16:03:58 RRSAgent has joined #aria-editors 16:03:58 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/08/19-aria-editors-irc 16:04:03 meeting: ARIA Editors 16:04:06 rrsagent, make log world 16:04:08 agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria-editors/2022Aug/0007.html 16:04:18 agenda+ Follow up on Evergreen questions 16:04:24 agenda+ esting check-in 16:04:34 agenda+ OpenUI liaising 16:04:44 agenda+ Updating workflow process for living standards 16:04:50 agenda+ Next meeting 16:04:58 agendum 2 = Testing check-in 16:05:17 present+ 16:05:19 chair: MichaelC 16:05:22 scribe: MichaelC 16:05:32 regrets: Peter_Krautzberger 16:06:01 present+ James_Nurthen, Jemma_Ku, Valerie_Young 16:06:59 ack me 16:07:31 how does a reader know a spec is evergreen? 16:07:44 Respec working on addition to boilerplate 16:07:44 Status should have text, but not checked 16:07:44 https://w3c.github.io/tr-design/p2021mockup/cr-6.3.8.1.html mockup 16:07:44 Could make enhancement request to tr-design, respec 16:09:10 jamesn has joined #aria-editors 16:09:52 people need to know doc is evergreen so not mixed up with number versions 16:11:44 if we can document use cases, we can better prepare feedback 16:17:26 what do we do with spec versions after evergreen? 16:17:26 Can do indefinite CR without Rec snapshots, if we don't need AC endorsement 16:17:26 Spec will still have version in system (pub URI), but we don't have to put it in the title 16:17:26 Unversioned URI still exists, tied to a versioned URI, Core-aam will need update to 1.2 anyways 16:19:23 but we won´t refer to it as versions 16:21:33 we can enable auto publication after going to CR the first time 16:23:05 will need to work out a comfortable workflow for the living standards process 16:23:25 agenda? 16:24:00 zakim, close item 16:24:00 I don't understand 'close item', MichaelC 16:24:05 zakim, close this item 16:24:05 I do not know what agendum had been taken up, MichaelC 16:24:12 zakim, take up item 1 16:24:12 agendum 1 -- Follow up on Evergreen questions -- taken up [from MichaelC] 16:24:17 zakim, take up item 4 16:24:17 agendum 4 -- Updating workflow process for living standards -- taken up [from MichaelC] 16:24:39 need a different workflow to approve AAM content that won´t be too much, but gets review 16:24:57 potentially different workflow for AAMs, specs, and guides 16:26:17 zakim, close item 1 16:26:17 agendum 1, Follow up on Evergreen questions, closed 16:26:18 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:26:18 2. Testing check-in 16:27:23 zakim, next item 16:27:23 agendum 2 -- Testing check-in -- taken up 16:28:12 q+ IA2 testing 16:28:24 MichaelC has approve on wpt, but that seems outdated 16:28:39 Valerie and Joanie should be the reviewers instead 16:29:29 Jon won´t be able to help with IA2 16:30:22 Valerie has been looking in in the framework, may be able hodge podge something for 1.2 16:32:15 zakim, next item 16:32:15 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, MichaelC 16:32:18 q? 16:32:21 ack ia 16:32:22 ack t 16:32:26 zakim, next item 16:32:26 agendum 3 -- OpenUI liaising -- taken up [from MichaelC] 16:32:30 deferred 16:32:39 zakim, next meeting 16:32:39 I don't understand 'next meeting', MichaelC 16:33:03 zakim, next item 16:33:03 agendum 3 was just opened, MichaelC 16:34:22 Next meeting: 2 Sept 2022 16:34:42 zakim, take up item 5 16:34:42 agendum 5 -- Next meeting -- taken up [from MichaelC] 16:34:45 Next meeting: 2 Sept 2022 16:34:51 rrsagent, make minutes 16:34:51 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/19-aria-editors-minutes.html MichaelC 16:35:17 present+ MCK 16:35:36 rrsagent, make minutes 16:35:36 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/19-aria-editors-minutes.html MichaelC 16:35:39 rrsagent, bye 16:35:39 I see no action items