12:35:21 RRSAgent has joined #rqtf 12:35:21 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-rqtf-irc 12:35:23 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:35:23 Zakim has joined #rqtf 12:35:25 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 12:35:25 Date: 05 October 2022 12:35:29 present+ 12:35:33 chair: jasonjgw 12:35:37 scribe+ jasonjgw 12:35:47 agenda+ Collaboration Accessibility User requirements. 12:35:47 agenda+ Accessibility of digital wallets: exploring the issue. 12:35:47 agenda+ Miscellaneous topics. 12:49:34 janina has joined #rqtf 12:49:49 zakim, who's here? 12:49:49 Present: jasonjgw 12:49:51 On IRC I see janina, Zakim, RRSAgent, MichaelC, jasonjgw, Joshue108, trackbot 12:49:58 present + 12:59:41 SteveNoble has joined #rqtf 13:00:50 present+ 13:01:19 scribe: SteveNoble 13:01:30 zakim, next item 13:01:30 agendum 1 -- Collaboration Accessibility User requirements. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 13:01:58 scott-H has joined #rqtf 13:02:05 https://w3c.github.io/caur/ 13:02:20 present+ 13:02:34 jasonjgw: What additional changes to we need to make to this document 13:03:15 janina: Asked Jeanne Spellman (sp?) to look at this 13:03:52 jasonjgw: The main concern is that this document was compiled mostly from meeting discussions 13:04:41 Scott: not sure if there is a lot out there in the research literature that can be added 13:05:06 jasonjgw: I did find a few things, but have not added those citations 13:05:46 jasonjgw: Not sure if that will be essential for a working draft 13:06:30 Scott: Would be OK publishing without a lot of substantive research 13:07:17 janina: We need some more elaboration on some of these topics, and that might be best to get more widely (not just from us) 13:07:49 present+ Raja 13:09:12 jasonjgw: Propose that we all look at this over the next week of so for content to add and also work forward to messaging 13:09:44 all: sounds like a good approach 13:10:03 jasonjgw: The messaging will take a bit of work 13:10:18 jasonjgw: Who else would like to work on the messaging 13:10:34 scott-H: Would be happy to be involved 13:11:32 scott-H: Optimistic that once we publish, we will get good feedback including good citations 13:11:50 jasonjgw: Will bring this back next week 13:12:00 zakim, next item 13:12:00 agendum 2 -- Accessibility of digital wallets: exploring the issue. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 13:13:09 jasonjgw: As a result of the recent TPAC discussion it was suggested we look at the accessibility of digital wallets 13:14:40 janina: The direction we would like to see this proceed is to validate key documents, not just to pay for things 13:15:36 janina: A lot of legal documents only count when they are on paper, which is concerning 13:16:25 janina: Example of US Customs using electronic credentials rather than paper 13:18:22 scott-H: One verifiable credentials issue in Australia is how the drivers license is the default ID, but leaves out those who cannot drive 13:19:18 scott-H: Other things like an accessible bus or train pass is an issue 13:21:36 janina: Read recently about a tool for storing passwords and encryption keys securely; requires a threshold of keys to access the data; this has been around for a while and may be useful as an example 13:23:30 janina: Medical durable power-of-attorney would be an example of where more than one person would need access so a mixture to keys to access this 13:26:37 janina: Found out recently how hard it was to get an image of a government issued ID into my phone; not really accessible to a blind user 13:27:34 Raja: similar problem with verifying my identity when using a relay caller 13:29:59 jasonjgw: Strong digital identifiers will fix issues like needing to make photographs of paper credential 13:31:39 janina: Current work on accessibility guidelines in working groups tend to fall in what works in current technologies; this work isn't really looking forward to what is on the horizon, which is what we need to look at 13:34:21 janina: Propose we write to Manu and Lionel W to ask them what documents we should read and where we shout start 13:34:36 jasonjgw: Sound good 13:34:57 jasonjgw: Let's get back to this next week 13:35:33 zakim, next item 13:35:33 agendum 3 -- Miscellaneous topics. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 13:36:38 scott-H: Update on TPAC meeting minutes; notes have been found and they will be turned into minutes soon 13:38:02 janina: Need to discuss our calendar 13:39:09 janina: We are going to have an extreme diversity of time zones 13:40:38 janina: What if we take a recess for November to December? 13:41:28 scott-H: That sound fine; we have had a lot of output so a small break would not be an issue 13:42:04 raja: When are we recessing? 13:44:49 janina: Propose that the last meeting would be October 26; then in November and December no meetings; then resume regular meetings on January 4 13:45:11 scott-H: +1 13:47:49 janina: This also avoids the confusion around time changes in November 13:49:01 all: confirm the proposed meeting schedule break 13:49:24 janina has left #rqtf 13:49:36 zakim, bye 13:49:36 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been jasonjgw, SteveNoble, scott-H, Raja 13:49:36 Zakim has left #rqtf 13:49:42 rrsagent, make minutes 13:49:42 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/10/05-rqtf-minutes.html jasonjgw