11:55:52 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #wot-script
11:55:52 <RRSAgent> logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/11/22-wot-script-irc
12:01:00 <dape> dape has joined #wot-script
12:03:03 <kaz> Meeting: WoT Scripting API
12:03:18 <kaz> present+ Kaz_Ashimura, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner
12:03:39 <cris> cris has joined #wot-script
12:05:06 <Mizushima> Mizushima has joined #wot-script
12:07:16 <dape> scribenick: dape
12:07:22 <dape> TOPIC: Previous minutes
12:07:34 <dape> -> Nov-15 -> https://www.w3.org/2021/11/15-wot-script-minutes.html
12:11:57 <dape> -> Minutes approved
12:12:26 <dape> TOPIC: Issues
12:12:36 <dape> SUBTOPIC: Next charter topics
12:12:42 <dape> ->  https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/352
12:13:10 <kaz> present+ Tomoaki_Mizushima
12:15:28 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
12:15:33 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:15:33 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:16:35 <dape> DP: created basic list
12:16:46 <dape> ... Ege added "complex actions"
12:16:52 <dape> ... that makes sense to me also
12:17:02 <dape> CA: Looks good so far
12:17:21 <dape> DP: Details don't need to be fully specified
12:17:29 <dape> Kaz: Right
12:17:44 <dape> ... more important to look at *new* TD work
12:18:23 <dape> SUBTOPIC: Reference terminology section of the architecture specification
12:18:27 <dape> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/342
12:18:58 <dape> DP: M. Lagally advised us to look at terms
12:19:22 <dape> ... 2nd topic was about where to put terminology section
12:20:52 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:20:52 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:21:53 <dape> DP: should move terminology to Chapter 4
12:21:55 <dape> CA: +1
12:22:21 <zkis> zkis has joined #wot-script
12:22:23 <dape> ... should also look at terms
12:22:33 <dape> DP: Agree, suggest having 2 PRs
12:22:38 <dape> CA: Makes sense
12:22:55 <dape> Kaz: Since we do have a not we do not need terminology section
12:23:27 <dape> DP: Correct, but i guess it still makes sense .. we also have conventions
12:24:07 <kaz> s/we do have a not/Scripting API is a Note,/
12:24:18 <zkis> present+ Zoltan_Kis
12:24:21 <kaz> s/terminology section/the conformance section/
12:24:33 <dape> CA: wonder whether we can link most of the terms
12:24:55 <dape> ... e.g, URL terms
12:25:58 <kaz> q+
12:26:05 <kaz> present+ Zoltan_Kis
12:31:01 <dape> Kaz: points to Conformance section. Should revisit it.
12:31:07 <dape> DP: Will create an issue about it
12:31:50 <kaz> s/an issue/a dedicated issue/
12:32:07 <Mizushima> +1
12:32:26 <dape> SUBTOPIC: Description for labels
12:32:34 <dape> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/336
12:34:25 <dape> DP: Other label
12:34:40 <dape> ZK: Meant we create "other" label
12:34:43 <dape> DP: not the plan
12:35:02 <dape> CA: +1 for adding the descriptions
12:35:28 <dape> SUBTOPIC: Finding correct unsubscribe form
12:35:33 <dape> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/351
12:35:49 <dape> DP: Issue links TD issue
12:36:50 <dape> CA: TD resolution is to be post-poned
12:37:05 <dape> ... Ege was saying it is not 1st priority
12:37:34 <dape> ... algorithm in Scripting spec seems fine
12:38:19 <dape> SUBTOPIC: Clarify multiple requests for subscription/observation
12:38:24 <dape> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/346
12:39:15 <dape> DP: multiple subscription
12:39:21 <dape> CA: Not sure what runtime should do
12:39:26 <dape> ... one subscribe
12:39:32 <dape> ... multiple subscribers
12:39:57 <dape> ... what to do in case of cancellation of 1 subscriber
12:40:57 <dape> DP: Decision of complexity
12:41:37 <dape> ZK: Would vote for 1 subscription
12:41:50 <dape> ... another subscription would overwrite it
12:41:59 <dape> CA: I am OK with that
12:43:31 <dape> ZK: Wonder what should happen in case of a *new* subscription
12:43:39 <dape> ... throwing error ?
12:43:54 <dape> CA: Not throwing hides mistakes
12:44:06 <dape> DP: +1
12:44:08 <dape> ZK: +1
12:48:20 <dape> SUBTOPIC: subscribeEvent and observerProperty misaligned signature
12:48:26 <dape> ->  https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/343
12:48:57 <dape> DP: difference of TS definitions and the spec
12:49:15 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:49:15 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:49:37 <kaz> chair: Daniel
12:51:08 <dape> CA: Will work on PR w.r.t. return type
12:52:35 <dape> SUBTOPIC: New op values (queryaction and cancelaction)
12:52:39 <dape> -> https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/335
12:52:53 <dape> ZK: Is TD integrating it?
12:53:00 <dape> CA: Yes, it has been merged
12:54:20 <dape> ZK: discuss this next time...
12:55:40 <kaz> [adjourned]
12:55:44 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
12:55:44 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/11/22-wot-script-minutes.html kaz
12:56:01 <Mizushima> Mizushima has left #wot-script
14:30:55 <Zakim> Zakim has left #wot-script