused on screen reader users
- 15:28:46 [Jennie]
- ...until one about distractions
- 15:29:14 [Jennie]
- ...My feeling was that all of Making Content Usable would be useful - we put that at the beginning
- 15:29:33 [Jennie]
- ...I am thinking about the stuff we have learned to do in collaborative documents
- 15:29:47 [Jennie]
- ...One of the things we have learned is to put instructions at the top
- 15:29:52 [Jennie]
- ...People have said that is helpful
- 15:29:58 [Jennie]
- ...But I haven't always seen it
- 15:30:23 [Jennie]
- ...What problems with real-time editing have you come across?
- 15:30:32 [Jennie]
- David: Just like this one.
- 15:31:44 [Jennie]
- Lisa: I have opened one of the older documents, that contains comments from previous conversations
- 15:32:08 [Jennie]
- ...We have said not to do this in Content Usable, but I think it is a big deal for collaborative documents
- 15:32:54 [Jennie]
- ...the use of strange terms
- 15:33:26 [Jennie]
- Jennie: I wonder if the terms are caused by the need for something unique, in terms of copyright
- 15:33:42 [Jennie]
- David: maybe the mechanics?
- 15:33:53 [Jennie]
- Lisa: Going back to the document we are reviewing...
- 15:34:07 [Jennie]
- ...It divides it into sections
- 15:34:21 [Jennie]
- ...Should there be a general section? Or is that what was in section 1.3 and 2?
- 15:34:28 [Jennie]
- David: Do you mean about how to do?
- 15:35:22 [Jennie]
- Lisa: I will put in the document within section 2: COGA suggestion - common pitfalls
- 15:35:32 [Jennie]
- ...(kept drafting using suggesting mode in the document)
- 15:37:26 [Jennie]
- David: Can we preface it with something like "Collaborative tools use processes that are not as a familiar as....they have a set of unique mechanics"
- 15:37:35 [Jennie]
- Lisa: (drafts based on this into the document)
- 15:38:02 [Jennie]
- David: ties it to collaborative tools
- 15:38:13 [Jennie]
- Lisa: (continues drafting in the document)
- 15:39:20 [Jennie]
- ...I think this area needs a bit of work
- 15:39:25 [Jennie]
- David: This is a good start
- 15:39:33 [Jennie]
- ...To present the interactions clearly
- 15:39:49 [Jennie]
- Lisa: I think someone said previously they needed the search
- 15:39:59 [Jennie]
- ...Like when things are somewhere, but you don't know where
- 15:41:00 [Jennie]
- Jennie: there can be different permissions/capabilities of different searches
- 15:41:10 [Jennie]
- ...It would be important to expose this to users
- 15:41:26 [Jennie]
- Lisa: Knowing how it works - using ands and ors
- 15:41:31 [Jennie]
- ...this is important to know
- 15:41:52 [Jennie]
- ...For some, if something is in quotes, that can have a different use case
- 15:42:34 [Jennie]
- ...Sometimes you can be inundated with terms
- 15:43:02 [Jennie]
- David: Is it specific to collaborative tools? Or is it more general?
- 15:43:13 [Jennie]
- Lisa: We are listing common pitfalls that we know about
- 15:43:20 [Jennie]
- ...Not limited to specific areas
- 15:44:05 [Jennie]
- Jennie: I am wondering if we need a section called provide help
- 15:44:15 [Jennie]
- ...And then specifics of using search could be under that
- 15:44:25 [Jennie]
- David: yes, these are the mechanics of using the tool
- 15:44:35 [Jennie]
- Lisa: Then we can add some things under the help
- 15:44:49 [Jennie]
- ...(goes back to looking through Issues using W3C Tools and Processes
- 15:44:56 [Jennie]
- ...)
- 15:45:29 [Jennie]
- ...reading from one commenter saying it is hard to have to learn a new way of thinking to do something like edit
- 15:45:40 [Jennie]
- ...(goes back to the document we are editing)
- 15:46:50 [Jennie]
- David: maybe expose common features?
- 15:47:01 [Jennie]
- Lisa: I have that here in the COGA suggestion - common pitfalls
- 15:47:24 [Jennie]
- ...(continues adding into the draft)
- 15:49:41 [Jennie]
- Jennie: one of the comments we have is about adding a glossary. Maybe we can add it into the document as suggested text, then resolve that comment?
- 15:50:03 [Jennie]
- Lisa: (adds it in to the document)
- 15:50:40 [Jennie]
- ...(resolved)
- 15:52:40 [Jennie]
- Jennie: thank you. Making sure we add information into the document with suggested text, then resolving the comments will help ensure we are
- 15:52:56 [Jennie]
- ...all working within this document the same way
- 15:53:29 [Jennie]
- Lisa: (added in the comment about adding information about what is out of scope in the document, then resolved the comment)
- 15:54:17 [Jennie]
- ...(continued working through the comments, moving them into the suggested language within the document/inline, then resolving the comments)
- 15:57:09 [Jennie]
- (Lisa continued going through the comments, pasting them inline, then resolving the comments)
- 15:58:23 [Jennie]
- Lisa: Do we put in something like "add topic, or make sure the topic is clear"?
- 15:58:39 [Jennie]
- ...(drafted into the document in section 3)
- 15:59:36 [Jennie]
- ...We are not talking to the document authors, we are talking to those making the platforms
- 15:59:52 [Jennie]
- ...We know that multi-step processes are difficult
- 16:00:03 [Jennie]
- ...Having a link that automatically opens the read me file
- 16:00:07 [Jennie]
- ...It will open
- 16:00:13 [Jennie]
- ...You can write your instructions
- 16:00:25 [Jennie]
- ...Or have a place to add instructions for your reviewers
- 16:00:32 [Jennie]
- David: Are you thinking of a specific platform?
- 16:00:41 [Jennie]
- Lisa: we sometimes put read me files in
- 16:01:18 [lisa]
- RRSAgent, publish minutes
- 16:01:20 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/07/03-coga-minutes.html lisa