14:08:25 RRSAgent has joined #smartcities 14:08:25 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/09/14-smartcities-irc 14:08:27 Zakim has joined #smartcities 14:13:21 Meeting: Web-based Digital Twins for Smart Cities - TPAC 2022 breakout 14:13:23 Chair: Kazuyuki_Ashimura 14:13:25 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/f243730c-747a-4966-9b43-b18a6e53c44f#agenda 14:13:27 RRSAgent, make log public 14:13:29 RRSAgent, this meeting spans midnight 14:18:26 RRSAgent, stay 14:18:28 Zakim, stay 14:18:28 I don't understand 'stay', dom 15:10:53 kaz has joined #smartcities 15:14:58 dom has joined #smartcities 16:13:05 agenda+ breakout 18:07:29 kaz has joined #smartcities 18:15:49 dom has joined #smartcities 19:16:42 rrsagent, make log public 19:16:52 rrsagent, draft minutes 19:16:52 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/14-smartcities-minutes.html kaz 20:15:05 dom has joined #smartcities 20:30:10 dom has joined #smartcities 21:07:02 dom__ has joined #smartcities 21:35:14 kaz has joined #smartcities 21:52:59 dom has joined #smartcities 21:53:07 kaz has joined #smartcities 23:21:39 MichaelC has joined #smartcities 23:22:25 dom has joined #smartcities 23:22:58 meeting: Web-based Digital Twins for Smart Cities 23:23:06 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Cooper 23:23:44 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/F2F_meeting,_September_2022#Web-based_Digital_Twins_for_Smart_Cities 23:25:48 gmlee has joined #smartcities 23:27:28 McCool_ has joined #smartcities 23:27:43 present+ Michel_McCool, Gyu_Myoung_Lee 23:27:48 present+ Jim_Luth 23:28:04 present+ Eric_Siow 23:28:53 Jim_Luth has joined #smartcities 23:29:05 present+ Takashi_Kasuya 23:29:27 Mizushima has joined #smartcities 23:29:28 present+ Tetsushi_Matsuda 23:29:40 present+ Shuji_Hirakawa 23:29:55 present+ Hiroshi_Ota 23:30:00 ktoumura has joined #smartcities 23:30:05 present+ Bladley_Needham 23:30:08 scribenick: McCool_ 23:30:46 present+ Kunihiko_Toumura, Tomoaki_Mizushima 23:30:48 present+ 23:30:51 ota has joined #smartcities 23:30:59 present+ 23:31:00 donle has joined #smartcities 23:31:11 kaz: thank you for coming 23:31:14 bneedham has joined #smartcities 23:31:22 present+ 23:31:23 ... (self-introduces) 23:31:41 ... would like to talk about web-based digital twins 23:31:57 kasuya has joined #smartcities 23:32:06 https://www.w3.org/2022/Talks/0914-smartcities-ka/20220914-dt-sc-ka.pdf 23:32:10 ... will first define scope, what has been done so far, what is missing, then discussion on how to resolve gaps 23:32:30 ... as background, we had a workshop and identified a LOT of problems 23:32:46 ... and we also need feedback from stakeholders, including smart cities 23:33:13 ... out of this we generated a charter, but still need to identify and include more stakeholders, so are revisiting 23:33:28 kaz: (summarizes presentations from workshop) 23:33:40 kaz: summarize what has been done 23:34:01 ... we have been working with ECHONET, IoT SDO from Japan 23:34:18 yonet has joined #smartcities 23:34:23 ... working with IEC SC3D, working on IoT ontologies 23:34:56 ... and IPA, Takanaka has been working on BIM, and now working on a smart city project in Osaka, already using WoT 23:34:57 ddahl has joined #smartcities 23:35:16 ... TC1/JG11 also working on some projects 23:35:28 ... ITU-T SG20 and some related groups 23:35:44 ... and there is a prototype smart sity 23:35:49 kaz: what is missing? 23:35:50 dezell has joined #smartcities 23:36:03 ... (slides) 23:36:03 present+ David_Ezell 23:36:16 ... OGC standards and digital twins 23:36:26 DanD has joined #smartcities 23:36:35 hjrchung has joined #smartcities 23:36:40 ... finally W3C: not just HTML, but lots of other data transfer technologies 23:36:58 ... and web standards have been applied to various industries 23:37:15 ... still have a big problem with IoT silos and fragmentation 23:37:33 ... Takanaka has demonstrated integration 23:37:43 ECHONET_Consortium has joined #smartcities 23:37:56 ... but still have a problem with common semantic vocabulary 23:38:49 ... still need guidelines for discovery, inter-system binding, ID auth and management, standard vocabulary, accessibility, geolocation 23:39:07 ... governance of data distribution: security, where to start with data search 23:39:26 kaz: how can be organize the discussion to resolve these gaps? 23:39:53 kaz: "Digital Twins" is commonly mentioned, might be a good place to start 23:40:08 ... would like therefore to start with web-based digital twins 23:40:43 ... since we already had a workshop, and we already have a lot of use cases, we should consolidate 23:40:52 ... so should we start with a CG or IG? 23:40:54 q+ 23:41:00 q+ to ask more about what the web-based digital twin proposal is 23:41:23 ... this morning we also talked with DID/VC, and can integrate with WoT to create a common framework 23:41:47 ... WoT can be used for devices, DID can be used for other entities 23:42:07 q? 23:42:24 mm: we generated a draft Charter for the potential IG 23:42:41 mm: why did we not just proceed with an IG and the charter we developed? 23:42:51 kaz: need more stakeholders 23:44:09 mm: perhaps we should reopen the charter and revise it as needed 23:44:26 YanZhang has joined #smartcities 23:44:44 kaz: think "smart cities" is still too broad, want to narrow further 23:44:55 q+ 23:45:01 jl: OGC has also been doing work in smart cities 23:45:29 ... but there is no clear definition of "smart city", but we also have been looking at digital twins 23:45:49 q+ to ask how digital twin differs from other exchange mechanisms 23:45:56 ... better connected to goals of data sharing and analysis (esp spatial-temporal) of OGC 23:46:05 q? 23:46:24 ack me 23:46:24 MichaelC, you wanted to ask more about what the web-based digital twin proposal is and to ask how digital twin differs from other exchange mechanisms 23:46:25 jl: agree that DT is a good focus, will help clarify smart city concept 23:46:37 ack MichaelC 23:46:56 mc: coming from outside, want to understand how smart cities and digital twins connect 23:47:11 kaz: DT is basically a virtualization of actual environment 23:47:40 ... such a mechanism should be useful for managing and providing services 23:48:10 mc: to me twin meant "city twinning" which I understand is different concept 23:48:42 present+ Phil_Archer 23:49:00 jl: many tools enable a digital representation of various aspects of the real system: looks the same, behaves the same, but is not the same 23:49:06 q+ 23:49:23 q+ to ask if digital twins and metaverse would intersect 23:49:25 jl: also recognition that social dimension is also important 23:49:41 tantek has joined #smartcities 23:50:00 ... connection between physical and digital is still important 23:50:12 ... has an affinity with concepts of models 23:50:30 q+ to ask about twins in retail 23:50:38 lgombos_______ has joined #smartcities 23:51:22 mm: even "Digital Twins" may be still too broad 23:51:47 ... we should narrow the purpose and clarify our points 23:52:04 ... also different kind of data to be handled 23:52:09 ack mc 23:52:17 ... not only geolocation but also temporal data, etc. 23:52:47 YanZhang has joined #smartcities 23:52:55 ... combination of IoT device and geolocation, for example 23:53:03 jl: totally agree 23:53:08 Q+ 23:53:11 ... absolutely right 23:53:45 ... for example, it comes to my mind around energy consumption 23:53:55 ... take action to solve problems 23:54:08 q? 23:54:16 ... there are sensors and actuators 23:54:24 ack Yan 23:54:33 q- later 23:54:37 yz: do have projects for smart cites in did/vc 23:54:48 qq+ 23:55:06 ... looking at metaverse applications, in particular event management, stadiums, temples 23:55:24 ... part missing in all projects is confidential computing 23:55:37 ... need privacy protection 23:55:58 ... need secure enclaves 23:56:06 ... need to add this aspect 23:56:42 ... ex project in Toronto got a lot of complaints for not respecting privacy 23:57:00 ... mapping people into virtual worlds can "trap" them 23:57:23 ... feel there are two direction: privacy, and then a focus on users 23:57:45 kaz: many similar discussions in workshop 23:57:47 q? 23:57:51 ack k 23:57:51 kaz, you wanted to react to YanZhang 23:58:06 q+ gyu 23:58:10 q- later 23:58:25 qq+ Gyumoung 23:58:34 ack Gyu 23:58:43 q- g 23:58:55 gym: regarding digital twin, is important direction to compose physical and cyber space 23:58:58 Josh-OGC has joined #smartcities 23:59:08 ... but how to do that is the important thing 23:59:21 ... there are lots of efforts and different dimensions 23:59:34 tantek_ has joined #smartcities 23:59:40 ... also in case of web3 and metaverse, lots of things to consider 23:59:51 present+ 23:59:58 q? 00:00:08 ack de 00:00:08 dezell, you wanted to ask about twins in retail 00:00:24 de: wanted to second some comments; here representing retail 00:00:33 present+ 00:00:35 ... stores care about similar things as cities 00:00:53 ... have traffic, cameras, making sure that things that are supposed to happen do happen 00:01:13 q? 00:01:22 ... other similar environments would be a laboratory, or a kitchen 00:01:38 ... point about confidential computing 00:01:49 ... iot is the physical reality input into the DT 00:01:54 ... two big problems 00:01:57 ... one is replay 00:02:25 ... can imagine an attacker spoofing data 00:02:50 The chain of links between a sensor reading and an interpretation of the world is described by the OGC/ISO standard Observations and Measurements, also modeled by the W3C ontology SOSA/SSN 00:02:52 ... and the other is fingerprinting, AI can watch that data and make inferences 00:03:01 ... both those things are hard to get around 00:03:02 +1 concerned about fingerprinting 00:03:29 yz: and all that data needs to be processed, typically with an AI algorithm 00:03:55 ... often want to use a cloud services, but too much bandwidth, need edge computing 00:03:57 present+ Daihei_Shiohama 00:04:01 present+ Dan_Duruta 00:04:51 mm: part of the draft IG Charter suggests we collaborate with the related groups 00:05:02 Important to remember that there is an inevitable tension between confidentiality of data and transparency of (e.g. ML) interpretations. 00:05:14 q? 00:05:32 -> https://w3c.github.io/wot/charters/smart-cities/smart-cities-ig-charter.html Draft IG Charter 00:05:35 q+ 00:05:38 mc: thinking about digital twins, can use for modelling 00:05:52 ... who are the users? metaverse visitors? citizens? 00:05:59 q? 00:06:02 q+ 00:06:05 ack m 00:06:05 MichaelC, you wanted to ask if digital twins and metaverse would intersect 00:06:06 ack me 00:06:08 ack j 00:06:14 jl: talked about different representations 00:06:26 ... DT is useful just as an organizing concept 00:06:38 ... consistency between DT and world 00:06:57 ... also clear there will not be one DT but different aspects 00:07:11 ... but do need to use consistent data, e.g. the same maps 00:07:32 q? 00:07:38 ack d 00:07:38 kaz: consistency also arises in ontologies 00:08:06 The basis of any start in digital twins is indeed a consistent spatial data framework. 00:08:08 dezell: does current charter include digital twin 00:08:27 s|ontologies|ontologies as well. how to choose necessary ontologies/DTs is a good question| 00:08:33 ... but wonder if smart city should be in quotes, and focus be on digital twins 00:08:41 q? 00:09:15 ... from the marketing point of view, smart cities is a useful concept 00:09:24 q+ 00:09:47 mm: agree the target is still too broad 00:10:09 ... all of stores, buildings and cities are important 00:10:30 The different scales of digital twins benefit and suffer from the same scale and unit area concerns of classical spatial analysis, just in more dimensions. 00:10:51 DanD has joined #smartcities 00:11:12 mm: worried about scope, different technologies for retail, BIM, smart cities 00:11:13 q+ 00:11:30 ... for example, building is part of cities 00:11:37 ... would prefer narrow scope, but don't know if we CAN decouple buildings and cities 00:11:51 dd: we have digital twins for networks 00:12:04 ack d 00:12:07 ... use simulation all the time in other areas 00:12:18 ackm 00:12:23 OGC is supporting activities in both "Urban" Digital Twins and "Environmental" Digital Twins. Jet engines, a bit less so. 00:12:28 s/ackm/ack m/ 00:12:29 ... parallel that david was using for retail is interesting 00:12:34 ack m 00:12:52 ... but in city are talking about different sensor networks owned by different owners 00:12:58 ... in retail, single owner 00:13:13 ... this needs to be taken into account, data sharing is much harder 00:13:21 q+ 00:13:25 YanZhang has joined #smartcities 00:13:28 ack m 00:13:33 mm: I agree 00:13:42 Q+ 00:13:47 ddahl has joined #smartcities 00:14:14 ... different smart cities use different mechanisms and don't share information with each other 00:14:33 ack y 00:14:47 mm: cities are also very fragmented 00:14:57 ... even hard to get departments to work together 00:15:00 ... silos 00:15:10 yz: agree with that, have seen that as well 00:15:45 ... not only departments, but adjacent regions may not use the same standards 00:15:49 https://www.atis.org/resources/smart-cities-data-catalog-specification/ 00:15:50 q+ 00:15:53 Successful smart cities have a data "czar" with some authority to collect, harmonize, and disseminate data, really creating incipient UDT's 00:16:13 qq+ 00:16:26 q- later 00:16:26 yz: even time series database sharing 00:16:39 q+ 00:16:52 ack m 00:17:14 mm: reminded me of the WoT Demo 00:17:30 ... what we're still missing is expressing transformation data 00:17:38 ... mapping into common construction 00:17:46 ... the way to express the structure 00:18:09 ... maybe we need to look into some kind of transmation mechanism like XSL 00:18:23 mm: I do think data alignment and mapping are one of the key problems 00:18:55 ack mc 00:19:17 kaz: agree we should look at mechanisms to connect different silos 00:19:56 .. this morning we had a discussion with did/vc, and internal collaboration 00:20:00 q? 00:20:05 ack k 00:20:05 kaz, you wanted to react to YanZhang 00:20:07 ack j 00:20:29 jl: another aspect is bilateral transformation are a dead end 00:20:32 s/tranmation/transformation/ 00:20:56 ... having an integration model that other silos can converge on 00:21:17 ... have been working on such common models for infrastructure 00:21:25 q? 00:21:28 ... but so far have only got one model built 00:21:39 ... not for lack of tools, but from lack of culture 00:21:43 q+ 00:21:51 ack m 00:22:20 mm: honestly, the workshop was great but no citizens attended 00:22:25 ... that is a big problem 00:22:53 ... number of effort for citizens is quite low 00:23:21 q? 00:23:47 qq+ josh 00:23:55 q- josh 00:23:58 mm: do thing big problem is getting cities to the table 00:24:20 jl: plug for OGC, group has been working on developing a set of practices 00:24:51 ... then there is a set of expectations and appropriate tools to accomplish various missions 00:24:55 s/do thing/do think/ 00:24:55 q? 00:25:18 kaz: I would like to ask SDO people who have not yet raised their hands 00:25:35 ... if they have any comments or questions, for example, regarding BIM 00:25:42 Just to clarify, Spatial Data on the Web is a joint OGC - W3C group with shared membership. 00:26:00 https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/#card-75471 00:26:01 ly: IEC, not only focused on smart city, but providing common ontologies for devices and sensors 00:26:31 Sorry: https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/sdw 00:26:48 ... common understanding of available devices and assets 00:27:08 s|https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/#card-75471|| 00:27:11 ... is necessary and related to data models for digital twin, should be included in this group 00:28:08 ... digital twin is not only for smart cities, already widely used in manufacturing 00:28:16 ... and we can refer to existing use cases in other domains 00:28:35 kaz: collecting that kind of existing best practices will be important 00:29:09 yamashita: I think web based technologies are necessary for digital twins and for smart buildings 00:29:18 ... so we definitely want to keep in touch 00:29:37 kaz: also, you are working on actual smart city projects so should have some concrete goals 00:29:44 s/yamashita/kasuya/ 00:29:53 yamashita: we must use automation to create data models 00:29:58 s/yamashita/kasuya/ 00:30:10 ... we are currently researching this topic 00:30:20 q? 00:30:21 kaz: need some kind of organization 00:31:44 +1 McCool_ create a CG before considering creating an IG 00:32:11 mm: what are next steps? Can we send invitation to people here to another meeting? 00:32:18 kaz: will do that 00:32:27 MichaelC has left #smartcities 00:32:35 ktoumura has left #smartcities 00:32:48 ddahl has left #smartcities 00:33:04 Josh-OGC has left #smartcities 00:36:45 ... I'll generate a ML including people here, and also we can use GitHub for further discussion, e.g., reviewing the draft Charter 00:36:48 [adjourned] 00:36:53 rrsagent, draft minutes 00:36:53 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/14-smartcities-minutes.html kaz 00:37:01 rrsagent, make log public 00:37:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 00:37:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/09/14-smartcities-minutes.html kaz 01:28:56 tantek has joined #smartcities 15:33:19 bneedham has left #smartcities 16:05:37 tantek has joined #smartcities 18:51:18 tante has joined #smartcities 20:33:28 tantek has joined #smartcities 21:14:55 dom has joined #smartcities 21:56:31 Zakim, bye 21:56:31 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_Cooper, Michel_McCool, Gyu_Myoung_Lee, Jim_Luth, Eric_Siow, Takashi_Kasuya, Tetsushi_Matsuda, 21:56:31 Zakim has left #smartcities 21:56:33 RRSAgent, bye 21:56:33 I see no action items