12:03:39 RRSAgent has joined #wot-marketing 12:03:39 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/03/01-wot-marketing-irc 12:04:25 McCool has joined #wot-marketing 12:05:10 meeting: WoT Marketing 12:05:31 present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Ege_Korkan, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, Michael_McCool 12:05:58 scribe: dape 12:07:26 TOPIC: Approve previous minutes 12:07:53 SUBTOPIC: Feb 15 12:07:59 q+ 12:08:00 -> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/15-wot-marketing-minutes.html 12:09:23 s/html/html Feb-15/ 12:10:57 Ege: 12:12:07 Ege: anything to change? 12:12:21 ... none --> minutes approved 12:12:26 SUBTOPIC: Feb 22 12:12:37 https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/263 12:13:01 Ege: postponed, Kaz works on integrating scribed minutes 12:13:07 TOPIC: Pull Requests 12:13:16 SUBTOPIC: PR #263 12:13:23 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/pull/263 12:13:45 Ege: Got some feedback during the call 12:13:56 ... will work on these comments 12:14:21 q+ 12:14:30 q- 12:14:36 ... SK pointed me to Industrie 4.0 PDF which provides something similar 12:14:47 --> https://www.plattform-i40.de/IP/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publikation/AAS-ReadingGuide202201.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4 12:14:53 1+ I like the approach too 12:14:58 Ege: I like the approach taken 12:15:20 MMC: Not exactly the same as developer journey 12:15:25 ... more spec guideline 12:15:39 s/263/263 PR 263 - WIP Developer Journey/ 12:15:58 s/-->/->/ 12:16:10 s/v=4/v=4 Industrie 4.0 PDF/ 12:16:15 rrsagent, make log public 12:16:21 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:16:21 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/03/01-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 12:17:14 MMC: like a reading guide 12:17:34 Ege: Will create issue for a "reading guide" 12:18:23 MMC: Should look at architecture document, is it enough for business people? 12:18:35 ... or some sections 12:19:47 Ege: w.r.t. to comments in PR, will work on it 12:19:53 MMC: Where does the content go? 12:20:24 Ege: in top of developers page there is a new para pointing to a new site 12:20:29 chair: Ege 12:21:18 TOPIC: Easy Issues 12:21:26 SUBTOPIC: CG Page Links 12:21:31 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/270 12:21:45 Ege: each page has own web-page 12:22:00 ... our CG page does not point to it 12:22:27 ... wonder whether we need all these other links like participants 12:22:45 q+ 12:22:47 MMC: Wonder whether we should note chair selection process 12:23:06 Ege: I think we should just update once it happened 12:23:08 ack k 12:23:10 ack m 12:23:22 Kaz: chairs will be selected tomorrow 12:23:37 s/selected/decided/ 12:24:05 Ege: Not sure how to nicely show this *new* link 12:24:32 q+ 12:25:04 ... shall we remove mailing list? 12:25:25 MMC: one link to the CG page is enough 12:26:27 DP: w.r.t. layout, we can use HTML tabs 12:26:29 ack dape 12:26:49 CA: Okay having just one link 12:26:56 q+ 12:27:54 (comment was that it is better to have one link going somewhere useful rather than four links, only one of which goes somewhere useful...) 12:29:48 DP: Wonder whether we can remove "participants" and add Website link at the top 12:30:17 Ege: I noticed also several mailing-lists on CG pages 12:31:06 q+ 12:31:18 ack m 12:31:53 Kaz: Community groups are different groups. Hence I suggest to just add the link to each group 12:32:27 ... Links can change and maintained on their side 12:32:55 Ege: not sure about tabbing 12:33:14 MMC: Tabs are not needed if the entries are short 12:33:43 Ege: Daniel will provide a proposal 12:33:57 SUBTOPIC: Marketing TF place 12:34:03 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/219 12:34:42 Ege: Japanese CG has even different task forces 12:35:20 .. Comment from CA: "Assume that the TF inside the WoT CG decides a new style from READMEs (which are inside repositories controlled by WoT WG) can we apply the changes without asking again for consensus inside the WG? or do we have to wait for another approval.... ?" 12:35:31 q+ 12:35:35 MMC: Should stick to current template 12:35:40 q- 12:35:45 ... okay if they are distinct 12:36:16 q+ 12:36:33 CA: do we have control on other groups document? 12:36:41 q+ 12:36:45 ack cr 12:36:58 ... do we need a special approval each time? 12:37:18 MMC: depends on activity? 12:37:38 ... should make clear which task belongs to which group 12:38:10 Kaz: community groups are different groups. Chairs are responsible 12:38:32 ... if the published content is incorrect is problematic 12:38:40 q+ 12:38:44 ... chairs from both groups should collaborate 12:38:51 ack m 12:38:52 ack c 12:38:57 q- 12:39:01 q? 12:39:16 ack k 12:39:26 MMC: Next week chair election is closed by next week. Hence we should put it on hold for now 12:39:44 s/is closed by next week/is closed 12:40:40 MMC: PlugFest part of CG? 12:40:51 ... would vote not make it CG 12:40:58 ... should discuss that soon 12:41:12 q+ 12:41:48 https://www.w3.org/2022/02/22-wot-marketing-minutes.html 12:43:28 i/minutes/topic: Minutes from Feb-22 meeting - revisited/ 12:43:55 kaz: generated the HTML version minutes based on your IRC log 12:43:59 Kaz: minutes missed attendance list 12:44:12 Ege: all of us, plus P. Blum 12:44:27 -> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/22-wot-marketing-minutes.html 12:46:15 Ege: minutes are short, but correct. 12:46:23 ... any changes needed? 12:46:37 ... no objections -> minutes approved 12:46:43 TOPIC: Discussion Issues 12:46:54 SUBTOPIC: Jekyll PRs 12:47:01 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/148 12:47:21 Ege: contacted SteveALee, did not get any response yet 12:47:31 ... maybe she was on holiday 12:47:42 s/148/148 Issue 148 - Jekyll Preview PRs/ 12:47:49 s/SteveALee/hawna-slh 12:48:12 Ege: let's wait until she replies 12:48:25 s|-> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/22-wot-marketing-minutes.html|| 12:48:46 s|https://www.w3.org/2022/02/22-wot-marketing-minutes.html|-> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/22-wot-marketing-minutes.html Feb-22| 12:49:26 DP: could also create a private (free) account 12:50:02 ... in case one person disappears we create yet another account 12:50:13 Ege: Yes, store script somewhere 12:51:16 SUBTOPIC: Activities Tab 12:51:22 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/216 12:51:32 Ege: "Activities" is misleading 12:52:14 MMC: brainstorm ... "work" 12:52:25 ... "meetings" vs "events" 12:53:27 ... maybe 3 pages, "Task-foces", "Events" and "Meetings" 12:53:57 ... will add my comments to issue 12:54:09 SUBTOPIC: Twitter Embedding 12:54:16 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-marketing/issues/127 12:54:42 Ege: problem with cookie agreement 12:54:57 .. idea to put static thumbnail 12:55:28 ... don't like that because of user experience 12:55:49 ... found jekyll plugins that may help 12:55:50 s/127/127 Issue 127 - Check if we can generate thumbnails from the latest Twitter news/ 12:56:03 q+ 12:56:08 q- 12:56:34 CA: plugin run on server side? 12:56:48 s/216/216 Issue 216 - Activities tab is misleading/ 12:56:56 rrsagent, draft minutes 12:56:56 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/03/01-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 12:57:24 DP: Don't think 12:57:33 ... the content would be static 12:57:45 CA: Maybe it is static. there might be such use-cases 12:57:53 .. not sure though 12:58:25 Ege: I think CA is correct, looks like it creates static page 12:58:50 CA: We would need a GitHub action that runs regularly 12:59:26 Ege: will check this for next week and report 12:59:45 q? 12:59:54 ack cris 13:00:19 [adjourned] 13:00:25 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:00:25 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/03/01-wot-marketing-minutes.html kaz 15:05:46 Zakim has left #wot-marketing