15:03:42 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #rdf-star
15:03:42 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/05/20-rdf-star-irc
15:03:44 <Zakim> RRSAgent, make logs Public
15:03:45 <Zakim> please title this meeting ("meeting: ..."), Pierre-Antoine
15:03:55 <Pierre-Antoine> meeting: RDF-star
15:04:04 <ora> present+
15:04:06 <doerthe> present+
15:04:07 <Pierre-Antoine> Chair: pchampin
15:04:13 <Pierre-Antoine> Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/2022May/0001.html
15:04:13 <agendabot> clear agenda
15:04:13 <agendabot> agenda+ Announcements and newcomers
15:04:13 <agendabot> agenda+ Open actions
15:04:13 <agendabot> agenda+ WG chartering
15:04:13 <agendabot> agenda+ Schedule next call
15:04:15 <agendabot> agenda+ Open-ended discussions
15:04:22 <AndyS> present+
15:04:23 <Pierre-Antoine> Previous meeting: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2022-05-06.html
15:04:27 <Dominik_T> present+
15:06:31 <Pierre-Antoine> present+
15:06:58 <Pierre-Antoine> scribe: gkellogg
15:07:07 <Pierre-Antoine> zakim, open next item
15:07:07 <Zakim> agendum 1 -- Announcements and newcomers -- taken up [from agendabot]
15:07:21 <olaf> q+
15:07:33 <Pierre-Antoine> ack o
15:08:28 <gkellogg> olaf: We have a paper accepted in the Grades? Workshop, about mapping graph databases to RDF-star, running querying and seeing the performance impact.
15:08:57 <olaf> s/Grades?/GRADES
15:09:23 <olaf> "Converting Property Graphs to RDF: A Preliminary Study of the Practical Impact of Different Mappings" http://olafhartig.de/files/KhayatbashiEtAl_GRADES2022.pdf
15:09:24 <Pierre-Antoine> q?
15:09:37 <Pierre-Antoine> zakim, open next item
15:09:37 <Zakim> agendum 2 -- Open actions -- taken up [from agendabot]
15:09:43 <Pierre-Antoine> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction
15:09:43 <Pierre-Antoine> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction
15:10:32 <Pierre-Antoine> q?
15:11:25 <gkellogg> pchampin: I haven't spoken to danbri since the last call about w3c/rdf-star#247, but nothing more to report.
15:11:25 <ghurlbot> -> Action 247 ping DanBri about publishing the final report on the CG page (on pchampin)  https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star/issues/247
15:13:42 <gkellogg> pchampin: On w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter#29, I've been waiting for ora's validation on the PR.
15:13:43 <ghurlbot> -> Action 29 Add Ora Lassila as one of the expected chair (on pchampin) As decided during today's call: https://w3c.github.io/rdf-star/Minutes/2022-04-08.html#a02 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/29
15:14:04 <gkellogg> ora: Sorry, I missed that. But to be clear, it's okay for me to be a chair, if that's what the group desires.
15:14:24 <Pierre-Antoine> zakim, open next item
15:14:24 <Zakim> agendum 3 -- WG chartering -- taken up [from agendabot]
15:14:57 <gkellogg> pchampin: I've sent the charter to W3CM for approval, which is currently in progress.
15:15:23 <gkellogg> ... The current draft doesn't mention chairs, but I've communicated offline.
15:16:19 <gkellogg> ... We've also contacted some other potential chairs, and have some positive answers from Vladimir at Ontotext, and will meet him next week at a Dataspace interoperability workshop.
15:16:45 <Pierre-Antoine> q?
15:17:42 <gkellogg> olaf: I also reached out to xxx, who is somewhat skeptical about his suitability. But, he'd like to talk about it some more.
15:18:06 <olaf> s/xxx/Adrian Gschwend
15:18:17 <gkellogg> pchampin: Yes, Ora should be there too.
15:18:19 <olaf> Adrian Gschwend from Zazuko
15:18:55 <Pierre-Antoine> action olaf to organize a call with Adrian Gschwend
15:19:06 <Dominik_T> q+
15:19:15 <Pierre-Antoine> ack D
15:19:35 <gkellogg> Dominik_T: Any news about Josh? He was also discussed.
15:20:03 <gkellogg> pchampin: We had some exchange after the last call, but LinkedIn is not a W3C member, which makes it more difficult.
15:20:29 <gkellogg> ... They either need to be part of a member organization, or an Invited Expert.
15:21:25 <gkellogg> ... In the case of Josh, LinkedIn is not a member, and inviting him as an IE is difficult, as he hasn't participated in the group to date.
15:21:51 <AndyS> q+
15:21:57 <gkellogg> ... That said, Zazuko is not a member or either. But, it's a startup, and that might make it easier.
15:22:05 <Pierre-Antoine> ack A
15:22:45 <gkellogg> AndyS: In the past, it was easier to get an IE added, but it's become more difficult.
15:23:47 <gkellogg> ... In the past, it's been hard to be an IE if you work for a company that would be expected to join as a member otherwise.
15:24:19 <gkellogg> pchampin: That might be an issue for Adrian.
15:24:51 <gkellogg> gkellogg: Rates for small companies used to be more afordable.
15:25:27 <gkellogg> pchampin: I'll talk with the communication team about criteria.
15:26:06 <Pierre-Antoine> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/41
15:26:24 <gkellogg> pchampin: We have a number of expressions of support, and no contrary expressions to date.
15:26:25 <ora> q+
15:26:40 <gkellogg> ... Some from organizations, some from individuals.
15:26:45 <Pierre-Antoine> ack ora
15:26:48 <AndyS> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Aexpression_of_support
15:27:23 <gkellogg> ora: Two weeks ago at the KG conference, I ran into someone from Oracle, and they could join.
15:27:36 <gkellogg> AndyS: He has his head in the space.
15:28:05 <gkellogg> ora: He's interested in the whole PG vs RDF space, and had an interesting presentation on neighborhood aware path queries.
15:28:24 <ora> Souriprya Das from Oracle
15:28:44 <gkellogg> s/someone/Souriprya Das/
15:29:14 <ora> q+
15:29:33 <gkellogg> pchampin: I think we could do with three chairs, but if we have more than two, one should be identified as "head" chair, or the others as co-chairs.
15:29:47 <gkellogg> ... With too many chairs, the responsibilities dilute.
15:30:10 <gkellogg> ... The amount of work justifies more than two chairs.
15:30:30 <gkellogg> AndyS: I think it's a good idea.
15:31:27 <gkellogg> ora: I'm not sure I like the idea of three chairs. It should be possible for things to get done in a WG without a chair having direct responsibility.
15:31:42 <gkellogg> ... But, I do like the idea of not being the _only_ chair.
15:32:57 <gkellogg> pchampin: Most WGs lately have two (or even three) chairs. If we go for three, I think if we go for three, there should be some kind of hierarchy, but your opinion weighs more.
15:33:33 <gkellogg> ora: If we do end up with three chairs, I think it would be good if they're not all Bay Area graph vendors.
15:34:13 <gkellogg> pchampin: Having chairs from the industry strengthen's the proposal from the W3M perspective, but other communities should also be represented.
15:34:38 <gkellogg> ... Chairing the group, it sends a strong signal if a GDB vendor is involved.
15:35:19 <gkellogg> ora: I think two chairs from vendors is fine. If three DB vendors are involved, then it might seem that the group is dominated by industry.
15:36:00 <gkellogg> pchampin: If we ask Souriprya to chair, we might need to choose between him and Vladimir.
15:36:47 <gkellogg> ora: Maybe we just lobby Souriprya to make sure Oracle joins the WG.
15:38:07 <Pierre-Antoine> action: Pierre-Antoine to come back to Vladimir
15:38:08 <ghurlbot> Created -> action 42 come back to Vladimir (on ) due 27 May 2022 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/42
15:39:44 <gkellogg> pchampin: Thank you ghurlbot!
15:40:06 <Pierre-Antoine> action: olaf to organize a call with Adrian Gschwend
15:40:07 <ghurlbot> Created -> action 43 organize a call with Adrian Gschwend (on ) due 27 May 2022 https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues/43
15:40:58 <Pierre-Antoine> q?
15:41:12 <gkellogg> pchampin: If you can encourage more people to express support on the repo, please do so. That will all help W3M to decide.
15:41:22 <Pierre-Antoine> zakim, open new item
15:41:22 <Zakim> I don't understand 'open new item', Pierre-Antoine
15:41:40 <Pierre-Antoine> s/new/next/
15:41:48 <ora> q-
15:42:02 <Pierre-Antoine> zakim, open next item
15:42:02 <Zakim> agendum 4 -- Schedule next call -- taken up [from agendabot]
15:43:08 <gkellogg> pchampin: I hope to have some W3M answers next week.
15:44:21 <gkellogg> ... I'm not sure if we need a call before the call for votes goes out. Maybe have a regular call in 2-3 weeks.
15:44:59 <gkellogg> ... A call in three weeks (June 10) may be in the middle of the call for votes.
15:45:15 <Pierre-Antoine> PROPOSED: have our next call in 3 weeks, 2022-06-10
15:45:17 <Pierre-Antoine> +1
15:45:18 <olaf> +1
15:45:21 <gkellogg> +1
15:45:21 <Dominik_T> +1
15:45:44 <AndyS> +1
15:45:46 <doerthe> +1
15:46:07 <ora> +1
15:46:16 <Pierre-Antoine> APPROVED: have our next call in 3 weeks, 2022-06-10
15:46:19 <ora> (had to check the calendar)
15:46:33 <Pierre-Antoine> zakim, open next item
15:46:33 <Zakim> agendum 5 -- Open-ended discussions -- taken up [from agendabot]
15:46:44 <Pierre-Antoine> q?
15:47:21 <Pierre-Antoine> q+
15:47:26 <Pierre-Antoine> ack p
15:48:32 <gkellogg> pchampin: TPAC is coming in September, which will be a Hybrid meeting. 12-16 September. It would be nice to have a meeting during TPAC, if a WG is chartered.
15:48:39 <olaf> W3C TPAC, Sep. 12-16, in Vancouver
15:49:03 <gkellogg> ... It is in Vancouver.
15:49:04 <gkellogg> https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/9503
15:49:28 <gkellogg> ... It should be in a convenient time slot for other parts of the world.
15:49:51 <AndyS> CA
15:50:19 <gkellogg> ora: I may be in Seatle around that time, so going to Vancouver would be easy enought.
15:50:47 <gkellogg> olaf: Unfortunately, it overlaps with the European semantics conference.
15:50:56 <olaf> The SEMANTiCS conference in Vienna is in the same week
15:51:47 <gkellogg> pchampin: Are there other groups that might also meet at TPAC so we can organize a joint meeting?
15:52:39 <gkellogg> AndyS: RDF Canonicalization and DCAT groups may be there.
15:52:58 <gkellogg> gkellogg: JSON-LD will probably have at least a BOF at TPAC.
15:53:22 <Pierre-Antoine> q?
15:54:22 <olaf> olaf has left #rdf-star
17:27:36 <rhiaro> rhiaro has joined #rdf-star
17:28:33 <csarven> csarven has joined #rdf-star