18:11:37 RRSAgent has joined #webauthn 18:11:37 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/07/13-webauthn-irc 18:11:39 inviting RRSAgent 18:11:39 RRSAgent, make logs Public 18:11:40 Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2022Jul/0096.html 18:11:40 Meeting: Web Authentication WG 18:11:42 present= 18:59:11 matthewmiller has joined #webauthn 19:00:03 kaiju has joined #webauthn 19:01:47 elundberg has joined #webauthn 19:05:15 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1755/ 19:05:35 present+ matthewmiller, agl, akshay, davidturner, elundberg, johnbradley, jfontana, nsteele, sbweeden, suekoomen, timcappalli, wseltzer 19:05:56 agl: sounds good to me 19:06:04 ... I'll make that change 19:06:21 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1732 19:06:36 agl: got an update from Mozilla 19:07:00 ... saying they're unlikely to formally object 19:07:20 dveditz has joined #webauthn 19:08:59 dveditz: we're working actively on it 19:09:07 present+ dveditz 19:10:10 ... we still think it's lower-level than webauthn should be 19:11:20 ... but might as well go with what people are working on 19:11:35 agl: I'd prefer to have more than grudging acceptance 19:12:19 dveditz: thanks, we'd probably implement, not a current priority 19:20:15 jfontana: 4 reviewers have signed off. ok to merge 19:21:39 matthewmiller: Tim has done some work with issue templates to help people direct their issues to the right audience 19:22:07 ... including suggestions to use other forums, e.g. the fido-dev mailing list 19:22:10 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1778 19:22:28 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1778/files 19:22:47 timcappalli: are those the right categories? 19:23:22 ... if you think there should be more scripted prompts, categories, please suggest 19:23:33 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1777 19:23:44 elundberg: sounds good. 19:23:58 ... is there a big difference between technical change/new use case or feature? 19:24:19 nsteele: I think it's different in level of detail 19:24:36 ... flesh out abstract ideas in the issue before getting to technical proposal 19:25:39 ... helps in routing people with implementation-specific questions to the right place too 19:27:07 timcappalli: is it OK to add links to implementations' bug trackers? 19:27:35 wseltzer: that's fine, add any that are relevant 19:28:27 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1765 19:28:37 jfontana: ok to merge? 19:28:44 ... please do 19:29:21 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1744 19:29:39 elundberg: draft for discussion 19:30:09 ... I don't expect it to be merged, just to prompt discussion 19:30:19 ... if no discussion, ok to close 19:31:02 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1733 19:33:46 agl: 1462 can be closed 19:35:09 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1663 19:35:53 nsteele: 1633 closed out 19:36:36 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1633 19:37:35 nsteele: 1633 closed reopened 19:38:14 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1766 19:38:36 timcappalli: I opened an issue in the Web Extensions repo 19:38:54 ... I don't think there's anything to do in WebAuthn 19:39:38 https://github.com/w3c/webextensions/tree/main/_minutes 19:44:31 An easy one to merge: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1770 19:44:49 matthewmiller: can we close out 1770? 19:45:00 elundberg: should merge 19:47:08 agl: want people to look at the DPK PR 19:47:16 ... it's complicated, because logic is throughout the spec 19:49:39 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1663 20:00:44 [adjourned] 20:00:47 rrsagent, draft minutes 20:00:47 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/07/13-webauthn-minutes.html wseltzer 20:11:32 kaiju has joined #webauthn 20:56:03 kaiju has joined #webauthn 20:58:51 kaiju has joined #webauthn