15:52:40 RRSAgent has joined #maturity 15:52:44 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/03/01-maturity-irc 15:52:44 RRSAgent, make logs Public 15:52:45 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Fazio 15:53:18 meeting: Maturity Model Task Force 15:53:33 Chair: Fazio, SBH 15:54:59 Agenda+ New member introductions 15:55:11 zakim, clear agenda 15:55:11 agenda cleared 15:55:15 Agenda+ New member introductions 15:55:34 Agenda+ Check in with Josh about Github Issues 15:55:55 Agenda + Maturity Model review discussion with Stacey 15:56:09 Agenda + New business 15:56:19 present+ 15:58:21 janina has joined #maturity 16:01:22 CharlesL has joined #maturity 16:01:28 present+ 16:02:11 IrfanAli has joined #maturity 16:02:41 present+ 16:02:59 regrets: Lionel, Nadine 16:03:02 zakim, who's here? 16:03:02 Present: Fazio, Joshue, nadine, janina, Lionel, Fazio_, CharlesL, Mark_Miller, IrfanAli, Sheri_B-H, jlkline 16:03:05 On IRC I see IrfanAli, CharlesL, janina, RRSAgent, Fazio, Zakim, jspellman 16:03:14 agenda? 16:03:22 scribe: Irfan Ali 16:03:35 zakim, next item 16:03:36 agendum 1 -- New member introductions -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:03:39 jlkline has joined #maturity 16:03:45 Sheri_BH has joined #Maturity 16:03:58 Present + 16:04:14 present+ 16:04:14 present+ 16:04:24 Chair: David Fazio 16:06:05 Lionel_Wolberger_ has joined #maturity 16:06:10 present+ 16:06:38 Joshue108 has joined #maturity 16:06:48 zakim, who's here? 16:06:48 Present: Fazio, Joshue, nadine, janina, Lionel, Fazio_, CharlesL, Mark_Miller, IrfanAli, Sheri_B-H, jlkline, Sheri_BH, Lionel_Wolberger_ 16:06:48 On IRC I see Joshue108, Lionel_Wolberger_, Sheri_BH, jlkline, IrfanAli, CharlesL, janina, RRSAgent, Fazio, Zakim, jspellman 16:06:48 present+ 16:07:18 stacey has joined #maturity 16:07:28 rrsagent, make minutes 16:07:29 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/03/01-maturity-minutes.html janina 16:08:05 present+ 16:08:07 present+ 16:08:19 present+ 16:13:05 Inroduction 16:16:30 zakim, next item 16:16:31 agendum 2 -- Check in with Josh about Github Issues -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:16:31 s/Inroduction/Introductions 16:19:10 jspellman: most of the issues are minor and dealt on different layer. if there is something that you want me to look into, I will check it out. 16:19:32 Joshue108 has joined #maturity 16:20:15 Fazio: we have asked Josh to cleanup the queue in github 16:20:49 janina: this is useful to have fresh overview especially for the people who come with fresh perspective. 16:21:44 When would they start using this model? Where do they start/What initial steps would they take? What happens if they have one person with 8 hours per week or less available to be documenting (and doing the due diligence with others that they work with to get that data)? Is this model still a feasible option for them? 16:22:21 q+ 16:22:38 stacey: I would like to hear from you all. How do you envision to use this model? 16:23:17 stacey: if I am a brand new person in my org, I would not know how to use it and I would like to have this info 16:23:40 Fazio: we get similar questions and need to work on the case studies. 16:24:33 janina: we regard the click-ability of this model for all. therefore the case studies is required. 16:25:11 ack me 16:25:52 Joshue108: I did some search in github. I want to ask you about the priority. There are tons of stuff out there 16:26:30 janina: let me suggest if there are editorials to validate and they are substantive please focus on them 16:26:42 Joshue108: before the call next week I will update about the progress 16:26:49 q? 16:28:10 sheri: some use cases - Large organization, Equity, consulting model. we can put anything which is going to be helpful to explain people about the usage 16:29:40 Lionel_Wolberger_: size is not everything. because in some huge compnies have only one digital asset and some that are not big they may have multiple products 16:30:34 sheri: informed and un-informed model 16:31:06 q+ 16:32:53 q+ 16:34:58 Brian: mistake that we made was that we took this template, I would stay on first step whether it is one person or group of people are spending time on the template, we found that that we all had different interpretation. 16:36:00 Lionel_Wolberger_: we talk about different personas, but the person who is running the model is responsible for the progress. there is a huge difference between a typical case that we see very often. 16:36:59 Lionel_Wolberger_: you might be a beginner and you are in this org and working on multiple products. or other way around 16:37:07 ack, lionel 16:37:13 q? 16:37:18 ack Lionel 16:37:19 q+ 16:37:59 janina: we can form a subgroup if people are interested 16:38:18 janina: once we have something in writing we can add it in our document 16:38:41 stacey: I am willing to help 16:38:51 ack charles 16:40:14 CharlesL: with these personas, I am wondring about the different dimentions sheets in excel e.g knowledge, skills, support.. would we also define the role of organization departments 16:40:57 sheri: whoever has data has to be involved 16:41:44 CharlesL: I am trying to see how these dimensions are going to be assigned in organizational structure 16:42:31 jeff: it depends on the scale of the company 16:44:07 q- 16:44:08 Is the model only for SDLC/external-facing products? Or, does it encompass internal products, experiences, processes? This isn’t clear, but at first read of the introduction it seems external facing products only. 16:45:09 sheri: intent was to cover if you are external facing app includes 3rd party then they become important for the assessment 16:47:18 q+ 16:48:10 stacey: just in case if we are using any internal tool for external users like customer support which is not accessible, I believe it will be included in this model to assessment 16:48:44 ack charles 16:49:30 CharlesL: this is what I was wondering about whole personas and knowing what dimension each company want to consider. I wasnt considering engineering procurement. 16:49:46 it might be good to point out 16:50:05 +1 16:50:28 Integrate stage - who’s creating the roadmap? Or is this meaning it’s baked into the roadmap for various teams? Part of OKRs? 16:51:13 stacey: Objective and Key results for quantitate goal settings 16:51:27 OKR = Objectives, Key Results 16:53:05 rrsagent, make minutes 16:53:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/03/01-maturity-minutes.html IrfanAli 16:53:38 Fazio: do we want to create any github issue to address some of the points and to update SDLC documentation 16:53:55 Sheri: we already ahve github issues for usecases including personas 16:55:20 zakim, next item 16:55:20 agendum 3 -- Maturity Model review discussion with Stacey -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:55:29 zakim, close this item 16:55:29 agendum 3 closed 16:55:30 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 16:55:30 4. New business [from Fazio] 16:55:33 zakim, next item 16:55:33 agendum 4 -- New business -- taken up [from Fazio] 16:56:19 CharlesL has left #maturity 17:15:53 janina has left #maturity