IRC log of rdf-star on 2022-05-20
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:03:42 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star
- 15:03:42 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/05/20-rdf-star-irc
- 15:03:44 [Zakim]
- RRSAgent, make logs Public
- 15:03:45 [Zakim]
- please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Pierre-Antoine
- 15:03:55 [Pierre-Antoine]
- meeting: RDF-star
- 15:04:04 [ora]
- present+
- 15:04:06 [doerthe]
- present+
- 15:04:07 [Pierre-Antoine]
- Chair: pchampin
- 15:04:13 [Pierre-Antoine]
- Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2022May/0001.html
- 15:04:13 [agendabot]
- clear agenda
- 15:04:13 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Announcements and newcomers
- 15:04:13 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Open actions
- 15:04:13 [agendabot]
- agenda+ WG chartering
- 15:04:13 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Schedule next call
- 15:04:15 [agendabot]
- agenda+ Open-ended discussions
- 15:04:22 [AndyS]
- present+
- 15:04:23 [Pierre-Antoine]
- Previous meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2022-05-06.html
- 15:04:27 [Dominik_T]
- present+
- 15:06:31 [Pierre-Antoine]
- present+
- 15:06:58 [Pierre-Antoine]
- scribe: gkellogg
- 15:07:07 [Pierre-Antoine]
- zakim, open next item
- 15:07:07 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- Announcements and newcomers -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:07:21 [olaf]
- q+
- 15:07:33 [Pierre-Antoine]
- ack o
- 15:08:28 [gkellogg]
- olaf: We have a paper accepted in the Grades? Workshop, about mapping graph databases to RDF-star, running querying and seeing the performance impact.
- 15:08:57 [olaf]
- s/Grades?/GRADES
- 15:09:23 [olaf]
- "Converting Property Graphs to RDF: A Preliminary Study of the Practical Impact of Different Mappings" http://olafhartig.de/files/KhayatbashiEtAl_GRADES2022.pdf
- 15:09:24 [Pierre-Antoine]
- q?
- 15:09:37 [Pierre-Antoine]
- zakim, open next item
- 15:09:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- Open actions -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:09:43 [Pierre-Antoine]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction
- 15:09:43 [Pierre-Antoine]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction
- 15:10:32 [Pierre-Antoine]
- q?
- 15:11:25 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: I haven't spoken to danbri since the last call about w3c/rdf-star#247, but nothing more to report.
- 15:11:25 [ghurlbot]
- -> Action 247 ping DanBri about publishing the final report on the CG page (on pchampin) https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/247
- 15:13:42 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: On w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter#29, I've been waiting for ora's validation on the PR.
- 15:13:43 [ghurlbot]
- -> Action 29 Add Ora Lassila as one of the expected chair (on pchampin) As decided during today's call: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2022-04-08.html#a02 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/29
- 15:14:04 [gkellogg]
- ora: Sorry, I missed that. But to be clear, it's okay for me to be a chair, if that's what the group desires.
- 15:14:24 [Pierre-Antoine]
- zakim, open next item
- 15:14:24 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- WG chartering -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:14:57 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: I've sent the charter to W3CM for approval, which is currently in progress.
- 15:15:23 [gkellogg]
- ... The current draft doesn't mention chairs, but I've communicated offline.
- 15:16:19 [gkellogg]
- ... We've also contacted some other potential chairs, and have some positive answers from Vladimir at Ontotext, and will meet him next week at a Dataspace interoperability workshop.
- 15:16:45 [Pierre-Antoine]
- q?
- 15:17:42 [gkellogg]
- olaf: I also reached out to xxx, who is somewhat skeptical about his suitability. But, he'd like to talk about it some more.
- 15:18:06 [olaf]
- s/xxx/Adrian Gschwend
- 15:18:17 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: Yes, Ora should be there too.
- 15:18:19 [olaf]
- Adrian Gschwend from Zazuko
- 15:18:55 [Pierre-Antoine]
- action olaf to organize a call with Adrian Gschwend
- 15:19:06 [Dominik_T]
- q+
- 15:19:15 [Pierre-Antoine]
- ack D
- 15:19:35 [gkellogg]
- Dominik_T: Any news about Josh? He was also discussed.
- 15:20:03 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: We had some exchange after the last call, but LinkedIn is not a W3C member, which makes it more difficult.
- 15:20:29 [gkellogg]
- ... They either need to be part of a member organization, or an Invited Expert.
- 15:21:25 [gkellogg]
- ... In the case of Josh, LinkedIn is not a member, and inviting him as an IE is difficult, as he hasn't participated in the group to date.
- 15:21:51 [AndyS]
- q+
- 15:21:57 [gkellogg]
- ... That said, Zazuko is not a member or either. But, it's a startup, and that might make it easier.
- 15:22:05 [Pierre-Antoine]
- ack A
- 15:22:45 [gkellogg]
- AndyS: In the past, it was easier to get an IE added, but it's become more difficult.
- 15:23:47 [gkellogg]
- ... In the past, it's been hard to be an IE if you work for a company that would be expected to join as a member otherwise.
- 15:24:19 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: That might be an issue for Adrian.
- 15:24:51 [gkellogg]
- gkellogg: Rates for small companies used to be more afordable.
- 15:25:27 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: I'll talk with the communication team about criteria.
- 15:26:06 [Pierre-Antoine]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/41
- 15:26:24 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: We have a number of expressions of support, and no contrary expressions to date.
- 15:26:25 [ora]
- q+
- 15:26:40 [gkellogg]
- ... Some from organizations, some from individuals.
- 15:26:45 [Pierre-Antoine]
- ack ora
- 15:26:48 [AndyS]
- https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aexpression_of_support
- 15:27:23 [gkellogg]
- ora: Two weeks ago at the KG conference, I ran into someone from Oracle, and they could join.
- 15:27:36 [gkellogg]
- AndyS: He has his head in the space.
- 15:28:05 [gkellogg]
- ora: He's interested in the whole PG vs RDF space, and had an interesting presentation on neighborhood aware path queries.
- 15:28:24 [ora]
- Souriprya Das from Oracle
- 15:28:44 [gkellogg]
- s/someone/Souriprya Das/
- 15:29:14 [ora]
- q+
- 15:29:33 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: I think we could do with three chairs, but if we have more than two, one should be identified as "head" chair, or the others as co-chairs.
- 15:29:47 [gkellogg]
- ... With too many chairs, the responsibilities dilute.
- 15:30:10 [gkellogg]
- ... The amount of work justifies more than two chairs.
- 15:30:30 [gkellogg]
- AndyS: I think it's a good idea.
- 15:31:27 [gkellogg]
- ora: I'm not sure I like the idea of three chairs. It should be possible for things to get done in a WG without a chair having direct responsibility.
- 15:31:42 [gkellogg]
- ... But, I do like the idea of not being the _only_ chair.
- 15:32:57 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: Most WGs lately have two (or even three) chairs. If we go for three, I think if we go for three, there should be some kind of hierarchy, but your opinion weighs more.
- 15:33:33 [gkellogg]
- ora: If we do end up with three chairs, I think it would be good if they're not all Bay Area graph vendors.
- 15:34:13 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: Having chairs from the industry strengthen's the proposal from the W3M perspective, but other communities should also be represented.
- 15:34:38 [gkellogg]
- ... Chairing the group, it sends a strong signal if a GDB vendor is involved.
- 15:35:19 [gkellogg]
- ora: I think two chairs from vendors is fine. If three DB vendors are involved, then it might seem that the group is dominated by industry.
- 15:36:00 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: If we ask Souriprya to chair, we might need to choose between him and Vladimir.
- 15:36:47 [gkellogg]
- ora: Maybe we just lobby Souriprya to make sure Oracle joins the WG.
- 15:38:07 [Pierre-Antoine]
- action: Pierre-Antoine to come back to Vladimir
- 15:38:08 [ghurlbot]
- Created -> action 42 come back to Vladimir (on ) due 27 May 2022 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/42
- 15:39:44 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: Thank you ghurlbot!
- 15:40:06 [Pierre-Antoine]
- action: olaf to organize a call with Adrian Gschwend
- 15:40:07 [ghurlbot]
- Created -> action 43 organize a call with Adrian Gschwend (on ) due 27 May 2022 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/43
- 15:40:58 [Pierre-Antoine]
- q?
- 15:41:12 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: If you can encourage more people to express support on the repo, please do so. That will all help W3M to decide.
- 15:41:22 [Pierre-Antoine]
- zakim, open new item
- 15:41:22 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'open new item', Pierre-Antoine
- 15:41:40 [Pierre-Antoine]
- s/new/next/
- 15:41:48 [ora]
- q-
- 15:42:02 [Pierre-Antoine]
- zakim, open next item
- 15:42:02 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- Schedule next call -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:43:08 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: I hope to have some W3M answers next week.
- 15:44:21 [gkellogg]
- ... I'm not sure if we need a call before the call for votes goes out. Maybe have a regular call in 2-3 weeks.
- 15:44:59 [gkellogg]
- ... A call in three weeks (June 10) may be in the middle of the call for votes.
- 15:45:15 [Pierre-Antoine]
- PROPOSED: have our next call in 3 weeks, 2022-06-10
- 15:45:17 [Pierre-Antoine]
- +1
- 15:45:18 [olaf]
- +1
- 15:45:21 [gkellogg]
- +1
- 15:45:21 [Dominik_T]
- +1
- 15:45:44 [AndyS]
- +1
- 15:45:46 [doerthe]
- +1
- 15:46:07 [ora]
- +1
- 15:46:16 [Pierre-Antoine]
- APPROVED: have our next call in 3 weeks, 2022-06-10
- 15:46:19 [ora]
- (had to check the calendar)
- 15:46:33 [Pierre-Antoine]
- zakim, open next item
- 15:46:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 -- Open-ended discussions -- taken up [from agendabot]
- 15:46:44 [Pierre-Antoine]
- q?
- 15:47:21 [Pierre-Antoine]
- q+
- 15:47:26 [Pierre-Antoine]
- ack p
- 15:48:32 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: TPAC is coming in September, which will be a Hybrid meeting. 12-16 September. It would be nice to have a meeting during TPAC, if a WG is chartered.
- 15:48:39 [olaf]
- W3C TPAC, Sep. 12-16, in Vancouver
- 15:49:03 [gkellogg]
- ... It is in Vancouver.
- 15:49:04 [gkellogg]
- https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/9503
- 15:49:28 [gkellogg]
- ... It should be in a convenient time slot for other parts of the world.
- 15:49:51 [AndyS]
- CA
- 15:50:19 [gkellogg]
- ora: I may be in Seatle around that time, so going to Vancouver would be easy enought.
- 15:50:47 [gkellogg]
- olaf: Unfortunately, it overlaps with the European semantics conference.
- 15:50:56 [olaf]
- The SEMANTiCS conference in Vienna is in the same week
- 15:51:47 [gkellogg]
- pchampin: Are there other groups that might also meet at TPAC so we can organize a joint meeting?
- 15:52:39 [gkellogg]
- AndyS: RDF Canonicalization and DCAT groups may be there.
- 15:52:58 [gkellogg]
- gkellogg: JSON-LD will probably have at least a BOF at TPAC.
- 15:53:22 [Pierre-Antoine]
- q?
- 15:54:22 [olaf]
- olaf has left #rdf-star
- 17:27:36 [rhiaro]
- rhiaro has joined #rdf-star
- 17:28:33 [csarven]
- csarven has joined #rdf-star