15:02:56 RRSAgent has joined #wot-discovery 15:03:00 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/12/19-wot-discovery-irc 15:03:04 meeting: WoT Discovery 15:03:21 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Kunihiko_Toumura, Tomoaki_Mizushima 15:07:13 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Discovery_WebConf#19_December_2022 15:07:55 scribenick: kaz 15:07:59 topic: Minutes 15:08:13 -> https://www.w3.org/2022/12/05-wot-discovery-minutes.html Dec-5 15:08:36 approved 15:08:41 topic: Logistics 15:09:03 mm: this is the last meeting this year 15:09:12 ... next meeting is a bit tricky 15:09:24 ... normally Jan 16 15:09:48 ... but due to the special meeting on the WG Charter, the next Discovery meeting will be on Jan 23 15:10:09 ... anything else? 15:10:11 (none) 15:10:16 topic: IANA registration 15:10:32 mm: Kaz contacted the IANA guys 15:10:44 ... the TXT keys are updated now 15:11:03 -> https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=wot IANA registry entries for WoT 15:11:09 mm: so that's done 15:11:16 ... please double check to make sure 15:11:28 topic: DID registration 15:11:43 mm: the next one is DID registration, but it's problematic 15:12:15 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/402 Issue 402 - Register DID service names 15:12:33 mm: normative change for the WoT Discovery topic? 15:12:34 glomb has joined #wot-discovery 15:13:37 -> https://github.com/w3c/did-spec-registries/pull/486 did-spec-registries PR 486 - Add WotThing and WotDirectory service types 15:14:29 s/mm: normative change for the WoT Discovery topic?// 15:14:31 mm: normative change for the WoT Discovery topic? 15:15:00 ... the URL is describe within the example 15:15:24 ... how to deal with that? 15:16:04 kaz: if that is about an example, we could change that after CR transition 15:16:19 mm: right 15:17:10 ... what about the additional reference to the DID registry? 15:17:22 ... that would be a normative reference, I think 15:17:44 ... we would not add any assertion based on this change, though 15:18:08 kaz: would suggest we ask PLH about that 15:19:16 mm: and another possible point on adding an assertion defining the "@context" 15:20:33 kaz: we need to talk with PLH about that as well 15:20:56 mm: the question is that we don't have implementations about that feature 15:21:18 kaz: we can add that feature and republish an updated CR 15:21:53 s/and/but probably need to/ 15:22:03 s/mm: the question is that we don't have implementations about that feature// 15:22:05 mm: the question is that we don't have implementations about that feature 15:22:14 https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/402#issuecomment-1357835235 15:24:42 kaz: in that case, my suggestion is (opt1) simply removing that feature or (opt2) adding that as an informative feature 15:25:14 mm: the section "6.5 DID Documents" is already identified as "at-risk" 15:26:42 kaz: "12.1 DID Service Name Registration" should be also removed if we remove "6.5 DID Documents" 15:26:53 ... anyway, let's talk with PLH about this 15:26:53 mm: ok 15:27:08 topic: Next Charter 15:27:43 mm: we'll talk about the next WG Charter during the week of Jan 16 15:28:06 ... so we need to finalize what to be discussed for WoT Discovery today 15:28:32 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/blob/main/proposals/deliverable-proposals/discovery.md deliverable-proposals/discovery.md 15:28:45 mm: (goes through the proposal) 15:28:57 present+ Christian_Glomb 15:29:25 ... signing for JSON-LD depends on RDF signing 15:29:33 ... which is kind of heavy 15:30:07 ... the second point around JSON Path 15:30:13 ... then Geolocation 15:30:34 q+ 15:30:44 ... would have a finite set of extension 15:31:53 cg: would be good to come with some comment query 15:32:01 ... based on use cases and best practices 15:32:07 ... to see typical queries 15:32:13 q+ glomb 15:32:19 ack g 15:33:07 mm: (adds comments around that) 15:33:25 ... filters can be a general mechanism that can also encapsulate common queries 15:33:35 ... such as searching by keyword or id 15:33:48 ... we should look at some common use cases for additional filters 15:34:10 cg: which filters to be formulated? 15:34:59 mm: potentially, something like [[?filter="goe/lat=45.5,long=123.3,r=15)"]] 15:35:34 cg: need some syntax for that purpose 15:35:54 ... would be an addition to the search endpoint 15:36:46 mm: e.g.: https://tdd.example.com/list?filter="geo(lat=45.5, long=123.3, r=15)|keyword('light')" 15:36:48 q? 15:37:01 cg: we should add support for Thing Model 15:37:29 mm: do you mean storing TMs in TDDs? 15:37:32 cg: yeah 15:37:47 mm: and allowing links from TDs to be resolved 15:38:21 cg: can use TM for validation 15:38:47 mm: would be helpful to also be able to validate a TD against a TM 15:39:03 ... (adds "validation" as well) 15:39:13 ... validation could be improved 15:39:15 q? 15:39:35 ... hopefully this will be improved in TD 2.0 15:40:34 kaz: I agree those topics are important 15:40:45 ... but wondering which spec(s) to handle them 15:40:58 ... maybe not or not only the WoT Discovery spec 15:41:14 ... but (also) TD, etc., as well 15:41:18 mm: yeah 15:41:54 ack k 15:41:57 q+ 15:42:05 ... Digital Twin may also be related 15:43:00 kaz: yeah 15:43:32 ... putting TM and Validation to this discovery.md is fine at the moment 15:44:13 ... but during the Charter discussion next year, it would make more sense to consider which technology and which topic to be handled by which spec and which phase from the whole WoT lifecycle again 15:44:27 mm: yeah, TM handling is not only for Discovery 15:45:01 ack k 15:45:36 ... Validation mechanism also to be defined in the TD spec 15:45:57 ... also other protocols 15:46:02 ... CoAP and MQTT 15:47:45 ... HTTP2/QUIC 15:47:57 ... time-based filter 15:48:29 s|HTTP2/QUIC|HTTP/3, QUIC| 15:49:04 ... (goes through the issues with the label of "defer to Discovery 2.0") 15:49:26 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/labels/defer%20to%20Discovery%202.0 Issues with "defer to Discovery 2.0" label 15:50:32 mm: additional security features, e.g., object security/JOSE 15:50:41 ... additional checks 15:51:34 s/checks/checks during registration 15:51:41 rrsagent, make log public 15:51:45 rrsagent, draft miutes 15:51:45 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft miutes', kaz. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:51:53 s/rrsagent, draft miutes// 15:51:57 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:51:58 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/12/19-wot-discovery-minutes.html kaz 15:52:20 cg: also Scripting API for Discovery as well? 15:52:36 ... not really updated about the current discussion, though 15:53:19 mm: Scripting API is informative, but should be consistent 15:53:31 ... any other thoughts? 15:53:41 (none) 15:54:06 mm: will create a PR to add these points to discovery.md 15:55:17 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1046 wot PR 1046 - Update discovery.md 15:55:18 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1046 15:55:24 mm: any objection to merge this? 15:55:26 (none) 15:55:41 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1046|| 15:55:43 merged 15:55:51 topic: Testing 15:56:21 -> https://w3c.github.io/wot-discovery/testing/report.html latest Implementation Report on GitHub 15:56:41 mm: still bunch of features at-risk 15:57:12 s/features/security features/ 15:57:22 ... also bunch of privacy features at-risk 15:57:57 ... then CoAP feature 15:58:25 ... security-bootstrapping-endpoints should be easy 15:58:53 ... still missing UDP-based features 15:59:18 ... would make more sense to have CoAP-based directory 15:59:32 ... or MQTT-based 16:00:09 ... some of them are really fatal but the core functionality should be OK 16:01:01 ... any other comments? 16:01:17 ... please look at the updated Implementation Report as well 16:01:35 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Special_Meetings_to_Discuss_Next_Charter 16:01:41 ... will see you at the special meeting on Charter on Jan 16 16:01:54 ... link available above 16:02:01 ... any other business? 16:02:03 (none) 16:02:06 [adjourned] 16:02:09 rrsagent, make log public 16:02:14 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:02:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/12/19-wot-discovery-minutes.html kaz 18:00:49 Zakim has left #wot-discovery