11:02:41 RRSAgent has joined #wot 11:02:45 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/03/02-wot-irc 11:03:18 ktoumura has joined #wot 11:04:28 meeting: 4th WoT WG Charter Meeting - Day 4 11:05:06 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Tomoaki_Mizushima 11:06:19 mlagally has joined #wot 11:07:44 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Agenda_Session_4.2C_Day_4_-_Mar_2 11:07:50 Ege has joined #wot 11:08:13 scribenick: kaz 11:09:25 present+ Sebastian_Kaebisch, Ege_Korkan 11:09:32 topic: PRs 11:10:08 q+ 11:10:11 mm: two PRs based on the discussion yesterday 11:10:28 ack l 11:10:44 ml: we're discussing high-level points like scope. right? 11:10:59 sebastian has joined #wot 11:11:14 q+ 11:11:18 ... there are detailed discussions during the TF calls as well 11:11:19 q+ 11:11:22 ack ml 11:11:54 sk: we didn't have the WoT main call, and had to have additional discussion during the TD call 11:12:11 mm: need to kind of fork off some of the discussions 11:12:36 ... basically, could summarize which way to 11:12:39 s/to/to go/ 11:12:57 ... have Binding Templates as a separate spec or not 11:13:13 q? 11:13:32 ack e 11:14:01 ek: wanted to answer to Lagally 11:14:25 ... couldn't have discussion during the main call and had to have one during the TD clal 11:14:31 s/clal/call/ 11:14:44 ... also didn't have enough time for the discussion itself 11:14:55 q? 11:14:58 ml: ok 11:15:13 ... however, the discussion should happen during the main call 11:15:32 mm: note that this is a whole WG call specifically about the WG Charter 11:16:08 ... my proposal is managing some of the discussions offline 11:16:28 present+ Michael_Koster 11:16:32 zakim, who is on the call? 11:16:32 Present: Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Ege_Korkan, Michael_Koster 11:16:51 ... and finalize the draft WG Charter during the main call next week 11:16:53 ml: ok 11:17:19 ... what about the remaining PRs? 11:17:26 mm: we've not done everything yet 11:20:28 kaz: (gives a comment on general policy for charter generation) 11:20:33 mm: yeah, you're right 11:20:46 ... let's look into the PRs then 11:20:52 subtpic: PR 74 11:21:00 q? 11:21:03 ack k 11:21:20 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/pull/74 PR 74 - Add TD while removing binding| 11:21:24 s/|// 11:21:33 mm: (goes through the PR) 11:21:48 -> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/pull/74.html preview 11:22:04 q+ 11:22:11 q+ 11:22:20 mm: this part (and profiling mechanisms to ...) might be problematic 11:22:30 ... is this intentional? 11:22:33 ack e 11:22:39 ek: that's kind of oversight 11:23:05 mm: two issue I see here 11:23:18 ... this says profile mechanism within TD 11:23:34 ... also another entry on Profile (of course) mentions Profile 11:23:47 ... maybe need to replace this part 11:23:55 q? 11:23:56 [[ 11:23:57 as well as include the core binding and profiling mechanisms to increase interoperability. 11:23:58 ]] 11:24:13 ek: there was some discussion during the TD call yesterday 11:24:15 q+ 11:24:37 ... how TD and Profile work together 11:24:54 ... maybe it would be better to say "Core Binding" and "Core Profile" 11:25:03 mm: a bit confused 11:25:18 ... using the same term within two different specs is confusing 11:25:41 ml: would rather say addressing use cases, etc. 11:25:47 ... without diving into the details 11:26:20 mm: ok 11:26:26 q+ 11:26:33 ... so you think this description in the proposal is too detail 11:26:35 ml: right 11:26:46 mm: Ege, could you revise the text? 11:26:53 ack ml 11:26:59 ek: I can remove the test there 11:27:22 ... but there was discussion on how to deal with Profile-related topics during the TD call yesterday 11:27:35 ... mechanism happen with keywords 11:27:38 q? 11:27:39 ack e 11:27:43 q+ 11:27:52 present+ Ben_Francis 11:28:13 mm: my preference is removing this text (as well as...) first 11:28:21 ek: ok with removing that text 11:28:36 ... but the bigger question is what would be applicable 11:29:12 mm: don't disagree but maybe some additional description outside the Charter 11:29:13 q? 11:29:28 ml: that would imply yet another deliverable... 11:29:40 ... why don't we simply remove the sentence itself 11:29:45 mm: that would be fine 11:32:29 kaz: I'm OK with removing that sentence itself 11:33:07 +1 11:33:11 ... However, the bigger question is (as I've been mentioning) that we need clarify the relationship among all the WoT specs with each other 11:33:12 mm: right 11:33:32 ... Architecture should describe the relationship but the description is not enough 11:33:59 ... anyway, regarding the Charter text, would suggest we removing the text 11:34:02 ack k 11:34:03 ack b 11:34:17 bf: I'm also OK with removing the sentence itself 11:34:34 ... but we should clarify the relationship between Binding and Profiling 11:35:06 ... think it would be better to describe both Binding and Profiling within the Thing Description spec 11:35:15 q+ 11:35:47 mm: having same definition within two places would be problematic 11:35:49 q+ 11:36:03 bf: the "Update" may remove the overlap 11:36:35 q+ 11:36:46 ack ml 11:37:19 ml: the Profiling mechanism is discussed by the Profile TF, but can be discussed by all 11:37:35 ... want to collaborate with the other TFs 11:37:47 ... discussions on what to go for which spec 11:37:53 ack s 11:38:06 ... still think we should have a bit more dynamic document 11:38:17 ... some kind of concern there 11:38:31 q? 11:38:51 ... if TD defines possible protocols, we need to wait until the TD spec reaches REC 11:38:57 mm: we have options 11:40:04 kaz: btw, we need clarification about what "Profile" and "Profile (Update)" mean 11:40:09 ... "Profile" is modification to the current version 11:40:19 ... and "Profile (Update)" is a newer version 11:40:20 q? 11:40:21 ... right? 11:40:23 ack k 11:40:23 ack k 11:40:27 mm: right 11:40:52 zakim, who is on the call? 11:40:52 Present: Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Ege_Korkan, Michael_Koster, Ben_Francis 11:41:08 ... let me add some changes to the PR 74 11:41:17 s/74/74 based on the discussion/ 11:41:37 ... (looks into the HTML for PR 74) 11:42:14 ... (remove the sentence from the "Thing Description" entry) 11:42:36 ... maybe someone can create another PR for further modification 11:42:44 ... (shows the diff) 11:43:03 -> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/74/bbfb69e...b852e96.html diff 11:43:12 mm: still missing information 11:44:31 ... what "Expected completion" means? 11:44:40 kaz: should be the estimated date of the REC publication 11:45:03 q? 11:45:04 q+ 11:45:22 ack k 11:45:38 kaz: that is related to our schedule.md for the next Charter period 11:45:41 mm: right 11:47:08 kaz: btw, given all the deliverables entries don't have that information, we can think about the date later and put estimated dates at once for all of them 11:47:11 mm: yeah... 11:47:30 ... we need to think about the publication process 11:47:38 ... including CR->PR->REC transitions 11:47:54 q+ 11:48:34 kaz: and all the dates should be discussed by each TF offline 11:48:38 mm: yeah... 11:49:13 s/for the next Charter/for the current Charter and the next Charter/ 11:49:17 ack k 11:49:19 rrsagent, make log public 11:49:23 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:49:24 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/03/02-wot-minutes.html kaz 11:50:25 kaz: note that specifying the dates using Quarters is fine for the Charter :) 11:50:29 mm: ah, yes 11:50:59 ... for the moment, let's merge this PR 11:51:01 merged 11:51:22 subtopic: PR 73 11:51:43 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/pull/73 PR 73 - Remove reusable connections term from charter 11:52:02 mm: would suggest we simply remove "reusable connections" to avoid confusion 11:52:05 q? 11:52:09 bf: that's fine 11:52:22 q+ 11:52:31 ... the question was rather we didn't share the same image on what it meant 11:53:19 q? 11:53:31 ml: quick comment 11:53:44 ... a bit concerned about repeated payloads 11:54:31 ... would take this (reusable connections) out 11:54:33 q? 11:54:33 ack ml 11:54:40 rrsagent, draft minutes 11:54:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/03/02-wot-minutes.html kaz 11:54:48 mm: ok 11:54:55 ... two options here 11:55:19 ... but just want to go for removing this 11:55:22 ml: ok 11:55:24 merged 11:55:53 topic: Next step 11:56:06 mm: don't want to have more meetings for Charter discussion 11:56:22 ... would propose we decide main PRs via emails 11:56:55 ... make decision about the process and finalize the draft Charter 11:57:08 ... let me finish up the other PRs which should be relatively easier 11:57:19 ... will make necessary additional PRs 11:57:45 ... maybe could delay until the next main call 11:57:55 ... but could make decision by the end of Tuesday 11:57:57 q+ 11:58:11 ... not changing the decision policy 11:58:13 q+ 11:58:40 ack k 11:58:59 kaz: would suggest we finalize the draft Charter during the main call next Wednesday 11:59:01 mm: ok 11:59:06 ... sounds reasonable 11:59:12 q+ 11:59:16 ack e 11:59:18 ek: also agree 11:59:29 https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/issues/16 11:59:34 s/agree/agree we're getting close/ 11:59:47 ... but probably we still need some more dedicated discussion 11:59:55 ... for example about issue 16 above 12:00:29 I have to move to another meeting. Bye 12:00:37 mm: my personal opinion is moving the normative things into the Architecture 12:00:42 ... e.g., Onboarding 12:00:54 ... but OK with generating a separate deliverable 12:01:29 s/would suggest/I personally think we need some more discussion for the Charter but would suggest/ 12:01:52 s/Wednesday/Wednesday assuming you, McCool, will work on further cleaning up./ 12:01:55 q? 12:02:04 q+ 12:02:24 mm: we can decide which way to go next week 12:02:33 ml: responding to Ege 12:02:41 ... please read my comments on issue 16 12:03:04 ... clear terminology and clear definitions 12:03:29 q? 12:03:42 mm: we're out of time and close the meeting 12:03:49 bf: have to follow up next time 12:04:11 ... curious about the next step of the Charter 12:04:51 mm: AC review followed by the W3M/horizontal reviews 12:05:09 kaz: would suggest we continue the discussion during the main call next Wednesday 12:05:23 ... and see if we still need further dedicated discussion at that time 12:05:24 mm: yeah 12:05:30 ... after some more cleaning up 12:05:32 [adjourned] 12:05:38 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:05:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/03/02-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:12:40 kaz has joined #wot