13:27:19 RRSAgent has joined #adapt 13:27:24 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/04/24-adapt-irc 13:27:24 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:27:55 Meeting: WAI Adapt Task Force Teleconference 13:27:55 Date: 24 April 2023 13:27:55 agenda? 13:27:55 chair: Sharon 13:28:06 zakim, clear agenda 13:28:06 agenda cleared 13:28:20 agenda+ A11y4Children ontology follow-ups 13:28:35 agenda+ Gap Analysis, https://github.com/w3c/adapt/wiki/Gap-Analysis 13:28:46 agenda+ Issue 240, https://github.com/w3c/adapt/issues/240 13:28:56 agenda+ Review open issues 13:29:06 agenda+ Test to show rendering symbols do not 'break' existing pages 13:29:19 agenda+ Recruiting 13:29:28 agenda+ Registry update 13:29:41 agenda+ Symbol Module Implementations 13:29:57 agenda+ User Agents and Symbols (e.g. Immersive Reader) 13:30:54 agenda? 13:55:21 Roy_ has joined #adapt 13:59:48 matatk has joined #adapt 14:00:00 present+ 14:00:01 mike_beganyi has joined #adapt 14:00:06 present+ 14:00:10 Lionel has joined #adapt 14:00:22 present+ 14:01:00 scribe+ 14:01:19 topic: TPAC 14:01:47 present+ 14:01:59 janina has joined #adapt 14:02:02 present+ 14:02:08 matatk: coordinate meetings between APA and its TFs 14:02:36 q+ 14:02:36 matatk: submit list to TPAC organizers, more info about meetings the better 14:03:22 ack janina 14:04:13 janina: have a list and it's expandable. able to add navigation points to media content. would like that to support markup. we have a powerful use case in symbols. creating a table of contents for media shouldn't be a time offset and words. it should be also symbols 14:04:50 janina: we need to ask for markup in that part of the spec. ongoing agenda we started last year and we have the request for the "adapt-" prefix and we may have others 14:05:28 janina: solid reception last year. a lot of the former concern from years ago is less relevant now 14:06:07 Lionel: it's not exactly the depth. it's not like we have a set of useful symbols. it's more a general request to have symbols 14:07:40 janina: no sense of anything nest-able here currently. DAISY navigation was excellent and it's a pity it didn't have any recognition at the time 14:08:00 Lionel: this sounds like more of an APA issue as opposed to specifically Adapt 14:08:04 q+ 14:08:31 ack matatk 14:08:32 janina: we're all part of APA, so it's possible to be part of many meetings without being part of all 14:08:54 matatk: this is between WGs, we also have specific TFs that tackle TF-specific things. I agree with previous comments 14:09:28 matatk: one idea is that we may have started by TPAC making our own versions of well-known URI specs. if we make one fully, we should make one that specifies which ones are supported 14:09:51 matatk: should meet with the original group who authored the first so that we can collaborate on optimal process for implementation 14:10:15 janina: strong Adapt interest in that. whether that's nesting in global accessibility architecture or something else 14:10:27 janina: what level do we bring in Adapt-specific tree? 14:10:53 Lionel: these are so important. help me understand that as chairs of Adapt we are responsible for these things. 14:11:17 q+ 14:11:27 Lionel: markup for rich media, but lack the tools at the moment. 14:11:28 q+ 14:11:51 Lionel: finish gap analysis, then we can determine who (CSS, for example) to determine what markup can be 14:11:58 ack matatk 14:12:19 matatk: almost certainly would have a meeting with CSS 14:12:56 matatk: don't want to talk architecture deeply, but I feel the common destinations COGA identified shouldn't be underneath accessibility 14:13:49 matatk: would advise against over-scoping 14:14:07 Lionel: suggesting changing direction, then? 14:14:23 matatk: most of those destinations would be what people want to do on a site. nothing preventing relation to an attribute. 14:14:38 matatk: lots to do on that, but seems beyond the scope of this topic 14:15:04 matatk: not sure we will need to talk to i18n about issues around symbols attribute 14:15:11 matatk: if we have concerns, we can certainly meet with them 14:15:41 matatk: great resource and very much into a11y 14:15:49 ack janina 14:16:06 janina: just in queue to agree with you, Mat. up-levelling for the sake of curb cut effect 14:16:50 janina: meeting with i18n still possible, depending 14:17:08 Lionel: agree 14:19:06 Russell: specifically for YouTube chaptering, would be relatively easy coding-wise. Google could champion this idea of chaptering and would provide a lot of encouragement for our proposals 14:20:16 Lionel: captions derive from SRT standard. powerful idea but could be a deep-rooted issue that involves a lot of consideration for backwards-compatibility 14:20:57 janina: it is manageable but has to be verified. if an old browser interacts, then issues could ensue if issues are not compatible 14:21:46 zakim, take up item 1 14:21:46 agendum 1 -- A11y4Children ontology follow-ups -- taken up [from Sharon] 14:22:06 Sharon: any follow-up to discuss? 14:22:22 Sharon: any activities that need to occur 14:23:01 Lionel: sent notes. there are many follow-ups. identified another research paper that had a lot of headings that we are interested in. found a similar and sympathetic ontology 14:23:12 q+ 14:23:30 Lionel: determine next step. could be gap analysis, moving to Research Questions, etc. 14:23:41 q+ 14:23:49 ack matatk 14:24:30 matatk: felt that there is a lot of useful reading material. user profiles and simplification aspect are interesting for our purposes. 14:24:58 matatk: two things I think we should do: 1) as we determine mainstream simplification, Bob's work will help 14:25:33 matatk: and 2) it turns out two other people are very familiar with UDL , mike_beganyi and Paul 14:25:57 ack janina 14:25:59 matatk: Mike has good experience with this 14:26:13 janina: there is a research question here we could review in that TF. we should structure it as a question 14:26:52 janina: what kind of output are we looking for? members of the RQTF can get access to those vital research papers 14:27:27 Lionel: acknowledge that UDL is well-regarded as a set of practices, but the semantics are curated by CLIPPS and NSF 14:28:00 Lionel: suggest the question to RQTF is something like "we have this citation, is it sufficient?" 14:28:02 q+ 14:28:16 ack matatk 14:28:25 matatk: forgot to acknowledge Lionel's experience. slipped my mind earlier, so apologies 14:29:59 Lionel: would like to peek at Gap Analysis, please 14:30:05 zakim, next item 14:30:05 agendum 2 -- Gap Analysis, https://github.com/w3c/adapt/wiki/Gap-Analysis -- taken up [from Sharon] 14:30:57 Lionel has joined #adapt 14:32:06 https://github.com/w3c/adapt/wiki/Gap-Analysis,-WAI-Adapt-Content-Attributes 14:33:21 Lionel: assess heading structure and determine if anything is missing 14:33:58 janina: Charles may be able to offer assistance on defining scope for DPUB section 14:34:24 janina: would suggest assistance regarding that specific question as we do a gap analysis what we should look at in DPUB 14:34:42 Sharon: Lionel can you do that? 14:34:46 Lionel: yes, will do 14:38:46 zakim, close this item 14:38:46 agendum 2 closed 14:38:47 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 14:38:47 3. Issue 240, https://github.com/w3c/adapt/issues/240 [from Sharon] 14:38:53 rrsagent, make minutes 14:38:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/04/24-adapt-minutes.html mike_beganyi 14:42:16 zakim, bye 14:42:16 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been mike_beganyi, janina, Lionel_Wolberger, Sharon, matatk, Roy, EA, Lionel 14:42:16 Zakim has left #adapt 15:31:58 janina has left #adapt