14:54:24 RRSAgent has joined #wot-td 14:54:24 logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-td-irc 14:54:39 McCool has joined #wot-td 14:54:56 meeting: WoT-WG - TD-TF 14:55:02 present+ Kaz_Ashimura 15:04:27 dape has joined #wot-td 15:04:45 JKRhb has joined #wot-td 15:05:24 present+ Daniel_Peintner, Jan_Romann, Michael_McCool, Sebastian_Kaebisch, Tomas_Jaeckle 15:06:12 present+ Michael_Lagally 15:06:39 q+ 15:06:45 q- 15:07:00 agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Thing_Description_WebConf#Jan_19.2C_2022 15:07:35 topic: new member 15:07:56 Bosch joined the WoT group yesterday 15:08:17 Thomas Jäckle representing Bosch in WoT 15:08:22 present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi 15:08:30 Thomas: hi everyone 15:08:56 ... I'm contributing to the Eclipse Ditto project 15:09:24 ... currently working on integration of WoT in Ditto. Using the Thing Model approach e.g. 15:09:51 q+ 15:10:31 ack k 15:11:08 thomas_jaeckle has joined #wot-td 15:13:29 topic: minutes check 15:13:37 check minutes from Dec 15 15:13:47 https://www.w3.org/2021/12/15-wot-td-minutes.html 15:20:01 McCool will check this issue https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1211 15:21:39 rrsagent, make log public 15:21:43 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:21:43 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:21:49 any objections? 15:21:55 no 15:22:16 next minutes from last week 15:22:20 https://www.w3.org/2022/01/12-wot-td-minutes.html 15:22:24 i/Bosch jo/scribenick: Sebastian/ 15:22:44 i/scribenick: Sebastian/scribenick: sebastian/ 15:22:46 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:22:46 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 15:23:09 chair: Sebastian 15:23:43 present+ Michael_Koster, Tomoaki_Mizushima 15:27:06 any comments, objections? 15:27:08 q? 15:27:10 no 15:27:51 topic: Webhook 15:28:27 ML: happy to have Bosch onboard 15:29:55 ML: let me give the background again 15:30:15 ... everything what has an interface a TD can be designed 15:30:19 present+ Ege_Korkan 15:31:01 ... its mainly works for IP based connections 15:31:34 i|happy to|-> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1323 Issue 1323 - Missing event/notification affordance or operation| 15:31:44 ... a servient is a combination of a consumer and provider 15:32:44 ... everything is a Thing and the TD describes the Things' interface 15:33:07 ... we have properties, actions and events 15:33:25 ... for event affordance we get notifications 15:34:19 15:34:28 https://w3c.github.io/wot-thing-description/#eventaffordance 15:35:38 ... a consumer Thing do a subscription 15:36:22 ... consumer gets notify if values are changed 15:37:23 ... if there is a battery powered device it can not open the network the full time 15:38:30 q+ 15:38:31 ... a consumer register a listener at a Thing 15:38:44 q+ 15:39:18 ... we have TD for the consumer which is part of the event mechanism 15:39:22 ack m 15:39:32 q+ 15:40:21 ... we need a kind of callback functionality for the event affordances 15:40:49 ... its an abstract model without specific protocol 15:41:06 cris has joined #wot-td 15:41:25 q+ 15:41:38 q+ 15:42:01 ... it would be good to have a notify in the event affordances 15:42:12 mlagally___ has joined #wot-td 15:42:35 Ege: I'm agree with the use case 15:42:45 ... however, it is very protocol driven use case 15:43:39 ... TD needs 2 kind of consumer 15:44:09 s/I'm agree/I agree/ 15:44:16 ML: sounds to complicated which seems not needed 15:44:31 ... only one TD is needed 15:45:17 Ege: with notify it is pushed to the listener that was registered 15:45:48 s/Things' interface/Thing's interface/ 15:46:20 s/... a consumer Thing/ML: a consumer Thing/ 15:46:58 ML: the registration can a TD which would be a solution 15:47:13 s/its an/it's an/ 15:47:26 q+ 15:48:06 ML: TD spec is silent where I have to provide the listener information, e.g. 15:48:17 ack ege 15:50:24 McCool: What I understood so far, there is missing information to initalize and execute Webhook based affordance 15:50:50 s/affordance/interaction 15:51:39 ML: shows the PR with a proposal 15:51:54 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1329 15:53:48 ack M 15:54:06 McCool: looks ok for me this kind of approach 15:54:38 Ege: Im wondering how the forms look like 15:55:02 ... would be good to have TD example 15:55:20 ML: ok I will take this action 15:56:18 q? 15:57:13 ML: dataresponse is the response of the data notification 15:57:52 ... I need to go 15:58:21 q? 15:58:35 McCool: lets continue this discussion in the issue and do discussion next week again 15:59:53 q+ 16:00:26 -> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/1329/21ce84a...6a563db.html#eventaffordance diff version from PR 1329 - 5.3.1.5 EventAffordance 16:01:39 ack s 16:02:09 Seb: Im ok with the dataresponse, however, not sure about the op type "notify" 16:02:25 Chris: Im not sure about the use case which is ML looking for 16:03:15 s/Im/I'm/ 16:04:23 q? 16:04:28 ak cris 16:04:32 s/ak cris// 16:04:33 ack c 16:04:33 ... by definition I'm not a consumer of the TD anymore as a consumer, it is also a producer 16:04:57 s/anymore/any more/ 16:06:32 +1 for kaz 16:06:47 ack k 16:06:54 Kaz: We need a detailed use case description 16:08:02 McCool: I'm concerned about duplicated definitions if TD is used to define the target resources 16:08:17 ... we need to understand more a practical use case 16:08:27 s/description/description with concrete device setting, data transfer and interaction protocols, and should ask Michael Lagally to work on that. Then we can talk about what is needed based on that./ 16:08:39 ack M 16:09:24 ... however, I understand this main intention of the use case 16:09:43 Chris: If you understand this use case why we cannot use a simple protocol for this? 16:13:47 McCool: we need only an action that uses the notify op 16:15:28 q? 16:15:33 ... however, issue came very late, needs more clearification 16:16:07 s/clearification/clarification 16:16:34 q+ 16:16:39 topic: publication plans 16:17:12 made resolution about publication the 2nd WD 16:17:45 ... in the main call 16:18:15 s/made re/sk: made re/ 16:18:18 Kaz: will work on the publication. Maybe next week will be ready, however, depends on issue which may arrise 16:18:32 s/issue/issues/ 16:19:35 s/Maybe next week will be ready/would expect it'll be ready next week. 16:19:43 s/arrise/arise/ 16:20:26 i/made resolution/subtopic: 2nd WD/ 16:21:05 i/subtopic: Updated schedule/ 16:21:44 s|i/subtopic: Updated schedule/|| 16:21:54 subtopic: Updated schedule 16:22:05 -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1010/files proposed updates 16:22:14 subtopic: Wide reiews 16:22:19 I will start to do the wide review process until end of this week for the TD spec 16:22:29 s/I will/sk: I will/ 16:22:40 s/reiews/reviews/ 16:22:42 topic: check PRs 16:24:16 subtopic: #1282 16:24:17 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/ 16:24:22 decided not to merge 16:25:26 subtopic: #1317 16:25:31 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1317 16:25:36 q+ 16:26:03 will be addressed until CR transition 16:26:47 kaz: btw, we do need a change log section from the previous WD for the 2nd WD publication 16:27:12 sk: good question. need to talk with Taki 16:27:51 i/btw/subtopic: Change log for the 2nd WD/ 16:28:00 i/btw/scribenick: kaz/ 16:28:03 subtopic: #1319 16:28:07 scribenick: sebastian 16:28:08 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1319 16:31:10 decided to merge. Has no impact on the TD spec itself 16:32:38 subtopic: #1327 16:32:42 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1327 16:33:00 I need to check this PR before decided to merge 16:33:14 Daniel: we should be careful about this fix namespaces 16:33:44 add discussion label 16:35:00 subtopic: #1328 16:35:05 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1328 16:35:19 Kaz: this file was used for publication in the past 16:35:24 ... is not needed anymore 16:35:34 s/anymore/any more/ 16:36:01 decided to merge 16:41:34 subtopic: #1342 16:41:45 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/1342 16:41:52 needs further discussions 16:43:32 topic: TD Issues 16:43:42 Clarifications on readmultipleproperties and writemultipleproperties / writeallproperties 16:43:51 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1349 16:54:53 i/Clarifications/subtopic: #1349/ 16:55:02 subtopic: #1357 16:55:09 https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/1357 17:02:58 q+ 17:04:01 (continue the discussion next week) 17:04:03 ack k 17:04:31 topic: Binding 17:04:52 sk: let's discuss wot-binding-templates issue 144 next week 17:04:55 [adjourned] 17:04:59 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:04:59 I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-td-minutes.html kaz 20:08:04 Zakim has left #wot-td