12:02:01 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-script
12:02:01 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/12/06-wot-script-irc
12:02:07 <kaz> meeting: WoT Scripting API
12:03:07 <kaz> chair: Daniel
12:03:15 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Daniel_Peintner
12:04:59 <Mizushima> Mizushima has joined #wot-script
12:06:55 <kaz> present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima
12:09:58 <kaz> scribenick: kaz
12:10:02 <kaz> topic: Minutes
12:10:13 <kaz> -> https://www.w3.org/2021/11/29-wot-script-minutes.html Nov-29
12:10:40 <kaz> Agenda: https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/WG_WoT_Scripting_API_WebConf#6_December_2021
12:10:58 <kaz> dp: let's discuss the topic on the Use Cases section later again
12:11:11 <kaz> ... don't see any issues with the minutes themselves
12:11:35 <kaz> (no objections; minutes approved)
12:13:35 <cris> cris has joined #wot-script
12:13:58 <kaz> present+ Cristiano_Aguzzi
12:15:11 <kaz> topic: Decision process
12:15:46 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot/pull/1005 wot PR 1005 - Asynchronous Review Process for Specification Changes
12:16:13 <kaz> ca: maybe we can introduce some specific labels to clarify the importance of each issue/PR
12:16:16 <kaz> q+
12:16:41 <kaz> dp: yeah, would make sense
12:19:13 <kaz> kaz: if we REALLY want and need, we can go for this asynchronous decision making direction
12:19:33 <kaz> ... however, as I mentioned last week already, we should be very careful about this issue
12:21:17 <kaz> ... because our basic policy for this Charter period has been having discussion on GitHub, then during TF calls and during the main call in the end for important topics like publication decision
12:21:37 <kaz> ... so we should clarify what kind of issues/PRs can be handled by which method
12:21:43 <kaz> dp: right
12:22:17 <kaz> ... we should continue to discuss how to deal with it
12:25:23 <kaz> topic: Meeting cancellations
12:26:57 <kaz> dp: McCool suggest we cancel all the WoT calls after Dec 19 except the main calls (and all meetings canceled after 26th)
12:27:14 <kaz> -> https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Main_WoT_WebConf#Cancellations Cancellation plan on the main wiki
12:27:20 <kaz> dp: I'm OK with that plan
12:27:33 <kaz> ca: I'm also OK
12:27:56 <kaz> topic: PRs
12:28:01 <kaz> subtopic: PR 353
12:28:31 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/353 PR 353 - refactor: move section "Terminology and conventions" right after "Conformance"
12:28:40 <kaz> dp: moved the Terminology section
12:28:46 <kaz> s/moved/moving/
12:31:09 <kaz> ... also removing references
12:31:26 <kaz> ca: reference for ECMAScript has some issue
12:32:11 <kaz> dp: can create another issue to address that point
12:33:09 <kaz> ... note there is some ReSpec error about [[value]]
12:33:43 <kaz> ... objection to merge this PR 353?
12:33:47 <kaz> (no objections)
12:34:14 <kaz> merged
12:34:41 <kaz> subtopic: PR 356
12:34:53 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/356 Allow only one subscription per affordance
12:35:31 <kaz> ca: will clean up the PR
12:36:10 <kaz> dp: if you can fix the issue with ECMAScript, that's great
12:38:45 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/358 Issue 358 - FIX ECMASCRIPT references
12:39:02 <kaz> topic: Issues
12:39:20 <kaz> subtopic: Issue 342
12:39:47 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/342 Issue 342 - Reference terminology section of the architecture specification
12:39:55 <kaz> dp: think this issue is already resolved
12:40:13 <kaz> q+
12:40:32 <kaz> ca: what about the "Use cases" section?
12:41:04 <kaz> dp: there is a comment from Mizushima-san for another issue about that point
12:42:06 <kaz> ... (adds comments)
12:42:23 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/342#issuecomment-986740109 Daniel's comments
12:42:33 <kaz> subtopic: Issue 355
12:42:49 <kaz> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/355 Issue 355 - Rename Use Cases section ?
12:43:31 <kaz> dp: Mizushima-san suggests we change the section title from "Use Cases" to "Features"
12:43:40 <kaz> ca: features are about more products
12:43:42 <kaz> q?
12:48:43 <kaz> ack k
12:57:08 <kaz> kaz: the most important thing here is all the WoT Editors/Contributors having the same understanding for the terminologies for WoT specs including "Use cases", "Functionalities" and "Features" so that we can use those terms consistently for all the WoT spec documents
12:59:18 <kaz> dp: I'm OK with "Functionalities"
12:59:24 <kaz> ca: I'm OK too
13:00:26 <kaz> mizu: would still prefer "Features"
13:00:46 <kaz> kaz: I'm OK with either way, "Functionalities" or "Features"
13:01:40 <kaz> ... but "Use cases" is confusing to be used to show functionalities withing WoT spec documents
13:01:44 <kaz> [adjourned]
13:01:48 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
13:01:57 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
13:01:57 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/12/06-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
15:28:19 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wot-script