14:04:21 RRSAgent has joined #w3process 14:04:21 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/06/08-w3process-irc 14:04:45 present=fantasai, wseltzer , jrosewell , plh, florian 14:04:53 regrets+ Jeff 14:05:02 regrets+ Chris 14:06:40 scribe+ 14:06:49 plh: this will be a short meeting, I promise 14:06:57 zakim, give meeting 20 minutes 14:06:57 I don't understand 'give meeting 20 minutes', wseltzer 14:06:59 famous last words 14:07:04 agenda+ Goals and timeline for upcoming Process: Work for the next 9 months. 14:07:04 agenda+ 4 Pull requests: Let's approve pull requests within 2 weeks 14:07:04 agenda+ Director-Free Formal Objection handling: Status & next steps. 14:07:04 agenda+ Director-Free TAG appointment: Status & next steps. 14:07:05 agenda+ Director-Free Chartering and pre-AC review: Status & next steps. 14:07:05 agenda+ P2022 to close: restarting the closures. 14:07:07 agenda+ P2022 issues list. 14:07:09 agenda+ Next meeting: June 22. 14:07:11 agenda+ Any other business. 14:07:16 zakim, move to next agendum 14:07:17 agendum 1 -- Goals and timeline for upcoming Process: Work for the next 9 months. -- taken up [from plh] 14:07:48 plh: Fantasai and I are your new chairs, welcome back 14:08:10 ... we have no fires 14:08:26 ... but we should set goals for the next 9mo 14:08:41 ... a few edits that have been approved and merged 14:08:57 --> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Drafts/#changes-2021 Change log 14:09:04 ... nothing that requires shipping a process update urgently 14:09:22 ... mainly continued prep for post-Director 14:10:02 ... Don't think we're on-track to ship a process in September 14:10:18 ... and as there are no significant substantive changes 14:10:38 ... We could get Dir-Free by Q1/Q2 2023 14:10:52 ... need we ship a Process before then? I don't think so 14:10:59 +1 14:11:05 florian: agree 14:11:22 ... git would permit us to ship one while working on another in branch 14:11:38 ... but don't think it's worth the pause we've seen in the past 14:12:06 fantasai: the pause was combo of explanation and exhaustion. don't think that's necessary here 14:12:09 q+ 14:12:14 ack ws 14:12:24 wseltzer: I think we should explicitly choose to wait until DF to update 14:12:24 wseltzer: let's wait until we have Director-Free 14:12:34 q- 14:12:51 wfm 14:13:05 plh: I think, unless someone comes with something critical, focus on Q1-Q2 Dir-Free release 14:13:20 ... by moving things one by one from Dir-Free branch to main 14:13:30 zakim, move to next agendum 14:13:30 agendum 2 -- 4 Pull requests: Let's approve pull requests within 2 weeks -- taken up [from plh] 14:13:59 plh: PRs. Not looking for approval today, but heads-up that we'll ask for decision in 2 weeks 14:14:04 ... 2 PRs on the same issue 14:14:20 ... from wseltzer, florian 14:14:37 florian: as mine preceded Wendy's, which has PSIG review 14:14:44 ... if people like Wendy's, take it 14:14:50 fantasai: but Nigel pointed out problems 14:15:31 action: wseltzer to re-review 572 and Nigel's comments 14:15:40 s/572/599/ 14:15:57 action: everyone fix the process 14:16:26 plh: if there are other things in 572, do a distinct PR 14:16:33 ... Wendy, tell us how to move forward 14:16:48 florian: the additional changes in 572 are part of the same thing, just touching more of the surrounding text 14:16:59 scribe+ 14:16:59 plh: 602 is simple clarification of how we announce charter extensions to AC 14:17:52 florian: can we just approve this? 14:17:56 ... it's trivial 14:18:00 wseltzer: +1 14:18:23 plh: let's merge 602 14:18:32 https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/602/files 14:18:36 plh: 586 14:18:53 https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/586 14:19:08 florian: this is one from Dir-Free 14:19:21 ... when a doc is making progress on rec track, there are things team should check 14:19:49 ... currently, it's marked the Director is supposed to do, but should be done by team 14:19:58 ... not decision responsibility but verification 14:20:09 ... it's starting from WG decision 14:20:38 ... and the possibility of AC review if something goes wrong 14:20:49 ... so it should be easy to replace Dir with Team 14:21:00 plh: and a should became must 14:21:07 plh: people SHOULD look at it 14:21:14 ... in 2 weeks, I'll ask if merge 14:21:21 ack fan 14:21:27 https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/586#issuecomment-967144665 14:21:39 fantasai: I agree with changes. see Leonie's comment 14:21:59 ... that team should document exceptions 14:22:09 ... should address either in this PR or elsewhere 14:22:17 florian: I'll add something 14:22:40 plh: I'll want to make sure Ralph sees the update 14:23:02 zakim, move to next agendum 14:23:02 agendum 3 -- Director-Free Formal Objection handling: Status & next steps. -- taken up [from plh] 14:23:39 plh: FOs 14:23:55 florian: we have a description of Council in DF branch 14:24:21 ... not completely up-to-date with experimental process, esp wrt dismissal/recusal 14:24:42 ... we also need to review 14:25:14 --> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lB8Q_pvqxfN204FQHZ8D2HObxfo36qnguif9mGpEJTU/edit# W3M-AB Formal Objection Planning 14:25:33 plh: I came up with this draft ^ 14:25:39 ... steps and who's responsible 14:25:55 ... check its alignment with DF 14:26:12 florian: I expect most of that detail would go in to /Guide 14:26:24 plh: agree. mostly check for consistency 14:27:42 ... and there's more work to be done around dismissal 14:27:45 florian: not stable yet 14:28:22 plh: I'll ask Ralph to join us next meeting, as he's been Council team contact 14:29:02 florian: a nit, Member Submission appea 14:29:08 ... we should fold into the same process 14:29:11 s/appea/appeal 14:29:32 florian: and detail about what's public when 14:30:09 ... also group decision appeal. similar to FO, but not quite 14:30:11 s/same process/same process once we have the Council, currently says for technical things go to TAG and for process things go to AB/ 14:30:31 q? 14:30:58 plh: timing 14:31:18 ... right now Dir can decide whether to address when objection is brought or at transition time 14:31:30 ... who addresses when to address? give Council the option? 14:31:57 florian: timer starts when objection is filed. team has some time to review, ... 14:32:04 plh: bad side effect 14:32:32 ... e.g. I have groups who have FO on record, who haven't sent transition request 14:32:42 florian: start a new issue 14:33:25 fantasai: people shouldn't be able to escalate to council at non-transition time unless at least formal decision to which they object, or long-standing (year-long) issue ignored 14:34:13 ... you shouldn't be able to go to council on e.g. an editor's choice 14:34:24 zakim, move to next agendum 14:34:24 agendum 4 -- Director-Free TAG appointment: Status & next steps. -- taken up [from plh] 14:34:41 s/choice/choice that has not yet been escalated to the WG/ 14:35:09 florian: we had a complete proposal, we haven't touched it in a long time, probably need to simplify 14:35:30 ... how should we proceed? 14:36:05 fantasai: think we should file an issue with AB 14:36:10 ... w high level overview 14:37:09 plh: let's review proposal next time 14:37:15 florian: I can proceed in parallel 14:37:22 zakim, move to next agendum 14:37:22 agendum 5 -- Director-Free Chartering and pre-AC review: Status & next steps. -- taken up [from plh] 14:37:56 florian: DF branch just replaces Dir with Team 14:38:01 ... some people feel it's insufficient 14:38:19 ... and want more member role/transparency/mgt 14:38:45 ... should we do 2 steps or 1? 14:39:08 plh: 2 steps. let's land what we have and then recognize we need to do better 14:39:13 florian: I'm fine with it 14:39:49 fantasai: but some people not here have indicated being uncomfortable with that 14:39:53 s/fantasai/florian/ 14:40:03 plh: who will work on this, wendy? 14:40:21 wseltzer: would rather not... 14:40:30 s/wseltzer: would rather not...// 14:40:56 dsinger has joined #w3process 14:40:57 [discussion of florian making a PR of the minimal changes] 14:41:09 zakim, move to next agendum 14:41:09 agendum 6 -- P2022 to close: restarting the closures. -- taken up [from plh] 14:41:31 plh: florian and david spent lots of time on issue triage 14:41:39 ... reminder, we'll do some issue closure 14:41:42 https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22P2022+Proposed+to+close%22 14:41:43 ... on upcoming calls 14:42:13 zakim, move to next agendum 14:42:13 agendum 7 -- P2022 issues list. -- taken up [from plh] 14:42:57 plh: if you have issues that aren't on this list, please make sure you speak up 14:43:06 ... or if you believe issues should be dropped, 14:43:23 florian: this isn't list of everything that must be fixed 14:43:38 ... it's a signal of things we'll probably try to solve 14:43:59 plh: if you want issues to be on the list, chairs will be looking for volunteers. 14:44:04 zakim, move to next agendum 14:44:04 agendum 8 -- Next meeting: June 22. -- taken up [from plh] 14:44:52 plh: btw, we should expect to share progress at TPAC 14:45:24 [adjourned] 15:04:52 tzviya has joined #w3process 16:00:12 tantek has joined #w3process