<Helen> Zoom decided to install updates...
<scribe> scribe: ToddL
Wilco: instead of going through
things, surveys, etc. everyone let us know what they're
doing.
... Prs are ready, CfC is ready to send out next week.
Helen: had PR merged, surveys done, plan to start other things, needs a nursemaid.
kathy: Call for Review out on
scrollable elements
... can send it out for CfC
... secondary requirements we will get to
Will_c: nobody commented on image
accessible name is descriptive
... it's ready to go
Wilco: ready for CfC, yes?
Will_c: Ready for CfC then. That's it, everything is CfC or published
thbrunet: PR out for color
contrast
... addressed wilco's comments. nothing too major on Tom's
end.
<kathy> todd: update heading is descriptive needs work, kathy had a comment
<Wilco> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1958
Wilco: needs review on PR
#1958
... Jen will no longer be returning to the TF perhaps.
<Will_c> agreed! Like the standup
Wilco: had no objections, 1 comment from Kathy
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act-rules/issues/156
<Wilco> proposed RESOLUTION: Approve report pages after #156 is addressed
RESOLUTION: Approve report pages after #156 is addressed
Wilco: Will check w/AGWG after this
Helen: Has ideas and stuff is
happening, ideas need to be put on paper.
... Will will be Helen's #2
kathy: may join, and just observe for now. has a lot on plate.
Wilco: Going over Captions survey in spreadsheet
group discussing audio/auditory issues with the rule
Wilco: Testing in Firefox. Off
and no label for "on", that is built into the browser, browser
bug.
... not related to us and suggest we move on from that
... Need to address Wilco's comment on Q5
... Need example of video with background music and no
caption
... A/V aspects need to be properly linked
... secondary requirements take on for next half of meeting? or
table headers?
<Wilco> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E93qynXtcBVL3beIeenv_cbovCy_TsB8mjhmFZUJfqk/edit#
kathy: Moved the PR over to
Google Doc
... discussing suggestions and edits to make things clear
minor edits and mapping conformance requirements
kathy: discussing new secondary
requirements
... moving on to next scenario
... going over third scenario
... Enhanced contrast is secondary
Wilco: What makes enhanced secondary?
kathy: the accessibility requirement can not be not satisfied
wilco and kathy discussing enhanced contrast issue.
kathy: if we have requirements mapped in both, how would having them mapped to both address consistency?
Wilco: you can report SC as
failed but you don't have to.
... thinks it handles that scenario