12:06:21 RRSAgent has joined #wot 12:06:21 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-irc 12:06:35 meeting: WoT IG/WG 12:06:36 McCool has joined #wot 12:06:43 mlagally_ has joined #wot 12:06:43 sebastian_ has joined #wot 12:07:06 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool, Sebastian_Kaebisch 12:07:47 dape has joined #wot 12:08:09 scribenick: McCool 12:11:30 guest: Matthias Kovatsch 12:11:52 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#5_October_2022 12:11:54 q+ 12:12:02 topic: minutes 12:12:10 mm: reviewed, found small things 12:12:34 kaz: Matthias not actually a guest, is W3C member via Siemens 12:12:38 i/Matthis/topic: Guest/ 12:12:43 good to see Matthias back :-) 12:12:59 seb: Sep 28 minutes 12:13:33 s/guest: Matthias Kovatsch/sk: Matthias Kovatsch will talk about IIWOT23/ 12:13:43 s/kaz: Matthias not actually a guest, is W3C member via Siemens// 12:14:10 seb: conclusion was to stay with WebEx... 12:14:18 i|topic: minutes|kaz: note that Matthias is an official WoT WG participant from Siemens :)| 12:14:49 i|Sep 28|-> https://www.w3.org/2022/09/28-wot-minutes.html Sep-28| 12:15:49 seb: did we resolve if we are having Arch tomorrow? 12:15:54 ml: yes, 1h 12:16:07 zakim, who is on the call? 12:16:07 Present: Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool, Sebastian_Kaebisch 12:16:30 present+ Matthias_Kovatsch, Ryuichi_Matsukura, Tomoaki_Mizushima 12:16:43 present+ Daniel_Peintner 12:18:54 seb: any objections to publishing SEp 28 minutes? 12:19:06 ... hearing no objections, will be published 12:19:28 q+ 12:19:33 seb: some editorial issues with TPAC minutes, still need to be fixed, let's defer to next week 12:20:05 ack k 12:20:59 mm: will send an email to kaz with some fixes to TPAC minutes 12:21:11 topic: IIWOT'23 Workshop 12:21:34 mk: let me show a summary of the workshop 12:22:21 ... I am involved as a consultant, not the main organizer 12:22:28 ... is second iteration of workshop 12:22:45 ... will be co-located with CES 12:23:00 ... directly after 12:23:09 q+ 12:23:10 q+ 12:23:19 q+ 12:23:51 ... will be part of an IEEE conference 12:24:08 cris_ has joined #wot 12:24:34 ... not limited to work happening in standardization, but also new ideas in the area 12:24:48 ... academia, collaboration 12:25:09 ... schedule is soon, but expect deadline extension, prob two weeks 12:25:29 q+ 12:25:30 q+ 12:25:33 q- 12:25:34 q? 12:27:14 rrsagent, make log public 12:27:18 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:27:18 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:27:28 mm: two issues; WG representation; remote attendance 12:28:00 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi 12:28:19 q? 12:28:20 q+ 12:28:37 ack mc 12:29:16 chair: Sebastian/McCool 12:29:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:29:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:29:38 mm: fees also seem high; is there a workshop-only registrations? 12:30:02 mk: usually only for publication and on-site attendance; will look into it 12:30:28 kaz: WoT is W3C's product, so should have representation as an invited talk 12:30:54 ack k 12:31:00 i|Matthias Kovatsch will|topic: Guests| 12:31:25 ml: support and suggest remote presentation; each TF lead could present their specs 12:31:28 i|note that M|scribenick: kaz| 12:31:44 i/reviewed, found/scribenick: McCool/ 12:31:50 ... many people have problem with travel right now 12:31:53 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:31:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:33:33 i|let me show a|-> https://iiwot23.nws.cs.unibo.it IIWoT23 Web page| 12:33:35 q? 12:33:40 ack m 12:33:46 ack cris 12:33:53 mm: probably need between 30m and 1h; 30m we just do the summary presentation 12:34:12 cris: there is also the WoT CG, maybe a joint session 12:34:42 q+ 12:34:56 q+ 12:35:30 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:35:30 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:35:38 mk: there is also a demo session, may be appropriate 12:35:47 q+ 12:35:52 ege: agree it would be *better* if we can go there 12:36:02 mk: demos would also be great 12:36:04 +1 12:36:42 ege: also some linked news, Thread group, you can see how they do things 12:37:30 ack e 12:37:30 ack ege 12:37:34 ack mc 12:39:45 q+ 12:41:13 mm: if we want to assemble bullet points, include WoT CG, etc. we will need to create a proposal and agree on it as a group 12:41:29 ... although I can easily just forward a link to our current summary pres 12:41:47 kaz: suggest we just go for the simple option of the WoT WG update this time 12:42:12 ack k 12:43:06 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:43:06 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:43:26 mm: suggest that I send off something with a request for an hour, then we can fill in some details in some sections 12:43:38 ml: how many people? 12:43:54 mk: expect about 20 people, plus some people from the main conference 12:43:54 ack ml 12:43:56 ack cr 12:44:16 cris: for the record we should do CG and WG together, not separately 12:45:23 q? 12:45:45 (please remember the WoT-JP CG, who has been working hard and giving updates to the WoT-WG/IG, as well in that case :) 12:45:58 q+ 12:46:03 mm: thinking of just asking for at most 1h, and squeeze in various subtopics 12:46:25 ... including possibly even some demos 12:47:04 ack k 12:47:14 ... also agree on WoT-JP Cg 12:47:19 topic: Cancellations 12:47:33 seb: arch NOT cancelled, but otherwise testfest 12:47:49 topic: Binding Templates 12:48:22 seb: TD call has been mostly on TD, and this has delayed Binding Templates 12:48:38 ... TD is now mostly ready, but Binding Templates is behind 12:48:56 q+ 12:50:13 ... would keep TD call, but considering adding additional slot (in Editor's slot); agree with Ege would be useful 12:50:32 kaz: mentioned on email list, not clear why we need a separate slot 12:51:04 ... if TD is mostly done, we can explicitly assign 1h or 1.5h of TD call for Binding 12:51:24 ... also, is a Note, we need to focus on normative specs 12:51:36 ... don't think we need a separate call 12:51:38 q+ 12:51:42 ack k 12:52:04 q+ 12:52:07 q+ 12:52:08 ack mc 12:52:22 +1 kaz 12:52:42 ml: where we are with normative specs, putting one additional hour into Note does not seem appropriate 12:52:53 ack ml 12:53:20 ege: understand kaz's point of view, if can't do it, editors did agree 12:53:22 q+ 12:53:25 ack e 12:53:50 q+ 12:55:03 ack mc 12:55:04 mm: wonder how much work there actually is 12:55:06 qq+ Ege 12:55:12 ack Ege 12:55:13 Ege, you wanted to react to McCool 12:55:37 ege: main reason wanted to allocate more time is TD spec is using in examples, is a dependency 12:55:49 q+ 12:56:17 ... regarding maturity, text needs work, but implementations are in good shape 12:56:31 ... but needs introductory text; technical work is mature 12:57:26 kaz: needs to ask implementers about whether Note for binding templates is enough 12:57:36 ... in which case we can wrap up the group notes 12:57:55 ... and then if it is really possible to wrap up in a month 12:58:20 ... but please do think about schedule and implementability before holding these additional calls 12:58:42 ... we are not thinking about overall goals, just about clearing PRs 12:59:09 ... we need to think about wrapping up deliverables, with normative specs as a priority 12:59:35 q+ 12:59:40 ... W3C process requires us to provide IRs etc. for normative specs 12:59:52 ack k 12:59:52 q+ 13:00:09 ack ml 13:00:28 ml: suprised to hear about the dependency of TD on binding note 13:00:44 ... would have thought it was more of a guideline document 13:00:59 ... also, looked at it recently, saw a lot of to dos, etc. 13:01:21 ... it is not enough if editors agree on something 13:01:33 s/IRs/Implementation Reports/ 13:01:37 ... we are lacking bandwidth on other things, including testing 13:01:55 ege: dependency is in examples, not that strong 13:02:18 ... where we show the TD does not have to be dependent on a particular protocol 13:02:32 ... so really about citability, not about normative dependency 13:02:36 q? 13:02:38 q+ 13:02:39 ack e 13:02:41 ack e 13:02:43 q+ 13:02:57 ml: to clarify, I think we need to focus on normative deliverables 13:03:22 seb: suggest we stick with the current setup in the Wed mtg, but can start with binding topics 13:03:39 mm: (time check, now in overtime) 13:04:01 seb: when TD is in CR status, can spend more time on binding 13:04:09 q? 13:04:12 ack s 13:04:17 q+ 13:04:50 seb: agree REC documents are important, but we also need to clean up our notes that are being referred to; need to be in good shape 13:05:38 ack cr 13:05:46 cris: second importance of protocol bindings, got a lot of feedback from developers 13:06:00 ... in next charter will also hope to move them to REC track 13:06:22 ... however, agree with what Sebastian said 13:06:42 seb: need to close, summarize other topics 13:06:47 q? 13:07:12 q- 13:07:15 ... be aware the testfest is going, and we need inputs for TD, Architecture (which has many gaps, please help), and Profile 13:07:36 i/need to close/topic: AOB/ 13:07:38 ... other topics, met with OPC UA about formal collaboration, still in process 13:07:51 q+ 13:08:02 ... but it looks quite good and much interest to proceed 13:08:04 ack m 13:08:14 q+ 13:08:48 kaz: regarding OPC UA liaison: two viewpoints, procedural and technical. Talking to different people about these aspects. 13:08:49 ack k 13:09:03 q+ 13:09:11 ege: next week Thursday WoT CG is planning a Digital Twins event 13:09:28 ack e 13:09:34 ... will put in W3C Calendar later today and send invites 13:10:40 kaz: would like to clarify if WoT CG's scope if more than outreach 13:10:42 q+ 13:10:46 ack k 13:11:39 q+ 13:11:51 ack m 13:11:58 ack m 13:12:12 ml: any news about DTDL? 13:12:32 seb: Erich was also in OPC UA meeting, two weeks ago 13:12:45 ... but has vacation this week, COVID situation in their office 13:13:35 mm: can deal with that after CR, def as part of next charter discussion 13:13:38 s/than outreach/than outreach. If the initial target is outreach and the other topics like WoT Marketing pages and Plugfests can be deferred, that's fine, but please clarify that plan, and explicitly declare that./ 13:14:03 [adjourned] 13:14:10 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:14:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:16:03 s/if more than/is more than/ 13:16:54 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:16:54 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:18:19 s/fine, but/fine. However, / 13:18:20 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:18:20 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-wot-minutes.html kaz