IRC log of pwe on 2023-02-14
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:37:36 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #pwe
- 14:37:41 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/02/14-pwe-irc
- 14:37:43 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #pwe
- 14:37:49 [tzviya]
- Zakim, start the meeting
- 14:37:50 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 14:37:52 [Zakim]
- Meeting: Positive Work Environment CG
- 14:37:56 [tzviya]
- Date: 2023-02-14
- 14:38:03 [tzviya]
- chair: Wendy
- 14:39:00 [tzviya]
- Agenda+ Inclusion Fund for TPAC 2023
- 14:39:00 [tzviya]
- Agenda+ Running Better Meetings Training logistics review
- 14:39:00 [tzviya]
- Agenda+ Equity CG announced
- 14:39:00 [tzviya]
- Agenda+ Open TPAC issues
- 14:39:01 [tzviya]
- Agenda+ Revisit decision about changing name to CPC
- 14:39:01 [tzviya]
- Agenda+ open PRs and issues
- 14:39:01 [tzviya]
- Agenda+ AOB
- 14:48:35 [Jem]
- Jem has joined #pwe
- 14:57:47 [dbooth]
- dbooth has joined #pwe
- 14:59:20 [wendyreid]
- wendyreid has joined #pwe
- 15:00:32 [uxjennifer]
- uxjennifer has joined #pwe
- 15:01:44 [dbooth]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:01:45 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/14-pwe-minutes.html dbooth
- 15:02:21 [dbooth]
- present+
- 15:02:31 [cwilso]
- present+
- 15:02:36 [wendyreid]
- present+
- 15:02:39 [uxjennifer]
- present+
- 15:02:39 [tzviya]
- present+
- 15:03:40 [sheila]
- sheila has joined #pwe
- 15:04:08 [cwilso]
- scibe+
- 15:04:24 [wendyreid]
- scribe+ cwilso
- 15:04:43 [cwilso]
- s/scibe+//
- 15:05:00 [cwilso]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 15:05:00 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Inclusion Fund for TPAC 2023 -- taken up [from tzviya]
- 15:05:07 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/issues/205
- 15:05:45 [cwilso]
- wendy: this is our annual task; hopefully will take less time this year since we created a template last year.
- 15:06:17 [cwilso]
- ...we need to figure out the dates - TPAC is mid September, we need to backtrack far enough for people to be granted and receive the funds.
- 15:07:34 [cwilso]
- jen: thanks for doing this last year - it was very helpful, and having a buddy helped
- 15:08:10 [tzviya]
- q+
- 15:08:15 [wendyreid]
- ack tzviya
- 15:08:16 [cwilso]
- ...I would definitely encourage providing a support person if desired
- 15:08:53 [cwilso]
- tzviya: we should check with Coralie (I think) what our budget is; we tend to fundraise a year in the future. I'll take on checking.
- 15:09:16 [cwilso]
- ... also when they are planning on announcing registration.
- 15:09:25 [tzviya]
- +1 to doing this at the AC meeting
- 15:09:47 [cwilso]
- wendy: should definitely try to get out funding ask as well
- 15:10:22 [cwilso]
- ... we got a lot of spam last time, too - probably 75% of the submissions were spam
- 15:10:24 [uxjennifer]
- q+
- 15:10:30 [wendyreid]
- ack uxjennifer
- 15:10:57 [tzviya]
- q+
- 15:11:19 [wendyreid]
- ack tzviya
- 15:11:24 [cwilso]
- jen: I didn't know about the scholarship until I was told by someone. Socializing it would be good; relying on the AC rep to pass it on is not necessarily successful.
- 15:11:38 [wendyreid]
- q+
- 15:11:53 [cwilso]
- tzviya: we wrote up a blog post; unfortunately, it got buried at the end of another blog post rather than posted separately.
- 15:12:03 [cwilso]
- ... definitely want to get this out with registration.
- 15:12:05 [uxjennifer]
- q+
- 15:12:05 [wendyreid]
- ack wendyreid
- 15:12:11 [cwilso]
- ack uxj
- 15:12:39 [cwilso]
- wendy: encouraging chairs to mention this when they mention TPAC registration is a good idea, too.
- 15:12:49 [sheila]
- I wonder if we could also do a PSA about this at the AC meeting in May?
- 15:12:54 [dbooth]
- +1 to the idea of chairs mentioning it, so that people learn about it early enough
- 15:12:58 [wendyreid]
- ack uxjennifer
- 15:13:16 [cwilso]
- jen: I would never have even thought about this until I was personally approached.
- 15:14:03 [cwilso]
- ...reaching out to newcomers would be really helpful
- 15:14:39 [cwilso]
- wendy: hard for chairs to know peoples' situations, but we should definitely encourage chairs to reach out to their group members.
- 15:14:49 [npd]
- that's good advice to remind chairs; as a chair I didn't think to do that last year and I think it might have helped our group!
- 15:14:56 [cwilso]
- zakim, take up agenda 2
- 15:14:56 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Running Better Meetings Training logistics review -- taken up [from tzviya]
- 15:15:51 [cwilso]
- wendy: we're going ahead with this training session; the first session is recorded, and we ask attendees to watch it; the second session is live, and we'll deal with time zones, etc.
- 15:16:11 [cwilso]
- ...I can take on recording the first session and captioning, etc.
- 15:16:29 [cwilso]
- tzviya: we talked about doing this before the AC meeting, but I don't know if that's crucial.
- 15:16:42 [cwilso]
- ... would be nice to have a breakout at the AC meeting
- 15:17:09 [uxjennifer]
- q+
- 15:17:16 [wendyreid]
- ack uxjennifer
- 15:17:21 [npd]
- present+
- 15:17:40 [cwilso]
- jen: finally started attending some other WGs and CGs, and they're all so different in process and structure.
- 15:17:44 [cwilso]
- q+
- 15:17:59 [cwilso]
- ...is there any way to ensure chairs get this training?
- 15:18:20 [dbooth]
- Is there a URL for draft content for "Running Better Meetings"? I'm looking in https://github.com/w3c/PWETF and don't immediately see it.
- 15:18:26 [cwilso]
- ...frequently there's no transcript, no IRC, etc...
- 15:19:17 [dbooth]
- chris: This was feedback that I took from TPAC: anyone new had a hard time fitting into groups, without knowing the technology used.
- 15:19:28 [dbooth]
- ... How to take notes, queuing, etc.
- 15:19:32 [wendyreid]
- scribe+ dbooth
- 15:19:50 [dbooth]
- ... One challenge: Some had different expecations for how convos would run.
- 15:20:14 [dbooth]
- ... hard to track multiple conversations.
- 15:20:27 [dbooth]
- ... One colleague thought side conversations were helpful.
- 15:20:29 [tzviya]
- q+
- 15:20:34 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:20:37 [wendyreid]
- ack tzviya
- 15:20:51 [npd]
- +1 that it's hard to get unanimous views on how/what to use for running a meeting
- 15:20:58 [npd]
- (I'm one of those side conversation people)
- 15:21:15 [cwilso]
- tzviya: there are many aspects of this; the process CG tried to write something about tooling, I know Michael Cooper is looking at this also.
- 15:21:27 [uxjennifer]
- One group I attended didn't track attendance. They had a Google doc, but I didn't have access to it, to track comments, so I didn't know how to participate and didn't want to derail the meeting.
- 15:22:06 [cwilso]
- ... getting tools that work for a group can be challenging. Sometimes we can't dictate what every group uses, but we can ask that groups don't use tools that are inAccessible.
- 15:22:28 [cwilso]
- ... and tools that are not available
- 15:22:52 [cwilso]
- wendy: I know I spend a lot of time talking about tools.
- 15:23:29 [uxjennifer]
- It could be helpful to have a list of things that need to be done in a group: attendance, queueing for questions, etc. and make sure each group has a process for that and asking for questions about process.
- 15:23:31 [cwilso]
- tzviya: we should just make sure that chairs are given the message "be clear about the tooling"
- 15:23:39 [cwilso]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 15:23:39 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- Equity CG announced -- taken up [from tzviya]
- 15:23:42 [wendyreid]
- https://www.w3.org/community/equity/
- 15:24:33 [cwilso]
- jen: will restart meetings, etc shortly
- 15:24:45 [cwilso]
- q+
- 15:25:11 [cwilso]
- ...if there's anything I need to do differently, please let me knopw
- 15:25:17 [cwilso]
- a/knopw/know
- 15:25:48 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:25:50 [cwilso]
- ...hope to see some of you there.
- 15:26:00 [sheila]
- q+
- 15:26:02 [dbooth]
- chris: THere's no chair listed.
- 15:26:26 [dbooth]
- ... I think anyone can set the chair until it's set, then only the chair can set it.
- 15:26:50 [cwilso]
- q+ to address sensitivity
- 15:27:17 [wendyreid]
- ack sheila
- 15:27:23 [npd]
- would be interesting to experiment with a group that doesn't have a chair, although I believe the Process insists on it
- 15:27:44 [cwilso]
- sheila: thanks - curious to know scope of the equity group
- 15:28:53 [cwilso]
- jen: more about outcomes of W3C than processes
- 15:28:56 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:28:56 [Zakim]
- cwilso, you wanted to address sensitivity
- 15:30:32 [sheila]
- will definitely need to do some norm-setting around collaborative decision-making, in the absence of a chair
- 15:30:43 [cwilso]
- wendy: so, new CG. please join if you're interested.
- 15:30:48 [wendyreid]
- https://github.com/w3c/PWETF/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3ATPAC
- 15:30:49 [cwilso]
- zakim, take up agendum 4
- 15:30:49 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- Open TPAC issues -- taken up [from tzviya]
- 15:30:59 [npd]
- +1 for figuring out with the group a better sense of what we mean by equity in the horizontal review process
- 15:31:25 [cwilso]
- wendy: first topic is childcare. I note it's mentioned in the announcement, which is a huge deal
- 15:32:20 [cwilso]
- ...second was sensory rooms/quiet rooms.
- 15:32:28 [cwilso]
- ... any suggestions?
- 15:32:32 [dbooth]
- q+ to ask if food amenities might cause people to com ein for other reasons
- 15:32:43 [wendyreid]
- ack dbooth
- 15:32:43 [Zakim]
- dbooth, you wanted to ask if food amenities might cause people to com ein for other reasons
- 15:32:46 [cwilso]
- tzviya: would be helpful to have some consensus on this.
- 15:33:00 [cwilso]
- david: I wonder if providing food might be counterproductive.
- 15:33:04 [cwilso]
- +1
- 15:33:25 [cwilso]
- q+
- 15:33:29 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:33:42 [npd]
- q+
- 15:33:45 [uxjennifer]
- sometimes it is hard to access the snacks
- 15:33:58 [uxjennifer]
- q+
- 15:33:58 [dbooth]
- chris: In a conf often just need a quiet place.
- 15:34:22 [dbooth]
- ... Not having food, conversations, figget spinners migt be better. They might be distractions.
- 15:34:33 [dbooth]
- ... Suggest a sign saying "Please no chat here"
- 15:34:34 [tzviya]
- +1 to no conversations in this space
- 15:34:51 [dbooth]
- ... We have signs like that in the google nap rooms.
- 15:35:07 [wendyreid]
- ack npd
- 15:35:12 [dbooth]
- ... Sign of "This is for quiet space" might be enough
- 15:35:47 [cwilso]
- nick: +1 on quiet. It would be tempting.
- 15:36:02 [cwilso]
- ...I wouldn't choose a room where people are eating and drinking, either.
- 15:36:06 [wendyreid]
- ack uxjennifer
- 15:36:09 [sheila]
- +1 on concerns about food/drink for COVID reasons
- 15:36:35 [cwilso]
- jen: +1 to all. it was nice to have the hotel room right there for me.
- 15:36:58 [cwilso]
- +1 to Jen. I typically disappear at least once a day for 15 mins of deco time.
- 15:37:22 [npd]
- yeah, many people use hotel rooms specifically for getting away from the social overwhelmed feeling, but not everyone will have a hotel room in the same building
- 15:37:34 [cwilso]
- +1 npd
- 15:37:48 [cwilso]
- jen: citrus/scents are also nice
- 15:37:50 [dbooth]
- +1 to avoiding food in the room, for covid reasons
- 15:37:54 [tzviya]
- q+ to ask about consensus
- 15:37:59 [wendyreid]
- ack tzviya
- 15:37:59 [Zakim]
- tzviya, you wanted to ask about consensus
- 15:38:15 [cwilso]
- tzviya: do we have general consensus on having quiet room signs?
- 15:38:16 [dbooth]
- +1 to quiet room
- 15:38:19 [cwilso]
- +1
- 15:38:44 [uxjennifer]
- note scents are sensitive -- some may have migraines and such, so it's key to keep it to the individual who needs to think of their own.
- 15:39:04 [npd]
- +1 to quiet room. and using "quiet room" might actually make the concept more readily understandable to more participants
- 15:39:23 [wendyreid]
- zakim, next topic
- 15:39:23 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'next topic', wendyreid
- 15:39:27 [wendyreid]
- zakim, next item
- 15:39:27 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Inclusion Fund for TPAC 2023 -- taken up [from tzviya]
- 15:39:32 [cwilso]
- zakim, take up agendum 5
- 15:39:32 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 -- Revisit decision about changing name to CPC -- taken up [from tzviya]
- 15:40:35 [cwilso]
- wendy: we wanted to revisit the decision about changing the name. We've socialized CEPC quite a bit. We'd have to resocialize the name. Also, I don't think we should give up the idea of having ethics in the code.
- 15:41:01 [dbooth]
- q+ to suggest that if the groups wants to include ethics, that a visible placeholder be put into the doc
- 15:41:06 [cwilso]
- q+
- 15:41:07 [wendyreid]
- ack dbooth
- 15:41:08 [Zakim]
- dbooth, you wanted to suggest that if the groups wants to include ethics, that a visible placeholder be put into the doc
- 15:41:30 [tzviya]
- q+ to respond to dbooth
- 15:41:39 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:41:43 [npd]
- q+ to like the name, but also that ethics is not enforced in the same way
- 15:41:54 [cwilso]
- david: I'm sort of neutral - I think it would be better to address ethics in a separate document - but at least maybe put in a placeholder
- 15:42:21 [cwilso]
- tzviya: the document really needs to be in a final state, so we probably shouldn't have placeholders - it might have legal implications.
- 15:42:25 [cwilso]
- q+
- 15:42:45 [wendyreid]
- ack tzviya
- 15:42:45 [Zakim]
- tzviya, you wanted to respond to dbooth
- 15:42:52 [wendyreid]
- ack nick
- 15:42:55 [wendyreid]
- ack npd
- 15:42:55 [Zakim]
- npd, you wanted to like the name, but also that ethics is not enforced in the same way
- 15:43:13 [cwilso]
- ...while we don't strictly list things that are ethics, I'm not concerned enough that it's not obvious.
- 15:43:32 [cwilso]
- nick: if there are ethics in the document, I don't think those are handled by a chair in the moment.
- 15:44:00 [cwilso]
- ...I'm not sure I could interrupt a meeting in the moment, "that's not Sustainable" or the like...
- 15:44:10 [dbooth]
- q+ to say if the document is not complete -- lacks ethics -- then it should not bill itself that way.
- 15:44:11 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:44:14 [cwilso]
- ...seems like a separate direciton
- 15:44:32 [tzviya]
- s/direciton/direction
- 15:45:06 [tzviya]
- q+ to say I prefer CoC to CPC
- 15:45:10 [dbooth]
- chris: Not strongly pushing to change the name. The point of it being socialized is strong. Need to socialize it w every new person. That's where I feel like "Code of Conduct" is a well socialized concept, not a surpirce.
- 15:45:16 [tzviya]
- +1 to cwilso
- 15:45:41 [dbooth]
- ... Introducing it as CEPC referring to it as "Code of Condct".
- 15:46:31 [dbooth]
- ... Other side, ethics: Getting attacked from other areas, such as from other groups, I don't think it belongs in the same place. Who defines thr right ethics? Probably not this community group. They're supposed to be binding.
- 15:46:47 [dbooth]
- ... It will leave some stuff in the cold. Will be a hard convo.
- 15:47:04 [dbooth]
- ... Don't want to intro ethics here beause we'll have to define ethics.
- 15:47:20 [dbooth]
- ... .Worried it will weaken our ability to deliver on Code of COnduct.
- 15:47:24 [wendyreid]
- ack dbooth
- 15:47:24 [Zakim]
- dbooth, you wanted to say if the document is not complete -- lacks ethics -- then it should not bill itself that way.
- 15:48:03 [cwilso]
- david: I think it's important not to bill itself as something it's not.
- 15:48:03 [wendyreid]
- ack tzviya
- 15:48:03 [Zakim]
- tzviya, you wanted to say I prefer CoC to CPC
- 15:48:40 [cwilso]
- tzviya: I don't think there's a lot of disagreement. We probably shouldn't call it CPC - either CEPC or CoC.
- 15:49:06 [cwilso]
- ... I'd be comfortable making it CoC.
- 15:49:08 [cwilso]
- q+
- 15:49:11 [npd]
- I preferred CPC, but I don't have a strong view on it
- 15:49:20 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:49:41 [dbooth]
- +0 -- I'm neutral about "Code of Conduct" vs "COPC"
- 15:49:44 [uxjennifer]
- q+
- 15:49:52 [sheila]
- also neutral
- 15:49:58 [dbooth]
- Fine with me to rename as "Code of Conduct"
- 15:49:59 [wendyreid]
- ack uxjennifer
- 15:50:42 [cwilso]
- jen: it's very confusing. When I first heard CEPC, it was confusing - but then I thought it was awesome.
- 15:50:57 [cwilso]
- ...What we really want is more people participating in PWE.
- 15:51:21 [tzviya]
- zakim, close item 1
- 15:51:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 1, Inclusion Fund for TPAC 2023, closed
- 15:51:22 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 15:51:22 [Zakim]
- 2. Running Better Meetings Training logistics review [from tzviya]
- 15:51:26 [cwilso]
- ...we definitely would need to say that we're not removing ethics from the W3C
- 15:51:27 [cwilso]
- +1
- 15:51:31 [tzviya]
- zakim, close item 2
- 15:51:31 [Zakim]
- agendum 2, Running Better Meetings Training logistics review, closed
- 15:51:32 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 15:51:32 [Zakim]
- 3. Equity CG announced [from tzviya]
- 15:51:45 [cwilso]
- wendy: part of it would be communication of the change.
- 15:51:50 [tzviya]
- zakim, close item 3
- 15:51:50 [Zakim]
- agendum 3, Equity CG announced, closed
- 15:51:51 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 15:51:51 [Zakim]
- 5. Revisit decision about changing name to CPC [from tzviya]
- 15:52:07 [dbooth]
- q+ to suggest that if there's concern about removal of the word "ethics", a note should be added at the bottom saying it will be in a separate document
- 15:52:57 [cwilso]
- david: +1 to acknowledging Ethics is not being abandoned.
- 15:52:58 [tzviya]
- ack db
- 15:52:58 [Zakim]
- dbooth, you wanted to suggest that if there's concern about removal of the word "ethics", a note should be added at the bottom saying it will be in a separate document
- 15:52:58 [wendyreid]
- ack dbooth
- 15:53:15 [cwilso]
- q+
- 15:53:17 [npd]
- q+
- 15:53:29 [cwilso]
- tzviya: I really don't want to include a note in this document
- 15:53:33 [cwilso]
- +1
- 15:53:53 [wendyreid]
- ack cwilso
- 15:54:13 [dbooth]
- I find tzviya's argument convincing also.
- 15:55:17 [wendyreid]
- ack npd
- 15:55:23 [dbooth]
- chris: I don't think we will ever add "thou shalt be ethical in these ways ..." to the doc.
- 15:55:57 [cwilso]
- nick: I still kind of appreciate the "P" in CoPC.
- 15:56:32 [cwilso]
- ... it's not "just a code of conduct"
- 15:56:32 [uxjennifer]
- q+
- 15:56:32 [cwilso]
- ...professional standards, not just ground rules that might get ignored
- 15:56:53 [wendyreid]
- ack uxjennifer
- 15:57:04 [cwilso]
- s/to the doc/to this document, developed in this CG - there are several other groups working on broader ethical consensus (TAG, AB)
- 15:57:25 [npd]
- npd: but no strong objection to any of the change proposals here
- 15:58:05 [cwilso]
- jen: I suggested we have a monthly training session for new members. The Code could be reviewed in that.
- 15:58:18 [npd]
- I don't mind considering ethics in this group even if it will need to be reviewed and get consensus from the wider community
- 15:59:14 [cwilso]
- wendy: PROPOSAL: we change CEPC to "Code of Conduct".
- 15:59:18 [tzviya]
- +1
- 15:59:19 [cwilso]
- +1
- 15:59:23 [uxjennifer]
- +1
- 15:59:24 [wendyreid]
- +1
- 15:59:25 [dbooth]
- +0
- 15:59:33 [npd]
- +0
- 15:59:47 [sheila]
- +0
- 16:00:33 [dbooth]
- q+ to say I think i'ts resolved!
- 16:00:36 [cwilso]
- wendy: not going to resolve this today. Will do a PR, and maybe the tone will make us lean one way or another.
- 16:00:47 [cwilso]
- tzviya: will also ask others, like Ada and Angele.
- 16:00:55 [cwilso]
- s/Angele/Angel
- 16:01:17 [cwilso]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:01:18 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/14-pwe-minutes.html cwilso
- 16:01:57 [dbooth]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 16:01:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/02/14-pwe-minutes.html dbooth
- 16:02:03 [tzviya]
- rrsagent, make logs public