15:50:51 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webfonts
15:50:51 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/06/14-webfonts-irc
16:00:16 <Bianca> Bianca has joined #webfonts
16:01:59 <Vlad> zakim, start meeting
16:01:59 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
16:02:00 <Zakim> Meeting: Web Fonts Working Group Teleconference
16:02:06 <Vlad> present+
16:03:34 <chris> https://github.com/w3c/woff2-tests
16:04:11 <Garret> Garret has joined #webfonts
16:05:21 <chris> https://github.com/w3c/woff2-tests
16:05:21 <Garret> present+
16:07:24 <chris> present+
16:07:31 <Bianca> present+
16:09:39 <skef> skef has joined #webfonts
16:09:57 <Vlad> scribenick: skef
16:10:17 <Vlad> Topic: PR review
16:10:52 <skef> Vladmir says "first topic: brief review of all PRs starting with #95" which has already been discussed call before last
16:11:34 <skef> Garret: Goal is to allow selective transmission of features, PR adds several fields to the request and response
16:12:13 <skef> ... Interesting part: defined a default sent of features that are sent regardless of the list requested by the client
16:12:25 <skef> ... Appendix added to spec with those defaults
16:12:46 <skef> List isn't finalized, can be changed, add comments if needed
16:13:17 <skef> Vladmir: We seem to be in good shape now
16:14:47 <Vlad> The above is re: PR #95(https://github.com/w3c/IFT/pull/95) and the issue discussion #87 (https://github.com/w3c/IFT/issues/87)
16:15:28 <skef> Vlad: PR has already been closed, want to talk about other PRs that are recently closed or still open
16:15:43 <Vlad> PR #97 (https://github.com/w3c/IFT/pull/97)
16:16:25 <skef> Garrett: PR 97: Allows client to patch from one version of a font to another.
16:16:47 <skef> Garrett: This means that data not normally changed between updates can now be changed
16:17:06 <Vlad> PR #98 (https://github.com/w3c/IFT/pull/98)
16:17:33 <skef> Garrett: PR 98: Members wanted to see better integration between this spec and other HTTP specs, such as cache interactions
16:18:19 <skef> Garrett: E.G. compatibility with FETCH,
16:18:45 <skef> Garrett: Up to the user agent to decide how these interactions are initiated
16:19:01 <skef> Garrett: Will merge after call unless there are additional comments
16:20:38 <skef> Vlad: Reviewing related issues #63 and #69
16:21:02 <Vlad> Topic: Open Issues: https://github.com/w3c/IFT/issues
16:21:12 <skef> Vlad: Let's also review the related issues
16:23:05 <skef> Garrett: RE issue 93, Clarified can support redirect, can discuss other possibilities at TPAC meeting
16:26:28 <skef> skef: May need a separate has key to cache on, but POST-related problems remain
16:33:40 <skef> Skef will add some discussion to the issue, and open an issue about a la carte access to the IFT facilities
16:34:22 <skef> Vlad: There are quite a few issues labeled "range request",
16:34:53 <skef> How do we progress on these issues?
16:36:07 <skef> ... If we don't have the main proponent of that joining the meetings
16:36:59 <skef> Chris: We can send a note to Miles and ask whether he or someone else can join to represent the issue. We don't necessarily need to resolve this before publishing the next draft
16:37:31 <skef> Garret: Probably ready to publish another draft.
16:37:55 <skef> Vlad: Resolve to publish another draft. Any objections?
16:38:05 <skef> (No objections)
16:38:29 <chris> RESOLUTION: publish updated IFT draft
16:38:44 <chris> rrsagent, draft minutes
16:38:44 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/06/14-webfonts-minutes.html chris
16:39:20 <chris> rrsagent, make logs public
16:39:23 <chris> rrsagent, draft minutes
16:39:23 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/06/14-webfonts-minutes.html chris
16:40:51 <chris> present+ Garret, skef, Vlad
16:41:15 <skef> Will close #62: Method specific privacy sections
16:42:43 <skef> Will discuss #57: "Require supporting both IFT methods by User Agents" at TPAC
16:43:53 <skef> Garrett: #30 "method negotiation has potential time wastes in it" can probably be closed
16:45:43 <skef> Garrett: on #28 "Font Collection support", could add a font index parameter, so that fonts that are part of a collection can be patched individually. Too complicated to patch every font in a collection together
16:46:32 <skef> Chris: Suggest using a PostScript name rather than an index
16:46:58 <skef> Chris: More robust in the face of font upgrades, such as those that add fonts to a collection
16:48:04 <skef> Garret: Makes sense to use what CSS is using to identify the font
16:48:13 <chris> Defined in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8081
16:48:57 <skef> Vlad: Next topic, TPAC schedule and demo opportunity
16:49:11 <skef> Tentative schedule: Meeting room available for all of Tuesday
16:49:30 <skef> Doesn't overlap with CSS meeting, which is Friday.
16:49:47 <skef> Tuesday seems like the best option given that that's the call day.
16:50:28 <skef> Vlad: With luck there won't be additional changes to the schedule
16:51:32 <skef> Vlad: Two agenda links, one for the demo. Want to discuss whether IFT should do a demo this year
16:52:20 <skef> Garret: Can commit to a demo based on the existing code
16:52:53 <skef> Garret: Could use a COLR v1 emoji font, in addition to the usual CJK case
16:53:21 <skef> Vlad: That's it for the announced agenda
16:53:43 <Vlad> rrsagent, make minutes
16:53:43 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/06/14-webfonts-minutes.html Vlad