11:43:49 RRSAgent has joined #wcag3-supported 11:43:49 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/08/09-wcag3-supported-irc 11:44:10 rrsagent, set logs world-visible 11:44:48 meeting: Accessibility Supported Subgroup - Week 4 - AGWG 11:45:47 agenda+ Documentation Check-in "Accessibility supported in WCAG 2" 11:46:04 agenda+ Review comments on "Accessibility supported in WCAG 2" 11:46:50 zakim, start meeting 11:46:50 RRSAgent, make logs Public 11:46:51 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Makoto 11:47:01 meeting: Accessibility Supported Subgroup - Week 4 - AGWG 12:01:18 bruce_bailey has joined #wcag3-supported 12:01:39 present+ 12:01:49 LauraBMiller has joined #wcag3-supported 12:03:14 Handbook https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_caRiZaTQDmsd2Vq415sz4AIullNse-GeGtohUfg_5M/edit# 12:03:27 present+ 12:03:28 Subgrouop wiki https://github.com/w3c/silver/wiki/Accessibility-supported-Subgroup 12:03:50 Awk has joined #wcag3-supported 12:04:13 present+ 12:04:13 Is there a different zoom link/meeting id? 12:04:26 Says it is invalid 12:04:30 Zoom https://mit.zoom.us/j/98115280962 12:04:49 s/ Zoom https://mit.zoom.us/j/98115280962// 12:05:44 zakim, take up item 12:05:44 I don't understand 'take up item', Makoto 12:05:51 q+ 12:05:55 zakim, take up next item 12:05:55 agendum 1 -- Documentation Check-in "Accessibility supported in WCAG 2" -- taken up [from Makoto] 12:07:26 I don't think I have finished with 508 use case 12:10:00 Use case notes seem worth while, but it is not clear to me how they relate to goal of presenting back to AGWG pro/con of accessibility support. 12:10:51 Bruce to write up some summary prose on how Access Board addressed topic of Accessibility Support with 508 Refresh 12:11:03 ack me 12:11:25 scribe: bruce_bailey 12:11:46 Reviewing Use Case 3 and 5 in doc 12:11:47 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XxzwsgWZSDh2EDqTag-nYfrqAT3b6Glpu8DGbVpTd9M/edit 12:11:55 q? 12:12:04 q+ 12:12:06 q? 12:12:08 ack me 12:12:47 s/Case 3 and 5/Cases/ 12:13:02 q+ 12:13:42 q+ 12:13:45 Mokoto: Review Use case three by Pormnima (sp) on Browsers and AT support 12:13:52 ack me 12:15:07 ack Rachael 12:15:16 s/Pormnima (sp)/Poornima/ 12:15:52 Rachael: What Poornima has started is similar to what Laura and I had been discussing. 12:15:55 q+ 12:16:10 ack bruce 12:16:26 that makes sense 12:16:46 Q+ about "Older" accessibility products 12:17:14 ack Laura 12:17:16 Bruce: prefer Rachael and Laura and build from what Poornima has started 12:18:17 Laura: Suggest "legacy" instead of "older" because might what to distinguish between older versions and commercial products no longer being developed. 12:18:34 q+ 12:18:35 ... Are we talking about supporting well established products only? 12:19:02 ack 12:19:10 ack about 12:19:18 ack "Older" 12:19:29 ack me 12:19:29 bruce_bailey, you wanted to say what 12:19:44 q- accessibility 12:19:45 q- accessibility, 12:19:49 q- products 12:20:02 ack Rachael 12:20:55 Rachael: Going into a little more detail, there are some valuable sections, so should each Use Case have those sections? 12:21:46 Mokoto asks Bruce (and he agrees) to add Challenges and Suggestions to the 508 Refresh use case. 12:22:01 q+ to suggest edit access so we can use the formatting 12:22:42 Makoto: AWK can you add more for accessibility support experience with PDF ? 12:23:35 ack Rachael 12:23:35 Rachael, you wanted to suggest edit access so we can use the formatting 12:23:38 AWK: I can write up what we did, namely helping document for working group (10 years ago) that PDF is example of Accessibility Supported. 12:24:42 Rachael: Please promote all of us to Editors because with about ability to accept changes, navigation is not working. 12:25:03 Q+ 12:25:04 ... Prefer "legacy" as better than older. 12:25:05 q+ 12:25:15 ack Laura 12:25:25 q+ to ask about "older" vs "legacy" 12:26:01 Laura: We should determine what products we are looking for 12:26:14 ... question as to what becomes "legacy" 12:27:06 Mokoto: After that step, we might discuss what we determining as what is at risk. Other possible use cases we should document? 12:28:43 ...After that, we will go onto discussion what we could propose as pros and cons for Accessibility Support with WCAG 3. 12:28:56 ... By next week we should assess schedule. 12:29:40 ... In Japan, we keep testing over-and-over again because screen readers keep updating.. 12:30:21 ... very time consuming and does not seem like best use of time. Huge challenge because there is not good documentation... 12:31:01 ... about how PC Talker supports document techniques. Japanese versions of NVDA and JAWS are better documented... 12:31:11 q? 12:31:15 ... this is a big change for Japan. 12:31:21 ack bruce 12:31:21 bruce_bailey, you wanted to ask about "older" vs "legacy" 12:31:55 q+ 12:32:03 ack Rachael 12:32:29 Bruce suggest legacy versus older is very difficult to investigate. How far back? 12:32:37 Q+ 12:33:10 Rachael: For our write up, we will note challenge and propose something. 12:33:32 Mokoto: Is problem that it is not well defined. 12:34:11 AWK: WCAG2x is basically saying there must AT which works, not most popular or even latest version... 12:34:28 ...What I hear proposed sounds more constrained... 12:34:46 ...May variables, platforms as well as browsers... 12:34:52 ack Laura 12:35:18 ...also sometimes the latest version breaks something. 12:36:00 Laura: I would like to put some parameters about how much we are looking into. Hopefully we can propose reasonable cut off. 12:37:01 ... Some JAWS versions are legacy and unsupported. No compelling reason to go far back, but we prose something sensible. 12:37:24 q+ to schedule initial brief back to AG 12:37:28 Makoto: I would like to propose target of where we are at for week six. 12:37:49 ...TPAC is a hard deadline. We want to have something for that meeting. 12:37:54 ack Rachael 12:37:54 Rachael, you wanted to schedule initial brief back to AG 12:38:35 Rachael: There is in the working draft handbook, the idea to have four-week touch point back to AGWG. Can that happen for this group? 12:39:16 Makoto would like AWK PDF write up for next week? 12:39:21 AWK: yes 12:39:24 Bruce: yes 12:40:02 Makoto, so I could present at AGWG meeting after that. 12:40:38 Makoto asks Laura about other use case which might be documented? 12:41:04 Laura: Rachael and I will discuss off line, and share at next week calls. 12:41:49 Makoto: Does anyone know of any database in English or other languages? 12:42:28 AWK has joined #wcag3-supported 12:42:36 Laura: I remember seen Wikipedia resource, so I will look for that. 12:43:09 Makoto: I will ask AGWG list. 12:43:35 s/Laura: I remember/Rachael: I remember/ 12:44:11 Makoto: I am not seeing new comments to our working document. We discussed comments last week. 12:44:50 Makoto: Please be encouraged to address current comments in working document... 12:45:28 ... I will give you all editor permissions, so what changes currently in document can be accepted. 12:45:29 q? 12:45:44 ...Any question about comments in document so far? 12:45:58 q+ 12:46:07 ack Laura 12:48:01 s/... Some JAWS versions are legacy and unsupported. No compelling reason to go far back, but we prose something sensible. / I guessing imagine that ... Some JAWS versions are legacy and unsupported. No compelling reason to go far back, but we prose something sensible. 12:48:52 s/prose something/propose something 12:48:59 rrsagent, generate minutes 12:48:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/09-wcag3-supported-minutes.html Rachael 12:49:27 present+ 12:49:37 +AWK 12:50:41 Makoto: Thanks everyone, please use ten minutes to review shared doc! 12:52:03 s/Zoom https:\/\/mit.zoom.us\/j\/98115280962// 12:53:03 s/ Zoom https:\/\/mit.zoom.us\/j\/98115280962\// 12:53:16 rssagent, generate minutes 12:53:44 rrsagent, generate minutes 12:53:44 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/09-wcag3-supported-minutes.html bruce_bailey 13:15:01 present+ AWK 13:15:56 regrets:Poornima 13:23:00 s/Japanese versions of NVDA and JAWS are better documented/We might be able to find information on JAWS and NVDA if available online 13:24:46 s/Huge challenge because there is not good documentation.../Huge challenge because there was not any information on how well PC-Talker supported each sufficient technique.... 13:25:29 s/about how PC Talker supports document techniques./we had to do something on PC-Talker. 13:26:19 s/this is a big change for Japan./this has been a big challenge for Japan. 13:27:33 s/Is problem that it is not well defined./The problem was that it was not well defined. 13:29:10 s/where we are at for week six./where we will be at for week 5 and 6. 13:30:36 s/I will ask AGWG list./I will ask it AGWG call. 13:31:17 rrsagent, generate minutes 13:31:17 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/09-wcag3-supported-minutes.html Makoto 13:32:16 s/I will ask it AGWG call./I will ask it at AGWG call. 13:32:27 rrsagent, generate minutes 13:32:27 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/08/09-wcag3-supported-minutes.html Makoto 13:47:53 zakim, please part 13:47:53 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been Makoto, Rachael, LauraBMiller, bruce_bailey, AWK 13:47:53 Zakim has left #wcag3-supported 13:48:08 rssagent, please part 13:50:50 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:51:06 trackbot, end meeting 13:51:18 rrsagent, please part 13:51:18 I see no action items