11:13:02 RRSAgent has joined #wcag3-supported 11:13:02 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/07/19-wcag3-supported-irc 11:13:55 Agenda+ Introduction 11:14:18 Agenda+ Subgroup Handbook 11:14:43 Agenda+ About "Accessibility supported" 11:15:02 Agenda+ Discussion on our goal 11:16:01 meeting: Accessibility Supported Subgroup Week 1 11:16:17 chair: Makoto 11:57:36 zakim, start meeting 11:57:36 RRSAgent, make logs Public 11:57:37 please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Makoto 11:58:01 meeting: Accessibility Supported Subgroup Week 1 11:58:21 rrsagent, make logs world 12:01:17 poornima has joined #wcag3-supported 12:01:26 bruce_bailey has joined #wcag3-supported 12:01:30 present+ 12:02:27 present+ 12:02:42 present+ 12:02:57 Rachael has joined #wcag3-supported 12:05:30 zakim, make minutes 12:05:30 I don't understand 'make minutes', Rachael 12:05:40 rrsagent, make minutes 12:05:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/19-wcag3-supported-minutes.html Rachael 12:06:16 rrsagent, make logs world 12:07:14 AWK has joined #wcag3-supported 12:08:01 Makoto's starting draft: 12:08:02 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_caRiZaTQDmsd2Vq415sz4AIullNse-GeGtohUfg_5M 12:08:55 zakim, take up item 1 12:08:55 agendum 1 -- Introduction -- taken up [from Makoto] 12:09:46 scribe: bruce_bailey 12:10:21 Makoto: welcome, joined AGWG in 2005 and also lead JIS committee work... 12:10:55 ... I wanted to share experience with accessibility supported, and would like others to introduce themselves 12:11:39 AWK: Andrew Kirkpatrick, representing Adobe on AGWG, including co-chair for seven years working on 2.1, based in boston 12:12:01 Poornima: Working with Holland American Group, three cruise lines... 12:12:48 ... before joining AGWG, worked in banking and team which focussed on accessiblity. Ten years in space, also includes engineering... 12:13:21 ... I have been mostly background work, but am interested with being more active. This sub group and protocols. 12:14:42 Bruce Bailey: U.S. Access Board, section 508 refresh, IE since ~ 2003. 12:15:41 Makoto: Screen shares Accessibility Supported Subgroup pages on GitHub 12:16:46 Makoto: One main issues is how comprehensive, language and OS/browser support 12:17:12 ... goal today is to figure out goals and plan for next 8 weeks 12:17:49 ... subgroup handbook outlines work plan 12:18:10 ... week 8 should be report back to AGWG 12:19:08 ... todays agenda is to finalize goals for eight week period 12:19:27 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_caRiZaTQDmsd2Vq415sz4AIullNse-GeGtohUfg_5M/edit 12:19:38 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XxzwsgWZSDh2EDqTag-nYfrqAT3b6Glpu8DGbVpTd9M/ 12:20:18 1st link is hand book 12:20:30 2nd link is working document 12:21:45 Makoto: doc starts with reference excerpts from 2.1, definitions and conformance requirement 12:22:19 ... in my experience, concept is miss understood 12:22:50 ... taken to means "can I use HTML or not?" -- Can I use PDF or not? 12:22:55 q+ 12:23:32 ack me 12:24:13 Bruce asks for clarification about how broadly "accessibility supported" is taken in Japan. 12:25:09 Makoto: In Japan, we tend to make PDF out of scope -- because it is so labor intensive to make accessible. 12:25:40 ... People think "PDF is not perfect, so we cannot use PDF (at all)" -- but that is not correct. 12:26:05 ... For example, simple PDF documents can be very easy to make accessible. 12:27:05 ... So some PDF can meet JIS requirements. 12:27:56 Makoto: Accessibility Supported concept in 2.0 was very important, since 1.0 required W3C technologies... 12:29:08 ... when 2.0 was under development, there were conversations about "baseline technologies" which considered listing products -- but AGWG settled on Accessiblity Supported instead. 12:29:42 Makoto: Concept was good, and technology neutral, but did not end up working well for Japan. 12:30:09 In 2nd doc, see "3. Use case # Japan" 12:30:46 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XxzwsgWZSDh2EDqTag-nYfrqAT3b6Glpu8DGbVpTd9M/edit#heading=h.y22sywdlyi60 12:31:23 WCAG 2.0 Level AA is highly recommended, but not legally required. 12:32:06 ... Bruce asked in document if there is movement for requiring in public sector. 12:32:34 ... There are legislative discussions, but no formal requirement. 12:32:53 ... Japan needs international (ISO) adoption for consideration. 12:33:19 ... there are conversations about moving to 2.2 Level AA, but that will have to wait on ISO adoption. 12:34:11 Makoto: The screen reader market share in Japan is dominated by PC Talker... 12:34:31 ... some developers are testing with NVDA 12:35:15 ... ARIA support for PC Talker is lacking, and PC Talker tends to lag behind JAWS and even NVDA in terms of features. 12:36:15 Makoto: Example of lack features is 2.4.4 Link Purpose because documented sufficient techniques do not work with PC Talker. 12:36:57 ... What we have done is include list of test cases in Japan standard. 12:37:28 ... WAIC, pronounced "wake", includes those many references. 12:38:25 Reference source is: https://waic.jp/ 12:39:25 Makoto: We created test code samples and testing proceedures. 12:40:21 ... we have supported, partially supported, not supported 12:40:50 ... this is H69 12:41:14 Accessibility Supported Informatin by WAIC https://waic.jp/docs/as/info/201406/index.html 12:42:10 Makoto: This is just one example. As you know, there are so very many techniques and failures already documented... 12:42:47 ... for Japan, we worked to review all of these against various browsers and screen reading software 12:42:58 ... many combination. 12:43:16 s/many combination./many combinations. 12:43:40 ... It has been a huge challenge, and it did not go as well as I had expected... 12:44:03 ... please see Google Doc for summary of some experiences. 12:45:17 Makoto: Base on our experience in Japan, I would like to suggest that this concept of Accessibility Supported is needed, but it is very difficult. 12:46:03 ... creating testing procedures should be developed by AGWG but I have not information about non-English efforts for similar work. 12:46:25 Please share example if you know of similar work outside of EN. 12:46:46 I would like to gather used cases of examples, if possible. 12:47:06 That background should help inform our goals for this subgroup. 12:47:07 q? 12:47:10 AWK has joined #wcag3-supported 12:47:47 AWK: I think one of the goals should be to come up with a recommendation if Accessibility Supported is needed or not. 12:48:19 ... Clearly there is need for something, but what we have been doing lags behind what is available. 12:48:37 ... So if needed, What does it need to accomplish? 12:48:45 ... Why is it present in the document? 12:48:55 +AWK 12:49:02 q? 12:49:42 Poornima: I will dive in and comment in document this week. The goals is not just HTML but must address other technologies. 12:50:12 ... Are we trying to develop guidelines for other technologies? 12:50:42 ... If you take technologies like screen readers, are we requiring them to be multi-lingual? 12:51:24 Makoto: We can go in several directions. Big question is to decide who to approach... 12:51:51 ... with HTML there might be an ABC element -- but how to know if compatible with assistive technology ? 12:52:35 Makoto: We used to have three standards, WCAG, ATAG, UAAG -- but WCAG3 aims to combine all of that. 12:53:22 ... most Japanese developers have difficulty with English technical requirements. So current approach has created barriers. 12:53:44 ... so this is what we are trying to address in these next 8 weeks. 12:54:28 Poornima: Simple example is hyper text links. Does every screen reader announce the presence of a link? 12:54:55 ... The interactions between different browsers complicates the results very much. 12:55:02 q+ 12:55:31 q+ 12:55:43 Makoto: We can say that 2.0 was easier (than 1.0) because it was open to technologies other than HTML. 12:55:50 ack bruce 12:56:28 Bruce: Likes the idea of dropping Accessiblity SUpport 12:56:31 Bruce: I like idea in principle of dropping Accessibiltiy Support 12:56:35 ... hard to convey to lay people 12:56:57 .... accessibility comes down to compatiblity with AT 12:56:58 ... accessible comes down to compatible with AT so it can't be ignored completely 12:57:25 ...other competing thing is that devs as a rule do a poor job of AT testing 12:57:55 ... the US trusted tester program has rules to help address this issue 12:58:37 ... another competing factor is that the DOJ and DoED go after sites they use a performance standard rather than conformance strictly 12:58:49 ack AWK 12:59:32 AWK: Is WCAG3 open to even more technologies? It will still be limited to web technologies. 13:00:24 Makoto: For next week, please review document and comments... 13:00:32 ... Please add some use cases. 13:00:41 rrsagent, make minutes 13:00:41 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/19-wcag3-supported-minutes.html bruce_bailey 13:04:06 rssagent, end meeting 13:04:33 zakim, end meeting 13:04:33 As of this point the attendees have been poornima, bruce_bailey, Makoto, AWK 13:04:35 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:04:35 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/19-wcag3-supported-minutes.html Zakim 13:04:38 I am happy to have been of service, bruce_bailey; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 13:04:42 Zakim has left #wcag3-supported 13:05:06 RSSAgent, you are excused 13:21:37 s/2.0 was easier (than 1.0)/2.0 was easier (than WCAG 3) 13:23:04 s/because it was open to/because it will be open to wider range of digital content 13:23:40 rrsagent, generate minutes 13:23:40 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/19-wcag3-supported-minutes.html Makoto