11:54:30 RRSAgent has joined #miniapp 11:54:30 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/10/13-miniapp-irc 11:54:33 Meeting: MiniApps CG Teleconference 11:54:37 present+ 11:54:42 present+ QingAn 11:54:50 rrsagent, make log public 11:54:55 rrsagent, make minutes 11:54:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/13-miniapp-minutes.html xfq 11:58:07 present+ Zitao_Wang 11:58:15 present+ Dan_Zhou 12:00:20 present+ Xiaoping_Zhao 12:00:22 present+ martin 12:00:28 scribe: xfq 12:01:15 chair: Dan_Zhou 12:01:27 dan: UI components 12:01:33 xiaoqian has joined #miniapp 12:01:43 present+ xiaoqian 12:01:56 martin: created the UI component spec 12:02:14 ... in the Packaging spec, we included references to web components 12:02:34 present+ Liang_Gao 12:02:49 present+ Dawei_Zhang 12:03:20 martin: in the new explainer, I added data binding 12:03:23 ... and other info 12:03:44 QingAn has joined #miniapp 12:03:48 ... info about the type of elements 12:03:55 ... checkboxes, etc. 12:04:19 ... compare it with PWAs and the rest of the Web standards, mainly HTML and DOM 12:04:39 ... I already received some comments from xfq 12:05:03 ... once we get the consensus to go ahead 12:05:11 ... we can start working on the spec 12:05:28 ... I have addressed all comments xfq provided 12:05:57 ... once we decided the scope of the document, we can start working on the document 12:06:18 ... I think a way to move this forward is to create a WG Note 12:06:37 ... to avoid overlapping with other W3C specs 12:07:19 present+ 12:07:22 ... any comments at this point? 12:07:56 https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-components/pull/5 12:08:18 ... I've tried to extract info from three miniapp implementations 12:08:40 ... I tried to create big blocks of info 12:09:51 ... the essence is the same, the implementations are different 12:10:08 present+ wind 12:10:36 zitao: I think this explainer is the consensus of our previous meetings 12:10:54 ... maybe we can write it based on the scope mentioned in the explainer 12:11:49 martin has joined #miniapp 12:11:57 present+ martin_alvarez 12:12:04 ... if we can find a way to publish a Note, we can work on a CSS profile 12:12:17 ... new components 12:12:47 ... would like Dan and others to review and refine it 12:12:53 ... call for co-editors 12:13:06 ... like the white paper 12:13:14 dan: ok 12:13:19 ... I'd be happy to 12:13:41 martin: feel free to comment on github 12:14:42 dan: any comments? 12:15:28 QingAn: no update on IoT 12:16:05 xiaoping: no update for widgets 12:16:16 s/widgets/the widget spec/ 12:16:43 xiaoping: I have updates on file handling in widgets, though 12:16:54 [xiaoping shares his screen] 12:17:43 xiaoping: we have done research about file handling in other platforms 12:18:05 ... web, quick apps, wechat, baidu, alipay 12:19:02 ... we suggest that we write another document on file handling 12:19:19 q+ 12:19:41 xfq: another file... an API to access? 12:19:46 xiaoqian: @@@ 12:19:52 scribe+ xiaoqian 12:21:07 martin: regarding the first part, how to refer the resources in the component... 12:21:24 s/xiaoqian: @@@/xiaoping: @@@ 12:22:03 ... at least how to handle these URI, it's something we need to describe 12:22:16 xiaoping: yes 12:22:39 martin: the definition of these APIs is something we need for the spec, I agree we need it 12:22:57 dan: I also think these should be in the package spec 12:23:09 ... other spec can refer to the packaging 12:23:36 martin: there are two parts, how to refer, and how to manage/describe 12:23:52 xiaoping: yes, we are thinking about it 12:24:08 ... do you have any suggestion regarding the second one? 12:24:30 martin: not sure if it's only for MiniApps 12:25:03 ... there are several APIs related about this topic 12:25:29 ... we need to invest some time thinking about it 12:25:41 ... I'll be glad to work with you on this 12:26:53 q- 12:27:45 Topic: Testing 12:29:00 zitao: maybe we can create an open-source project in the Open Atom Foundation 12:29:38 ... I have discussed with my colleagues internally, they support this 12:29:44 ... also want to discuss with you 12:30:16 ... what do you think? 12:30:34 dan: have you talked with qing? 12:30:47 zitao: I discussed with qing in hangzhou 12:31:16 ... he need more resources from Alibaba 12:31:30 dan: we also need more resources 12:32:40 martin: I believe this is important 12:33:27 ... not just testing the specs, but also validate the miniapp impls follow the standards 12:34:08 s/validate the miniapp impls/validate the miniapps/ 12:34:49 ... like the Nu Html Checker and EPUBCheck 12:35:37 dan: any other topic? 12:35:54 zitao: WG recharting 12:36:02 ... anything we need to move from CG to WG? 12:36:13 s/recharting/rechartering/ 12:37:12 dan: don't know the criteria 12:37:24 zitao: me neither 12:37:35 ... but I think UI components work is important 12:37:45 ... and maybe widget 12:38:01 [Qing left] 12:38:11 zitao: for iot, we can discuss when qing is here 12:38:59 zitao: we can edit the charter online 12:39:59 xfq: we need to have a clear scope if we want to move the UIComponent to the WG 12:40:07 zitao: agree 12:40:47 https://w3c.github.io/miniapp/charters/wg-2023.html 12:42:30 dan: what's the rechartering process? 12:42:59 xfq: we need to rewrite the draft charter, then horizontal review, then W3C team & Member review 12:45:13 martin: I agree we need to add some text for components 12:45:28 ... but not necessarily a normative document 12:45:35 ... can be a Note 12:47:16 xfq: it depends what we want to define in the Note, does it require patent protection? 12:48:30 martin: I can create an issue 12:48:36 ... we can discuss it in the issue 12:48:51 ... about the type of document we need to create 12:49:05 dan: thank you 12:50:30 Next meeting, November 17 12:50:56 rrsagent, make minutes 12:50:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/13-miniapp-minutes.html xfq 14:56:54 Zakim has left #miniapp