13:00:30 RRSAgent has joined #wot 13:00:35 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/02/21-wot-irc 13:00:54 meeting: 3rd WoT WG Meeting 13:01:21 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Koster, Michael_McCool 13:01:32 The link is wrong still 13:01:56 cris_ has joined #wot 13:02:33 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally 13:04:27 mlagally has joined #wot 13:05:17 luca_barbato_ has joined #wot 13:06:12 present+ Luca_Barbato, Tomoaki_Mizushima 13:06:47 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Agenda_Session_3.2C_Day_1_-_Feb_21 13:07:04 scribenick: mlagally 13:07:31 mjk has joined #wot 13:07:32 ml: I reviewed issues and PRs 13:07:43 ... let's review them, most are pretty simple 13:07:44 ktoumura has joined #wot 13:07:52 i/I reviewed/topic: Review issues, PRs and Status/ 13:07:56 s/ml:/mm:/ 13:08:19 dape has joined #wot 13:08:20 issue #51 13:08:21 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/51 : updated old JSON-LD context 13:08:26 q+ 13:08:59 mmc: I did a major cleanup 13:09:01 ack k 13:09:14 kaz: There are also many issues on the wot repo 13:09:37 mmc: let's review after this one 13:09:56 s/repo/repo. We should clean them up before starting the discussion on further updates on the wot-charter-drafts side./ 13:10:07 ... this is a cleanup for rendering 13:10:17 https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/pull/51 13:10:41 ... any objection to merge (none) 13:10:46 (merged) 13:11:02 i/issue #51/subtopic: Issue 51/ 13:11:05 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/51 : updated old JSON-LD context 13:11:09 topic: issues in WoT repo 13:11:19 mmc: multiple were moved 13:11:44 ... let's review those that are marked as WG New Charter Plans 2023" 13:11:56 s/WG/"WG/ 13:12:12 ... we can close these that were moved 13:12:22 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/51|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/51 PR 51 - Details cleanup| 13:12:46 kaz: you can ask submitters if they were moved 13:12:56 s/subtopic: Issue 51/subtopic: PR 51/ 13:13:08 mmc: I believe we are already done with these 13:13:20 q+ 13:13:43 ... I think we also moved the PR 13:15:19 i|multiple were|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot/labels/WG%20New%20Charter%20Plans%202023 issues and PRs on the wot repo with "WG New Charter Plans 2023" label| 13:15:47 ... I'll close all of these, if you feel that it was incorrect, please reopen and bring it up in the main call tomorrow 13:15:50 ack ml 13:15:58 s/mm:/mmc:/ 13:16:03 rrsagent, make log public 13:16:07 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:16:08 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/21-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:16:18 ... If there are any further issues, please bring them up in tomorrow's main call 13:17:01 chair: McCool 13:17:03 s/reopen/open a new issue/ 13:17:22 present+ Daniel_Peintner, Jan_Romann 13:17:26 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:17:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/21-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:17:37 s/The link is wrong still// 13:17:38 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:17:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/21-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:17:50 i/issue #51// 13:17:51 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/51 : updated old JSON-LD context 13:18:13 mmc: there are two PRs that are solving the same issue wrt. privacy and accessibility 13:18:30 s/issue #51// 13:18:31 s/issue #51// 13:18:34 ... we could remove them both or modify the description 13:18:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:18:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/21-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:18:57 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/51 : updated old JSON-LD context 13:18:58 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/51 : updated old JSON-LD context 13:18:59 +1 to for in addition to hz review 13:19:39 q+ 13:19:41 q+ 13:19:43 q+ 13:19:50 q+ 13:20:01 ack e 13:20:31 kaz: what is added to this PR - any specific text for a11y? 13:20:38 s/to/with/ 13:20:39 https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/issues/45 13:21:19 mmc: we should only mention these groups if we do more than horizontal review 13:21:30 ... trying to be consistent with what we do for PING 13:21:56 kaz: if we want stronger collaboration that would be great, however the text could be improved 13:22:09 mmc: was copied from last charter 13:22:12 +1 to ka 13:22:26 kaz: we might need another improvement to the text 13:22:48 mmc: let's merge and ask the a11y group for suggestions on improved text 13:23:09 kaz: we have to get review by these groups, we can ask for their comments even earlier 13:23:10 q+ 13:23:14 ack k 13:24:08 dape: Those groups are in the W3C process, why do we mention them at all? Charter could be shorter 13:24:17 q+ 13:24:58 ack d 13:25:00 ack ml 13:25:13 ml: shorter is better 13:25:59 ege: horizontal review is only at the end of publication period, feedback at the end may be too late 13:26:09 ... what about i18n? 13:27:29 mmc: if we work poractively with these groups, we should mention it 13:27:49 [[ 13:27:52 kaz: these days, those 4 horizontal groups are default groups for collaboration in the W3C 13:27:59 In addition to the above catch-all reference to horizontal review which includes accessibility review, please check with chairs and staff contacts of the Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group to determine if an additional liaison statement with more specific information about concrete review issues is needed in the list below. 13:28:02 ... there's a specifc note about tzhat in the tempalte 13:28:06 ]] 13:28:17 s/tempalte/template/ 13:28:50 ... if we think about stronger a11y support that's great, but we should have preliminary discussion with them and ask them how to handle it 13:29:30 mmc: if we start horizontal reviews early, we still need a document to review 13:29:58 kaz: we should talk with these groups and discuss what to do in the charter 13:30:24 mmc: I suggest we merge the text and work proactively with these groups 13:30:38 ... suggest we merge the text 13:31:23 ... before we call this done, we should have it reviewed by these groups. will keep the issue open 13:32:48 ... will close idssue#49 w/o merge 13:33:01 s /idss/iss/ 13:33:27 q+ 13:33:35 topic: merge request: #54 13:33:36 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/54 : Update JSON-LD context 13:33:38 ack e 13:33:58 ege: I fixed the title 13:34:20 ... there is some overlapping text 13:34:33 mmc: I have another PR that modifies the background section 13:34:56 ... we don't want to change the template, this belongs into our draft 13:35:24 q+ 13:35:36 q? 13:35:39 ack k 13:35:49 kaz: when I raised the issue about meeting title, I suggested to better describe our intentions 13:35:58 ... mission and basic policy 13:36:20 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/pull/54 PR 54 - Motivation and background title 13:36:33 mmc: if we don't add the header, the table will be split - this cleans up the section headers 13:37:07 i|54|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/issues/48 Issue 54 - Motivation and Background| 13:37:10 ... this is a bug fix. 13:37:12 (merged) 13:38:17 mmc: we were doing bottom up collection of work items, Kaz suggested top down 13:39:02 ... we have two choices: delete all details, take them to a separate document, or keep them. 13:39:04 q+ 13:39:12 q+ 13:39:19 q- 13:39:21 q+ 13:40:19 ack ml 13:41:45 ml: there are too many details in this section, the second part could be condensed into a single paragraph. The first part of the scope serction is fine. 13:42:25 kaz: I agree with both of you 13:43:30 ... we can think about adding new features about wider industry collaboration 13:44:11 ... it would be nicer to link discovery, geolocation , onboarding with wider topics 13:45:15 ack k 13:45:15 mmc: this is good enough to start the AC review 13:45:17 q? 13:46:17 ege: I have a pull request about 3 other items, I'm ok with the current text, but it misses binding templates 13:46:17 q+ 13:46:59 ... I agree with adding this part, however don't agree with the content 13:46:59 s/to link discovery, geolocation , onboarding with wider topics/to describe the relationship between the major bullet points above and the detailed items below if we want to keep the detailed items./ 13:47:15 ack e 13:47:54 ml: this discussion is premature, we first have to define the scope 13:48:24 q+ 13:48:26 ack ml 13:49:07 mmc: any objection to merge, we can always refine this later. 13:50:24 ... I commented out details about plugfests and open source implementations - we can always bring it back 13:50:56 ack k 13:50:57 kaz: I like to agree with McCool, Lagally and Ege, suggest we merge this PR and think about improvements next 13:51:12 s/impr/further impr/ 13:53:11 topic: PR #55 13:53:14 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/55 : @id/@vocab issue 13:53:52 ege: I restructured the description significantly 13:54:33 mmc: We have several topics such as onboarding and geolocation - we need a normative security deliverable 13:54:42 q+ 13:54:52 ... I put this normative work item into architecture 13:55:00 i|I restru|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/pull/55 PR 55 - Reorganize and consolidate work items| 13:55:35 q+ 13:55:40 ... if we want a prescriptive onboarding process and also normative security requirements, we can use architecture 13:55:44 q+ 13:55:58 ... I object to deleting this 13:55:59 q+ 13:56:03 i|I restru|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-charter-drafts/issues/24 Issue 24 - Consolidate and Refine Work Items and Describe Higher-Level Goals| 13:56:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:56:16 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/21-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:56:28 q+ 13:56:33 ... onboarding is a pretty big missing item, security TF is considering this very important 13:56:51 ben: not sure what onboarding relates to, could be put into discovery 13:56:56 q+ 13:56:59 ack b 13:57:01 ack e 13:57:03 mmc: we could do that 13:57:50 ege: I objected the security deliverable, not sure about the reason. I agree with Ben Francis, that it belongs into discovery. 13:59:00 mmc: Let'S review the rendered version 13:59:11 ++q 13:59:13 I also agree with Ben Francis, I was about to say about the same thing about Onboarding and Discovery being close 13:59:13 q++ 13:59:37 bkardell_ has joined #wot 13:59:37 q- + 13:59:43 ack ml 14:00:38 ack c 14:00:55 mmc: Please review the PRs and let's rediscuss logisitcs in tomorrow's main call 14:01:19 * ml: I have to leave 14:03:53 kaz: sounds to me that unfortunately we don't have enough consensus yet for generating actual text, would suggest we once stop generating/discussing Pullrequests but should concentrate on discussion to clarify people's expectations first. 14:04:02 s/sounds/scribenick: kaz/ 14:04:04 [adjourned] 14:04:09 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:04:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/21-wot-minutes.html kaz 16:08:10 Zakim has left #wot