15:40:51 RRSAgent has joined #pcg-a11y 15:40:51 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/01/27-pcg-a11y-irc 15:41:05 Zakim has joined #pcg-a11y 15:41:14 zakim, this will be pcg-a11y 15:41:14 ok, avneeshsingh 15:41:25 present+ 15:41:38 chair: avneeshsingh 15:42:52 zakim, agenda+ Which are the more frequently used DPUB ARIA roles? 15:42:52 agendum 1 added 15:43:01 GeorgeK has joined #pcg-a11y 15:43:17 zakim, agenda+ Overview of the feedback received by EDRLab, France for User experience guide for accessibility metadata. 15:43:17 agendum 2 added 15:43:36 zakim, agenda+ Next call? 15:43:36 agendum 3 added 15:45:01 GeorgeK has joined #pcg-a11y 15:47:26 present+ 15:47:35 mgarrish has joined #pcg-a11y 15:49:01 GeorgeK has joined #pcg-a11y 15:55:24 GeorgeK_ has joined #pcg-a11y 15:57:34 GeorgeK__ has joined #pcg-a11y 15:57:48 present+ 16:01:09 gpellegrino has joined #pcg-a11y 16:02:27 Naomi has joined #pcg-a11y 16:02:37 present+ 16:02:38 present+ 16:02:44 present+ 16:02:54 laurent_ has joined #pcg-a11y 16:02:59 tzviya has joined #pcg-a11y 16:03:04 present+ 16:03:07 Alex_Grover__ has joined #pcg-a11y 16:03:08 present+ 16:03:14 present+ 16:03:20 scribe zheng_xu 16:03:52 zakim, next agendum 16:03:52 agendum 1 -- Which are the more frequently used DPUB ARIA roles? -- taken up [from avneeshsingh] 16:03:58 Bill_Kasdorf has joined #pcg-a11y 16:04:08 present+ 16:04:20 main issue: 16:04:22 https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1643 16:04:25 CharlesL has joined #pcg-a11y 16:04:26 avneeshsingh hand over to mgarrish to the first agenda 16:04:50 Miia has joined #pcg-a11y 16:04:57 mgarrish basically it was raised in Aria about a number of issues related to Aria module 16:06:15 ... the dpub aria is to trying to improve dpub aria better than put role into aria 16:06:38 ... we can document better to help understand aria practice guide 16:06:58 s/aria practice guide/ARIA Authoring Practices Guide 16:07:09 ... there are about 47 rules but what is the most important roles for us to document 16:07:43 s/rules/roles 16:07:53 ... for this meeting, it's basically to narrow the larger rules to smaller list 16:08:01 s/rules/roles 16:08:35 (I lost this part :( ) 16:09:34 q+ 16:09:52 avneeshsingh one thing we wanted to notice is chrome including playbooks has large improvement on epub-aria support 16:10:03 s/(I lost this part :( )// 16:10:25 q+ 16:10:51 ... the main objective of this meeting is priotizing epub area roles 16:10:57 q? 16:11:06 ack tzviy 16:11:55 tzviya I think Apple is not refusing to implement it but their concern is if google implementation is good enough 16:12:12 ... and want to conform with society such as JAWS and other 16:12:29 ack george 16:12:52 s/ think Apple is not refusing to implement it but their concern is if google implementation/I think Apple 16:13:12 GeorgeK my concern is once webkit implement it would it duplicate with other world 16:13:20 s/ think Apple is not refusing to implement it but their concern is if google implementation/I think Apple's concern is that the Chrome implementation might be too much 16:14:18 avneeshsingh aria's response is to expose aria 16:14:33 ... they don't tell AT what to speak and how to speak 16:14:38 q? 16:15:19 q? 16:15:32 GeorgeK people might have with different requirement for super tech users 16:15:51 ... they process information different with normal people 16:15:57 q? 16:16:09 ... how can we satisfy both needs 16:16:40 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1atUkcAbkHpS5eUJ1rdDCrQ3saY8HZEMTNtWkanASLo4/edit?usp=sharing 16:16:50 avneeshsingh we came into a prioritize the roles above 16:17:29 ... we ended up with having 50+ High and Critical items in the list. how can we narrow it down a bit more 16:17:31 q+ 16:17:42 ... and how to move forward with this list 16:17:52 q? 16:18:21 q+ 16:18:21 ack charles 16:18:30 q+ to suggest a way forward 16:18:32 ack george 16:19:18 avneeshsingh the higher items are actionable items 16:19:22 ack tzviya 16:19:22 tzviya, you wanted to suggest a way forward 16:19:46 tzviya I think it's how we could sell this list to APG 16:20:20 ... maybe we can group some of them but not suggest to remove yet 16:20:41 ... suggest not start with importancy of list items 16:20:48 q? 16:21:32 avneeshsingh should we go through high priority items one by one? 16:21:55 CharlesL starting with items from top 16:22:12 ... most of items are Structural 16:22:12 q? 16:22:29 ... doc-toc is the highest one obviously 16:22:42 q+ 16:23:01 ack mg 16:23:15 mgarrish just needed some clarification 16:23:35 ... is there any policy to define Critical, High and other level 16:23:52 ... so we could use the criteria 16:23:59 q? 16:24:42 CharlesL there is a lot of epubs that publisher is putting in. So we needed this to be clear that publisher could label book correctly 16:25:12 q+ 16:25:18 ...might need more publisher to help answer this 16:25:39 q? 16:26:04 GeorgeK there seems to be some items that is only used by publisher but not other industry 16:26:26 ... such as doc-index and some of others 16:26:46 ack bill 16:27:08 Bill_Kasdorf some of the items are related to publisher's workflow 16:28:09 q? 16:28:09 ... one thing is once it's published for example some section will always have the same header such as "Abstract", "Appendix" 16:28:23 ... how we could help reader to understand that 16:29:44 CharlesL answering Paul's question. Good questions, Benetech and Daisy might need to survey end users 16:30:20 avneeshsingh there is an issue that W3C does not really connect to end users and community is doing that 16:30:55 ... can we look at the list from end user perspective as well? 16:31:30 pascal I think some of the items might also impact to end user a lot 16:32:05 ... the title of the section from end user perspective is to use it to determine if I should read the section. 16:32:40 ... I also think we could probably find end users through some organizations 16:32:56 q+ 16:33:18 Madeleine has joined #pcg-a11y 16:33:35 +Present 16:33:41 tzviya footnote and other types of notes might get higher priority but I understand it's not a lot books having hundreds of notes 16:34:12 GeorgeK the critical items I think are some of these are blocking user from reading the book 16:34:26 ... for example so many notes that user can not read the book 16:34:48 ... if any marks could help end user understand that then they can at least read the book 16:35:09 q? 16:35:26 ... so, if any items could help user to read the book then should be critical 16:35:59 ... or for example page number might be very noisy for end user as well 16:36:11 ack mg 16:36:13 ... since it was read aloud each page 16:36:54 mgarrish when I look at the list I am thinking if any items one step below Critical it should be great help user to read the book 16:37:21 ... for example bibliography maybe should be Medium 16:37:35 q? 16:37:58 CharlesL let's review critical items 16:38:12 ... doc-backlink, any objection to have it in Critical? 16:38:19 (no) 16:38:28 ... next biblioref, good 16:38:40 ... glossref, good 16:38:48 ... doc-index 16:40:12 index, bibliography and appendex suggest to move to Medium 16:40:24 next doc-noteref, keep 16:40:30 q+ 16:40:40 next pagebreak and pagelist, keep 16:40:54 ack gp 16:43:52 GeorgeK does pagelist has to be a list of 1 to 800? 16:44:04 CharlesL next doc-chapter 16:44:21 should it be high? 16:44:42 ... I think could be Critical? 16:45:08 tzviya if we don't consider it as Critical then we should leave a note there 16:45:13 q+ 16:45:43 gpellegrino we usually split chapter to a different html file 16:46:09 ... I think it's probably high or medium 16:46:11 ack gp 16:46:39 GeorgeK I can see publishers might use a separate file for "chapter" 16:46:56 ... I think it should keep as high 16:47:05 doc-conclusion move to Medium? 16:47:25 CharlesL doc-conclusion move to Medium. all agree 16:47:54 ... next doc-endnotes 16:48:03 GeorgeK I recommend to keep it as high 16:48:39 CharlesL do we tie doc-endnotes to doc-chapter? 16:49:06 Naomi endnotes is still a bit different from chapter 16:49:33 CharlesL move endnotes to Critical 16:49:44 ... next, doc-example 16:50:15 ... it depends on what kind of book structure we have 16:50:30 Naomi it could be a blocker for user to read the book 16:51:44 ... is it critical to say some items might be content specific item to be critical since it might be blocked in some type of books? 16:52:29 CharlesL doc-example move to Medium 16:52:58 avneeshsingh should we assemble again next week for this list? 16:53:53 ... let's have one more week of discussion on this 16:54:07 zakim, next agendum 16:54:07 agendum 2 -- Overview of the feedback received by EDRLab, France for User experience guide for accessibility metadata -- taken up [from avneeshsingh] 16:55:06 laurent_ for the a11y of epubs on each books, EDRLab we have a session of workshop coming soon 16:55:50 ... we presented some a11y guides to publishers such as onix and stuff 16:55:57 ... and we asked for feedback 16:56:46 ... one feedback is since the guide are provided by group of expert so when we put it to large audience they might not have much idea of certain items 16:57:56 ... so we did some proposal of different profile regarding to a11y for example certain profile for certain user group 16:58:35 ... there is also needs for search items 16:58:54 ... search accessibility contents 16:59:14 avneeshsingh bottom line is once we got this priority we need to come back to user experience 16:59:42 ... so, very interesting works ahead 17:00:04 ... thank you very much for the feedback 17:01:02 ... meet you all next week at the same time 17:01:23 zakmin make minits 17:01:47 zakim, end meeting 17:01:47 As of this point the attendees have been avneeshsingh, zheng_xu, GeorgeK__, mgarrish, gpellegrino, Naomi, laurent_, tzviya, Alex_Grover__, Bill_Kasdorf, Present 17:01:50 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:01:50 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/27-pcg-a11y-minutes.html Zakim 17:01:52 I am happy to have been of service, zheng_xu; please remember to excuse RRSAgent. Goodbye 17:01:57 Zakim has left #pcg-a11y 17:02:40 avneeshsingh has joined #pcg-a11y 17:02:41 rrsagent, make logs public 17:02:57 rrsagent, make minutes 17:02:57 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/27-pcg-a11y-minutes.html avneeshsingh 17:04:21 CharlesL has left #pcg-a11y 17:04:35 zakim, leave 17:04:45 zakim, bye 17:14:13 GeorgeK has joined #pcg-a11y 17:21:01 GeorgeK has joined #pcg-a11y 17:30:33 mgarrish has joined #pcg-a11y 17:31:01 GeorgeK has joined #pcg-a11y 17:39:01 GeorgeK has joined #pcg-a11y 18:23:18 gpellegrino has joined #pcg-a11y 18:31:54 gpellegrino has joined #pcg-a11y 18:53:38 gpellegrino has joined #pcg-a11y 19:12:10 gpellegrino has joined #pcg-a11y 19:22:04 gpellegrino has joined #pcg-a11y