IRC log of aria-apg on 2022-11-29
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 18:56:12 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aria-apg
- 18:56:12 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/11/29-aria-apg-irc
- 18:57:38 [isaacdurazo]
- isaacdurazo has joined #aria-apg
- 19:00:36 [Jem]
- Jem has joined #aria-apg
- 19:00:50 [Jem]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 19:00:50 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/11/29-aria-apg-minutes.html Jem
- 19:01:08 [Matt_King]
- MEETING: ARIA Authoring Practices Task Force
- 19:01:15 [Jem]
- present+
- 19:01:18 [Matt_King]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 19:01:22 [Matt_King]
- present+
- 19:01:29 [Matt_King]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 19:01:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/11/29-aria-apg-minutes.html Matt_King
- 19:02:22 [Jem]
- present+ siri
- 19:02:47 [Siri]
- Siri has joined #aria-apg
- 19:02:47 [MarkMcCarthy]
- MarkMcCarthy has joined #aria-apg
- 19:02:56 [Siri]
- Present+
- 19:03:09 [Jem]
- present+ Helen
- 19:03:13 [MarkMcCarthy]
- present+
- 19:03:19 [Jem]
- present+ alex
- 19:03:47 [isaacdurazo]
- present+
- 19:03:48 [Jem]
- present+ howard
- 19:04:21 [MarkMcCarthy]
- agenda: https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/wiki/November-29%2C-2022-Agenda
- 19:04:59 [Siri]
- present +
- 19:05:00 [howard-e]
- present+
- 19:05:09 [MarkMcCarthy]
- scribe+
- 19:05:11 [howard-e]
- howard-e has joined #aria-apg
- 19:05:15 [MarkMcCarthy]
- TOPIC: Setup and Review Agenda
- 19:05:28 [helen]
- helen has joined #aria-apg
- 19:05:29 [howard-e]
- present+
- 19:05:39 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: Holiday season is here, let's discuss Dec and Jan meetings
- 19:05:49 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: and we have lots to do, everyone has to work through! [laughs]
- 19:06:12 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: we'll definitely meet on the 6th and 13th
- 19:06:30 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: the 20th is cutting it close to holiday breaks
- 19:06:47 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: may need to do some async work
- 19:07:06 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: alex, are there any bocoup people working that week?
- 19:07:10 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: not sure
- 19:07:41 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: hoping to get first support tables from aria-at published, the restructure launched (Which needs redirect work yet)
- 19:08:19 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: should we plan NOT to meet the 20th, 27th, and the 3rd?
- 19:08:24 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: definitely not on the 27th and 3rd
- 19:09:07 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: two big things are landing the restructure and tables..
- 19:09:17 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: sounds like it's mainly bocoup work, right?
- 19:09:25 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: we've already done design reviews among us
- 19:09:37 [Jem]
- present+ isaac
- 19:10:10 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: okay, let's cancel 20th, 27th, and 3rd meetings
- 19:10:27 [MarkMcCarthy]
- MarkMcCarthy: second
- 19:10:41 [isaacdurazo]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2520
- 19:10:43 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: isaacdurazo, can you add a link to the redesign?
- 19:10:48 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: yes, above
- 19:11:00 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: i'll find time to add my comments
- 19:11:08 [MarkMcCarthy]
- TOPIC: Review design of option for viewing patterns and practices in a list
- 19:11:43 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: before we launched the redesign, Shawn Henry gave us feedback, and we got the same feedback afterwards
- 19:11:54 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: some folks think the card design is too much scrolling
- 19:12:00 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: something like a list view
- 19:12:14 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: if we DID include that, it'd be optional
- 19:12:22 [Jem]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2534
- 19:12:23 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: someone could choose card view or list view
- 19:12:29 [isaacdurazo]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2534
- 19:12:51 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: here are mockups of an alternative view
- 19:13:24 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: i'm also adding a search box
- 19:13:55 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: should hopefully be a live filter
- 19:14:02 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: it's just a search for the patterns?
- 19:14:04 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: yes
- 19:14:17 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: would we want a whole search for the APG?
- 19:14:50 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: maybe the "Search" on the pattern page is more of a filter, i'm now realizing
- 19:15:04 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: though i think this filter is useful
- 19:16:02 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: i also included your feedback in this latest mockup, matt
- 19:16:38 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: it might be an issue calling it "grid view" if we're not using aria-grid. maybe "card view"
- 19:16:58 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: that's a common name too, shouldn't be confusing, i like that
- 19:17:57 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: so in patterns and practices, we have iconography for different items - is this design adaptable to one whre there aren't unique icons for every topic?
- 19:18:33 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: yeah, i think so. if an item doesn't have an icon, the space for the icon can be blank, and we'll align the text
- 19:18:41 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: if we didn't have one, maybe a bullet icon or something?
- 19:18:56 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: yeah, we can think of a placeholder. i don't think we need an icon for EVERYTHING
- 19:19:32 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: does this seem like something that should move forward? feedback?
- 19:19:56 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: can you explain a bit what you mean about icons everywhere?
- 19:20:17 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: the about page will look more like this in the future, so thinking about that - everything may not or should not need an icon
- 19:20:39 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: makes sense
- 19:20:50 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: this is the same for practices, too
- 19:21:32 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: the concepts there are a bit more abstract, so difficult to represent visually
- 19:22:29 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: great, this sounds good, engineering can proceed then unless there's concerns
- 19:23:47 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: i'll make sure i clarify that the current "search" is a filter
- 19:23:58 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: what's the timeline to see implementation of this?
- 19:24:05 [MarkMcCarthy]
- isaacdurazo: howard, alex?
- 19:24:41 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: i can probably do it, but depends on when things get merged
- 19:24:53 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: support tables are probably a higher priority
- 19:24:59 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: so it'd be after that as well
- 19:25:04 [MarkMcCarthy]
- TOPIC: QA results for restructured repository
- 19:25:27 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: thank you SO MUCH to everyone who's done reviews on this
- 19:25:53 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: there were lots of comments about link text - all of those changes were intentional
- 19:26:33 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: there were some other content changes that i'm pretty sure were intentional but i'm going to make sure
- 19:26:49 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: there was a lot about spacing and color in different places
- 19:27:09 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: lots about it being better in the preview than production, and want to make sure there's consensus
- 19:27:52 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: i've been keeping track of feedback, waiting for marching orders.
- 19:28:18 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: i can summarize our feedback and share to the group to make it easier for everyone
- 19:29:01 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: let's talk about font size, spacing, and color - where are things problematic?
- 19:29:14 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: font size changes, sounds like none of that was desirable. right?
- 19:29:15 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: yes
- 19:29:29 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: was that unintentional?
- 19:29:36 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: not intentional, but i havne't looked into it
- 19:30:00 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: we made changes to warning, advisement, and note class
- 19:30:43 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: my recollection is those changes were good, having headings is good. but small things, like capital letters
- 19:31:30 [MarkMcCarthy]
- helen: i think the style in the preview version looks nicer, a bit more modern. the current warning has a red box all the way around, the new one looks nicer
- 19:31:44 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: that was to make the warnings consistent with advisement and notes, just different colors
- 19:32:04 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: there's still a wording difference, right? so it's not just color differentiating them, right?
- 19:32:21 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: usually warnings started with IMPORTANT, advisement with CAUTION, notes with NOTE
- 19:32:58 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: i'm not sure we need both advisement and warning - there's differences between notes and warnings, though
- 19:34:42 [MarkMcCarthy]
- helen: i also like that the preview has more padding between the headings and navigation menu, which i like a lot more
- 19:34:52 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: thank you for noticing, I feel validated! [laughs]
- 19:35:43 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: an excellent change! maybe we'll want to consider if we need notes AND warnings in the future. but THAT seems like an existing inconsistency, so i'm not super worried now
- 19:35:59 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: seems like one thing to fix is the font sizing. spacing, colors, are okay?
- 19:36:15 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: there's broken links we have to fix
- 19:36:25 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: just because the branches are different
- 19:36:30 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: what about the footer links?
- 19:36:39 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: well THAT's a bug
- 19:37:02 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: jon mentioned that the carousels are broken
- 19:37:19 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: i'll work on that too
- 19:40:02 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: alex, there's also some merge conflicts, can you look at them or let me know if you need help?
- 19:40:29 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: i'm not sure how to pre-emptively solve that, but i think i know what's going on. just cant figure out how to placate github
- 19:41:08 [MarkMcCarthy]
- alex: easily possible i'm also confused
- 19:41:30 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: aria-practices.html is getting deleted, so shouldn't be conflicting. weird, maybe something got restored that shouldn't have
- 19:42:04 [MarkMcCarthy]
- TOPIC: New Issue Action Planning
- 19:42:36 [Jem]
- Rating slider is not a good pattern #2501(https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2501)
- 19:42:37 [Github]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2501 : Rating slider is not a good pattern
- 19:43:34 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: i'd like Jon and James here for this one, so maybe we'll defer it
- 19:44:16 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Navigation Treeview Example #2477(https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2477)
- 19:44:19 [Github]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2477 : Navigation Treeview Example
- 19:44:31 [MarkMcCarthy]
- TOPIC: Nav Treeview Example
- 19:44:36 [MarkMcCarthy]
- github: https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/2477
- 19:45:39 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: so this isn't working properly for Talkback... I know we did some testing on iOS and Android without screenreaders to make sure they at least functioned. but there isn't support for the tree role in iOS or Android as far as I know
- 19:46:21 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: this might be a nonissue for us... may be an OS thing if there's no mapping
- 19:47:11 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: is this a bug in the code that would NOT require a change to the design of the pattern? or could this be Talkback not distinguishing between activation and expansion?
- 19:47:34 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: i could try it and see how it goes, can add comments here
- 19:48:03 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: there's no support for the tree role in Android, so we shouldn't expect it to work. but if it's a matter of something small...
- 19:50:34 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: how do you know they're expandable parent items?
- 19:51:26 [MarkMcCarthy]
- MarkMcCarthy: there's a right arrow facing the word, that when expanded turns into a downward arrow showing the child items
- 19:51:53 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: we -could- make the arrow icon itself something that talkback can focus on to open the child menu, but then it might have to exist outside of the tree
- 19:53:49 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: i don't think theres any way to structure a treeitem such that the icon is separate from the link, AND have them both in the treeitem
- 19:54:37 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: if the icons are outside the links but inside the list items, they might work? hmm
- 19:54:46 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: i don't think there's a straightforward way to do that
- 19:55:14 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Jem: plus the arrow icons look like indicators more than an actionable item
- 19:56:46 [MarkMcCarthy]
- MarkMcCarthy: the arrows themselves do appear actionable, though are small targets to click on,
- 19:57:15 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: and a keyboard user can expand/collapse the list items with the left and right arrow keys
- 19:57:19 [MarkMcCarthy]
- MarkMcCarthy: yes
- 19:58:33 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: can you do the same on android? expand the treeitems without changing the page?
- 19:58:39 [MarkMcCarthy]
- MarkMcCarthy: i have to zoom in a bunch, but yes
- 19:59:13 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: sounds like we're uncovering some stuff. but it might depend on what iOS and Android do, and/or what JAWS and NVDA do with touch events rather than keyboard or mouse
- 19:59:48 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: i would guess screen readers should perceive the arrows as something different, but as is not sure they would
- 20:01:12 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: we'll need to think about whether it's possible to structure this so there's an aelement for expand/collapse outside of the treeitem, that's recognizable by touch screen readers
- 20:01:38 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: sounds like it has to be outside of the treeitem but inside the tree. not sure how ARIA would handle that, as it relates to child items etc.
- 20:02:24 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: this could end up being an ARIA problem - how to make a tree itself accessible to touch-based screen readers
- 20:02:57 [MarkMcCarthy]
- Matt_King: sounds like this is a bigger question then - and a matter of solving some other accessibility issues
- 20:03:09 [MarkMcCarthy]
- zakim, who is here?
- 20:03:09 [Zakim]
- Present: Jem, Matt_King, siri, Helen, MarkMcCarthy, alex, isaacdurazo, howard, howard-e
- 20:03:12 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see helen, howard-e, MarkMcCarthy, Siri, Jem, isaacdurazo, RRSAgent, Zakim, Matt_King, jamesn, github-bot, MichaelC, Mike5Matrix, Github, ZoeBijl, trackbot
- 20:03:15 [MarkMcCarthy]
- present- howard
- 20:03:22 [MarkMcCarthy]
- regrets+ JonGund CurtBellew
- 20:03:44 [MarkMcCarthy]
- TOPIC: Talk to you all next week!
- 20:03:55 [MarkMcCarthy]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 20:03:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/11/29-aria-apg-minutes.html MarkMcCarthy
- 20:03:59 [Matt_King]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 20:03:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/11/29-aria-apg-minutes.html Matt_King
- 22:14:13 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #aria-apg
- 23:46:53 [MichaelC_]
- MichaelC_ has joined #aria-apg