14:37:07 RRSAgent has joined #apa 14:37:07 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/12/07-apa-irc 14:37:09 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:37:11 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), janina 14:37:26 agenda? 14:37:41 Chair: Janina 14:37:41 agenda+ Agenda Review & Announcements 14:37:41 agenda+ Advancing Adapt Symbols to CR 14:37:41 agenda+ New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 14:37:44 agenda+ A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review 14:37:47 agenda+ new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html 14:37:49 agenda+ Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned 14:37:52 agenda+ CSS Update (Paul) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues 14:37:55 agenda+ Task Force & Deliverables Updates 14:37:57 agenda+ Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open 14:38:00 agenda+ Other Business 14:38:02 agenda+ be done 14:38:23 Meeting: APA Weekly Teleconference 14:38:30 date: 07 Dec 2022 14:40:36 regrets: Fredrik_Fischer, Becky_Gibson 14:51:19 matatk has joined #apa 14:58:30 niklasegger has joined #apa 15:00:01 PaulG has joined #apa 15:00:37 present+ 15:02:12 present+ 15:02:19 agenda? 15:02:32 present+ 15:02:39 present+ 15:02:40 present+ 15:03:01 scribe: matatk 15:03:26 zakim, next item 15:03:26 agendum 1 -- Agenda Review & Announcements -- taken up [from janina] 15:03:34 regrets+ Lionel 15:03:43 rrsagent, make minutes 15:03:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/12/07-apa-minutes.html matatk 15:04:42 janina: Matthew, Lionel and I participated in the W3C Workshop on Permissions (virtually). We learnt quite a bit, and have work to follow up on. We'll let you know when the workshop report is out. 15:05:04 ... We've made connections for some of the work, particularly edge-related, that we started in TPAC (e.g. verifiable credentials). 15:08:06 matatk: I got insights from the workshop into ways the UA is acting on behalf of the user. 15:08:12 janina: Note: APA _is_ meeting next week. 15:08:16 zakim, next item 15:08:16 agendum 2 -- Advancing Adapt Symbols to CR -- taken up [from janina] 15:08:32 janina: We have a resolution from our Adapt TF. 15:08:59 https://www.w3.org/2022/12/05-adapt-minutes.html#r01 15:09:18 mike_beganyi has joined #apa 15:09:42 janina: Adapt TF has asked us to move the Symbols Module forward to CR. We do not believe we need a new CfC, because this module is the result of removing (for now) the non-symbol attributes. 15:09:46 present+ 15:10:13 janina: We met with TAG during TPAC and they agreed, as do we, that symbols is the best-architected part. So we have removed the rest for now, and are investigating the other work separately. 15:10:27 https://www.w3.org/2022/12/05-adapt-minutes.html#r015 15:10:31 ... The Symbols Module depends on our new AAC Registry, the FPWD of which was just approved overnight. (above) 15:10:51 s/overnight. (above)/overnight./ 15:11:36 janina: Does anyone object, and believe that another CfC is required? We do not believe so, but if you have concerns, questions, please raise them here. 15:11:58 DRAFT RESOLUTION: APA confirms support for advancing Adapt Symbol Module to CR based on our previous consensus which included symbols logged at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0058.html 15:12:22 janina: Any concerns about this resolution? 15:13:30 RESOLUTION: APA confirms support for advancing Adapt Symbol Module to CR based on our previous consensus which included symbols logged at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0058.html 15:13:57 janina: This truly is groundbreaking work. 15:13:58 +1 15:14:02 zakim, next item 15:14:02 agendum 3 -- New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22 -- taken up [from janina] 15:14:26 Roy: No new charters, no new issues, and nothing new on TR this week. 15:14:28 agenda? 15:15:00 zakim, clsoe this item 15:15:00 I don't understand 'clsoe this item', matatk 15:15:11 zakim, close this item 15:15:11 agendum 3 closed 15:15:13 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:15:13 4. A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review [from janina] 15:15:17 zakim, drop item 4 15:15:17 agendum 4, A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review, dropped 15:15:25 zakim, drop item 5 15:15:25 agendum 5, new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html, dropped 15:15:38 zakim, next item 15:15:38 agendum 6 -- Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned -- taken up [from janina] 15:15:47 subtopic: Autoplay Policy Detection 15:15:47 - TR: https://www.w3.org/TR/autoplay-detection/ 15:15:47 - tracking: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Autoplay_Policy_Detection 15:18:53 subtopic: Verifiable Credential Data Integrity 1.0 15:18:54 - TR: https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-integrity 15:18:54 - tracking: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Verifiable_Credential_Data_Integrity_1.0 15:18:54 - review by Lionel: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2022Nov/0045.html 15:20:54 Alisa_Smith has joined #apa 15:21:01 present+ 15:21:35 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/UI_Events_KeyboardEvent_code_Values 15:21:39 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/UI_Events_KeyboardEvent_key_Values 15:22:08 zakim, next item 15:22:08 agendum 7 -- CSS Update (Paul) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues -- taken up [from janina] 15:22:40 subtopic: no-motion 15:22:41 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7440 15:24:01 PaulG: One option suggested was an "important" directive to override motion. I think the UA should control this ultimately. A general path forward, involving adding some ability to continue to reduce motion, was agreed. 15:24:26 subtopic: fragment url() 15:24:27 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3320 15:25:00 PaulG: this is about clarifying expectations about how the URL is resolved 15:25:15 ... This is only for IDs. 15:26:11 s/is resolved/is resolved./ 15:26:17 PaulG: This one didn't seem a11y-related 15:26:19 subtopic: animate display:none 15:26:20 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429 15:26:49 PaulG: This one is about how some properties can't be animated. 15:26:59 ... Trying to make it more intuitive for developers. 15:27:17 ... Shouldn't affect animations or anything like that; just a technique for how the animation is executed. 15:27:58 niklasegger has joined #apa 15:29:02 subtopic: ruby spacing 15:29:02 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5995 15:29:16 janina: Are we piggybacking on this with Symbols? 15:29:28 PaulG: This is more about how whitespace is stripped or not, in different cases. i18n is being consulted on it. 15:29:33 q+ re symbols 15:30:21 PaulG: I mentioned the work on AAC symbols, but in current prototypes e.g. from matatk the symbols have their own spacing, margins. 15:31:33 ... Spacing is a little more important with Ruby because the rubies need to line up precisely wiht the charactrs. For Symbols, it is a bit more coarse and the text will need to be re-laid out to accommodate the symbols. 15:31:39 q- 15:31:45 q? 15:32:00 zakim, next item 15:32:00 agendum 8 -- Task Force & Deliverables Updates -- taken up [from janina] 15:32:16 subtopic: Pronunciation 15:32:35 janina: PaulG: Does the new proposed time work for you? 15:33:10 PaulG: Yes; that time looks generally good. 15:34:08 janina: Will check up on having a call next week. 15:34:36 ... I have an action to re-write the draft response to WHATWG. We may need to work with the WICG, too. 15:35:13 subtopic: Adapt 15:35:30 janina: As above - some key work finished, and AAC Registry FPWD will be published next Tuesday we hope. 15:35:42 ... Also, we hope, the Symbols Module CR, before the moratorium. 15:36:07 ... The Explainer has been, and will be, updated, so we should publish an updated draft of that too. 15:36:28 subtopic: Maturity Model (?) 15:36:43 janina: We're going to propose making MM a TF, probably in January. We'll run a CfC on this. 15:36:57 ... They've started working on a Work Statement, which will be reviewed shortly. 15:37:16 ... In the new year, APA is re-chartering, so we'll be asking you about making MM a TF then. 15:37:26 zakim, next item 15:37:26 agendum 9 -- Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open -- taken up [from janina] 15:37:30 rrsagent, make minutes 15:37:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/12/07-apa-minutes.html matatk 15:38:36 matatk: Suggest everyone reads and comments, if needed, on Lionel's review, posted to the list: Action item: Review Verifiable Credential Data Integrity: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2022Nov/0045.html 15:38:40 q+ 15:39:30 subtopic: Web of Things 15:39:39 niklasegger: Have been looking at the spec; have a few questions. 15:40:02 ... Gottfried planning to review between Christmas and New Year, and deliver report in the new year. Is that too late? 15:40:25 janina: No, that's fine. We didn't block their CR, but we can put in any comments before the CR closes. 15:41:25 niklasegger: The original question posted by WoT was if the Architecture doc should have an accessibility section. I talked with Gottfried and he had some more ideas, which relate to WoT in general, e.g. including more semantic info in the ThingDescription, (e.g. type of the device; it's location). Should we consider these things too, or is it too late? 15:42:03 janina: No it's not too late. Do you recall they have profiles, and they created an accessibility considerations section for the profiles. I think it needs a little more than what they have. We should decide on those together. Whether it goes into the Architecture spec, or Profiles, I'm not sure. 15:42:32 ... Also I want to capture what we called "middleware" accessibilty issues, which we raised with the group earlier, and the importance of making consumers aware of those issues/requirements in advance. 15:42:42 niklasegger: Thanks; we'll keep you updated. 15:42:53 zakim, next item 15:42:53 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, matatk 15:42:55 q? 15:42:57 ack niklasegger 15:42:58 q? 15:43:00 zakim, next item 15:43:01 agendum 10 -- Other Business -- taken up [from janina] 15:43:19 zakim, close this item 15:43:19 agendum 10 closed 15:43:20 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 15:43:20 11. be done [from janina] 15:43:24 zakim, next item 15:43:24 agendum 11 -- be done -- taken up [from janina] 15:43:40 janina: Thank you very much everyone for your time and good work, of which there is quite a bit being done! 15:43:52 janina: See you next week! 15:44:15 rrsagent, make minutes 15:44:15 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/12/07-apa-minutes.html matatk 15:45:12 PaulG has left #apa 15:47:35 matatk has joined #apa 15:47:43 zakim, bye 15:47:43 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been PaulG, matatk, janina, Roy, niklasegger, mike_beganyi, Alisa_Smith 15:47:43 Zakim has left #apa 15:47:50 rrsagent, make minutes 15:47:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/12/07-apa-minutes.html matatk 15:54:43 janina has changed the topic to: APA Weekly Teleconference; Wednesday 14 December at 1500Z