13:34:03 RRSAgent has joined #silver 13:34:03 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/06/17-silver-irc 13:34:06 RRSAgent, make logs Public 13:34:07 Meeting: Silver Task Force & Community Group 13:34:10 agenda+ Meeting on 1 July (US holiday weekend)? 13:34:29 agenda+ Report from the conformance options sub-group 13:34:41 agenda+ Migration Exercise 13:58:18 Makoto has joined #silver 13:58:32 Chuck has joined #silver 14:00:05 agenda? 14:00:10 Present+ 14:00:47 janina has joined #silver 14:00:52 present+ 14:03:59 Poornima has joined #silver 14:04:24 maryjom has joined #silver 14:05:50 present+ 14:05:53 sarahhorton has joined #silver 14:05:57 Zakim, take up item 1 14:05:57 agendum 1 -- Meeting on 1 July (US holiday weekend)? -- taken up [from Lauriat] 14:06:51 present+ 14:07:02 +1 14:07:03 Azlan has joined #silver 14:07:04 +1 14:07:04 present+ 14:07:04 +1 Jeanne to attending July 1 14:07:06 +1 14:07:11 -1 14:07:15 Chuck: 0 Uncertain 14:07:17 +.5 (maybe) 14:07:26 +1 14:08:05 present+ 14:08:11 scribe: Azlan 14:09:24 RESOLUTION: Silver will not meet for the July 1st instance of the Silver call. 14:09:35 Zakim, take up next item 14:09:35 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Lauriat 14:09:39 q? 14:10:09 ack Poor 14:10:16 Zakim, take up next item 14:10:16 agendum 2 -- Report from the conformance options sub-group -- taken up [from Lauriat] 14:11:20 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G9q082IFl4Rj4o07qMx8Y_5oFoDN7Lmx-5i3ViROpD8/ 14:11:41 janina: we are presenting a summary of use cases. This is another view we will present to AGWG on Tuesday. There is a two page summary as the full document is large. 14:12:51 q+ 14:12:52 We have been talking about options to incorporate the concerns but we have realised these use cases impact a wider range of groups than just conformance. 14:14:13 We have recently been asked to consider an impact statement which we believe to be a good approach but cannot do this in time for Tuesday. 14:15:58 ack Chuck 14:16:39 Chuck: You've identified there will be impact to other groups will that be explained on Tuesday or addressed? 14:17:32 janina: We are exploring ways this needs to be addressed but the use cases on their own are a central repository that should be separated out. 14:18:36 we looked at partial conformance and questioned whether this is technical or policy. 14:19:43 jeanne: Have not been able to split out that document yet 14:20:39 q? 14:23:03 janina: we think we have arranged the situations from least to most controversial. We would appreciate feedback on that. 14:23:50 +1 using strategy of starting from least controversial and scaling up to "most" 14:24:43 jeanne has joined #silver 14:25:27 zakim, next item 14:25:27 agendum 3 -- Migration Exercise -- taken up [from Lauriat] 14:25:42 I did not 14:26:26 I would be interested in discussing now? 14:28:13 Poornima: we were working on labels and instructions. It would be good to consolidate all the related information for these under these guidelines. 14:29:00 q? 14:29:00 q? 14:30:16 q+ 14:30:18 sarahhorton: It's been a helpful exercise to tease apart the intent behind labels and instructions. Is the exercise also about ideating what this should be including as we move forward? 14:31:11 jeanne: We don't want to expand too much but we want to be based on user needs. Part of what we want to do is to reorganise things. 14:31:53 But we don't want to be breaking ground on new items not based on research 14:33:42 q- 14:33:51 q+ 14:34:03 +1 to sarah's points 14:34:23 sarahhorton: we could create a set of requirements that pull from different requirements to create something focussed on labels and instructions. I want to ensure we are doing the right work for the migration process. 14:34:36 +1 to Sarah's points as well 14:35:23 q+ 14:35:24 jeanne: Suggest staying high level - the big things we want to categorise are the types of tests and the scope. 14:35:58 q+ 14:36:07 ack Chuck 14:36:20 sarahhorton: break down the use case and user needs into granular testable units 14:37:01 ack Makoto 14:37:04 Chuck: Janina experienced a similar thing with regards to captioning 14:38:49 Makoto: there are sufficient techniques to assiciate labels with form controls under 1.1.1, 1.1.3 and others which makes this complicated 14:39:09 ack Poornima 14:39:16 s/1.1.3/1.3.1 14:39:54 q+ 14:40:12 Poornima: Can we include notes for the cross-referencing? 14:40:25 ack Chuck 14:40:33 jeanne: Including in the notes is probably the way forwards 14:41:00 Chuck: Looking forward to seeing those notes with the references 14:41:07 qv? 14:41:38 jeanne: people have long been talking bout the need to break up 1.3.1 14:43:12 On Tuesday we will ask everyone to take success criteria and work on them. We would like to do a dry run of this. 14:43:25 Assignment spreadsheet -> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tXIaJxQCyuOTkvLcJR5QgTN13h6dIgtUlE7H9CUCvew/edit#gid=0 14:48:00 q+ I can start exploring Name, Role & Value 14:48:26 q+ 14:52:53 just fyi - I added Google doc link for 'Labels and Instructions' in the spreadsheet 14:53:10 Thank you! 14:54:29 maryjom_ has joined #silver 14:59:19 zakim, bye 14:59:19 leaving. As of this point the attendees have been jeanne, Makoto, Poornima, janina, sarahhorton, Lauriat, maryjom, Azlan 14:59:19 Zakim has left #silver 14:59:43 rrsagent, make minutes 14:59:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/06/17-silver-minutes.html Azlan 16:59:35 kirkwood has joined #silver