14:47:27 RRSAgent has joined #wot-cg 14:47:27 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/07/25-wot-cg-irc 14:48:47 start the meeting 14:49:36 present+ Ege Korkan 14:49:43 list attendees 14:51:52 present+ [Ege Korkan] 14:51:56 list attendees 14:53:27 kaz has joined #wot-cg 15:08:24 topic: Greetings and Logistics 15:08:33 citrullin has joined #wot-cg 15:10:54 ca: you can fill the questionnaire at https://forms.gle/FkHGF2hRwf8e49Qj6 in order to give us a feedback 15:11:12 ca: I will be back in a minute to give some time 15:11:13 dape has joined #wot-cg 15:12:22 luca: I am co founder of vaimee 15:12:35 lr: I remember the plugfest from dusseldorf airport 15:13:08 lr: I believe in the impact of WoT 15:14:09 philipp: I work in my own company, I used to be in crypto organization 15:14:24 ... I am interested in constrained devices, RIOT OS based 15:14:32 ... we have a running implementation 15:15:28 ... I came to know WoT while I was tinkering with Arduino, did not want to use custom protocols 15:15:38 mm: I am co chair of WoT WG 15:15:50 present+ Philipp_Blum, Kaz_Ashimura, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Ege_Korkan, Luca_Roffia, Dogan_Fennibay, Gregoria_Monari, Junde_Yhi, Salvatore_Cataldi, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Tomoaki_Mizushima 15:15:51 ... also involved in robotics and edge, other than IoT 15:16:27 sk: Here is Sebastian. I am co-chair of WoT WG with Michael 15:17:04 ... I am very happy that this group is reactivated, outside of the standardization work for the community to meet 15:17:35 present+ Michael_McCool, Daniel_Peintner 15:18:01 ... looking forward for new activities here 15:18:31 dogan: I am from Siemens, from smart infrastructure. I am interested in a non fragmented way to do IoT 15:19:39 daniel: I am from Siemens. I am active in working group. I am looking forward to see the community grow 15:19:50 ... it was lacking before 15:20:40 Mizushima has joined #wot-cg 15:21:11 gregorio: I am from Vaimee. I am here to learn more WoT, happy to be with the beautiful people here 15:22:25 ka: I am from W3C. Team contact for the WG and IG. I am an observer today 15:23:23 tm: I am Tomoaki Mizushima. From Internet Research Institute. I am co-editor of profile and use cases. Also co-chair of WoT Japanese CG 15:26:26 ... we talked about WoT with japanese 15:36:04 topic: Draft CG Charter 15:36:09 -> https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/charter-drafts/859914558bad9052cd33d42c5418be9516d6ed29/2022/wot-cg-2022.html Rendered version 15:37:02 ca: the idea behind externalizing the documents, is to make it easier to maintain them 15:37:53 ca: we have updated the image to reflect how to arrange the collaboration in the future 15:38:23 ca: we can give feedback to the WG, like how something is difficult to implement 15:38:52 ca: we will try to reach out to other CGs in the W3C 15:39:39 ca: it might be easier to let others join plugfest like events 15:40:06 ca: we want to support newcomers 15:40:45 i|https|-> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Fa9tSp_xSOtJnKN2AV5qcJf7JUCNHO9D/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106655031772979203612&rtpof=true&sd=true Slides| 15:40:56 q+ 15:42:23 scribenick: kaz 15:43:02 kaz: given this proposed diagram, we need to clarify the relationship among the three groups: WoT IG, WoT WG and WoT CG 15:43:35 ... also my question is: do we still need the WoT IG if the WoT CG can handle most of the IG work 15:43:43 scribenick: Ege 15:44:10 q+ 15:44:30 ack k 15:44:41 mm: we can let the CG work and decide later to revise IG 15:45:02 ... and see how a venue fits or not 15:45:27 sk: we should leave IG mainly for collaboration between the IG and other SDOs 15:46:03 pb: I like mccool's suggestion. we should resolve conflicts 15:46:46 ack k 15:47:10 ca: we can be the first contact for other SDOs and then direct them to IG 15:48:02 q+ 15:48:06 ... we do not compete with WoT IG or WG 15:48:24 ... outreach is a horizontal activity 15:48:42 ka: once cg clarifies the scope, we should talk with CG contact and project team contact from W3C 15:48:45 ... w3c management as well 15:49:18 ... ig and wg activity is defined by the process document, CG is not 15:50:24 ack k 15:50:24 ... so we need W3C's approval 15:50:36 ek: we have it as a next work item 15:51:16 ca: we also want to organise some meeting in TPAC as well 15:51:53 ... we want to organize monthly events after TPAC 15:52:04 s/W3C's approval/to talk with this proposal with the W3C Team as well/ 15:53:03 ... and publish polished versions of the minutes for others to digest 15:53:30 ek: CG work restarts after TPAC 15:53:42 ca: you can open issues and send emails 15:54:35 i/we want to organize monthly/kaz: in that case, maybe you're a bit late. there was a specific procedure for Chairs (including CG Chairs) to ask the Event Team to allocate a meeting during TPAC/ 15:54:37 pb: I would like to propose a chat solution in the next meeting 15:55:26 s/I would like to propose a chat solution in the next meeting/I would like to present something in regards of a chat solution etc. next meeting/ 15:59:44 ca: I propose to adjurn the call. Thank you all for attending! 15:59:55 ek: Thank you all, see you in the next meeting 16:05:02 [adjourned] 16:05:06 rrsagent, make log public 16:05:09 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:05:09 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/25-wot-cg-minutes.html kaz 20:07:12 Zakim has left #wot-cg