12:00:46 RRSAgent has joined #wot 12:00:46 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/05/04-wot-irc 12:01:32 McCool has joined #wot 12:01:41 meeting: WoT-IG/WG 12:01:50 ktoumura has joined #wot 12:01:57 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Kunihiko_Toumura, Michael_Lagally, Michael_McCool 12:02:36 present+ Ege_Korkan 12:02:42 present+ Sebastian_Kaebisch 12:03:41 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#4_May_2022 12:04:27 dape has joined #wot 12:05:42 present+ Daniel_Peintner, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Tetsushi_Matsuda 12:06:48 q+ 12:06:50 matsuda has joined #wot 12:07:39 q+ 12:07:42 ack dape 12:07:42 ack d 12:07:59 sebastian has joined #wot 12:09:46 topic: guests 12:09:50 dsr has joined #wot 12:09:51 present+ Erich_Barnstedt 12:10:00 present+ Michael_Koster 12:10:06 MM: we have a guest, Erich Barnstedt from Microsoft 12:10:51 i/guests/Daniel asks about the automatic captioning feature of WebEx, and Kaz will save the captions as backup this time./ 12:11:41 Erich: I lead standards and consortium at Microsoft. I'm with Microsoft for 19 years 12:12:40 i|we have a|-> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20200915/ W3C Patent Policy 2020 for IG| 12:12:47 ... I'm interested in WoT to align DTDL and WoT 12:12:56 i|we have a|-> https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20170801/ W3C Patent Policy 2017 for WG| 12:13:06 topic: Minutes 12:13:48 https://www.w3.org/2022/04/27-wot-minutes.html 12:14:55 any change requests, objections? 12:15:00 no 12:15:36 topic: quick updates 12:16:03 MM: no cancellations so far 12:16:08 barnstee has joined #wot 12:16:30 ... are there any cancellations in next time? 12:16:37 ... seems not the case 12:17:18 topic: Microsoft cooperation 12:17:49 Erich: we will join the WG soon, expecting no pushback 12:18:22 https://github.com/digitaltwinconsortium 12:18:39 https://github.com/digitaltwinconsortium/ManufacturingDTDLOntologies 12:18:40 ... I'm also involved in Digital Twin Consortium 12:18:57 https://github.com/digitaltwinconsortium/ManufacturingDTDLOntologies/blob/main/Models/Station.json 12:19:23 ... I saw presentation from Sebastian about OPC UA Binding for WoT. I had a similar idea with DTDL 12:20:23 ... I lead the group called UA cloud library 12:20:56 ... in DTDL there are difference between model and instane 12:21:09 s/instane/instance 12:21:36 12:21:49 mlagally_ has joined #wot 12:22:13 MM: we currently setting-up formal collaboration with OPCF 12:23:21 q+ 12:24:04 ... we discuss currently the claims 12:24:44 ... we are currently at the end of our current charter and do plans for the next charter 12:24:54 q+ 12:24:58 q+ 12:25:14 q- later 12:27:47 dsr has joined #wot 12:28:08 Erich: another point is tooling that I have. Transforming DTDL to WoT and vice versa 12:28:32 MM: we planing a TestFest for July 12:28:59 https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1020 12:29:01 ... a prototype for there would be great 12:30:03 s|https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1020|| 12:30:19 MM: for OPC UA we have an markdown and collecting objectives 12:30:28 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1020 wot PR 1020 - Technical Objectives and Requirements for OPC UA/WoT Binding| 12:30:37 s/OPC UA/OPC UA liaison/ 12:30:46 s/liaison/liaison,/ 12:31:08 Erich: yes, I think we can make improvements in the context of interoperability here 12:31:21 q? 12:31:21 q? 12:31:25 rrsagent, make log public 12:31:38 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:31:38 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/04-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:32:03 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:32:03 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/04-wot-minutes.html kaz 12:32:32 ack seb 12:32:43 chair: McCool/sebastian 12:32:45 ack ml 12:33:09 I just organizing a joint meeting with OPCF and W3C WoT members. I keep you in the loop. 12:33:29 s/I just/sk: I'm/ 12:34:43 ML: would be cool to involve you in the Profile discussion. 12:34:57 q? 12:35:30 Erich: onboarding at Microsoft usually takes 2-3 weeks 12:36:43 Kaz: we can talk about the W3C procedure offline 12:37:17 12:39:08 s/we can talk about the W3C procedure offline/in summary, we'd like you to join our WoT standardization discussion (e.g., on Use Cases, Profiles, Plugfest demos) directly as a representative from Microsoft as a W3C Member, and it would require some specific procedure. We can talk about the detail of the procedure offline.// 12:39:30 q+ 12:39:33 q? 12:40:30 mjk has joined #wot 12:40:31 ML: we have the IG Use call, it would be great to invite Erich to introduce DTDL 12:40:42 q? 12:40:44 s/Use/Use Case 12:41:19 https://www.w3.org/WoT/activities/task-forces/ 12:41:39 topic: schedule changes 12:42:35 MM: suggestion to suspend the Use Call till one month before TestFest event 12:42:37 i/schedule/kaz: let's have some more discussion about how to proceed offline, e.g., by email and possibly a separate call with Erich./ 12:42:58 ... what do you think about this? 12:43:36 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Use_Case_Review 12:43:48 ack k 12:44:02 s/Use Call/Use Case Call/ 12:44:09 q+ 12:44:11 q+ 12:44:14 q? 12:44:45 ack e 12:45:18 dsr has joined #wot 12:45:24 ML: everyone is busy, doing spec documents done etc., that was the motivation to suspend. However due to the new Microsoft involvment we should use one of the next calls to have the DTDL introduction 12:47:51 q+ 12:48:35 ML: another proposal would be a monthly shedule and if there not topics we can cancel it 12:49:41 MM: we can move editor call to the use case call 12:50:15 Kaz: how about having DTDL presentation during main call? 12:51:37 s/during main/during the main/ 12:53:12 MM: we can have DTDL during main call (next week or later) for 20 min. Discussion about requirements we can do during the use case call. 12:53:34 s/call?/call? also we should continue to include the use case coverage discussion during the Editors calls./ 12:53:59 topic: wide review 12:54:18 MM: we have almost done all review requests 12:54:56 https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Wide_Review 12:54:59 s/move editor call to the use case call/use the use case call's slot for the editors call, and possibly have those calls alternatively bi-weekly./ 12:55:50 ... Discovery is still in WIP, explainer not done yet 12:57:08 ... TAG is largely happy with current status, however, waiting until Arch is ready 12:57:59 ... there is an email about accessability 12:58:06 q? 12:58:08 ack k 12:58:12 q+ 12:58:31 ... already respond in the public mailing list 12:59:34 ML: for what we are waiting for Arch? 13:00:14 q? 13:00:17 MM: we need just to review the issue. If everything is ok, when can submit it 13:01:58 13:02:12 adjourn 13:02:54 i/adjourn/kaz: note that Michael Cooper mentioned on GitHub that they might have been going to give some more comments./ 13:11:33 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:11:33 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/04-wot-minutes.html kaz 13:12:15 ktoumura has left #wot 13:14:42 Fady has joined #wot 13:19:46 https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/294 13:32:42 Mizushima has left #wot 13:37:16 dsr has joined #wot 15:01:12 Zakim has left #wot