13:39:00 RRSAgent has joined #rqtf 13:39:00 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/03/02-rqtf-irc 13:39:02 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:39:02 Zakim has joined #rqtf 13:39:04 Meeting: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference 13:39:04 Date: 02 March 2022 13:39:11 chair: jasonjgw 13:39:15 present+ 13:39:36 agenda+ Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements. 13:39:36 agenda+ Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. 13:39:36 agenda+ Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA. 13:39:54 agenda+ Miscellaneous topics. 13:40:10 zakim, list agenda 13:40:10 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda: 13:40:11 1. Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw] 13:40:11 2. Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. [from jasonjgw] 13:40:11 3. Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA. [from jasonjgw] 13:40:11 4. Miscellaneous topics. [from jasonjgw] 14:00:35 SteveNoble has joined #rqtf 14:00:46 JPaton has joined #rqtf 14:00:47 present+ 14:01:14 present+ 14:01:29 scribe: Joshue108 14:02:15 JW: Notes the Maturity model document CFC 14:02:35 JS: Open till midnight Boston 14:03:04 Also next week there is a meeting on the W3C legal entity status - during APA call time. 14:03:25 JS: Please send any questions your have in advance 14:03:37 zakim, take up item 3 14:03:37 agendum 3 -- Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:04:04 JW: I have had a look at the Cloudfare demo site 14:04:16 It worked on Windows 11, running Chrome using the print reader 14:04:29 scott_h_ has joined #rqtf 14:04:32 And failed on a Mac Book Pro, M1 using Safari 14:05:03 We have contributed 14:05:16 Jason notes the range of devices that may be used 14:05:19 present+ 14:05:23 no special hardware required 14:05:41 relevant protocols are implemented 14:05:51 This has impact on our conculsions. 14:05:56 Janina has progress report 14:06:07 JS: Lionel has experience, and has tested 14:06:28 We've reached out to Cloudflare - should we set that up via RQTF etc or independently. 14:06:46 LW: Thanks for taking this up - good summary from Jason. 14:06:55 We would like all to test this. 14:07:13 I would just add the work that is yet to do, it is mature but we need to talk to Cloudflare. 14:07:26 Discusses logistics.. 14:07:48 V exciting - we have talked about zero knowledge proofs etc 14:07:58 We've found implementations that work 14:08:17 We want to do a security deep dive - with flow charts outlining transfer et 14:08:28 so we can understand how privacy is preserved. 14:08:46 JW: Who would like to be involved? 14:09:02 JS: They are not members, but we can invite them to a meeting. 14:09:09 They may be recruited. 14:09:17 JS: The may be looking at IETF? 14:09:27 JS: Thats a part but they are implementing a W3C spec. 14:09:40 Lionel mentioned authentication 14:10:11 LW: Microsoft and other major companies are involved 14:10:27 JS: Who would like to be involved? 14:11:06 14:11:30 JS: Sounds like a decision 14:12:26 JW: It would be good to have validation 14:13:21 LW: We can do more testing on diff devices.. 14:13:56 zakim, take up item 1 14:13:57 agendum 1 -- Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:14:12 JW: There is some progress to report 14:14:17 Raja has joined #rqtf 14:14:26 JW: I've review the doc, and the note on ASL accuracy 14:14:58 In the GH tracking , it looks like we had addressed it, but there was a reference to the FCC decision. 14:15:13 I put proposal in GH to move that ref to a note in the text 14:15:27 Steve has agreed - change has been reviewed - Josh has merged 14:15:45 Raja: I agree also 14:15:50 JW: Appreciated 14:16:05 There have been no other changes - but a suggested summary 14:16:20 Moving along well - Janina has some editorial item 14:16:27 s/item/items 14:16:36 We are on track for end of March publication 14:16:54 JS: I had an action to reach out to timed text - i've done that 14:17:23 I did outline some edits - and will reach out to Steve when I've got something 14:18:14 JW: Good progress 14:18:56 zakim, next item 14:18:56 agendum 2 -- Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:19:57 TOPIC: A11y of Remote meetings 14:20:10 JS: This needs to go note track, and be published 14:20:18 JW: It is published no? 14:20:21 JS: No 14:21:21 https://www.w3.org/TR/remote-meetings/ 14:21:25 JW: It is published 14:21:43 JS: Happy to be proven wrong 14:21:59 SH: I've got some updates etc to make 14:22:20 JW: I'll put it on an upcoming agendum 14:22:48 TOPIC: Natural Language Interface A11y User requirements 14:23:40 https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/naur_coga_edits_2022/naur/index.html 14:23:40 Joshue108: look at some COGA edits 14:24:16 Joshue108: Some look appropriate 14:25:18 jasonjgw: Let's have a quick overview first 14:25:56 Joshue108: Some deal with memory constraints 14:27:12 Joshue108: Definition edits 14:27:47 Joshue108: Primarily editorial 14:29:04 janina: May need to differentiate that "phrases" is a better term (not all spoken utterances are sentances) 14:29:41 Joshue108: Chatbots, speech vs. text? 14:30:09 jasonjgw: Need to read these in context 14:30:56 Joshue108: 16a, 16b, 16c (split 16 into subsections) 14:31:20 jasonjgw: Sounds good 14:31:57 Joshue108: Relates to inclusion of Content Usable references 14:32:14 Joshue108: Request to link to some of tehse 14:32:43 Joshue108: First relates to memory 14:33:07 Joshue108: This reference seems good 14:33:37 Joshue108: "Give the option first, then the option number" - one example 14:34:15 Memory item in content usable https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/#objective-6-ensure-processes-do-not-rely-on-memory 14:34:42 Provide help and support: https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/#objective-7-provide-help-and-support 14:35:42 Janina: some screen readers may allow user to get an option first as opposed to the number 14:37:02 jasonjgw: We can add the observation that something is useful for a user with a cognitive issue 14:38:46 s/tehse/these 14:38:58 JW: Any other thoughts? 14:39:32 14:40:50 JS: Do we have any idea of timing for publication on working draft? 14:42:45 JW: We are going for note - we want to do more reviews. 14:42:59 We need the CG on speech interfaces to look at this. 14:43:09 They were active at TPAC last year. 14:43:18 Then another review draft - and other wider review. 14:43:32 I've colleagues in ETS who would like to review it. 14:43:44 JOC: I think that is sensible. 14:43:57 JS: I think we are not publishing often enough. 14:44:22 We try to deal with many issues on our plate, and that we can say while we have more to go, we can say this is what we got. 14:44:48 JS: All of APA needs to publish more frequently. 14:45:20 +1 to Janina 14:45:37 s/+1 to Janina/JOC: +1 to Janina 14:45:50 JS: We don't have to wait many months between updates. 14:46:22 JS: Why don't we deal with the issues raised by COGA - then publish and keep working with the issues. 14:46:26 JS: +1 14:46:32 JW: Anyone object? 14:46:35 14:46:50 JW: Lets do it. 14:47:26 We can also publish intermediate working drafts without CFC - and also when we need wide review 14:48:06 JW: Lets get the COGA issues addressed, the we are on our way - and we can't reach out to potential reviewers. 14:48:09 zakim, take up item 4 14:48:10 agendum 4 -- Miscellaneous topics. -- taken up [from jasonjgw] 14:48:33 JW: We have covered most items 14:48:42 And the upcoming W3C organisation call 14:48:44 AOB? 14:48:56 14:49:22 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:49:22 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/03/02-rqtf-minutes.html Joshue108