16:52:06 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star 16:52:11 logging to https://www.w3.org/2023/01/19-rdf-star-irc 16:52:11 RRSAgent, make logs Public 16:52:12 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), pchampin 16:52:30 meeting: RDF-star WG 16:53:35 present+ 16:53:48 pchampin has changed the topic to: RDF-star WG 2023-01-19 — https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/8a431cda-d732-4c77-a896-be3a6e4a0028 16:54:37 pchampin has changed the topic to: RDF-star WG 2023-01-19 — https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2023Jan/0024.html 16:54:43 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2023Jan/0024.html 16:54:43 clear agenda 16:54:43 agenda+ Agenda 16:54:43 agenda+ Status of GH repositories 16:54:43 agenda+ GH Project for collecting issues [1] 16:54:43 agenda+ Continuation of last weeks discussion in the call 16:54:55 present+ 16:57:37 TIL -- There's a list of all previous meetings : https://www.w3.org/services/meeting-minutes?channel=rdf-star&num=200 16:58:26 previous meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/01/12-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:58:47 next meeting: https://www.w3.org/2023/01/26-rdf-star-minutes.html 16:59:07 someone ought invent a standard for for news feed on the web. 17:00:16 enrico has joined #rdf-star 17:00:17 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 17:00:21 present+ 17:01:04 AZ has joined #rdf-star 17:01:14 present+ 17:01:22 present+ 17:01:53 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:02:16 olaf has joined #rdf-star 17:02:16 agenda? 17:02:32 TallTed has joined #rdf-star 17:02:35 present+ 17:02:54 present+ 17:03:23 Dominik_T has joined #rdf-star 17:03:58 pfps has joined #rdf-star 17:04:12 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:04:52 present+ 17:05:02 present+ 17:05:05 additional items proposed for agenda: 17:05:05 * GH Project for collecting issues [1] 17:05:05 * Suri: Slide on storage, performance, and future-proofing aspects related to multi-edge handling (5m) 17:05:08 * Gregg: Editor assignments 17:05:11 present+ 17:05:39 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:05:57 zakim, who is present? 17:05:57 I don't understand your question, AndyS. 17:06:24 Doerthe has joined #rdf-star 17:06:24 scribe: AndyS 17:06:30 present+ 17:06:39 Dominik_T has joined #rdf-star 17:06:41 https://www.w3.org/2023/01/12-rdf-star-minutes.html 17:06:42 present+ 17:07:24 ktk: accept the minutes 17:07:35 ... feedback on agenda 17:07:38 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:07:39 Souri has joined #rdf-star 17:07:53 ... GH repos 17:07:57 present+ 17:08:13 ... a GH repo for issues of all docs 17:08:31 ... Souri would like a 5 min slot 17:08:53 ... gkellogg asked about editors 17:08:54 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:09:55 pchampin: created a GH repo per specification 17:10:16 ... github pages active 17:10:25 ... 'main' protected 17:10:26 q+ 17:11:03 q+ 17:11:30 AndyS: What is published to GH pages, is it the whole repo or a particular subdirectory? 17:11:35 pchampin: it's the whole repo 17:12:01 ack me 17:12:29 q- 17:12:49 pfps: Q about how GH page work 17:12:51 q+ 17:12:58 ... respec can run locally? 17:13:18 q- 17:13:20 AndyS: yes it can be run locally, it's some javascript in the spec itself 17:13:54 q+ 17:13:57 pfps: can we have pre-commits for checking things on commits? 17:14:37 AndyS: there are some pre-commit hooks but they only check basic things, not respec related 17:14:41 q- 17:14:51 pfps: will dig into checking possibilites for reSpec. 17:15:09 AndyS: I haven't pushed any content on SPARQL stuff yet, I was working separately. 17:15:29 ... I got some respec errors and will push after that. 17:16:40 q+ 17:16:40 topic: Issues project 17:17:49 ktk: Idea is a GH project for organising work. 17:18:14 ... also issues across repos 17:18:17 q+ to ask how GitHub projects handle GitHub notifications 17:18:33 w3c already uses GH rojects, so it should be possible 17:18:37 ... one central place to see all work 17:18:53 q? 17:18:55 s/GH rojects/GH projects/ 17:19:03 ack pfps 17:19:31 pfps: New feature of sub-projects may be useful 17:19:38 ... "task lists" 17:19:51 ... in an issue link to sub issues 17:20:49 q- 17:22:29 ack TallTed 17:22:29 TallTed, you wanted to ask how GitHub projects handle GitHub notifications 17:22:53 TallTed: GH creates features that are not fully thought out. 17:23:10 ... how does GH handle notifications? 17:23:42 ktk: subscribe is per project 17:24:25 ... should be cautions in using the features 17:24:44 s/cautions/cautious/ 17:25:19 ktk: PA and chairs will come back with a proposal. 17:25:41 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:27:29 topic: Editor assignments 17:27:57 ktk: gregg gave a list of docs he's interested in. 17:28:04 q+ 17:28:12 q- 17:28:31 q+ 17:28:37 ack olaf 17:29:00 +1 handle in an issue. Possibly with checklist of docs at top, to be supplemented with Editors as volunteered/assigned. 17:29:26 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:29:26 q+ 17:29:34 AndyS: I assume we do not do a complete review-cycle since the 1.1 specs 17:29:40 ack AndyS 17:29:54 ack TallTed 17:30:19 TallTed: I think most changes would be between 1.1 and today. but it would be good if reviewers still have a look at the whole document. 17:31:05 TallTed: Errata in a previous edition should be corrected in a new addition 17:31:36 ... if we find an error in a previous edition it should be corrected in any way. 17:32:02 AndyS: it depends on how much work this creates. we have only 18 months of time 17:32:16 TallTed: if errors create work, we should be able to extend the timeframe 17:32:46 q+ 17:33:12 pfps: if we get a comment that creates massive changes for everything, we can say it is out of scope. 17:33:28 pfps: we have the option of declining comments 17:33:33 ack pfps 17:33:36 TallTed: if the need for change is valid, like they discover a broken thing in the current spec, it should be treated with respect. 17:35:50 s/handle in an issue. Possibly/handle Editor assignments in an issue. Possibly/ 17:35:57 ktk: Will create issue to record editor offers 17:36:40 ACTION ktk, to create an issue for editors offers 17:37:46 Zakim, help 17:37:46 Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot for more detailed help. 17:37:48 Some of the commands I know are: 17:37:48 xxx is yyy - establish yyy as the name of unknown party xxx 17:37:48 if yyy is 'me' or 'I', your nick is substituted 17:37:49 xxx may be yyy - establish yyy as possibly the name of unknown party xxx 17:37:49 I am xxx - establish your nick as the name of unknown party xxx 17:37:49 xxx holds yyy [, zzz ...] - establish xxx as a group name and yyy, etc. as participants within that group 17:37:49 xxx also holds yyy - add yyy to the list of participants in group xxx 17:37:49 who's here? - lists the participants on the phone 17:37:49 who's muted? - lists the participants who are muted 17:37:50 mute xxx - mutes party xxx (like pressing 61#) 17:37:50 unmute xxx - reverses the effect of "mute" and of 61# 17:37:50 is xxx here? - reports whether a party named like xxx is present 17:37:51 list conferences - reports the active conferences 17:37:51 this is xxx - associates this channel with conference xxx 17:37:51 excuse us - disconnects from the irc channel 17:37:51 I last learned something new on $Date: 2020/12/31 21:20:53 $ 17:38:02 rrsagent, help 17:39:00 ACTION: ktk to create an issue for editors offers 17:39:07 Created -> action 11 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/issues/11 17:39:20 souri: present slide 17:41:11 The scribe asks that the slide be sent to the WG email list. 17:43:57 I'm confused. What is supposed to be happening here? An example that is part of a worked-out use case seems indicated. 17:45:12 gkellogg has joined #rdf-star 17:45:25 timestamp 17:46:10 timestamp is the use case? How is this being represented? 17:47:35 I'm confused. 17:49:12 pfps: This depends on what is presented and how. What's the UC? 17:49:31 ... the WG should pay attention to use cases 17:50:04 ... provenance, modal logic. Can't future proof everything. 17:51:19 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-star 17:51:37 q+ 17:54:51 ack TallTed 17:55:22 This looks like an attempt to change the RDF semantics from set-based to bag-based. This is a fundamental change. 17:55:34 TallTed: slide implies an automatic id - which is not always the case. 17:55:53 There's existing work (quite a lot actually) about mapping relational data to RDF (and back). It works. Do we need a new RDF that mimmics relational data so much that it's essentially doing the same thing? 17:55:59 ... I think you are asking for implicit and explicit naming 17:56:11 ... need to explain the slides 17:56:50 +1 to explicit use case (which I don't have ... yet) 17:57:04 +1 for concrete use cases 17:57:43 I agree that introducing things via email is better. 17:57:56 olaf has left #rdf-star 17:58:32 zakim, end meeting 17:58:32 As of this point the attendees have been AndyS, pchampin, enrico, gtw, AZ, olaf, ktk, pfps, Dominik_T, TallTed, Doerthe, Souri 17:58:34 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:58:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2023/01/19-rdf-star-minutes.html Zakim 17:58:43 I am happy to have been of service, AndyS; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 17:58:43 Zakim has left #rdf-star 17:58:52 rrsagent, please excuse us 17:58:52 I see 1 open action item saved in https://www.w3.org/2023/01/19-rdf-star-actions.rdf : 17:58:52 ACTION: ktk to create an issue for editors offers [1] 17:58:52 recorded in https://www.w3.org/2023/01/19-rdf-star-irc#T17-39-00