14:54:47 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #hcls
14:54:47 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/08/16-hcls-irc
14:54:51 <dbooth> rrsagent, make logs public
14:54:56 <dbooth> Meeting: FHIR RDF
14:55:01 <dbooth> Chair: David Booth
15:04:46 <dbooth> Topic: RDF Lists #76
15:04:46 <Github> https://github.com/w3c/hcls-fhir-rdf/issues/76 : How should list ordering be preserved in R5?
15:09:14 <dbooth> dbooth: Preferences on RDF lists?
15:09:28 <dbooth> houcemeddine: No opinion.
15:10:33 <dbooth> jim: Keep R4 for OWL compatibility.
15:10:51 <dbooth> gaurav: Keep R4
15:11:15 <dbooth> eric: Pref RDF lists, and use a transformation for OWL folks.
15:12:29 <dbooth> dbooth: R4
15:13:08 <dbooth> eric: R4 would complicate shex.
15:13:51 <dbooth> rob: Pref RDF lists.
15:25:55 <dbooth> eric: narrative.div has a direct string value, not an object.
15:26:00 <dbooth> dbooth: example: fhir:div "<div>…</div>"
15:27:52 <dbooth> dbooth: I view that as a bug.  It should be an object, to avoid potential OWL clash of ddatatype vs object property
15:28:53 <dbooth> ISSUE: Should narrative.div be an object property or datatype property?
15:30:17 <dbooth> rob; Willing to be persuaded .. . . (lost him)
15:31:04 <dbooth> gaurav: I could live with either option, so I don't feel strongly one way or another.
15:31:10 <dbooth> eric: Worried about deviating from the model.
15:32:19 <dbooth> rob: why?
15:32:49 <dbooth> eric: Because you can't have a fhir:index list if you have a list of scalars directly.
15:42:11 <dbooth> dbooth: Views?
15:42:17 <dbooth> rob: RDF lists
15:42:28 <dbooth> gaurav: Either option
15:42:39 <dbooth> houcemeddine; Either
15:42:51 <dbooth> jim: Both fine for me.
15:43:41 <dbooth> AGREED: Adopt RDF lists
15:47:46 <dbooth> Topic: Should FHIR datatype values have an rdf:type? #106
15:47:47 <Github> https://github.com/w3c/hcls-fhir-rdf/issues/106 : Should FHIR datatype values have an rdf:type?
15:48:00 <dbooth> dbooth: I think it's too late to consider for this R5 ballot
15:48:43 <dbooth> eric: explicit is nice, but terse is nice also.
15:49:40 <dbooth> AGREED: Table this for the moment.
15:50:31 <dbooth> Topic: Modifier extensions #93
15:50:32 <Github> https://github.com/w3c/hcls-fhir-rdf/issues/93 : How should modifier extensions be handled in R5?
15:56:33 <dbooth> dbooth: opinions?
15:56:59 <dbooth> rob: somewhat persuaded by option 6
15:57:18 <dbooth> jim: option 6
15:57:27 <dbooth> houcemeddine: option 6
15:58:13 <dbooth> gaurav: option 6.  FHIR validator is ridiculously specific about validating all modifier fields.  Not sure how we'll replicate that.
15:59:17 <dbooth> eric: option 6.
15:59:35 <dbooth> dbooth: ok w option 6
15:59:43 <dbooth> AGREED: Go with option 6.
16:05:04 <dbooth> eric: I'm editing things at https://w3c.github.io/hcls-fhir-rdf/spec/v2
16:11:23 <dbooth> dbooth: things to vote tomorrow:
16:11:23 <dbooth> 1. Shortening property names
16:11:23 <dbooth> 2.  RDF Lists #76
16:11:23 <dbooth> 3.  Modifier extensions #93
16:11:24 <dbooth> 4. Concept IRI
16:11:24 <dbooth> 5. fhir:v
16:11:24 <Github> https://github.com/w3c/hcls-fhir-rdf/issues/76 : How should list ordering be preserved in R5?
16:11:24 <Github> https://github.com/w3c/hcls-fhir-rdf/issues/93 : How should modifier extensions be handled in R5?
16:14:00 <TallTed> TallTed has joined #hcls
16:29:24 <dbooth> ADJOURNED
16:33:18 <dbooth> rrsagent, draft minutes
16:33:18 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/16-hcls-minutes.html dbooth
18:12:14 <dbooth> dbooth has joined #hcls
19:48:51 <dbooth> dbooth has joined #hcls
19:57:37 <dbooth> dbooth has joined #hcls
19:58:03 <dbooth> rrsagent, make logs public
19:59:47 <dbooth> Present: David Booth, Houcemeddine, Jim Balhoff, Gaurav Vaidya, EricP, Rob Hausam
20:04:01 <dbooth> rrsagent, draft minutes
20:04:01 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/16-hcls-minutes.html dbooth