14:23:15 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-pf
14:23:15 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-pf-irc
14:23:29 <kaz> meeting: WoT Plugfest/Testing
14:24:25 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Michael_McCool, Cristiano_Aguzzi, David_Ezell, Ege_Korkan, Fady_Salama, Kunihiko_Toumura, Tomoaki_Mizushima
14:25:13 <cris> cris has joined #wot-pf
14:25:20 <kaz> scribenick: cris
14:25:50 <McCool> McCool has joined #wot-pf
14:25:58 <cris> topic: Plug Fest schedule
14:26:16 <cris> fady: are all the features frozen?
14:26:42 <cris> mc: no we are delaying feature freeze cause there still some normative changes that need to happen
14:27:01 <kaz> s/Plug Fest/PlugFest/
14:27:11 <cris> fady: therefore should we postpone the PF ?
14:27:13 <kaz> s/no we/no, we/
14:27:41 <cris> mc: it depends do we see value of having it on February? or would it be better to move it in March?
14:27:45 <kaz> agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/PlugFest_WebConf#Agenda_19.01.2022
14:28:25 <cris> ... plus we are also deferring CR transition which needs a TestFest
14:28:45 <kaz> rragent, make log public
14:28:52 <kaz> s/rragent, make log public//
14:28:56 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
14:28:56 <cris> fady: I don't see any problem to move it
14:29:06 <cris> ... any objections?
14:29:37 <cris> mc: we could have also a second pf around June
14:30:03 <Mizushima> Mizushima has joined #wot-pf
14:30:03 <cris> ... there we can test also Discovery and other stuff that we couldn't test this February
14:31:19 <cris> ... probably it would be better to do a PF in June regardless to what we are deciding for this PF
14:31:27 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
14:31:27 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-pf-minutes.html kaz
14:32:16 <cris> ... to have webhooks implemented it might be better to wait until March
14:32:27 <cris> ... I would vote to have this PF in March
14:32:54 <cris> ... also there are some security issues that need to be tested
14:33:44 <cris> fady: I'm feeling that we should decide the date in Main call
14:34:18 <cris> mc: true, let's assume for now that we are keeping February
14:34:27 <cris> ... I'll update the PR
14:34:37 <cris> ... where we can discuss this new schedule
14:34:48 <cris> fady: aob?
14:35:00 <cris> ege: there's a PR
14:35:18 <kaz> chair: Fady
14:35:27 <cris> topic: PR
14:35:35 <cris> s/PR/PRs/
14:35:45 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
14:35:45 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-pf-minutes.html kaz
14:35:49 <cris> fady: I created a project readme template
14:36:31 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-testing/pull/203 PR 203 - add Project readme template
14:36:49 <Ege> q+
14:37:01 <cris> mc: where does this go?
14:37:36 <cris> ege: we can also describe the workflow
14:37:45 <cris> mc: agree
14:38:05 <cris> ... there's a before and after phase in each PF
14:38:21 <cris> ege: if this is a issue template
14:38:37 <cris> ... we could leverage on Github issues templates
14:39:12 <kaz> s/is a/is an/
14:39:41 <cris> fady: we thought to use issues
14:39:47 <cris> q+
14:40:03 <Ege> ack e
14:40:31 <cris> ... and then when PF is finished I move issue content in the md file
14:40:50 <cris> mc: we could use the template as an issue template
14:41:43 <kaz> q+
14:42:38 <kaz> ack c
14:42:43 <cris> cris: we could use the discussions feature of github
14:42:50 <cris> mc: or we could use PRs
14:43:12 <cris> ... cause it would save some work from our side
14:43:28 <cris> fady: yeah maybe
14:45:33 <cris> mc: I would suggest to propose a workflow and then we can discuss it
14:45:47 <cris> q?
14:46:40 <cris> kaz: I also would like to see a concrete workflow; having a concrete md file inside the Project folder it will look better
14:47:28 <kaz> ack k
14:48:56 <cris> mc: maybe in the sammary we could link to project md files
14:49:00 <kaz> s/it will look better/would make sense given each project has description on the project and then result from the project. note that we should add links from the summary.md file to each project's result under RESULTS subdirectory./
14:49:11 <cris> ... the current document content is a bad example
14:49:20 <cris> ... let's do it properly next time
14:49:49 <cris> ... it would beneficial to indicate which projects were successful
14:49:57 <cris> fady: should I merge PR 203?
14:50:08 <cris> mc: ok and then have another one that describe the process
14:50:20 <kaz> s/folder/directory (rather than a GitHub issue)/
14:50:29 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
14:50:29 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-pf-minutes.html kaz
14:50:53 <cris> fady: aob?
14:51:20 <cris> topic: AoB
14:51:33 <cris> mc: I'm trying to integrate WoT with HomeAssistant
14:51:41 <kaz> s/AoB/AOB/
14:51:43 <cris> ... if people are interested in that ping me
14:52:12 <cris> fady: what should be the topic about the next PF? testing Tds? or random wot projects?
14:52:36 <cris> mc: we can do two events -> one for testing and one for interesting projects
14:52:55 <cris> q?
14:53:54 <kaz> [adjourned]
14:54:00 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minute
14:54:00 <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft minute', kaz.  Try /msg RRSAgent help
14:54:06 <kaz> s/rrsagent, draft minute//
14:54:08 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
14:54:08 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2022/01/19-wot-pf-minutes.html kaz
14:54:46 <Mizushima> Mizushima has left #wot-pf