14:53:01 RRSAgent has joined #wcag3-scoring 14:53:01 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/08/17-wcag3-scoring-irc 14:53:19 zakim, start meetin 14:53:19 I don't understand 'start meetin', Francis_Storr 14:53:22 zakim, start meeting 14:53:22 RRSAgent, make logs Public 14:53:23 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Francis_Storr 14:53:37 meeting: issue severity week 5 14:53:46 rrsagent, make logs world 14:53:53 present+ 14:59:31 ShawnT has joined #wcag3-scoring 15:03:37 present+ 15:05:41 Scribe: ShawnT 15:05:58 sarahhorton has joined #wcag3-scoring 15:05:58 present+ 15:06:05 present+ 15:07:10 alastairc: presenting the Issue Severity document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/138l-fn_JuKl_lOX90JhywLbz9BK1KmjlLLyUjkoouyM/edit#heading=h.u4q2bwx7l0f0 15:08:12 alastairc: talking about the the critical issues per method section 15:08:38 ... you need some form of score 15:08:58 ... asked if we agree with this approach? 15:09:41 sarahhorton: there are checks in the WCAG guidelines that currently exist, there are groups of testing 15:10:43 .. giving example of alt text guideline tests 15:11:20 alastairc: to follow this approach you will have to review all the failures? 15:13:26 sarahhorton: this is an exercise in checking to see is just to see if we can use this as a building block to see the critical failures 15:14:05 alastairc: asks to see if we looked at other approaches or methods to explore 15:15:10 sarahhorton: could we branch away from the approach, we can come to an agreement to the method we were talking about? 15:15:27 alastairc agrees we could talk it through. 15:16:45 ... we should go through other resources 15:17:27 sarahhorton: this is a new concept but there might be a base 15:17:59 alastairc: We are presenting our summary next week, either Tuesday or Friday 15:18:25 ... a few slides are needed for the presentation 15:18:56 alastairc: has a few slides about a different approach 15:19:25 .. hoping sarahhorton or Francis_Storr would be able to present sarahhorton's approach 15:20:30 sarahhorton: worried that we aren't all aligned in a method as a group 15:21:53 ... worried that we are not like other groups that had different methods that seems to make it harder 15:22:22 sarahhorton: try to summaries the different methods 15:23:08 sarahhorton: presenting the spreadsheet, combined tab 15:23:22 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MEdnI4CvrTlq1843MZfWLaIBGmoGXXQPpUOhEY1NgV4/edit?pli=1#gid=0 15:24:31 .. methods and tests tab: test between ourselves to rate different severities 15:24:44 ... look at just the ones that are critical 15:25:52 ... then we focuses on the Critical Severity Worksheet tab which are rated as critical user needs 15:27:01 ... shows that the critical needs that are only critical 15:27:20 alastairc: would this be all the tests? 15:28:43 sarahhorton: if a test does not have severity it won't be listed in the sheet 15:29:30 ... this is not complete, there is still work to be done 15:29:55 ... we wanted to create a prototype for this matrix 15:30:41 alastairc: This is some foundational work? How would this be used in the guideline? 15:31:44 sarahhorton: we just wanted to have some work to bring back, as a starting point, to build what was in WCAG 3.0 instead of introducing new stuff 15:36:33 ... talking about critical barriers with video tests and different user needs and how the severity is critical for some needs 15:41:14 sarahhorton: we were seeing if it was even possible to see if we could rate a process as severity 15:41:23 There is Scoping subgroup, but it's not started: https://github.com/w3c/silver/wiki/Scoping-Subgroup 15:42:03 alastairc: we are trying to improve the flat structure of the WCAG 2 testing process 15:43:18 alastairc: a more granularity of a testing process by checking all the barriers and figure out how bug of a barrier is it for your task 15:44:31 sarahhorton: when doing the test, how severe are the barriers 15:46:36 ShawnT: As an auditor, you wouldn't necessarily want to go through every instance. We'd like to link to WCAG and say "this is a critical barrier". 15:46:59 ... would be good for AG + community to fill this in first, so everyone can use that. 15:47:41 https://github.com/w3c/silver/wiki/Issue-Severity-Subgroup 15:50:12 alastairc: How can we ensure WCAG 3 better reflects the "lived experience" of people with disabilities on the web? Answer: we are creating a more nuance set of tests. 15:51:41 Francis_Storr: we need a plan for next week, putting a presentation together 15:51:55 alastairc: would maybe have some time to work on this 15:52:23 Francis_Storr: is off next week, could do something on Tuesday but can't be there Friday 15:52:38 https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-9AlgikV9idYF0JZBS8zvmaz9TxyYXt7M1zsNd_JbdI/edit#slide=id.p 15:56:33 sarahhorton: thought this group would have just come up with one method instead of presenting different thoughts of prototypes 15:57:27 alastairc: we can update this and present it as an approach that we have been working on 15:58:27 alastairc: we should look at the core questions and answer them 15:59:50 Francis_Storr_ has joined #wcag3-scoring 16:01:21 alastairc: going over the slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1-9AlgikV9idYF0JZBS8zvmaz9TxyYXt7M1zsNd_JbdI/edit#slide=id.g14585acc711_0_0 16:05:26 sarahhorton: how to get people not to see this as scoring 16:06:52 sarahhorton: by trying to define when a failed test is going to impact a user with functional needs 16:08:23 sarahhorton: we don't have a breakdown on how does this affect different critical barriers of user needs 16:13:54 Francis_Storr: will ask Wilco preference for a Tuesday presentation 16:14:33 rrsagent, generate minutes 16:14:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/17-wcag3-scoring-minutes.html Francis_Storr 16:16:08 zakim, end meeting 16:16:08 As of this point the attendees have been Francis_Storr, ShawnT, alastairc, sarahhorton 16:16:10 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:16:10 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/17-wcag3-scoring-minutes.html Zakim 16:16:13 I am happy to have been of service, Francis_Storr; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 16:16:18 Zakim has left #wcag3-scoring 16:17:41 I've added the presentation link to the Google doc 16:19:02 thanks 16:20:17 Want me to add it and the Google doc link to the Wiki? 16:21:58 I added the doc for now 16:22:01 The working document we have? I think we decided that was just going to be for us and not public. 16:22:34 Oh shoot sorry 16:23:43 I get mixed up between the different wikis we use in AGWG 16:23:47 I removed it 16:24:16 thanks :) 16:24:32 good job with the minutes :) 16:26:19 FS has joined #wcag3-scoring 16:26:26 FS has left #wcag3-scoring