IRC log of personalization on 2022-05-02

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:18:56 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #personalization

13:18:56 [RRSAgent]

logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/05/02-personalization-irc

13:18:58 [trackbot]

RRSAgent, make logs public

13:19:01 [trackbot]

Meeting: Personalization Task Force Teleconference

13:19:01 [trackbot]

Date: 02 May 2022

13:19:14 [sharon]

zakim, clear agenda

13:19:14 [Zakim]

agenda cleared

13:20:24 [sharon]

agenda+ TPAC 12-16 September 2022 - Discuss meetings and form needed by 31 May at the latest: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/LogisticsTPAC2022/

13:20:52 [sharon]

agenda+ Naming - Next steps and WAI-Adapt Overview (draft) https://deploy-preview-8--wai-personalization-standards.netlify.app/personalization/

13:23:53 [sharon]

agenda+ Caption line on WAI-Adapt draft overview https://deploy-preview-8--wai-personalization-standards.netlify.app/personalization/

13:24:34 [sharon]

agenda+ Follow-up on i18n issue #144 https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/144

13:24:49 [sharon]

agenda+ Implications of issue 203 for the data-symbol attribute - https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/203

13:25:04 [sharon]

agenda+ Discuss (a) multiple symbol values in a single markup, in addition to (b) multiple symbols constituting a single aggregated symbol

13:25:18 [sharon]

agenda+ data-symbols https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/204

13:25:39 [sharon]

agenda+ Issue 202 regarding Visible Indicators on 2.2 - https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/202

13:25:58 [sharon]

agenda+ Planning future COGA meetings on Our Other Two Modules

13:26:04 [sharon]

agenda?

13:29:03 [sharon]

chair: Sharon

13:50:52 [janina]

janina has joined #personalization

13:51:40 [janina]

agenda?

13:58:47 [Matthew_Atkinson]

Matthew_Atkinson has joined #personalization

14:02:23 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Lionel_Wolberger has joined #personalization

14:04:46 [Matthew_Atkinson]

present+

14:05:16 [Lionel_Wolberger]

scribe: Lionel

14:05:22 [Lionel_Wolberger]

scribe: Lionel_Wolberger

14:05:30 [Lionel_Wolberger]

zakim, next item

14:05:30 [Zakim]

agendum 1 -- TPAC 12-16 September 2022 - Discuss meetings and form needed by 31 May at the latest: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/LogisticsTPAC2022/ -- taken up [from sharon]

14:05:37 [Matthew_Atkinson]

rrsagent, make minutes

14:05:37 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/02-personalization-minutes.html Matthew_Atkinson

14:07:29 [Lionel_Wolberger]

sharon: the form does include a field, do you want to meet with other groups

14:07:49 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: sounds like the usual

14:08:09 [Lionel_Wolberger]

regrets: becky

14:08:18 [Lionel_Wolberger]

zakim, next item

14:08:18 [Zakim]

agendum 2 -- Naming - Next steps and WAI-Adapt Overview (draft) https://deploy-preview-8--wai-personalization-standards.netlify.app/personalization/ -- taken up [from sharon]

14:10:36 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: The CFC is in process, please chime in

14:10:44 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... we can change the shortname in future

14:10:46 [Lionel_Wolberger]

q?

14:11:06 [sharon]

ack Lionel_Wolberger

14:11:42 [Matthew_Atkinson]

scribe: Matthew_Atkinson

14:11:48 [Matthew_Atkinson]

Lionel_Wolberger: Lisa raised concerns: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Apr/0003.html

14:11:57 [Matthew_Atkinson]

Lionel_Wolberger: I think we can allay her fears about this.

14:12:03 [Matthew_Atkinson]

scribe: Lionel_Wolberger

14:12:11 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... expect the decision on Thursday morning East Coast Time

14:12:19 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Lionel: Let's respond to Lisa's concern

14:12:43 [Matthew_Atkinson]

s/... expect the/janina: expect/

14:12:49 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... she wrote, "I have a concern that we will limit ourselves in the future because of the name change. IE not do things, that are included in personalization but not in adaptation. Such as identifying the right version, via metadata for the page as a whole"

14:13:01 [Matthew_Atkinson]

rrsagent, make minutes

14:13:01 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/02-personalization-minutes.html Matthew_Atkinson

14:13:35 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: I will respond with COGA coordination

14:14:02 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... We don't see that this new name limits us in this way.

14:14:21 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... I can't possibly see how it would limit us in the specific case that Lisa mentions

14:15:46 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... Regarding our consensus in general BTW: Consensus is not unanimity. If one member does object, perhaps very strongly, the test is, 'can you live with this group decision.'

14:16:12 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... If you find frequently that you 'cannot live' with the consensus, consider whether you are being part of the problem or part of the solution

14:17:11 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... This is restating what is already stated in the process document.

14:17:47 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... Relying on a super majority, without defining the specifics on how to measure that super majority

14:17:48 [Matthew_Atkinson]

FYI here's the section (I think) of the process doc: https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#consensus-building

14:17:52 [Lionel_Wolberger]

zakim, next item

14:17:52 [Zakim]

agendum 3 -- Caption line on WAI-Adapt draft overview https://deploy-preview-8--wai-personalization-standards.netlify.app/personalization/ -- taken up [from sharon]

14:19:18 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: This is up to your group, we can make this decision internally, no need for checking in with external groups

14:19:46 [CharlesL]

CharlesL has joined #personalization

14:19:51 [CharlesL]

present+

14:19:52 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... I like the last one, "Enabling users to personalize content presentation"

14:20:01 [Lionel_Wolberger]

+1

14:20:02 [Matthew_Atkinson]

q+

14:20:02 [sharon]

+1

14:20:13 [sharon]

ack Matthew_Atkinson

14:20:49 [CharlesL]

rrsagent, make logs public

14:20:54 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Matthew_Atkinson: I, too, like the last one, particularly as it mentions Personalization

14:21:00 [CharlesL]

rrsagent, draft minutes

14:21:00 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/02-personalization-minutes.html CharlesL

14:21:25 [Lionel_Wolberger]

.... the end of the phrase could, by some people, be seen as limiting

14:21:43 [Lionel_Wolberger]

.... Enabling users to personalize content presentation. Note the "content presentation"

14:22:02 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: The end user is always primary in this picture

14:22:13 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Matthew_Atkinson: I think presentation means getting the user the right content in the form they want

14:22:28 [CharlesL]

+1 to last option as well "Enabling users to personalize content presentation

14:22:28 [CharlesL]

"

14:23:13 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: I can recall that Lisa did also speak about content replacement, which tread on the toes of copyright concerns

14:23:21 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... but i dont see this as a problem

14:23:22 [Lionel_Wolberger]

q+

14:23:34 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... we build technologies that enable people to simplify things

14:23:45 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... and give those to the author. The author controls it.

14:23:59 [sharon]

ack Lionel_Wolberger

14:25:32 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Lionel_Wolberger: I agree that those two words are not perfect. I have thought that the personalization is the experience, or the user agent mediated experience

14:26:03 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Matthew_Atkinson: We just need to discuss it enough to be able to answer any concerns that people may have in future about these two words

14:26:16 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... This phrase is pithy and brings most of what's important to mind

14:27:06 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: and we can always expand and clarify

14:27:16 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... and it gives a good basis to talk about it.

14:28:45 [Lionel_Wolberger]

RESOLVED: The subtitle (the 'tag line') is "Enabling users to personalize content presentation"

14:28:56 [Matthew_Atkinson]

q+

14:29:17 [Lionel_Wolberger]

zakim, next item

14:29:17 [Zakim]

I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Lionel_Wolberger

14:29:26 [Lionel_Wolberger]

ack Matthew_Atkinson

14:30:42 [Lionel_Wolberger]

zakim, next item

14:30:42 [Zakim]

agendum 4 -- Follow-up on i18n issue #144 https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/144 -- taken up [from sharon]

14:30:59 [janina]

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2022Apr/0024.html

14:31:26 [Matthew_Atkinson]

q+

14:32:00 [Matthew_Atkinson]

Check out this latest comment on #144 at the time of writing: https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/144#issuecomment-1112202953

14:32:08 [sharon]

ack Matthew_Atkinson

14:33:41 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Matthew_Atkinson: i18n has closed the issue

14:33:51 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Lionel pops a champagne cork !

14:37:45 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Zakim, next item

14:37:45 [Zakim]

agendum 5 -- Implications of issue 203 for the data-symbol attribute - https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/203 -- taken up [from sharon]

14:38:22 [Matthew_Atkinson]

q+

14:38:47 [sharon]

ack Matthew_Atkinson

14:39:58 [Lionel_Wolberger]

agenda?

14:41:58 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: These issues prove that we are venturing into little trod territory

14:42:06 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... the fact that Lisa and other experts cannot advise us

14:42:26 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... (referring to Agenda item 6 (a) and (b)

14:42:41 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... Lisa was not confident that the issue was addressed in the Bliss document she sent

14:43:23 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Matthew_Atkinson: The cup of tea sample has a multiple symbol example in it: cup of tea has three symbols

14:44:57 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Matthew_Atkinson: Perhaps we just pay attention to the samples in the specification. Should there be a multiple symbol sample in the spac?

14:45:02 [Lionel_Wolberger]

q+

14:45:11 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: Keep in mind, the spec will improve in future

14:45:31 [sharon]

ack Lionel_Wolberger

14:46:33 [Lionel_Wolberger]

+1 to Matt on just looking at the samples

14:47:48 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Lionel: Bliss seemed to be the only symbol set that expressed abstract grammatical, syntactial semantics like "of" or "to"

14:48:02 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... we learned that in modern day practice, symbols are very symbol and broad

14:48:12 [CharlesL]

+1 to simpler examples

14:48:37 [Lionel_Wolberger]

Matthew_Atkinson: The multiple attribute samples feels like we are recommending something, where we are not

14:48:43 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: Let's run it by Lisa

14:48:50 [Lionel_Wolberger]

+1 to simpler examples

14:48:56 [sharon]

q?

14:51:59 [Lionel_Wolberger]

RESOLVED: Change the cup of tea sample--currently with three symbols in one attribute, to be a cup of tea sample with one symbol in each attribute.

14:53:28 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: The chairs should see to it that Bliss is contracted regarding using W3C registries as a master lookup index for the symbol values that they publish

14:54:57 [Lionel_Wolberger]

... ion "The Fundamental Rules of Blissymbolics" published by Blissymbolics Communication International, © Blissymbolics Communication International (BCI) 1982,2020. Bliss-characters and Bliss-words used herein conform to the BCI Authorized Vocabulary as published by BCI. For more information see www.blissymbolics.org

14:55:16 [Lionel_Wolberger]

q?

14:57:01 [Lionel_Wolberger]

sharon: We need to turn our attention now to messaging.

14:57:32 [Lionel_Wolberger]

agenda?

14:57:58 [Lionel_Wolberger]

janina: Everyone: remember to vote on the CfC!

14:58:37 [Lionel_Wolberger]

rrsagent, make minutes

14:58:37 [RRSAgent]

I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/05/02-personalization-minutes.html Lionel_Wolberger

15:16:51 [CharlesL]

CharlesL has left #personalization